what about people with a system that only share half of the system

Reply #220

OscarGrouch05 — Fri, 28 May 2010 10:50:02 GMT

I was using Finger's to Count 9's , example 9x1=9 duck the first finger to get the answer! 9x2=18 duck the 2nd finger to get answer works all the way upto 9x9=81 80) .

rocket science yes i belong Cloud Busters recall the movie October Sky Homer Hickam was there the day i certified my rocket! the motor i use an H motor High Power Rocketry not toy's.

PowerBall Note: 2nd Number Calls the PowerBall

First Number Call's 3rd Number Call's 5Th Number

3rd Number Call's 4Th Number.

I m Lern... [ More ]

Reply #219

Lucky Loser — Thu, 27 May 2010 05:13:57 GMT

It isn't as important to buy as cheap as possible as it is to buy at the right time.

Jesse Livermore

L.L.

Reply #218

pepper1 — Wed, 26 May 2010 16:56:02 GMT

Spoken from a true trooper.

Reply #217

Lucky Loser — Wed, 26 May 2010 13:46:31 GMT

Delta, I haven't seen you post in a bit...maybe I just missed out. However, when I do see you stop in, I really enjoy the reading. Once again, you've hit the nail on the head.

L.L.

Reply #216

Delta Draw — Wed, 26 May 2010 13:29:01 GMT

There was this guy in grade school that would make his selections on multiple choice tests by banging the required pool of fingers on his desk. I can still remember hearing him make his selections today. I never really bought into it because IT MADE NO SENSE that the finger that hurt the most was the right answer. But he thought it did.

The point I am making is that not every system, claim-to fame, big fat claim or magic-mirror parlor trick is worth more than the time required to discard it.

Reply #215

pepper1 — Wed, 26 May 2010 04:03:42 GMT

I have played as much as $100.00 at one time when I first started out and didn't hit a dam thing. I have played

$10.00 and did very well. I need about $40.00 a day to play with. Last week I hit 3 time just making my forty

buck back. I would like to see a system that give me one good hit a week. My great aunt use to so the way to

get there is to pick one number and ride it out for a nice play day. Trust me when i tell you they made more

off, of me than I made on the lottery. I cut bac... [ More ]

Reply #214

CutlassBob — Wed, 26 May 2010 03:56:44 GMT

I've never won on a quick pick YET or as they are called here in Michigan Easy Pick .

CutlassBob

Reply #213

pepper1 — Wed, 26 May 2010 03:53:32 GMT

If you come on this board to share something. Share it all are just keep your system to youself. Why play with people

we're not toys, nor are we rabbit to put a carrot in my face. Save us all the trouble if you're up to no good.

Reply #212

Lucky Loser — Wed, 26 May 2010 03:07:03 GMT

If there was a System that picked the numbers and took out the human element, that's what i'm talking about.

Yep, I know exactly what you're referring to...they're called Quick Picks. All the human does is press the button and WALLAH...

You have all the tools needed at your disposal. Now, go make some money!!

L.L.

Reply #211

CutlassBob — Wed, 26 May 2010 02:56:04 GMT

If there was truly a system that gave you, say 10 picks per drawing and you would get minimum a boxed win. Now that's a System.

Well i guess i just make the wrong picks. Sure they may be right infront of my eyes but i don't always make the right decision.

If there was a System that picked the numbers and took out the human element, that's what i'm talking about.

Sure there are lots of folks hitting, and i Congratulate them daily and thank them for their time.

I do know this, when W... [ More ]

Reply #210

Lucky Loser — Wed, 26 May 2010 02:42:58 GMT

If this is your opinion, then you need to just look around a bit more because players are getting boxed and pairs all day long here at LP. In other words, the system YOU'RE looking for is right under your nose. What are you waiting for? You should be playing and making plenty of money if you want boxed hits. This ain't no joke, either.

And, as far as the state lotteries go, they will never change anything because they have had, and, always will have the absolute edge on this game...PERIOD. Yo... [ More ]

Reply #209

CutlassBob — Wed, 26 May 2010 02:31:57 GMT

Especially if the system is just SPEND your Cash on 300 Picks that may or may not come in STRAIGHT Daily, or per Drawing Played.

