My digit system for pick-5 or pick-6 lottery

Reply #684

jimmy4164 — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:57:10 GMT

RL-RANDOMLOGIC,

This is so simple I can't understand why you cannot seethis.

Thanks so much for not giving up on me! I can finally see the light (and the colours!) Hallelujah!

My only concern is that if too many people have the fog lifted from their eyes as I have, given

the parimutuel setup of many of the lotteries, as jackpots dwindle, more and more people might

stop playing, which could spell the end of the lotteries as we know them. Tell you what - I pledge

to do my part... [ More ]

Reply #683

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:28:25 GMT

Jimmy

So if I post the last lets say $100.00 of tickets that I have purchased for my 5-39 game and show

that I have beat the odds you have listed above then you will go away; I don't think that you will.

You will come back with some kind of remark that I must have spent thousands of dollars to produce

the winning tickets. Since I posted that I would post my winning tickets I have spent less than $100.00

total. here is a rough estimate of my play

Just going from memeory

$13.0... [ More ]

Reply #682

jimmy4164 — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:20:44 GMT

garyo1954,

Poor fellow.

Since RL-RANDOMLOGIC offered to decode the colorful charts for ALL to see on 9/30, it's such a shame he lurks in the shadows while others make pathetic attempts to divert attention from the question at hand.

At least joker17 was willing to admit he didn't understand the math. All you've managed to do is cobble together a poorly contrived mixed metaphor.

Why not sit back and wait for the proffered revelation in all its colorful brilliance.

--Jimmy4164... [ More ]

Reply #681

garyo1954 — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 03:08:50 GMT

Jimmy,

At one time I was in the service of this nation where each year each member is required to undergo a physical exam.

On such occasions the mettle of a man is tested in ways not essential to combat.

One particular young gentlemen, one of the strongest among us, was terrified of needles, passing out at the sight of the corpmen testing the spray.

Too, he was a particularly bright young fellow, choosing to become an accountant.

Yet for all his strength, for all the classes he ha... [ More ]

Reply #680

rcbbuckeye — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 02:11:31 GMT

Couldn't have said it better myself joker17.

Reply #679

joker17 — Thu, 07 Oct 2010 23:01:58 GMT

Actually I haven't read the Fallacy, or the endless pages of the threads you mentioned. And I don't intend to either. I did read few pages back within this thread though.

My math is terrible, so when you show me all those equations, it goes right over my head.

You seem to have skipped the part about how the Old Idea would be true If the coin was only flipped once in a lifetime, but because it is flipped more than once, the odds continually climb against the occurrence happening again. You... [ More ]

Reply #678

jimmy4164 — Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:33:00 GMT

joker17,

You really surprise me bringing this up at this time. This has been dealt with ad nauseum in this thread and in Fooled By Randomness. Your mysteriously disappearing math professor turned wagering method salesman writes,

Upon the first presentation of my discovery which we will refer to as 'Random Number Displacement' ... or ... RND, for brevity, the old belief, which is still the accepted rule of random numbers by most students, was suppose to show that regardless of what happene... [ More ]

Reply #677

joker17 — Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:43:01 GMT

Well isn't that funny. I just did a search on the method and there's one top listing but the site is promoting some casino, not the method.

So there still isn't anything on the net with pertaining to his method. He must be living in a cave somewhere....lol

But it's funny because there are 2 links in the list that refer to a system I posted here on Lottery Post a few years ago when I was know as pacattack05. Some guy created a site using the key words of Koycerin wagering method and LP was... [ More ]

Reply #676

joker17 — Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:26:26 GMT

A few years ago I purchased a wagering method that I still can't fully understand. I understand the fundamental parts, but his wagering method is where I am confused.

I may post his method in a new thread later, so someone here who is smarter than I can decode it and use it for all our benefit. But for now, I want to post an excerpt dealing with randomness, particularily to the discussion at hand.

Years ago I researched the author's name on the net but could not find any info whatsoever. I... [ More ]

Reply #675

jimmy4164 — Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:05:35 GMT

All Patient Players,

While we're waiting for RL-RANDOMLOGIC to post the next step in the winning process, I thought I would extend his analysis of the probabilities involved in a (5,39) Lotto game. I'll use his values from Missouri for the probabilities of winning each prize category and the Payouts:

match 5 of 5 = 1 in 575757

match 4 of 5 = 1 in 3386.8

match 3 of 5 = 1 in 102.6

match 2 of 5 = 1 in 9.6

match 1 of 5 = 1 in 2.48

match 0 of 5 = 1 in 2.09

We... [ More ]

Reply #674

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:02:03 GMT

The above should read that the overall odds of winning a prize that pays more than

$1.00 should be 1 in 100 and not 1 in 1000. And the the percent of sets that contain

a winning prize $1.00 = 1 percent. Left the zero off the 5610 when making the cal-

culation, my calculator is getting old and the buttons hang sometimes. I should have

caught this before the copy and paste. I was up very very late that night and should

have waited tell morning to proof read it first.

