How are ball drawings better than computer drawings?

Reply #25

Dawn32 — Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:35:14 GMT

I am going to play 829 the last 2 weeks of the year to try that out. At a quick glance looking at the Daily 3 winning numbers history, there is a pattern there but I am not good at figuring out patterns.

I noticed this though: on 8/31 222 came out, then 2 days later, on 9/2 444 came out. LOL. Weird.

Reply #24

Mark Haigh — Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:59:23 GMT

Certain patterns do emerge in the lottery over time:

They do, but that doesn't mean they are useful for predicting what comes next.

Reply #23

Hermanus104 — Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:39:03 GMT

Certain patterns do emerge in the lottery over time:

- In Georgia, 444 had seven CONSECUTIVE April wins between 2000 and 2010. (Less impressive: the FIRST FOUR TIMES that 953 won in Washington State were in April).

- In Georgia, 8 of the 11 times that 122 has come up has been on Mondays (as of 26 July 2010).

- Kansas drew 509 for THREE CONSECUTIVE DRAWINGS in December 2005.

- In Minnesota, 4 of the 5 times that 103 has won have been on Sundays. Similarly, the first six times that 10... [ More ]

Reply #22

Hermanus104 — Fri, 22 Oct 2010 02:59:09 GMT

Texas puts their pre-draw results up. I would love to see other states do this, just to see if one of my favorite numbers popped up in one of them more than anything else. It would also be interesting to see if certain combinations come up more frequently with certain ball sets and certain machine sets.

I like ball drawings more than computer drawings because they are more fun to watch. I like watching ping-pong balls go up and down in the machines. I remember when DC switched from balls to c... [ More ]

Reply #21

Todd — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:07:38 GMT

Reply #20

joker17 — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 02:40:24 GMT

An Iraqi station has a similar show. It's called Spongebob square turban.....

Reply #19

joker17 — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 02:38:48 GMT

I'll make the same response I did to a member who PMd me desperately for a winning system. I told the person that I was on the same boat. I have no magic bullet. I throw ideas around. That's all I do. I hope to someday, hoepfully very soon, to inter-twine many systems and make a better judgment call on numbers. That's the best I can do.

If anyone has something to blow me away, they sure are taking steps to keep it waya from me...lol

Reply #18

joker17 — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 02:35:09 GMT

Well then it's labeled wrong....lol

It should read Patterness.....lol

Reply #17

danyo1332 — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 02:21:18 GMT

When you told me you plan on making a lving off pick 3..how are you going to do this if completely random? And what about all your systems? If the drawings are random then how do these work some of the time? I'm not startin an argument with ya Joker i love readin your posts and systems (thats why I always asked you questions lol) I'm just confused a lil with what your response was

Reply #16

jimmy4164 — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 02:20:42 GMT

joker17,

Randomness has patterns.

Isn't that an oxymoron, of sorts?

--Jimmy4164

Reply #15

jarasan — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 02:17:05 GMT

Balls are best

Reply #14

joker17 — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 02:08:28 GMT

I haven't done any analysis on either but I'm sure they're good.

Randomness has patterns. It's possible.

Reply #13

danyo1332 — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 01:58:43 GMT

I would say BlackApple hits a VERY high percentage of the time when he posts, and luckys number hit quite often also. Joker you told me before you want to eventually make a living off of pick 3. How is this possible is the drawings are completely random

Reply #12

joker17 — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 01:56:34 GMT

Which members

Reply #11

joker17 — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 01:53:14 GMT

I agree, If they aren't rigging anything let's see the results of the pretests, tube rotations, and machine set rotations. If they have nothing to hide then................

Reply #10

danyo1332 — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 01:49:37 GMT

So you agree? lol..I'm going to look for this for ohio's draws tomorrow..

Reply #9

MzDuffleBaglady — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 01:44:50 GMT

Where to Check Your Lottery Numbers:

Watch the Illinois drawing, and tell me if you see the ball pop from the bottom to the top, or if they just show the ball at the top, watch your t.v. screen change from showing the actual machine, and the balls moving, to just showing that actual winning ball, at the top.

Illinois lottery:

Tune into WGN-TV or WBBM (Radio 780 AM) for the following games and times: Powerball: Wednesdays and Saturdays at 9:59 p.m. Mega Millions: Tuesdays and

Reply #8

danyo1332 — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 01:40:48 GMT

So how do some of these members predict numbers a good amount of the time? And I did a backtest for triples and found out a certain set of series come RIGHT before a triple comes..

Reply #7

Mark Haigh — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 01:30:03 GMT

What would be the point of rigging a draw? Lottery companies make plenty of money from fair random draws, there's no need to rig anything.

Reply #6

joker17 — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 01:27:49 GMT

No, they're random, I just wanna see the results of the pretests, the tube rotation placements, and the machine set placements.

Reply #5

danyo1332 — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 01:11:35 GMT

So you agree then joker? Ball drawings really ARENT random!? I believe theyre not and that theyre rigged! Systems can prove this IMO.

Reply #4

joker17 — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:55:56 GMT

Computer draws may have their transparency problems, but balls have thier own too. The officials pretest multiple times before the draw without revealing the results. They also have a rotation process pertaining to the tubes, which they never disclose either. Not to mention the rotation cycle of the 3 sets of machines...... All under the guise of ensuring a proprely working machine, and the other excuse is to make sure no tampering was done overnight.

I got a bridge to sell these officials. R... [ More ]

Reply #3

danyo1332 — Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:55:51 GMT

Just look at the vtracs. For ball drawings a double vtrac ex: 332 will usually repeat or come as 223..with computer drawings it doesnt. Also with ball drawings I found numbers that come before a triple hits..doesnt work with computerized drawings.

Reply #2

Mark Haigh — Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:46:00 GMT

I thought people didn't like computer draws because they thought they were less transparent and therefore more open to abuse. Whereas a ball based draw you can see what's going on so it's more reassuring. Personally I think both methods are random, and scrutinised and audited sufficiently to ensure they stay that way.

Reply #1

RJOh — Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:39:55 GMT

Its obvious that its easier to win ball drawings than computer drawinggs..

The odds of winning either way are the same so you much see something that others are missing, what is it

How are ball drawings better than computer drawings?

danyo1332 — Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:31:17 GMT

Its obvious that its easier to win ball drawings than computer drawinggs..but how does it work?!On tv it looks random when really I dont think it is