Spend $150 for $75 profit?

Reply #15

LAVERNE MALONEY — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 01:03:26 GMT

No.

I have guts, I am glad that I do not have what it takes to bet like this

Reply #14

Stack47 — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:34:25 GMT

I was wondering how you did playing that method and actually did some research into finding groups of 600 numbers that consistently averaged four out of five hits.

Currently, I run no more than (450) numbers because this is the absolute maximum for keeping the profit to cost ratio at 1:1.

By reinvesting the winnings twice you can get $7 to $1; not bad for an almost even money bet.

If you'll look around, you'll see where I've tried to introduce this but, it was to no avail and I got m... [ More ]

Reply #13

paurths — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:13:23 GMT

talk the talk,

but walk the walk...

Reply #12

Stack47 — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:47:52 GMT

I never said I know what you're doing and just gave an example of a 60-40 method since you provided zero information on your method.

Reply #11

bigdaddy — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:52:13 GMT

no more than $50 for a $1000 win, $150 is 15 numbers times 10 it better payout at least $2000,which can be done easily...

Reply #10

Lucky Loser — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:45:43 GMT

...I thought my old buddy would have at least responded to me by now. Guess not, though. Oh, well.

L.L.

Reply #9

Lucky Loser — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:39:58 GMT

I certainly agree that it's much better to spend less to make more in profit, okay. But, when playing this game, the player must find a method and combine that with a balancing act of a reasonable set of numbers by which to play that method.

This is a numbers game based on total possibilities to produce a specific hit and the more combinations one can afford to play, the right way within reason, the better. I never said my method is best but, I know that it works...and it's consistent. It als... [ More ]

Reply #8

Jordans121 — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:27:43 GMT

You think you know but you dont.

Reply #7

Jordans121 — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:25:12 GMT

Over the past year I built an excel sheet (no formulas) for IL. The problem was that the system was not consistent enough so I ended up creating it for every state (thanks to LOTSOFTPRO) so when one state does not work another one WILL. In my spreadsheet is MANY ways to analyze numbers from MY perspective. the system is built for players that have small budgets and large budgets ( choose yours). the more you spend the more you will make, vice versa. with my system you can win up to 4 times in a

Reply #6

Jordans121 — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:12:10 GMT

I'm glad some people are interested in learning what they can use. However, for those who do not have the funds to pay for the Top strategy, I have a smaller strategy that should get you enough money to get the Top one.

For the record, I'm no good at creating websites so dont laugh when I finish it just input your info and get what you ordered.

Reply #5

Jordans121 — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:06:14 GMT

Are you attempting to explain the pick 3 to me? thats weird.

Reply #4

Lucky Loser — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:02:00 GMT

I'd like to address the second part of your question directly. Now, even if you're online betting at .25/number, $150 is a fair amount of money to wager. If you don't have that kind of money to lose in case of a mishap, I encourage you NOT TO DO IT. This kind of loss can add up very quickly which ultimately prevents the mass of players from even considering it.

Although it's a lot of numbers to cover even the most finicky of draws, it can still lose...and has. Patience and discipline play the... [ More ]

Reply #3

Lucky Loser — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:59:38 GMT

It's like a sign of the times. I've discussed this method very extensively many times before now....and still use it when I really need it. It works, it produces the profit mentioned, and it will get you ahead very quickly. However, this is considered an upside down profit because it costs you more to win in relation to the payout but, the consistency is very good.

You'll need to win (2) draws to recover your initial investment of $150 and after that, you're actually generating $75 in true pr... [ More ]

Reply #2

Stack47 — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:54:56 GMT

If you're talking about playing online, getting a $900 to $1 payoff, and playing 600 straight pick-3 numbers for a quarter, it's looks like an even bet. The odds are 3 to 2 in your favor and you lay $150 to make $75. However if you play 100 drawings the probable outcome is winning 60 times and 60 X $225 = $13,500 for a loss of $1500. You have to win at least 67 times to show a tiny profit.

if you could do it multiple times in a row?

Since the probability is you'll win 60 times out of 100... [ More ]

Reply #1

paurths — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:17:57 GMT

Hi,

if it is a sure thing, i would not even hesitate to do it. A profit is a profit.

I usually play numbers using progression, meaning that the longer it takes before a number comes in, the lower the profit will be.

But i don't mind, since it is a profit.

For example, these 44 straight numbers are out for 268 draws, they have an average skip of approx. 23 draws.

018, 024, 064, 068, 094, 105, 109, 129, 135, 175, 179, 216, 246, 286, 327, 357, 397, 420, 438, 450, 468, 490, 509, 531,... [ More ]

Spend $150 for $75 profit?

Jordans121 — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 04:27:19 GMT

Would you spend $150 for $75 profit if you could do it multiple times in a row? do you have guts or what it takes to bet like this