RL

Reply #673

hoping2winbig — Fri, 01 Oct 2010 05:41:12 GMT

Hi RL I find your system very interesting , how can I get a copy of your system software ?

pm me if you want

Reply #672

Greg — Fri, 01 Oct 2010 02:13:49 GMT

He's a real nowhere man

Sitting in his nowhere land

Just sees what he wants to see

He's as blind as he can be

- Nowhere Man by Lennon/McCartney

Yup, Red Toad, you and John Lennon said it better than I ever could.

In fact, the greatest geniuses the world has ever known have suffered the same attacks as RL.

Am I worried? Nah. Great minds-- Edison, Preston Tucker, Bucky Fuller, and now RL-- have always suffered such indignities. RL is in good company

Reply #671

RedToad — Fri, 01 Oct 2010 01:21:40 GMT

I won $13.00 last nite, the set I did not publish came in with the money.

Now a word about the roaming Jackass!!, Gregg RL I think this JackAss is suffering from INTELLECTUAL CONSTIPATION!

And nothing you say or prove will affect his intellect or understanding.

His mind is closed, he cannot see farther than his nose.

He is a pain in the rear-end, and the best way to deal with the JACKASS is to IGNORE the ass.

Reply #670

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:30:08 GMT

The Digit System Disclaimer!!!

The digit system is a method of building sets of numbers without regard for the

actual numbers within the set. All numbers are made of one or more digits. The

data below is calculated using a 5 of 39 lottery matrix which contains 575757

different combinations of 5 numbers.

The overall odds of winning a prize for this game = 1 in 8.7 for =$1.00 prize

match 5 of 5 = 1 in 575757

match 4 of 5 = 1 in 3386.8

match 3 of 5 = 1 in 102.6

matc... [ More ]

Reply #669

jimmy4164 — Thu, 30 Sep 2010 03:38:43 GMT

Greg,

Nice move - accuse your detractor of your own tactics:

...he Bullies his way through by distracting, diverting, deflecting attention through the Irrelevant positioning of 'facts'.

You made no attempt to address the issue at hand.

I'm sure I'm not the only one of the thousands of people registered at this site who sees that your hero spews gibberish and you're running interference. Most people don't consider facts irrelevant, as you proclaim. All I am willing to do in any furt... [ More ]

Reply #668

Greg — Thu, 30 Sep 2010 02:03:26 GMT

Jimmy, Jimmy, Jimmy,

I guess you didn't get enough breast milk as an infant because your narcissistic, self-centered, self-absorbed pseudo-posts Smack of someone who can only get enough attention if he Bullies his way through by distracting, diverting, deflecting attention through the Irrelevant positioning of facts .

I question the Degree you hold because evidently none of your Professors taught you that people who quantify and code discoveries (for example, discoveries such as patterns... [ More ]

Reply #667

RedToad — Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:38:30 GMT

10-12-13-22-33

10-12-13-20-30

And one other set which I won't publish.

Lets see the money after 10:00 PM.

Reply #666

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:08:34 GMT

dear clueless

You still don't understand. I input the digits and the software does the rest. I guess I could have as

many as 25 numbers in play but like I said the numbers that are produced are sets of 5 numbers

that are built around the digits. What numbers that are produced mean nothing just that they

contain the correct digits in the correct arrangment to pass all the filters. I don't care what numbers

make up the set. Of course I see the numbers when i feel out the tick... [ More ]

Reply #665

jimmy4164 — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:32:34 GMT

RL-RANDOMLOGIC,

I guess I could post my digits if thatwould make you happy.

I know how hard it is for you to deal with numbers. You've explained several times how you only think in digits. Have you trained the clerks at your lottery outlet to convert your digits into sets of numbers, or do you help them?

Note that MadDog accepts UP TO 12 WBs and UP TO 4 PBs, so it need not be as challenging to enter as you fear. And who knows, maybe MadDog would be willing to do the conversion for you... [ More ]

Reply #664

RedToad — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:16:40 GMT

DONKEY TRAINER

Your donkey is too stupid to learn any thing.

I know it is hard, let him stew in his petard, by ignoring him. I know its hard.

But I think its best for me, this thread, and lottery post, to STOP TRAINING the donkey.

Ignore his posts.

Reply #663

RedToad — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:13:11 GMT

IGNORE IGNORE

IGNORE IGNORE.

LETS SAY THAT RL DISCOVERED HOW TO WIN THE 5 NUMBER GAME.

THAT WILL NOT BE THE END OF THE LOTTERY THEY WILL HAVE SCRATCH OFF GAMES.

ALSO RL WOULD HAVE MADE A SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY IN MATH, THAT COULD EARN HIM THE NOBLE PRIZE IN MATH.

LET THE LOTTERY WORRY ABOUT THEIR GAMES.

IF THERE IS A WINNING SOFTWARE, AND I BELIEVE THERE IS, USE it TO GET RICH.

