<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Three number matches</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/219443</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/219443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Three number matches</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/219443/1761903</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/219443/1761903</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 03:43:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jimmy4164</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I missed this when you first posted it.<br /><br />Are any of the 18,424 three number combinations doing any better than their compatriots?<br /><br />It&#x27;s an interesting run to make, but I&#x27;m thinking you won&#x27;t be able to draw any conclusions<br /><br />until it runs its course. Do you agree? Also, if you do uncover any anomalies it may be very<br /><br />difficult or even impossible to speculate on what caused them. If my questions tell you I<br /><br />misread your description above, please advise.</p>]]></description>
			<category>jimmy4164</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/219443/1752442</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/219443/1752442</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 04:56:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Clipper</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Boy that sure seems like a lot of work to come up with some numbers to play. I only go back 31 games to determine what to play.<br /><br />Think when Lotto started in Texas we had a 6/50 game. Canada 6/49 wouldn&#x27;t be much different then that so I figured the numbers play similar to what they do in the 6/50. If that is the case you can eliminate up to 25 of the numbers each time and sometimes more if you watch what does/does not play from game to game.<br /><br />I know too many people that track that think sinc... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/219443/1752442">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Clipper</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Three number matches</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/219443</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/219443</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:57:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jwhou</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>OK, this is on the Canadian Lotto 6/49 because there&#x27;s a lot of historical data, it goes back to 1982 and for the time being I&#x27;m in Canada rather than Texas.<br /><br />The minimum that you have to match in the 6/49 is three numbers so I took all 2,734 draws and parsed them into the three number combinations from each draw then I have a script running through all 13.98 million combinations scoring them on how many three number matches they would&#x27;ve had, if the combination was one that matched all six n... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/219443">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>jwhou</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