If there was truly a system that gave you, say 10 picks per drawing and you would get minimum a boxed win. Now that's a System.

BUT.....

I do know this, when WE figure out all the lottery's answers, they will change the questions. *BURP*

CutlassBob

Reply #208

Lucky Loser — Wed, 26 May 2010 02:07:52 GMT

Very intelligent reply.

L.L.

Reply #207

Lucky Loser — Wed, 26 May 2010 02:05:49 GMT

As you have plainly stated, pepper, some people can afford to do it...especially when they understand how what they are doing actually works. For some players, spending $50 is just like another player that spends $10 on their numbers. It's absolutely ridiculous for anyone to assume that it's doubtful for a serious player to spend more money than most to get what they want out of a game.

It costs money to cover bets in order to get an edge along with applied strategy compiled with opportunity.... [ More ]

Reply #206

RJOh — Tue, 25 May 2010 21:53:35 GMT

I assume when players share systems, they are sharing their unproven ideas. They are putting their ideas out there for comments from others hopefully exposing a negative that they never noticed. If their ideas was a proven system that win, they would be using it instead of discussing it.

Reply #205

tmead — Tue, 25 May 2010 21:41:30 GMT

I am relatively new here but I think it's only logical for above average systems to be withheld from public consumption, not for selfish reasons but for the good of everyone. More than likely the houses gather intelligence from the largest lottery board on the internet. There is nothing wrong with sharing predictions and deliberating on numbers, sharing hot and cold sheets and digit frequency charts, in fact I advocate and participate in these type of activities. Perhaps it is best that if someo... [ More ]

Reply #204

Coin Toss — Tue, 25 May 2010 21:30:48 GMT

pepper,

For the people who can afford to play like that they're not playing for the same reason most people are, to try and pick up a little extra $ (Pick 3).

I personally seriously doubt, truth be known, that all of the people claiming to play that much actually do play that much.

Reply #203

pepper1 — Tue, 25 May 2010 14:35:59 GMT

Some of the people can afford to do that. You tell use how to keep it simply. Show us what you're

working with.

Reply #202

ekem6078 — Tue, 25 May 2010 07:04:39 GMT

I agree too, and once they finish giving you there half a system they leave you with 20 or 30 numbers and say their good for both midday and evening draws.

I don't know about yall but I'm no Rockerfellow$$$. If you play all the numbers they give you, you would be out quit a bit of money. Playing all those numbers in both midday and evening you would be broke. Why not just keep it simply.

Reply #201

pepper1 — Mon, 24 May 2010 03:50:34 GMT

No need to fight I've got two hand. I can dance with you both.

Reply #200

pepper1 — Mon, 24 May 2010 03:45:09 GMT

I do like to dance till I drop

Reply #199

rcbbuckeye — Mon, 24 May 2010 02:12:53 GMT

That was their system....quite successful.

Reply #198

jarasan — Sun, 23 May 2010 23:55:21 GMT

Yes, because no one and who's on first...............

Timing perfection.

Reply #197

RJOh — Sun, 23 May 2010 23:49:54 GMT

Did they too have a money making system they wouldn't share

Reply #196

rcbbuckeye — Sun, 23 May 2010 23:16:45 GMT

OMG!!!!!!

You guys are almost as good as Abbott and Costello.

Reply #195

tiggs95 — Sun, 23 May 2010 22:08:15 GMT

jrosina is tiggs pal so leave her alone..We all make mistakes just look at what your mom and dad did..

Reply #194

rdgrnr — Sun, 23 May 2010 22:06:13 GMT

You're just lucky Rosie wasn't here to see that one.

Reply #193

tiggs95 — Sun, 23 May 2010 21:58:36 GMT

Oh we're going to play them games are we Mr Perfect..

Reply #192

rdgrnr — Sun, 23 May 2010 21:50:04 GMT

And you shouldn't be telling everybody you saw her fisrt anyway.

Reply #191

rdgrnr — Sun, 23 May 2010 21:44:58 GMT

Yes, you may have seen her fisrt but I saw her first.