Reply #662

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:59:58 GMT

jimmy

why don't you admit that you work for the lotteries in spreading disinformation. I don't think that

what will be released will bankrupt anyone or add to the finacial crisis. I already help when I can

so If I never win a realy big one I will have done something. Your total lack of understanding

of my system really shows concerning Mad Dogs challenge, I guess I could post my digits if that

would make you happy. I done a workup that produced 4 of 5 with almost the same num... [ More ]

Reply #661

jimmy4164 — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:32:37 GMT

RedToad,

You seem a little excited and I thought you might forget about:

MadDog's Powerball Challenge (2010/09/29)

See ya'

--Jimmy4164

Reply #660

jimmy4164 — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:20:23 GMT

RL-RANDOMLOGIC,

I am working on the stats that will prove you wrongYou are a natural born idiot.

Are you sure that's a good idea? Our country is still trying to recover from a 2 year financial crisis. If you are correct, your posting will reveal what is necessary to bankrupt all the state lotteries! For someone who wants to build homeless shelters with their winnings, this would be a little out of character, wouldn't it?

And oh, BTW, some of us are still waiting for your 12 + 4 best p... [ More ]

Reply #659

RedToad — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:28:36 GMT

RL

The best thing is to ignore the OLD HORSE.

I am working on the stats that will prove you wrong

You are a natural born idiot.

You can PROVE NOTHING to him, he will IGNORE your proof.

And find some Symantec in your reply, to continue to disrupt and harass you.

You are wasting energy on the Old Horse.

Ignore him, and he will wallow in his own petard.

Reply #658

RedToad — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:22:43 GMT

I AGREE WITH YOU RL

IT SEEMS PEOPLE FROM GAMBLERS ANONYMOUS, ARE MEMBERS HERE.

IF THEY HAVE A PROBLEM WITH GAMBLING, THIS IS NOT A SITE FOR THEM.

I plan to win a few dollars this evening.

Reply #657

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:08:13 GMT

jimmy

Craping all over again are you, I am working on the stats that will prove you wrong

You are a natural born idiot. All of your stupid remarks like How can my removing

one number force it not to be drawn. I ask you how can your quick pick force the other

54 numbers not to be drawn, I say buying a quick pick is the same thing as removing

54 white balls and 38 power balls, You stupid jackass. This time I won't makke some

quick posting with a mistake or two but I will expose j... [ More ]

Reply #656

jimmy4164 — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:12:19 GMT

Greg,

And just what, pray tell, are these lottery truths that RL's system seems to point to ?

False hope of increased chances of winning causes those who can least afford it to gamble beyond their means. Anything which increases this hope deserves to be torn down. Your purple prose, in its heroic attempt to redeem the gibberish expounded by the author of the so-called digit system by associating it with scientific and literary giants is entertaining, but not very convincing. Your effort fa... [ More ]

Reply #655

Greg — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:48:10 GMT

Imagination is more important than knowledge , proclaimed Albert Einstein.

Take heed of that, Jimmy.

Why?

Because it was RL's wonderfully creative Imagination that gave birth to his system, one from which I am reading in these pages, has yielded some nice wins for some diligent LP readers!

So Jimmy, why do you keep writing about all that statistical Knowledge you have such a fine education in? What puzzles me is the energy you devote to wielding it like a hammer-- as in tearing down... [ More ]

Reply #654

RedToad — Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:00:03 GMT

RL

It's noteworthy that when P = 1/2, or a toss up, [your] ODDS = 1.0.

Now if the odds are 1, then you are certain to win, is that right RL-RANDOMLOGIC?

Because when I use the Expert Lotto digits filter, to filter all the digits that I think will not come, it is a toss up, because more than 3/4 of the sets remaining are winners.

So the equation is correct, the trick is to find away to make P =1/2.

And that is exactly what you do with your last digits system.

Let me... [ More ]

Reply #653

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sun, 26 Sep 2010 07:34:58 GMT

jimmy

The above statement was the end product of some bad editing.

Sorry for the delay getting back to you on this one, I am in the middle of making some changes

and have been offline for a while. I first want to thank you for pointing this out, it is misworded

and I take the blame for this one. I would however like to challenge the coin toss as having a

50/50 odds for each toss as I once saw a coin land on it's edge.

RL

Reply #652

jimmy4164 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:52:30 GMT

RL-RANDOMLOGIC,

In my continuing quest to understand how to ...learn what is being said here,,, I'm forced to ask another question. Just what are your ODDS, and could you please explain how your latest response above relates to your earlier explanation of probability, which I quote here, for your convenience,

RL-RANDOMLOGIC,

You said, Wake UP jimmy!!!!! You are the one in the wrong. You need to ask yourself what Odds really are.

'The ratio of the probability of occurrence of an even... [ More ]

Reply #651

PadawanLotto — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 05:08:27 GMT

I have been looking at Double base digits and they seem fairly easy to track the patterns.

