Does anyone progressively bet pairs??

Reply #51

truecritic — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:56:47 GMT

Reply #50

Jordans121 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:53:08 GMT

Eventually you will get your hands on it trucritic

Reply #49

truecritic — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:51:49 GMT

Besides being excited and posting about winning, what are your plans? Are you going to let us download the Excel file? Are you going to explain how to use it? Are you going to sell it? Are you just going to tease us until Lottery Post is no more

Reply #48

Jordans121 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:46:41 GMT

I didnt make it to explain anything, I was just excited I found a macro that was extremly useful, that all.

Reply #47

truecritic — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:39:42 GMT

@Jordans121

Just spent 3:14 watching a YouTube video that means nothing and has no audio? Is that your Excel sheet that you made up? How do you use it if you didn't create it - is there a better video that actually explains something

Reply #46

Lkydeb*594 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:29:58 GMT

U just proved my point. thank u! It's because he's still a little boy looking for a fight.

Reply #45

truecritic — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:24:11 GMT

I was probably typing when you posted that previous post. If you are not going to give away your system here, then why does it matter when others do give away their systems (good or bad

Reply #44

Jordans121 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:21:05 GMT

No I dont have a system here on LP, did you read the previous post? Click the link below...It is what I use.

Reply #43

truecritic — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:18:49 GMT

Jordan...You have a system posted here at LP?

I've read several posts of yours and haven't seen it. Post a link, I'd like to see it.

Reply #42

Jordans121 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:18:25 GMT

All I have to say is that I hope you are winning.

Reply #41

joker17 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:17:09 GMT

I'm not here to compete with you. I never claimed my system was all that. All I did was to throw ideas around and you come here like some big shot talking crap.

Like I said. Prove to me your wins/losses, or shut the heck up!

You're the one who started this crap, so you'll have to prove there's a better way.

Give me the stats(which you can't because you conveniently don't show your losses), or put a lid on it. It's very simple dude.....

Reply #40

Jordans121 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:10:38 GMT

As I just said, the system does not hit everday, but it hits wayyyy more than yours with more less numbers. Theres always 2nite.

Reply #39

joker17 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:06:26 GMT

Jordans121

United States

Member #69671

January 5, 2009

1391 Posts

OnlinePosted: Today, 11:57 am - IP Logged Reply Favorites

Looking at these....

056,057,058,059,156

167,168,169,257,267

278,279,358,368,378

389,459,469,479,489

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtoWKVfYT6Q

No Matter Which Way U Look at It, I have the Winners $$$

The winner was 215.....I guess your system is short lived HUH

Reply #38

joker17 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:02:25 GMT

If you don't want to prove it, then fine, but I don't want to read your BS crap about being holier than thou.

Either put up, or shut up.

Reply #37

joker17 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:59:47 GMT

Either prove your wins and losses, or just forget the whole thing. You got a boxed right last night in Florida. OK....wow....You missed Florida's Midday today. So that's why I ask to see the wins versus the losses. It's really very simple.

Don't bother. I know what the answer is.

Reply #36

joker17 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:56:57 GMT

Don't you read what I write? I said I'm sure it DOESN'T work everday. I said every state.

Jordans121

United States

Member #69671

January 5, 2009

1390 Posts

OnlinePosted: Today, 12:49 pm - IP Logged Reply Favorites

I have an original Idea that I choose not to give away right now and certainly not for free. My strategic approach works in every state. I'm making money, thats what counts. If you had played my numbers last night you would have won too.

http://www.youtube.com... [ More ]

Reply #35

Jordans121 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:50:35 GMT

Wait...Wait... you are putting words in my mouth once again, I never said it works everyday. Why do you resort to lying?

Who are you for me to show win loss ratio? C'mon, Im threw wit dis convo cause you are still lying.

Reply #34

joker17 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:45:19 GMT

I explained in the other thread. Look, just prove me wrong and I'll appologize. You haven't yet proved your wins exceed your expenditures.

You're the one who said it works in every state, but I'm sure it doesn't work everyday, so there must be some losses, and I'd like to see the wins/loss ratios. But you don't want to show that right

Reply #33

Jordans121 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:41:05 GMT

Why are you blatantly lying on me? I dont post in every state. I posted in Florida yesterday and hit. thats it. Why lie Joker17

Reply #32

joker17 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:36:18 GMT

C, I told you folks it would be one of those excuses I posted.

Doubters? You should talk of all people.

