I Believe Math Can Win Any Pick 3 Lottery

Reply #107

sincor — Fri, 07 May 2010 06:52:16 GMT

really

Reply #106

Maverick2842 — Sun, 02 May 2010 04:34:11 GMT

Hi Bager;

Yes it Does Work! .... But the one thing here is that it will change on you when there is a double or triple, and thus becomes a whole new game. You have to use mulitple types of your personal programs that you find that works and then do a lot of tracking. What I find also you must use the scale.... like 1000 to 1009!

This will help you out as well..... then watch it fall in place!

I am working on the pick 4, but in a different way (of course who needs another way to make it... [ More ]

Reply #105

GASMETERGUY — Thu, 29 Apr 2010 02:24:31 GMT

I rasied three questions to badger42 concerning his post. The questions were straightforward and honest as was my opening sentence. I did not tell him his doo stinks nor do I any appropriate reason why you would describe my questions that way.

I also see that your first post on this site was to attack me. Have you met Mega-Think-Tank? You and he would make for a perfect fit. Feel free to contact him. He can be found in the Lottory Discussion forum under the post Not enough thoroughbred player... [ More ]

Reply #104

badger42 — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:40:39 GMT

Anyone here

Reply #103

badger42 — Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:30:40 GMT

Hello everyone

Reply #102

bigpimpin — Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:04:58 GMT

What? How can this person not feel like he's being attacked. First you tell him his doo stinks but you would like to smell it anyway

Reply #101

jmill1948 — Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:11:59 GMT

using ttt +1 -1 to get results also using 123 234

Reply #100

Lucky Loser — Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:01:48 GMT

A fractal is a rough or fragmented geometric shape that can be split into parts, each of which is (at least approximately) a reduced-size copy of the whole, [1] a property called self-similarity. Roots of mathematically rigorous treatment of fractals can be traced back to functions studied by Karl Weierstrass, Georg Cantor and Felix Hausdorff in studying functions that were analytic but not differentiable; however, the term fractal was coined by Beno t Mandelbrot in 1975 and was derived from the... [ More ]

Reply #99

pumpi76 — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:37:20 GMT

math formulas, complex algorithms, complex math formulas, complex math equations can take the shape of creatures, living or dead creatures or things or figures...

look at a fractal...There is a LOT of stuff we dont know...

If you was to set up a Pick3 RNG and make each Pick3 combination in a long string form an image each RNG will form an imagine the same way that each TIME lenght of the string of the RNG will form a different image....

Reply #98

pumpi76 — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:21:50 GMT

math can win ANY game, and ANYTHING, now and ANY time, the simple fact that we use numbers numbers is math also...Just that dont expect every question to be answered WHEN YOU want....

dont know anything about math though...

Reply #97

badger42 — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:23:19 GMT

That's pretty interesting. How often have you won using that method

Reply #96

takeitez — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:20:33 GMT

If you want to win it,

put one of these pairs in it!!!

15 16 17 19 20 23 24 28 30 34

38 40 48 56 57 59 67 69 79 80

Check past results, if the number is not a double

one of these pairs will be in it 99% of the time

ez

Reply #95

badger42 — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:55:50 GMT

Really, what kind of math

Reply #94

jmill1948 — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:52:23 GMT

trying a little math of my own good luck

Reply #93

badger42 — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:48:00 GMT

Anyone here

Reply #92

threetwowin — Sun, 18 Apr 2010 02:30:20 GMT

yes we here ... you ready to post some math where we all can under stand it

thanks in advance for your work if you do

just go ahead and make your post we all will see it later tonite or tom when we get up out of bed

every one was waiting but you outlasting all of us

Reply #91

badger42 — Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:29:33 GMT

Anyone here

Reply #90

badger42 — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:49:09 GMT

Still working at it. Slow, but still working at it.

Reply #89

alikirca20 — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:06:32 GMT

hi badger42.... what about your system

Reply #88

badger42 — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:42:45 GMT

Anyone online

Reply #87

ca-dreamin* — Thu, 01 Apr 2010 03:30:30 GMT

Have you seen some of the cops from Chicago? I think they live at dunkin donuts

Reply #86

masongina — Wed, 31 Mar 2010 03:23:53 GMT

how

Reply #85

joker17 — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:17:27 GMT

I'm gonna buy a dunkin donuts store. It's totally safe from being robbed. Have you ever heard of a dunkin donuts ever being robbed?....lol

Reply #84

truecritic — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:21:07 GMT

Reply #83

rdgrnr — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:41:45 GMT

This is obviously weighted to favor cops.