Total Even DBD = 4

Total ODD DBD = 8

DED = 2, 20

DOD = 11, 13, 31, 33

MDN = 1, 3, 12, 14, 23, 32

MDN ODD = 1, 3, 21, 23

MDN EVEN = 12, 32

It's rare for there to be no double base digits to be drawn.

It's also rare that there are 3 or more double digits to be drawn in a single draw but it will happen every now and then.

It's more common for there to be 1 to 2 double base digits... [ More ]

Reply #650

LANTERN — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 04:56:40 GMT

Random or whatever as it is seen on the stats and numbers of the past draws tells you what is most probable and what is less probable and under which conditions , but nothing is set on stone, there are only the indications.

Reply #649

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 03:32:39 GMT

jimmy

You still don't understand, even if (P) =. 999999999 does not mean it will occure and if (P) = .000000001

does not mean it won't. Probable, ostensible, reasonable, plausible yes but not a law. Lets say that

I have worked out a system which allows me to trap the winning numbers in less than 500 sets 3 out

of 10 drawings on average. The odds of doing this for any one draw are 1 in 1151. I think that you

could ask many that have my software if this can be done and they would re... [ More ]

Reply #648

jimmy4164 — Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:11:33 GMT

RL-RANDOMLOGIC,

You said, Wake UP jimmy!!!!! You are the one in the wrong. You need to ask yourself what Odds really are.

'The ratio of the probability of occurrence of an event to the probability of the event not occurring.'

Learn what is being said here.

I'm trying, really I am. Let's see now, IF we let P represent the probability of the occurrence of an event, traditionally represented as a Real number, 0 = P = 1, THEN, the probability of an event NOT occurring would be (1 - P).... [ More ]

Reply #647

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:37:05 GMT

Jimmy

You should just go away because you don't understand! You think we are unable to do the

math, you think nothing can be done to improve or odds, you think we don't understand

the gamblers fallacy, you think we don't understand your points on fooled by random, you

don't think that we should be able to play self-pics. You think my system of using digits has

no advantage, you think you stoped me from selling my software, You think that you have

proved us all wrong. Wake UP ji... [ More ]

Reply #646

jimmy4164 — Fri, 24 Sep 2010 03:06:07 GMT

RJOh,

We're on a circular path. Unless, and until you come to agree that a system to make you a consistent winner does not exist, you are going to persist in suspecting that either I'm searching here for information to improve MY secret system, or for free winning selections from others' systems. All I can do is keep trying variations on what I've been consistently saying since I started posting here. If the following sounds familiar, it's because it's based on something I wrote in another th... [ More ]

Reply #645

RJOh — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 23:13:08 GMT

Come on RJOh, I was trying to introduce some levity!

I suppose that's your story and you're sticking with it.

Reply #644

adamcustom — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:54:02 GMT

This is RL's thread and not mine, but I have a following suggestion.

Let the people who use the system either with pen and pencil or with software tell abt. their ups and downs. Why not share experiences what seems to work and what not for various formats. What trends or biases, whatever term you prefer, seem to be more favorable for players in the games you play. How you fared in Gmode and how long it has taken you to be able to go real. A the end of the day that's RL's aim to help people do... [ More ]

Reply #643

RedToad — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 04:18:07 GMT

NOW WHO SAYS THAT SYSTEMS DO NOT WORK

Reply #642

RedToad — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 04:16:40 GMT

My system works, Power ball results 10 - 24 - 36 - 52 - 55 Powerball: 15

10 plus PB 15

Reply #641

azares — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 03:11:58 GMT

Is your software still available for download. Three weeks ago the download link longer works. Thanks.

Reply #640

jimmy4164 — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 03:10:39 GMT

RJOh,

Look good? Come on RJOh, I was trying to introduce some levity! No, I don't have a system. My first entry in the Challenge was [1...12] and [1...4]. Some thought I was trying to be sarcastic, so I started entering sets that I assume others accept as Random. Actually, the 1-12 :: 1-4 entry has just as good a chance as any to win the Jackpot!

These are not questions of intelligence; there are psychological issues determining how people perceive the Gambler's Fallacy and patterns in dra... [ More ]

Reply #639

RedToad — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 01:47:27 GMT

WB 10-18-20-21-22-35-43-45-48-49-51-54

PB 15-31-32-35

Reply #638

RJOh — Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:19:25 GMT

PowerBall is not always one of the top games to try and win, tonight all my money is on Ohio Classic Lotto.

Game Annuity Cash Odds

PowerBall $20.0 M $10.8 M 1:195 M

Classic Lotto $9.4 M $4.7 M 1:14 M

Reply #637

RJOh — Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:03:59 GMT

Earlier, I used LotteryPost's Quick Pick Powerball generator to select numbers for tomorrows game as well as MadDog's Challenge. They look pretty good to me!

What criteria are you using to decide what looks good ? Sounds like you too have a system or rules for deciding which numbers have a better chance of winning like the players you've been putting down.