Reply #190

tiggs95 — Sun, 23 May 2010 21:40:50 GMT

tiggs saw her fisrt old man...

Reply #189

Coin Toss — Sun, 23 May 2010 20:32:48 GMT

Lucky the Stuck a/k/a/ Lucky Larry a/k/a/ ????

Who said you decreased the numbers?

All along you've been saying your $75 played wins $150 yeah, but all you've done is talk about it.

NO PROOF.

Until you produce some proof you're just a stroker, like another one who was going to dazzle us with a Mega Millions jackpot win which turned into I will get three numbers right and victory will be mine.

So I guess in your case that will reducde to getting one digit of a pick three right and... [ More ]

Reply #188

rdgrnr — Sun, 23 May 2010 14:47:23 GMT

Now that there is my kinda woman.

I'd like to get pepper out on the dance flo.

Reply #187

pepper1 — Sun, 23 May 2010 14:19:54 GMT

That my point if I'm going to give somebody something I'm going all the way, are nothing at all

Reply #186

Lucky Loser — Sun, 23 May 2010 13:28:57 GMT

Oh my gosh, man!!! If the player is wagering (300) numbers and it only cost .25 per number then what is the cost, 'Toss??? Get your calculator out, man! 300 / 4 = 75. It's the same amount of numbers played at a lesser cost HERO. You want to know everything and you don't know jack!

I never decreased the numbers...the cost is simply 1/4 of the total. 1/4 of a dollar is what...twenty-five cents. When it costs $75 dollars to play @ .25 per number and the payout is $225 for a .25 bet, then the $15... [ More ]

Reply #185

Coin Toss — Sun, 23 May 2010 13:19:01 GMT

Sure Lucky, sure.

Youy're a 25 cent Pick 3 flea that can narrow it down to 75 numbers and be confident you're goug to pick up $150.

And I'm sure you had a great time at the 1994 World Series.

I hereby dub the Lucky the Stuck.

'Til you actually divulge the winning numbers your superior math knowledge produces I authenticate Alpha Mike as Foxtrot. Out.

Reply #184

jarasan — Sun, 23 May 2010 13:18:16 GMT

Yeah, when I play P4 and I play x numbers with boxes and straight I count the total number of combos as my total pick count.

So if play 7194, 1628, 3951, 1916, 7394, and 1191 for eg. I got 112 combos/picks/numbers a little better than 1/100.

With 300 combos/picks on P3 you are almost at 1/3! Get it right a few times in a row and MONEY

Reply #183

Lucky Loser — Sun, 23 May 2010 13:00:15 GMT

As for you, you pay absolutely no attention to anything except all those quotes, cliches, and B.S. you use to hear at whatever casino you hung out at. You need to brush up on your math skills and/or get some pills for that attention deficit disorder, okay.

Just so you know, the total number count is (300) and 1/4 of (300) is (75). This, translated into dollars when playing straight, is simply $75...which is also 1/4 of the total dollar amount of $300. This is exactly how I broke it down from

Reply #182

Lucky Loser — Sun, 23 May 2010 12:45:34 GMT

jarasan, at least you did get the total of (300) picks right on the first try which shows that you do pay attention to what you're reading.

L.L.

Reply #181

Coin Toss — Sun, 23 May 2010 05:54:51 GMT

Interesting twists.

As joker predicted, gibberish insgtead of results. Incredibly Lucky Loser mentions Mega-Think Tank (What is it with Texans and BS?), and with no longer 75 but 300 picks (as jarasan pointed out, filling out the playslips would take you to the next drawing) we're no longer shooting dart boards with shotguns but Howitzers.

What comes to mind here is Eli Wallach in the bath tub in the Good, The Bad, and The Ugly.....

When you got to shoot, shoot, don't talk.