Is that Dunkin' Donuts or Krispy Kreme?

I am shocked and appalled

Reply #82

ca-dreamin* — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:17:12 GMT

YUM! Wanna share?

Sometimes lots of choices is a good thing.

Thanks for clarifying that post...I couldn't figure it out.

Reply #81

joker17 — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 03:12:50 GMT

Great idea, but there are too many choices. In your first example you show the 6 in the 836. You say that 6=15. But 6 could also = 24, 33, 42, 51. And that's just one way you do it. Then you add the 4 from the 624 to the end of 15 to make it 154. And the 3rd set...125....well..........it's just there.....we do nothing at all..........lol........But we could do something. Or maybe not....lol There are dozens of possible strategies to be used. Which one? Only God knows....lol

Just too man... [ More ]

Reply #80

Embassy — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 03:15:53 GMT

Does this work for Daily 4

Reply #79

Seeker — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 02:45:53 GMT

take a look at this,,,,,836.....624...125 what common in three numbers?...154 next draw.....836{6}the six is =15 624{6}the six is=15 and there is the 4 at the end......125{15}is already there so you next pick should be 154..Good luck to all

Reply #78

optimistic — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 07:53:31 GMT

I agree with everything you just said. I thought he only had me in suspense.

Reply #77

steven1027 — Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:01:35 GMT

If you believe that your formular works lets give it a try. I am very good in math. I sure could use a lot of money. I play the lottery Daily 3 Pick,

in California. AND I am not doing

Reply #76

ladaily3 — Wed, 24 Mar 2010 05:05:58 GMT

Ok

Florida

3/24 Mid xx4

3/24 Eve xx3

Let's give it a shot...

Reply #75

joker17 — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:12:01 GMT

Cool..

I have a taker.

Good luck !

Florida

Reply #74

ladaily3 — Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:16:55 GMT

Ok i'm game gimme a state and i'll take a crack at it....and oh if im correct i would love to take $1000 thru paypal...but on to the system creating...

Reply #73

joker17 — Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:36:12 GMT

I also forgot to mention. There is a reward for anyone who has a system that can predict the first number in the p-3 consistently......forget 50 percent....I'm cutting it down even further.....25%.....Ha....25%....That's right folks. ONLY HITS 25% OF THE TIME!....WOW...WHAT A BARGAIN YOU SAY....

A 1,000 dollar award for anyone who can produce this. I'm serious. I'll purchase money orders amounting to 1,000 dollars....or even MORE !

Any takers?

I have a strange feeling I'll be hearing cr... [ More ]

Reply #72

joker17 — Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:29:11 GMT

Why do you say... Say no more ?

If you know something I don't, please don't hesitate to express what it is. I was encouraging exchange of information.

Positional play means straight betting. Box hits are good, but I like straights better.

If you come across a system that can predict the 1st position number correctly just 50 percent of the time, I'd make a little over 300 bucks a week in profit.

Reply #71

ladaily3 — Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:51:32 GMT

Ok Joker I'll say no more but dont take my word for it... positional playing is hard but not impossible also are you talking straights or box hits? If you're talking box hits you wouldnt need to play that much money but what do i know??? i suck at picking winners...

Reply #70

joker17 — Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:31:58 GMT

I believe it's nearly impossible to predict the first number on a regular basis. Regular basis to me means making a fairly decent profit and a comfortable living. It doesn't matter if you have a million bucks for a bankroll. Predicting a number doesn't require one penny. You just have to be correct.

Why would I need money, to predict a number right or wrong? A good number of LP folks do it on daily basis in the p-3 forum, and the prediction forum. Either they're right, or they are wrong. And... [ More ]

Reply #69

instinct — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:42:51 GMT

Cool, the facts r interesting.. i to planning to start with 1k now.. since i lost much in past 3 months..

i have a set of 36 nbrs to play.. if i know the one nbr on daily basis... winning could be fun..