Reply #636

jimmy4164 — Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:58:38 GMT

RedToad: Only About 10 Hours Left!

Welcome To:

Maddogs Powerball Challenge 9/22/2010

Click HERE to ENTER

Jackpot is now: $$ 20 Million $$

WB's up to (12) from 1 to 59

PB's up to ( 4 ) from 1 to 39

Reply #635

Maryland — Wed, 22 Sep 2010 07:33:25 GMT

RL has more than graciously given away his program I'm sure to many people, but yet I see no post cursing him out for a virus they received. Also believe or not, virus software does detect such things. I would give you a list of other members who have also given away software so you could start attacking them but won't waste my time on your trash talk. Man you need a life or go see a therapist.

Reply #634

jimmy4164 — Wed, 22 Sep 2010 04:47:07 GMT

It would NOT be advisable to download and execute a program written by an anonymous poster. Virus protection software will not find anything objectionable in a viral or destructive program if the virus or destructive code is part of the normal execution of the program. Even if the author is not attempting to do harm, he/she could delete all your files accidently through a logical error (BUG) in the code.

Besides, in the instant case, I have clearly explained that I do not believe the results

Reply #633

truecritic — Tue, 21 Sep 2010 20:53:49 GMT

Is your DOS program still available somewhere for download? Perhaps if others (i.e. jimmy) (or me) (or LP et al) can see it and run it, we could form a logical opinion of it

Reply #632

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 21 Sep 2010 20:38:12 GMT

Mr Wrong

What planet are you on, You still don't understand my software as a tool that can be used

to accept sets based on the users input. It is not trained to do anything. I think you need to

lay off the hash pipe. The examples above were for you so you could take the nessecary

actions by making a visit to your local house of representatives and get the ball rolling. I think

if you can get your state to shut down it's lottery that many other states will follow. There you

go g... [ More ]

Reply #631

yogibear — Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:23:22 GMT

jimmy4164,

Now that you finally succeeded, could you please go away. If you have some pudding to contribute and share in this post please do so, but in my view all you contributing is HASH. Please go away. Thank you.

Todd, is there anything you can say to this person, everyone is asking him to leave, he just doesn't get it

Reply #630

jimmy4164 — Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:27:12 GMT

RL-RANDOMLOGIC,

Finally! I succeeded! I succeeded in getting you to proclaim a few lottery truths. A couple of your points are technically arguable, but let's not quibble.

----You said,--------------------

Heres how I see things

1st. The lottery is designed to get people to play knowing full well that most wont win.

2nd. They know that the promise of winning big money will cause people to play to no end.

3rd. They design each game so that so that the only real winner is the... [ More ]

Reply #629

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:33:49 GMT

RJOh

I will take this one if you don't mind, Jimmy If you think you have scuttled my ship then you

are wrong again. I receive even more request for software then before. Many people have

requested software and offered to pay and I tell them that It is not and never will be for sale.

Your complete gross missunderstanding of my software and methods are beyound me. Do I

need to increase the font size for you? Do you even know what a RNG is? RNG stands for

Random Number Genera... [ More ]

Reply #628

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:47:20 GMT

Jimmy

You should change your name to MR Wrong, My system is not a RNG and if you think

it is then you are even more stupid then I had first believed and believe me, I think you

to be very very stupid.

Having said that I don't think I need to explain anything more because I believe you are

unable to understand anything that I would write.

RL

Reply #627

winsumloosesum — Tue, 21 Sep 2010 04:47:36 GMT

Jimmy to bad your really don't know RL.

The answer to your question is that RL truly wants to help people.

Let me say this again so it sinks in. He really, really wants to help people and expects nothing in return.

Reply #626

jimmy4164 — Tue, 21 Sep 2010 02:57:36 GMT

RJOh,

You're evading my point. Why?

I don't need to tell you that RL-RANDOMLOGIC has made countless claims in this thread alone that his Digit System is on the verge of success. In my opinion, he is giving people FALSE HOPE that his program will eventually make them millionaires. When pressed, he denies this. And now, you're denying it. However, there is a trail of evidence in the form of posts all over this site to support my theory that he was very close to the point where he could have... [ More ]

Reply #625

RJOh — Tue, 21 Sep 2010 02:16:00 GMT

--Jimmy4164

P.S. Is there noone reading this (your post) with the knowledge and/or courage to lend some support to what I'm saying?

Jimmy,

What you're saying isn't new, every lottery player has heard those arguments before. It doesn't take any courage to say the chance of any one winning a lottery jackpot is between slim and none when the odds are 1:14,000,000 or worst. Millions of players buy tickets every day and win nothing, so what you're saying is obvious.

Knowing all of the ab... [ More ]

Reply #624

jimmy4164 — Tue, 21 Sep 2010 01:28:33 GMT

RL-RANDOMLOGIC,

You said,

I have not deleted any post I have made. I don't think that it is even possible.