Lucky, ei... [ More ]

Reply #180

jarasan — Sun, 23 May 2010 05:01:09 GMT

There was a movie 300 and a car that is a 300 . My God 300 P3's if you don't fill out slips and call out the numbers or write them on sheet of paper, by the time you're done, it is time for the next drawing

Reply #179

CutlassBob — Sun, 23 May 2010 03:43:09 GMT

Hey Joker17, you got my respect. The 1st time you gave me any Numbers, 5 sets (not 300 sets) of 3 didgets and one of them was 229, the next day Midday Saturday 5-15 what came up here in Michigan, 229!

No 2 didgets followed by X, all 3 didgets. LoL

Proof.

CutlassBob Out for the night, TC's Folks.

Reply #178

Lucky Loser — Sun, 23 May 2010 03:40:56 GMT

Yeah, what ever joker. Ain't no jokes here. YOU KNOW and that's all I'll say to this end. On the business side of it, you were on the right track once upon a time and I even told you so in a PM. Then, you decided to abandon the whole project for what ever reason.

For reference's sake, when I first got here, on my very first day, I posted (300) numbers str8 for the state of Virginia...and hit str8 as intended all with a breakdown of the cost/profit analysis. I had to ad-lib in order not to giv... [ More ]

Reply #177

CutlassBob — Sun, 23 May 2010 03:31:18 GMT

I had a Michigan State Trooper along side me on the expressway today, he yelled to me, How can i make my Cutlass sound like that, i said Get a Big Block . Then he sais Nail It , got up to one hundred miles an hour and backed down, he was impressed. Gave me Thumbs Up and speed away, Whew...

CutlassBob

P.S. On Gratiot Ave i raced a few 5.0 Mustangs, pffffft, there a dime a dozen, not one of them beat me.

Reply #176

joker17 — Sun, 23 May 2010 03:30:03 GMT

See folks? This is what I mean. You ask for proof and you get labled as a bully who likes to beat up on people...lol

This has to be a joke LL. I'll leave it as that...a joke...

He's obviously another one who likes to pull our leg. He's just as bad as the ones who don't finish posting the whole system. They have nothing better to do. They're bored and need entertainment at our expense.

I'm so done, I can't believe I spent this much time to begin with. I'm the idiot who kept biting.....I... [ More ]

Reply #175

Lucky Loser — Sun, 23 May 2010 03:26:30 GMT

Bob, with all due respect, I've already risen to the occasion to this in the past...they just haven't gotten it yet. You came in a little late, so it's well within reason for you to feel this way. For certain others though, it's ridiculous. So far, one person has figured it all out and I addressed it openly with them. Not a word since then.

I like that big block Cutlass!!! But, I still prefer small blocks.

L.L.

Reply #174

CutlassBob — Sun, 23 May 2010 03:20:52 GMT

I was a Supervisor for 15 years and i had many employees who said I can do that, i deserve a raise . One of my favorite lines was Don't tell me, Show Me If it ended up that they could only do a portion of the task, they were encouraged to complete the training needed and then Show Me

It's simple, if they could prove to me they were capable of certain tasks then a merit raise was granted. If they did not prove themselfs i knew it was just a line of BS.

CutlassBob

Reply #173

Lucky Loser — Sun, 23 May 2010 03:18:36 GMT

Like I said, go and do some LP history research on people you've really hated in the past and beat up pretty bad. They took it...until it was time to fight back. And they did. You have proof if you'll only dig a little. Why don't you PM a few people and ask them to look in on this thing and I'm certain they can help you out. Just tryin' to help you.

L.L.

Reply #172

joker17 — Sun, 23 May 2010 03:13:44 GMT

I'm not trying to provoke you. The funny thing is that benign criticism seems to be the worst enemy with folks like you who come here and make claims without proof.

So I'm a bad guy because i want proof?

What is the world coming to

Reply #171

Lucky Loser — Sun, 23 May 2010 03:13:16 GMT

Go and read the last few posts from ThinkTank's Need More Thoroughbreds Around Here and pay close attention. Then, you go and do some homework and you'll see where I'm coming from. You should be receiving a PM from someone right about now...

L.L.

Reply #170

Lucky Loser — Sun, 23 May 2010 03:09:37 GMT

I'm not easily provoked, joker. But, I'm going to enjoy you...in my own way. Reduced from a drug store to a single pill and you still want more. You truly are hard core, sir.