Watch as I predict for tonight in ever state. When a get a win or two, I'll post it here tomorrow to prove my system works.

DUH

Reply #31

Lkydeb*594 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:35:13 GMT

Then why r u whining? There is nothing more to say, u just

proved a point. Have a nice day

Reply #30

Jordans121 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:28:01 GMT

C, this is why only certain people will get my system. All these doubters and non believers.

Reply #29

joker17 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:25:10 GMT

I don't mind criticism. I think it's a healthy approach If it's done with good intentions. but If someone who can't figure a better way to do it, or claims they do but can't prove it because of silly excuses, then I think they should clam up.

I'll be the first in line to eat my hat. I'm not one who's too proud to admit I was wrong. I really wish someone would come along and prove me wrong, but all we get is a few gun slingers who like to toot their horn and without backing it up. It gets frus... [ More ]

Reply #28

Jordans121 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:24:24 GMT

It doesnt matter what you think Lkydeb*594 --- . Im winning and you are not.

Reply #27

Lkydeb*594 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:19:29 GMT

Joker, u r right, don't waste your time on him. He's a sorry looooooooooser. He is all negative has no positive effect on anyone. He is a very disrepectful YOUNG man.

Jordans121

Reply #26

joker17 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:00:44 GMT

You probably already know all about the universe that there is to know. Why bother? You're already a genius.

Reply #25

Jordans121 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 16:53:01 GMT

Really, what does Light years have to do with winning? you are wayy out of focus.

Reply #24

joker17 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 16:50:22 GMT

I can understand how it could baffle you. Sorry, I'll try to stick with using simpler analogies. OK, Johhny has 3 apples and Jane has 12 apples.......

Reply #23

Jordans121 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 16:39:59 GMT

WOW. You've sunken to a new low. Galaxies, Clusters, blah-blah. The Universe

Reply #22

joker17 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 16:37:17 GMT

Yes, even if the same number is repeated. You have to remember that all cycles are not made in the same factory. Some have longer ones and some have shorter ones. And some are just as chaotic as the individual numbers themselves. But they all have to obey some given rule, and just because it's not always right in front of our eyes, doesn't mean they don't exist.

1-2-3-4-5-6 will eventually come out as long as the lottery exists long enought to allow it to show. It will also show again somewhe... [ More ]

Reply #21

Jordans121 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 16:09:56 GMT

Ok. I will give you the first statement. But as far as the second, I oppose your philosophy completely. You could say the same thing about the entire number. lets say 152 came out last week, if that same number is drawn 3 months later is that a cycle? hmmmm

Reply #20

joker17 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:59:00 GMT

I disagree. Every single system I ever used or came up with has cycles. You keep saying short lived. Short lived to me means the end.

I can guarantee you that the p-3 indicator system will return to it's cycle of hits. I even warned people to back off once they get a lot of hits in their state, in a short amount of time. Florida was doing that very same thing, and that's when I made the warning.

What part don't you get

Reply #19

bigdsing — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:56:33 GMT

Thank you Jordans121....I am not joining the debate here....I just won on 3 days using a tweaked version of Jokers FPI.

The Great thing about Lottery Post is that someone always posts new/adjusted methods to getting a hit.. . If it works that is

Fantastic. If it does not ,it's like a computer pick...Life goes on... My Hopes are always High in every area of my life... I NEVER play

thinking I am not going to win. I would not use this method daily and Joker was kind enough to point that ou... [ More ]

Reply #18

Jordans121 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:48:21 GMT

I never said I didnt see cycles, therefore you confirmeed my point that THEY ARE SHORT LIVED. Furthermore that is not a system its only a strategic approach.

Reply #17

joker17 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:40:21 GMT

I don't think anyone thinks systems work all the time. That's a given. Unless someone just started playing the lottery for the very first time, they'd already know this.

You've studied numbers for 2 years and never saw cycles? hmmmmm

It's nice to spark up conversation, but what do you want us to write about? You want me to sit here and write all day long about how futile it is to play the p-3, or any other game?....Should I go and sit in a corner of a dark room and cry? I thought the whole... [ More ]

Reply #16

Jordans121 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:06:48 GMT

C'mon Joker17, I'm just being honest. I am not saying things that I just happen to think of

one day, my stance comes from a two year history of actually studying the game. I'm sure

everyone knows that there is no system that works all the time but many systems are

short-lived or temporary if you want phrase it that way, either way the player will lose

over time due to randomness so it may work right now and thats good but it would

be unrealistic to think that it will continuously... [ More ]

Reply #15

joker17 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:49:48 GMT

I think you're confusing shortlived with temporary. There is no system that produces hits every single time it's used. But they do have cycles that can be taken advantage of.