Reply #68

ladaily3 — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:47:58 GMT

There IS a way you just have to find out the digit its very easy but to do that you would need a bankroll something outrageous like 10k to start with....trust me it's doable.

Reply #67

joker17 — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:22:23 GMT

I wish there was a way to predict one number correctly everyday. I'd make 400 bucks profit everyday.

All I would have to do is to correctly predict the number in the first position, and line it up with 00-99 in the second and 3rd positions. The cost would be a hundred bucks. The win..500 bucks. Net profit at the store...400 bucks.

Net profit online....800 bucks....lol

No such animal...

Reply #66

instinct — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:41:44 GMT

is there a way to predict one number on a daily basis... instaed of working on all the 3 nbrs,,,

I found this thread interesting hence asking suggestions from you all...

Reply #65

RJOh — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:48:58 GMT

I'm surprised someone who has a website selling lottery systems would be reading LP posts about lottery systems. Make me wonder if the systems they are selling are theirs or something they read and thought was interesting. Besides, most to the systems I've seen are guesstimating with fuzzy math which I didn't realize could be copyrighted.

Reply #64

Todd — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:14:11 GMT

Just so everyone is aware, joker did nothing wrong by describing the system in the forums. As such, I only removed it because he asked me to.

I personally think this Robert Walsh (or whatever his real name is) was pretty dumb for threatening joker with lawyers . Aside from the fact that there is near zero chance he even has a lawyer on retainer, making it a hollow threat, the idea of threatening joker for inserting what amounts to free advertising on the forums was stupid in the extreme.

Reply #63

ca-dreamin* — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:23:56 GMT

Oh ok

Reply #62

joker17 — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:16:49 GMT

I asked Todd to delete it. I was threatened by Robert about copyright violations.

Reply #61

ca-dreamin* — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:14:54 GMT

Joker was being a little smarty pants!

Joker......what happened to the thread you started about the pick 3 system you recently purchased

Reply #60

Lucky Loser — Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:36:00 GMT

All I can say is WOW!!! Let's see this put into action on a regular basis to determine consistencies. If it is and it produces profit, I will buy in on the system...guaranteed. So, let's see.

L.L.

Reply #59

markcornelius — Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:35:16 GMT

hello badger42,i would like see your formula can u p.m me.

Reply #58

ca-dreamin* — Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:26:36 GMT

HAHAHA

Reply #57

joker17 — Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:11:09 GMT

Sure...I'll explain it Ca-Dreamin.

Look at the corners..

012

345

678

0 is all alone. That means you divide it by the 5 in the second column, third row, from the center. Then if you look closely, you'll see the 8. Add the 8 to the 5 in the second column and get 13, which is 3.

That's the first number...3

Next....If you look at 048 in the diagonal, you'll notice the 5 and 3 in the center column is 345....Funny....3 and 5. That equals 8. If it didn't equal 8,,,,then I don't kno... [ More ]

Reply #56

ca-dreamin* — Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:56:05 GMT

WOW! That was a brief introduction?

Joker I KNOW you will figure this out and when you do....please explain it to the rest of us

Reply #55

ca-dreamin* — Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:53:46 GMT

OMG JOKER

Reply #54

JonnyBgood07 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:03:58 GMT

..not for nothin chief,I'm not too proud to hear about any insightful Connecticut picks...being from there and all lol.I've read and reread your method..can't say I understand it totally,but if it hits it hits...all the better...POST THEM PICKS!!!

...been getting killed recently

Reply #53

joker17 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:31:10 GMT

Nope...You can't go to work. You have to stay and explain it right now.

Just tell the boss I said so. OK?

What's his or her phone number. I'll call the boss myself.

Reply #52

badger42 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:22:10 GMT

I would but i have to get ready to go to work. I will be online tomorrow around the same time.

Reply #51

joker17 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:20:56 GMT

I understand, but because you left things out, it made even less sense. It leaves the reader scratching his head....lol

No problem. If you feel like telling us the whole story one day, be my guest. I've got time.

BTW, have you been using this for a long time? And if you have, how successfull has it been? Would you say 60%, 70% or more

Reply #50

marlon39 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:19:50 GMT

Hi badger42,

Can you post more examples and explanations? Thanks.

Reply #49

badger42 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:17:09 GMT

Well you're right. I gave you guys a brief introduction to it. Of course there are a few things that i left out. I figure giving you every angle to the puzzle would cause problems with understanding it. I gave you the basics.