L.L.

Reply #169

joker17 — Sun, 23 May 2010 03:09:29 GMT

I have no idea what past post you're talking about. Give me a link so I can see. I don't remember anyone, which includes YOU, to have won on anything resembling a victory in proving consistent wins. Please prove me wrong by showing a link that would make what you say correct.

To the best of my knowledge, no one here has proven to me otherwise. No ONE!

If they did prove themselves, I wouldn't be here right now writing to you. I'd be on some island in the Bahamas sipping on Tequilas.... [ More ]

Reply #168

THRUST — Sun, 23 May 2010 03:07:12 GMT

Lucky Loser,

I never doubted your skillz...just hope you understand that...I just approach the game a different way...and hope to gain success from that approach...we all need to win and when one of us wins...we all win.

Reply #167

Lucky Loser — Sun, 23 May 2010 03:03:34 GMT

Ditto.

Reply #166

Lucky Loser — Sun, 23 May 2010 03:01:04 GMT

Know what? The last time you, I, and others went 'round and 'round on this ya'll came out on the losing end...big time. Take just a moment and think about the MM Saga. You cried and cried for numbers and states and when he showed and proved and called you out on it, you had no answer, joker. None of you had answers.

Now, here you go again with the same request...one that has been responded to but you pretend that is wasn't. Think real hard about what I just said and I'm sure you'll get the po... [ More ]

Reply #165

THRUST — Sun, 23 May 2010 02:48:56 GMT

I put up some numbers on my blog...but they are far from anything to write home about...1-3/5 with 12-13 numbers...a 4/5 here and there...but I almost and what could have been isn't good enough.

Yes the proof is in the pudding as Bill Cosby would say...wait

Reply #164

joker17 — Sun, 23 May 2010 02:44:38 GMT

Reply #163

tiggs95 — Sun, 23 May 2010 02:37:21 GMT

Even Think Tank put up some numbers..They was losers but never let least he did put some up..

Reply #162

pepper1 — Sun, 23 May 2010 02:29:46 GMT

I agree someone get's it all are nothing.

Reply #161

THRUST — Sun, 23 May 2010 02:07:05 GMT

If one chooses to approach a lottery game like poker then so be it...there is a difference between skill, luck a scientific process...yours seems like across between skill luck...nothing scientific about it...which is cool if you have skills luck...but a system as I see it...meaning my opinion should be sound on facts and true unaltered data. No one should spend what they cannot afford...and studying a game you can do for free...until you get to a point where a system is worth putting money on..... [ More ]

Reply #160

joker17 — Sun, 23 May 2010 01:37:53 GMT

Every single word you write is pointless to me unless you prove yourself. You seem to keep avoiding this request by me and others.

You obviously have a right to express your feelings here on the LP, but folks can see right through crap like this. All the Fancy and endless paragraphs which are spiced up won't get you anywhere. The only thing that gets the point across is action, and I believe you know that.

I can just see the response to this. More blah blah blah....what's the point? Why do... [ More ]

Reply #159

Lucky Loser — Sun, 23 May 2010 00:49:23 GMT

Thanks, Thrust, I'm glad you're not pissed at me. However, what you're telling me is seemingly very contradicting. A system really is based on a pre- arrangement of particular events which should produce an expected outcome...consistently. See, most successful things are, in fact, most effective when conditions are right. Look at sports, the weather, business investments, and really everything.

Noone should go into anything blindly...just take a look at our Armed Forces. They do homework and... [ More ]

Reply #158

THRUST — Sat, 22 May 2010 23:23:48 GMT

I never questioned your technique just the thought process behind it...while your technique may be sound if you believe in playing only when the conditions are right...sounds like you are relying on luck...if one has a system it should be played every draw and have some success...maybe not be successful every time but enough to justify using said system.

Either way I don't play pick 3 or Pick 4. Good luck to you in the future.

Reply #157

Coin Toss — Sat, 22 May 2010 23:08:31 GMT

Raven62,

That''s true for most people but the ones with a problem go way beyond betting only what they can aford.