I'm sorry sir, but this statement is just not believable coming from a person who has made 366 Posts since March 13, 2008. I saw the Delete button after my first submit. Besides, the management here defines quite well the 20 minutes you have to delete a post after you submit it. I won't try to paraphrase what you deleted here, as you'll only deny it.

Check here at the Boss's B... [ More ]

Reply #623

jimmy4164 — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:06:45 GMT

RJOh,

Above, winsumloosesum said, referring to RL-RANDOMLOGIC's RNG,

I can tell you from my experience with lottery programs and this includes both paid and free stuff. This DOS program will help someone win a jackpot within the next month.

... and I replied,

Predicting jackpot winners is easy. I predict there will be many Quick-Pick-Playing Jackpot winners across the US over the next month.

I guess I mistakenly assumed everyone would understand that I was telling winsumlooses... [ More ]

Reply #622

RJOh — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:51:58 GMT

Predicting jackpot winners is easy. I predict there will be many Quick-Pick-Playing Jackpot winners across the US over the next month.

What kind of predicting is that? If you prefer to predict jackpot winners rather than numbers, at least name them. It doesn't take any smarts to know somebody will eventually win the jackpots with some numbers and 70-80% of those somebodies will be Quick-Pick players.

Reply #621

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:08:11 GMT

Jimmy

I have not deleted any post I have made. I don't think that it is even possible. As for the split

personality I live by a very simple rule, Lead, Follow or get the hell out of the way. The thing that

gets me the most about you is that you think I don't understand you point of view. Also your con-

tinued reference to Mad Dog's challenge shows that you don't understand mine. The numbers

produced by my system mean nothing to me. Even when I check my tickets I am looking at the... [ More ]

Reply #620

adamcustom — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:13:17 GMT

I thought that for those of you playing RL's system using pen and paper perhaps the following could prove helpful.

If you see for example that in position 3 there were three high digits in a row, meaning in the 3 most recent draws you saw digits : 5, 6 , 8

most probably the digit for that position will be low i.e. 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4 in the next draw.

Adam

Reply #619

RedToad — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:41:28 GMT

I can tell you from my experience with lottery programs and this includes both paid and free stuff. This DOS program will help someone win a jackpot within the next month.

Predicting jackpot winners is easy. I predict there will be many Quick-Pick-Playing Jackpot winners across the US over the next month.

OUT OF CONTEXT. NO ONE IS PREDICTING JACKPOT WINNERS.

IT IS THE PROGRAM THAT WILL PRODUCE A WINNER, a big difference.

Reply #618

RedToad — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:29:47 GMT

Some body has a mental problem on this thread, and it's ain't me

Reply #617

jimmy4164 — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:04:18 GMT

winsumloosesum,

Have you read any of the outrageous, snarling, contemptuous attacks your buddy has dumped on me. The worst one he wisely deleted once he knew I had read it. I don't take kindly to those kind of attacks. I have tried several times to ignore his drivel, but he is unpredictable and appears to have a split personality. Haven't you noticed?

I can tell you from my experience with lottery programs and this includes both paid and free stuff. This DOS program will help someone win... [ More ]

Reply #616

winsumloosesum — Sun, 19 Sep 2010 23:55:40 GMT

Jimmy what is your beef man!! Are you really a devil like your avatar?

Why can't you come over from the dark side and join forces?

Instead of nitpicking everything RL posts here. Why can't you provide anything that is positive?

So what if RL doesn't want to post any predictions in MadDogs thread. What's the big deal?

What if he did post predictions and won, what would your comment be, oh he was just lucky??

I can tell you from my experience with lottery programs and this include... [ More ]

Reply #615

jimmy4164 — Sun, 19 Sep 2010 22:54:33 GMT

RL-RANDOMLOGIC,

It's too bad you can't translate your predictions into MadDog's relatively simple format of [up to] 12 WBs and 4 PBs.

You said: Too bad for you because You never got nothing as usual

Very true.

I missed MO lotto by two settings also last night. Never seen you do anything close to that

My wife knows exactly how you feel; she almost won the PA Big4 last night.

--Jimmy4164

Reply #614

RedToad — Sun, 19 Sep 2010 22:39:16 GMT

i LIKE CHALLENGES I WILL ENTER MADD DOG CHALLENGE.

DO NOT BE SURPRISED IF I HIT 5 NUMBERS.

Reply #613

adamcustom — Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:29:27 GMT

RL,

You really need not prove anything to anybody. Let them all decide if and how they want to play lottery.

I personally believe that it's a good way to play.

Reply #612

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sun, 19 Sep 2010 12:58:40 GMT

To everyone

I also had 4 of 5 white balls in my list.

I think this is a good test because the 12 WB's in mad dogs challenge = 792 sets

I had 808 sets so I only had 16 more sets then the challenge would allow.

The software I used is basic with no other features then what is explained here at the post.

It was the built in one day version. I only use digits No Numbers so I could not post it

in mad dog's challenge. only one other person had 4 of 5.