Reply #48

joker17 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:16:30 GMT

I have an idea. Let's do the math again, this time let's try to simplify the process. Leave out all unnecessary steps, and make sure you show the rules as it happens. If something doesn't qualify tell us what it is, and what we have to do instead.

Let's do it with the following numbers.

012

345

678

Reply #47

joker17 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:12:47 GMT

Ok, i guess I was correct in thinking there is more to this than you explained right? There seems to be stipulations involved here.

Don't get me wrong. I appreciate you sharing the system, but you really have to mentiuon all the variables possible.

Just like the first step in the process, You say...... What you do is see if there are any matches for those 3 numbers. What if there aren't any matches, is there another rule that you left out? What do I di if there isan't any matches... [ More ]

Reply #46

badger42 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:04:31 GMT

If it was another number besides 1, then addition or subtraction would be needed.

Reply #45

joker17 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:01:15 GMT

so are you saying that if the 6 didn't point to the same number, being 1 , that the 1 wouldn't qualify to be played? Basically, what I'm asking is if there is anything other than the math involved here. I'm getting the sense that there are things you have to match up as being qualifiers in order to be used as a final number. I only say this because you used the word points . Because if it was only the math and nothing else, it really wouldn't matter if they both point to 1 or not. You just use 1... [ More ]

Reply #44

badger42 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:56:48 GMT

There was no addition necessary for that particular one. In column 3, the 6 in front of 11, and in column 1, the 6 is underneath 1. There no math need. The answer is 1. The reason is both 6's point to the same number.

Reply #43

joker17 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:52:10 GMT

Thanx for the reply.

I have a question. Below is a quote from you from your last step in the process.

In column 3, the numbers in front of the 6 are 8 3, which give you 11 or 1 .

You never use the above addition in your equation. You say 8 3 equal 11 or 1, but never use the 1 . Is this step even neccessary? Because eventually you do use the 1 , but not because of this equation, but because you go on to say.... Right underneath that 6 is a 1 . That's how you use the 1 . not from adding... [ More ]

Reply #42

badger42 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:50:22 GMT

Well i've been working on it for a little over a year, and i still run into snag from time to time. You will get it in time.

Reply #41

mrcat60 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:48:23 GMT

Hi Kidzmom, I will be visiting your fine State tonight for 2 weeks....looking fwd to playing there...and testing the math...

Reply #40

spirit2010 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:44:50 GMT

good job badger42

im still trying to understanded just cant not get it maybe because my head hurts

but ill keep reading it

thank you

spirit

Reply #39

badger42 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:43:56 GMT

Well good luck to you with it.

Reply #38

Kidzmom — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:39:44 GMT

I have to say that a lot of thought and time went into this method and it looks very promising. I will backtest it tonight for SC/NC. Thank you Badger42 for sharing your information with all of us. I will let you know what I find out with the testing.

Reply #37

badger42 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:33:32 GMT

Have to crawl before you can walk. Taking one lottery at a time.

Reply #36

GASMETERGUY — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:29:53 GMT

Good thinking, badger42. While I do not play any p3 (not even as a throw-away) I do appluad what you have uncovered. Perhaps you will make a dime or two off it; I sincerely hope so.

Got anything like this for a P5 game

Reply #35

mrcat60 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:21:44 GMT

Thank you badger42 for this information...I am leaving on a 4 1/2 hour flight to NC...will work on this math on the flight...and hopefully get closer to the future winning pick 3 number...

Reply #34

badger42 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:14:41 GMT

Okay, final column, which is a easy one. You are using the 6 again. In column one, you went from left to right. Now you are going right to left. In column 3, the numbers in front of the 6 are 8 3, which give you 11 or 1. Now right underneath the 8, you have the other 6, and right underneath that 6 is a 1. So the answer is 1. The winning number was 541. Any questions or comments

Reply #33

badger42 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:08:25 GMT

No, I'm not finished yet. The 4 is the second digit. Basically, each column has 3 numbers. One way or another they all pointing to one number.

Reply #32

Kidzmom — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:01:58 GMT

So does that mean you would play: 8-4-4? I think I got a bit lost if that is not the way.