Reply #156

tmead — Sat, 22 May 2010 21:18:27 GMT

I agree with this. Post all or nothing, or at least have an impressionable prediction record to back you up.

Reply #155

truecritic — Sat, 22 May 2010 20:38:10 GMT

All B.S. aside, no. Nothing wrong. I think maybe if the discussion was religion, people would just believe. No proof required. However, since it is the lottery, proof is required if you want to get out of here alive. It doesn't make sense to me.

I say, if you are winning and don't want to prove it, fine. If you want to tell us , fine. If you want to show us predictions, fine.

In response to the original question: what about people with a system that only share half of the system

Ther... [ More ]

Reply #154

pepper1 — Sat, 22 May 2010 19:31:36 GMT

I will have it my way, No I didn't get upset this was just something I want to post about

Quibble: Argue over

Locution: Expression

Some feel they have a system, and just don't want to give out the whole system I have seen it on here many times.

Reply #153

Lucky Loser — Sat, 22 May 2010 18:41:33 GMT

I play on average about 3-4 times per week, Johnny...that's it. I can only play on a specific type of draw which actually gives me very good odds. It requires playing a large list to cover the best numbers. I'm sure most think that I play on every single draw...and win on every one. Not so. But, I do win pretty regularly on these draws, and, when I lose I give up a 1/4 or 1/3 of any profit I've incured and usually get in back on the next draw. It's a very simple approach and extremely conservati... [ More ]

Reply #152

joker17 — Sat, 22 May 2010 18:36:40 GMT

The problem is not the amount, but the consistency of wins. You talk about absorbing the losses and still making a profit. Well...then show us here. Predict the Florida p-3 with 75 bets for whatever length of time you think is required to satisfy everyone. If lets' say, after a month of predictions, you come out ahead, then you made your point.

Reply #151

JohnnyPicksIt — Sat, 22 May 2010 18:15:05 GMT

That's a better return than some stocks.

Reply #150

Tenaj — Sat, 22 May 2010 17:59:50 GMT

That's right, math is not required. As I said before the data is not missing now. You have it now. Study it and play to your advantage. If you are trying to perform some kind of standard deviation/reduction model. DON'T DO IT. Use what you have not what you want to do.

Reply #149

Lucky Loser — Sat, 22 May 2010 17:51:25 GMT

Thank you, RJOh. That's all I wanted to know. I gave someone else the opportunity to do the same thing...regardless of what it was spent on and they wouldn't answer me. If it generates a descent profit, there's nothing wrong with it at all.

Here's the problem. Everybody and their momma, daddy, sister, brutha, cousin, nephew, and uncle feels that if you're not making nearly the ENTIRE PAYOUT PRIZE IN PROFIT, then you're not doing anything. If a person can spend their money, get it back relativ... [ More ]

Reply #148

RJOh — Sat, 22 May 2010 17:38:54 GMT

Absolutely nothing. It just that no one is convinced that ANYTHING can be $75 worth of pick3 tickets.

You simply have to pick a game and post $75 worth of numbers before its drawing and let the results speak for you.

Reply #147

Lucky Loser — Sat, 22 May 2010 17:38:12 GMT

Maybe you can tell me, joker, since noone else will. No frills, no strings, no beating around the bush. Just the numbers. You made $150 in profit from spending $75. What wrong with it?

L.L.

Reply #146

Lucky Loser — Sat, 22 May 2010 17:31:30 GMT

Can ANYONE here tell me what's wrong with making $150 profit from spending $75...on ANYTHING?? All B.S. aside.

L.L.

Reply #145

Lucky Loser — Sat, 22 May 2010 17:28:38 GMT

Yeah, I can see that most players here do spend $1 and land straight hits pretty regularly. It makes no sense to play more than about (5) combinations. I don't know what I'm thinking here. ICWTPI.

L.L.