Until YOU can come up with one that works ALL the time, I see no reason to go around the threads and warn people about how their system is useless, or not to get their hopes up.

Some systems work better than others, and some work better in some states than others.

What are you, a systems police

Reply #14

eddessaknight — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 07:46:10 GMT

Gents Lasies -

So what is the ROI prognosis here?

Short for 'Return On Investment' in percentage (%). The ROI is useful for identifying unique stats about a player actual performance.

This is a very useful stat tool to know as it shows in percentage terms how much profit or loss has been made. The stat can be used to show good and bad conditions. A positive ROI is good and a negative ROI is bad. The formula: ROI% = total profit / total staked * 100.

Example: if a series of 55 bets... [ More ]

Reply #13

Jordans121 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 06:34:45 GMT

Im happy that you have been winning but I must say that this is another method that is short lived so dont get your hopes too high.

Reply #12

bigdsing — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 06:24:34 GMT

Hello EddessaKnight,

I like your posts by the way...

I have not tracked or put any work into it, beyound trying a hunch after viewing Jokers thread on FPI. This was

just 3 days where the method worked and I was lucky and thankful....

Reply #11

bigdsing — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 06:05:56 GMT

Your welcome radoo9 !

Win Big

Reply #10

radoo9 — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:06:20 GMT

thanks for sharing bigdsing, glad that you have been succesful with pairs.

Reply #9

eddessaknight — Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:22:03 GMT

Looks like a positive ROI; what would you say your running average Return On Investment is???

Stay lucky,

EddessaKnight

Reply #8

joker17 — Fri, 24 Sep 2010 03:14:32 GMT

Nice....

Well Done!

Just remember...Just like here in Florida, we a had a run of wins almost back to back, and i warned to back off, and it became a reality, when only a hit or two surfaced shortly thereafter.

Great analyzation.

Reply #7

bigdsing — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 20:17:51 GMT

Perhaps this will help you......In the last 2 weeks I have made a profit using pairs only. My state has the front pair back pair plays.

I used Jokers system of first postion indicators and back tested for the last year .. I found in my state that 4 brings

9. 2 brings 7 and 5 brings 0. So i played front pair based on that infomation.( These numbers appeared more often in my State).

For example, we had 0-8-4 . Based on Jokers sytem I knew 5 (mirror) follows 0. I played 50,51,52,53,54,55,5... [ More ]

Reply #6

eddessaknight — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:48:42 GMT

Well Jordan et al that's the trick, isn't it, first overcome the negative odds expectaion-

For those inclined towards using progressions, you may find a suitable one in THE FUTURE GAMBLER by Craig Greiner who provides modern progressions for all forms of speculation including stock market trading.

Now, all that's left is, how to overcome the odds with conventional math, do tha with a adequet bank roll most rationally applied power progressions will work!

Hope, all Goodinclined, find thi... [ More ]

Reply #5

radoo9 — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:05:33 GMT

Thanks i do have a pair making system im working on, that seems ok. its hard to have a full time job and work on it at the same time. I can only do peices of it at a time. Next step is to track how many draws out these pairs come in. I can take one draw and make 9 pairs and usually get 2-5 pairs that hit from the 9 pairs. still working on it though.

Reply #4

Jordans121 — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 05:32:37 GMT

No there is bo way to progressively bet pairs for a profit over the long run unless you have a very good pairs system

Reply #3

joker17 — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 05:15:03 GMT

Actually, pairs may be part of the answer to more wins. It's been sitting under my nose for many years, but only after I see them differently, can I be amazed. It was right under my nose the whole 22 years...

Glad you brought up the subject...thanx..

Reply #2

radoo9 — Tue, 21 Sep 2010 05:14:03 GMT

Ok Mr know it all. Thanks

Reply #1

RJOh — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:57:05 GMT

Does anyone have a good progressive strategy for betting pairs?

That's like asking Does anyone have a good progressive strategy for losing money

Does anyone progressively bet pairs??

radoo9 — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:00:08 GMT

i figured if i progressively bet pairs, after a while i would lose money, if i continued to raise my money each time. maybe i figured it out wrong. Does anyone have a good progressive strategy for betting pairs? thanks