RL

Reply #611

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sun, 19 Sep 2010 12:27:54 GMT

jimmy did you even look at the post .

I had 9 three's and 72 2's

I missed only TD which was 9 and I played 10 and I blocked digit 9 and it hit.

changing these two settings gave a 5 or 5 with 577 sets.

exact count

1 of 5 =1

2 of 5 = 151

3 of 5 = 53

4 of 5 = 18

5 of 5 = 1

Too bad for you because You never got nothing as usual

I missed MO lotto by two settings also last night. Never seen you do anything close to that

Reply #610

adamcustom — Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:55:01 GMT

RL,

You are more than right saying that 04 should be made Basic Digit as well in 6/49.

Adam

Reply #609

jimmy4164 — Sun, 19 Sep 2010 02:54:36 GMT

RL-RANDOMLOGIC,

I just looked at mad dogs challange. No way I can fit within his restrictions.

Too bad. That's a shame.

--Jimmy4164

Reply #608

adamcustom — Sat, 18 Sep 2010 17:38:02 GMT

RL,

I have to tell you that before I hit upon your thread and ideas when thinking of lottery I was obsessed with the idea of a random number generator producing sequences of 12 numbers ready to wheel in 4 if 6 wheel. Was not sure what filters should be used to give good results, especially that the commission uses the ball drop system.

Adam

Reply #607

adamcustom — Sat, 18 Sep 2010 17:13:32 GMT

RL,

You are more than welcome. Just look at the errors I make all the time. Either writing too fast or thinking too slow.

Adam

Reply #606

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 18 Sep 2010 17:11:14 GMT

Adam

Thanks for the correction I make them all the time and hope most understand what I was

meaning to say

RL

Reply #605

adamcustom — Sat, 18 Sep 2010 17:03:42 GMT

RL,

You meant TD=11 and TD=12, right?

Well, as a matter of fact I mostly focus on 6/49. Funny to say, but I find it easier to play.

Hard to imagine making the sets by hand for this game using your system, that's a fact. I have not even tried it- overwhelming task.

As to payouts for pick-6- :

3 of 6- fixed ar. US 7

4 of 6- ar. US 75- 100

5 of 6 -ar. US. 1500- 1700

One bet for pick-6 costs 1 USD

That's the reason why mostly play 6 combos in a 4 of 6 wheel with 12 numbers... [ More ]

Reply #604

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 18 Sep 2010 16:59:56 GMT

jimmy

I just looked at mad dogs challange. No way I can fit within his restrictions.

I would play 3 base digits where one is allowed to hit or miss within each set

and 4 is a filler that can be used in draws with without all 3 base digits

6-9-0 blocked. 5-7-8 limited to less then 2 hits

I got 808 sets total using only posted filters set using low/hi ranges.

PB = 18 to 24 or 25 to 30 or 31 to 36 = G4, G5 and G6

I have very little confidence in this as I am using my 3-39 logi... [ More ]

Reply #603

Seachelle — Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:53:29 GMT

Rl

I wanted to say thanks for the time, patience, effort and enlightenment. Your examples really help me understand the process of picking the numbers. I still have to get caught up in reading but the more I read the more sense it makes.

again thanks

Seachelle

Reply #602

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:33:10 GMT

Adam

Your 6-49 game is a perfect matrix. You could do good with this system increasing the base digits

to 1-2-3-4. The 5-42 is one of the worst. Any matrix that has the same totals of base digits and

all non-base digit totals except 0 works best. Your 5-42 would be better if it was a 5-44 and

even better as a 5-49. A 5-36 is much harder to win then a 5-39 using this system. Rng's seem

to show better across the board which is a bit of a suprise because when I first started this MO.... [ More ]

Reply #601

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:01:15 GMT

Jimmy

I am starting to like you just a little. You know in a previous post I talked about the trash can,

you might remember. Lets take a little deeper look into the matter at hand. First most of the

system and methods posted here are at least 10 years old. You might ask yourself what I have

been working on since. Even the people whom I have sent my software to which I am in contact

with on a day to day bases have only what is posted here plus a few tools from the same time

fram... [ More ]

Reply #600

adamcustom — Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:14:29 GMT

RL,

I had a look at 5/42 and 6/49 base digit non-ocurrence rate. Of course, do not know how it compares to other games.

Looking in both cases at a range of 52 games the data is following:

5/42- 21 times i.e. 40% of the time at least one base digit missing

6/49 - 10 times i.e. ar. 19% of the time at least one base digit missing

TD= 12 for 6/49 does not seem to be bad as it appeared 16 times in 52 games, that's 30% of the time.

As to ID for 6/49 ID= 6 is predominant with ove... [ More ]

Reply #599

adamcustom — Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:59:19 GMT

RL,

Thanks for you explanations.

I guess it does take some time to grasp the system and be able to use its potential to the full.