Reply #144

joker17 — Sat, 22 May 2010 17:14:21 GMT

If your $75 play is so strong why don't you start a thread posting it, daily, before the drawing naming a specific game (Midday or Evening) and state. Paper trade it and let everyone see the results

There is always a reason why they don't, or can't post their predictions ahead of time. I've seen all kinds of excuses. Some don't even have excuses. The excuses range from..... Too many numbers ............. Family secret ................ We're just too dumb to understand ...................Or so... [ More ]

Reply #143

Raven62 — Sat, 22 May 2010 17:11:21 GMT

When it comes to Gambling and Risk (Exposure to loss or harm; to expose to loss or harm) people Play what they can Afford (You can't Bet what You Don't Have

Reply #142

Lucky Loser — Sat, 22 May 2010 17:09:07 GMT

Raven that's not fair neither is is accurate. However, let's put aside any talk of sytems and anything else. Let's focus on three things here: (75), (225), and (150).

If YOU spent $75 on ANYTHING and thus made a clear profit of $150, is this a bad thing for YOU? I'm only asking that you're honest with yourself. Remember, $150 in true profit from that $75.

L.L.

Reply #141

Raven62 — Sat, 22 May 2010 16:52:11 GMT

To teach one must have a student willing to learn: Not one that has their mind made up on how to play or just wants to argue their methods of play! Play On

Reply #140

Coin Toss — Sat, 22 May 2010 16:51:45 GMT

RJOh,

Bingo! I call it the 1994 World series Syndrome. Someone talks about what a great time they had at the 1994 World Series. (discussion board or real life). Someone nearby says, Excuse me, that was a strike year, there was no World Series.

The person who says there was looks (or repsonds) to the other person with hate in their eyes and looks for someone else to tell about their agreat time at the 1994 World Series.

Lucky Loser,

Regarding the $75 play. Fine and dandy if and only

Reply #139

Lucky Loser — Sat, 22 May 2010 16:43:54 GMT

ATWAGS.

L.L.

Reply #138

Lucky Loser — Sat, 22 May 2010 16:26:14 GMT

I would like to learn...and I want you to teach me the way. Now, a person spends $75 in order to win $225. They do, in fact, win. The $75 is recovered and, additionally, $150 above and beyond that is realized. Is this a diminishing return? Did the person actually lose money here? Was that a bad move (play)? Please help me understand this, Raven.

L.L.

Reply #137

Raven62 — Sat, 22 May 2010 16:24:36 GMT

Also on the Social Networks: Facebook Twitter

Reply #136

Raven62 — Sat, 22 May 2010 16:15:49 GMT

Have it Your Way: You didn't get upset!

Hate: An intense dislike or animosity; to loathe; detest

Upset: To perturb or disturb

They didn't have a System to begin with, and were Conning (deceiving) everyone all along.

Reply #135

RJOh — Sat, 22 May 2010 15:52:19 GMT

The truth is some people like to post even if it's just crap. When they run out of crap, they stop whether there's a logical ending of not. Either the reader ignore it or add his own ending, either way it's still just crap. After a while you'll learn not to take every thing you read here seriously.

Reply #134

RJOh — Sat, 22 May 2010 15:43:30 GMT

I've found that's true with my system. I've ran test that show after 20 lines, there's no significant improvement per number of additional lines added. I might get a $2 or $3 win but the additional lines will have cost more than I win. That's fine with me since my budget is between $5 and $20 worth of tickets depending on the jackpot size. I guess if you can't win the top prize with 10-20 lines, a hundred more are likely to change your luck.

Reply #133

pepper1 — Sat, 22 May 2010 15:42:11 GMT

Who getting upset. Why go to all the bother if you're not going to go all the way is my point.

Reply #132

Raven62 — Sat, 22 May 2010 15:32:33 GMT

The Truth of the Matter is: They didn't have a Lottery System to begin with: What ever they did post: They were making up as they went: Is it worth getting upset about: Not Really

Reply #131

Raven62 — Sat, 22 May 2010 15:05:46 GMT

When Playing the Lottery the Law of Diminishing Returns applies and explains why Lottery Systems Fail:

The tendency for a continuing application of effort or skill toward a particular project or goal to decline in effectiveness after a certain level of result has been achieved.

Reply #130

CutlassBob — Sat, 22 May 2010 14:52:44 GMT

Sounds like a very nice combo there sir.