Reply #31

badger42 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:52:34 GMT

Okay, column 2, this is a little tricky. Take 3, on the left and right. you have 6 8. That becomes 14 or 4., underneath the 3, you have a pair of 2's. That means they get combined with each other. Here is the tricky part. You subtract 6 4, which is 10, from 2. 10-2=8, 6-2=4. You take the 8 4, and subtract again, which give you 4. So the pair of 2's give you 4, and the 3 gives you 14 or 4. The answer is 4.

Reply #30

Kidzmom — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:47:58 GMT

i'M with you so far...what's the rest

Reply #29

bikeshcht — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:42:14 GMT

Yes go on badger42...

Reply #28

badger42 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:30:49 GMT

Here is a grid of 9 numbers that i came up with using the last 3 drawing.

8 3 6

6 2 4

1 2 5

Take the 1st column, 8,6,1.

What you do is see if there are any matches for those 3 numbers.

There is a 6 in column 3. So highlight both 6's. The 1st column. The numbers in front the 6 are 2 4, so you add them. Gives you 6. Take column 3. Underneath the 6 are 4 5, so add them too. That gives you 9. Now you take the 6 and the 9 and add, gives you 15. You dealing with single digi... [ More ]

Reply #27

badger42 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:23:34 GMT

Okay, spirit2010,

Let me show you what i know.

Reply #26

spirit2010 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:20:43 GMT

hi badger42

it's ok to share what you have we will try to help you here in lp there are lots of people

that would help you with this math your talking about so feel free to share it

spirit

Reply #25

badger42 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:12:24 GMT

Well that's quite interesting. My mother plays here numbers like that.

Reply #24

mrcat60 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:11:29 GMT

Thank you for the information...I will look at the scenario....I am happy we can all share information here to get a win...

Reply #23

badger42 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:10:50 GMT

Well it work 2 days in row this week. 3 times last week.

Reply #22

MzDuffleBaglady — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:05:25 GMT

864 865 863 975 753 Lottery Run Down If a number is missing, it's a Zero Bitmap

Workout-SP

2010 March Plus 1 Minus 1 Each 1 Up Each 1 down

1 Midday 710 711 709 821 609

Evening 401 402 400 512 390

2 Midday 932 933 931 43 821

Evening 851 852 850 962 740

3 Midday 325 326 324 436 214

Evening 801 802 800 912 790

4 Midday 45 46 44 156 934

Evening 434 435 433 545 323

5 Midday 293 294 292 304 182

Evening 987 988 986 98 876

6 Midday 562 563... [ More ]

Reply #21

mrcat60 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:00:46 GMT

Hi badger42....I think everyone believes you have a formula?....or so the story goes....is the math working towards a pick3 winner.....

Reply #20

badger42 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:56:01 GMT

I did not send anyone the formula. It's not really a formula anyway. It's just math.

Reply #19

badger42 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:53:31 GMT

Hello anyone home

Reply #18

mrcat60 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:07:00 GMT

If that formula is ever shared...will you alert me...(lol).......I have to go bake a cake and then off to NC for 2 weeks....

Reply #17

Scott311 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:18:45 GMT

Yes, Please share

Reply #16

bootleg233 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:05:29 GMT

YAAAAAAAWWWWWNNNNNNN STTTRREEETTTCCHHHHHHH ........ Looks like the same ole same ole........NEXT

Reply #15

joker17 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:57:28 GMT

That's not fair. He sent you a PM with the formula, and not the rest of us?

Well? Tell us what it is.

This thread is going nowhere really fast....lol

Reply #14

sha14215 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:58:56 GMT

hey sent me a pm with your formula it sounds interesting

Reply #13

GASMETERGUY — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:51:20 GMT

Well, tell us about it. We might learn something new. We might teach you something new. Either way, all of us will be better off than before.

Reply #12

badger42 — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:25:55 GMT

Not really a formula, It's just something i came across one day.

Reply #11

Icezkube — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:03:39 GMT

Yes, we are always here! What kind of formula are you talking about

Reply #10

badger42 — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:55:48 GMT

Anyone home, it's been a while since i've been up here.

Reply #9

GASMETERGUY — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:12:39 GMT

Badger42, where are you

Reply #8

Idesire$ — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:11:49 GMT

I would be glad to help with your formula, send me a pm.