As to hitting a jackpot, I think it's kind of a luxury problem. Our old days when we were young will never come back, jackpot or no jackpot. The money won could be put to so many uses, depending on what's important to us.

Btw jackpots here are not that impressive. For instance the max. you can win in pick-5 is ar. US 70,000 as there is no rollover. Only 3... [ More ]

Reply #598

jimmy4164 — Sat, 18 Sep 2010 06:12:16 GMT

RL-RANDOMLOGIC,

Awww...

Especially:

I posted this system hoping it would help someone win a nice amount. I have yet to hear of any big wins but I don't think that if someone did win a jackpot that they would post it here.

I have PB and MM programs and keep them updated but never play them.

Are you sure someone else doesn't have your LP password? I didn't think you liked to post your numbers in advance because somebody else might end up with half of your winnings. Maybe I've ju... [ More ]

Reply #597

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 23:37:20 GMT

Adam

I play a few pick-6 games from time to time. Winning a jackpot of any size can be a life

changing event and I think the main reason I don't play many of the bigger games is that

I like the way things are. No I am not rich, not even close but I have a good life. If I ever

did win a big one I don't think I could get rid of it fast enough but I would really try. I would

fund as many shelters and soop kitchens as I could find, help the homeless that sort of thing.

The wife say... [ More ]

Reply #596

adamcustom — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:57:10 GMT

RL,

It's really impressive! I understand you used bias search for PN, RN and HN or simply looked for minimum filters needed to get there?

We got here traditional ball drop system for all the lotteries played. They are afraid to turn to RNG as people are really distrustful over here. Believe my words what you can see, hear or read in the U.S. cannot be compared to former Soviet bloc countries as far people's attitudes are concerned.

I'm really looking forward to the possibility of learni... [ More ]

Reply #595

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:28:40 GMT

Adam

Not all of the filters need be used. I just ran last nights numbers without OD, BN or MD.

DO=1

DE=1

ID=5

TD=10

PN=1

RN=1

HN=3

I blocked digit #1

set 2-3 to hit at least once

played 4-5-6-7-8-9-0 wild = meaning no restrictions

total sets produced = 44

The set drawn = 23 27 28 35 38 last night

22 23 27 36 39

22 23 27 38 39

22 23 36 38 39

22 27 29 30 39

22 27 30 36 37

22 27 30 37 38

22 29 30 36 39

22 29 30 38 39

22 32 36 37 38

Reply #594

adamcustom — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:35:38 GMT

Now it's mostly me making mistakes on quite a constant basis.

Surely in this sentence : ' In my 6/49 game the average repeat rate of a number from last draw is 0.7, much higher skip than for any other number' the skip is not much higher , but much lower.

Wake up, Adam wake up.

Adam

Reply #593

adamcustom — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:28:50 GMT

RL,

I think that if you are able to set multiple filters and not make serious mistakes in doing so it can cascade into both fewer combos to play and better results.

Being able to predict, on regular basis, which specific numbers will repeat is like voodoo to me, pls forgive me all voodooists. It really seems that predicting how many is easier. In my 6/49 game the average repeat rate of a number from last draw is 0.7, much higher skip than for any other number. Of course, there's no 0.7 num... [ More ]

Reply #592

sacredstone — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:26:18 GMT

Thanks,

I could not any reference in this thread

As to what pn was.

Thanks for the link.

Reply #591

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:07:12 GMT

Adam

I think that the repeating numbers are a simple product of the tumbler or drawing process.

However I do think this can be used to aid in selecting the next set to play. I use to run a

filter called L-six for this very reason. I was unable to select which numbers would repeat

but I did find that I could, many days predict how many. Most all of my filters use this sort

of logic. By using the how many without regard for which only makes since. This by

it's self is of little... [ More ]

Reply #590

adamcustom — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:42:03 GMT

Clipper,

I agree.

If it were so random with no formula, rule or some kind of logic governing it then we would not see that from the numbers showing in last 6 draws we can, on average, expect 3 numbers in the next game.

Adam

Reply #589

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:35:17 GMT

winsum

Good morning, Give me a call if you want.

RL

Reply #588

winsumloosesum — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:30:39 GMT

PN = Prime Numbers

Here is a link to a list keep in mind you are just using the highest PN (Prime Number) in you lottery.

For example, if your lottery is 5/39 the PN would be the following:

2 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 23 29 31 37

http://primes.utm.edu/lists/small/10000.txt

Reply #587

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:12:26 GMT

SS

Prime Numbers

rl

Reply #586

jimjwright — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:40:24 GMT

I believe PN stands for Prime Number so every combo must contain 2 prime numbers.

Jimmy (not to be mistaken for jackass jim or is the joke on me

Reply #585

sacredstone — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 03:51:42 GMT

Can someone tell me what PN stands for in this example? Please and thank you

EXAMPLE #2

DO=1

DE=0

ID=7

TD=10

MD=4

OD=2

BN=3

RN=0

PN=2

HN=4