Took my Cutlass to UBLY Dragway here in Michigan for Test and Tune Day, shes pretty much stock, got a 425 ci Olds motor bored out to a 430, Edelbrock 4 bbl carb, getting a Holley this year. Headers, Turbo400 Auto Trans with stock 308 rear end. She hooks up good enough for me, i am a highway cruiser. Took it to Nebraska visiting relatives in Crete. Had a riot. Only ran a 13.23 in the quarter mile. Had a snowmobile lined up with me, it blew my doors off.... [ More ]

Reply #129

Lucky Loser — Sat, 22 May 2010 14:33:18 GMT

Okay.

L.L.

Reply #128

Coin Toss — Sat, 22 May 2010 14:30:46 GMT

Lucky Loser,

Re: your last post to me, I don't have anything against you.

I seriously doubt that jrosina or joker17 are playing $75 a drawing on the Pick 3. Even if they are they are not sufggesting it as the preferred m.o.

As far as investment since I had years in Vegas in casinos I know the lingo, regsrdless of thre specific game the jargon is the same. I'm even means I'm stuck less than $200, etc....

As for those playing just to be playing, they are sometimes known as a BRF.

I... [ More ]

Reply #127

Lucky Loser — Sat, 22 May 2010 14:26:51 GMT

Mistake in the equation: Bore x Bore x Stroke x Number of Cylinders x .7854 = Cubic Inches. Sorry about that.

L.L.

Reply #126

Lucky Loser — Sat, 22 May 2010 14:20:07 GMT

Bore x Bore x Stroke x Number of Cylinders = Cubic Inches. This is only one approach at arriving to cubic inches, right? There are more ways to figuring out Pick 3 mathematically as well but, people don't want to accept it. Yeah, Bob, I love cars and racing just like you do! I'm in the process of building a turbo LS1 and dropping it into a 2000 Mustang. Cross Breeding is in nowadays! Should run pretty good...hopefully.

I'm looking for some mid to high 5's in the 1/8 mile.

L.L.... [ More ]

Reply #125

CutlassBob — Sat, 22 May 2010 13:46:51 GMT

IMHO.....Maybe if you just added in your posts For online bets only We would know you know what you are talking about.

Never said you don't know what you are talking about, just not clear for us folks who do not play online.

Math does not make sense if the balls are driven by air and inhaled up a tube. Like i said before, math may give you a reduced pool of numbers, but the biggest common demoniator is the air and the suction, For us players in states where they use that type of method to... [ More ]

Reply #124

crow — Sat, 22 May 2010 13:44:50 GMT

Huh,did I read you correctly in that... math is not required ...?

My point was in order to run an accurate statistical analysis you NEED ALL the data.

Have you ever stopped to think WHY there is a pattern in randomness?

The digit 9 went missing in the regular draws but was in the pre-draws all along.This is how statistical analysis becomes incomplete and leads to error on the part of the individual trying to perform any kind of standard deviation/reduction modeling..

I mean come on i... [ More ]

Reply #123

Lucky Loser — Sat, 22 May 2010 13:28:49 GMT

It's for people who are able to wager online where .25 bets are offered. I guess I can see where I may have thrown you off a bit. My posts are based on this style of bet. Do yourself a favor and don't feed into anything I say because I don't know what I'm talking about, okay. None of my math makes sense and profit cannot be made on this game.

L.L.

Reply #122

CutlassBob — Sat, 22 May 2010 13:18:08 GMT

Texas...

Pick 3 offers a 50-cent play, twelve drawings a week (six Day and six Night drawings) and a top prize of $500 (on a $1 play.) It's easy to play. Just pick three single-digit numbers from 0 to 9 , choose how you want to play them, the number of drawings you want to play and the time of day you want to play.

Where does the twenty five cents come into play?

Michigan only offers a .50 cent which can be played straight or boxed. NOT 2Way.

The $1.00 bet can be played numerous way... [ More ]

Reply #121

Tenaj — Sat, 22 May 2010 13:02:18 GMT

I agree with you on this one Coin Toss. I'm happy to get a straight $1 hit. It's an extra paycheck.