Serial Lottery Winner

Reply #20

B$Rizzle — Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:44:59 GMT

Very true, however if a game has 20 top prize winners and there are (for example) 16 top prizes remaining, Id think it would be safe to say that most of those are still un-bought. I also slowed down on the scratch-offs quite a bit. I started putting the scratch-off money into the number games instead.

Reply #19

B$Rizzle — Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:42:01 GMT

Its all SQL based

Reply #18

Mr-Smith — Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:12:14 GMT

Well, I look at Richards book as an interesting read only. I have looked at reviews of the book and its all the same, spend a lot and reinvest.

a method or strategy means a constant way of doing a procedure that gives you the same out put, but as you see it took him 17 years to win big 7 times.

If i was 18 then maybe it for you, but hell im almost 40 and dont have the time wait that long for a win...

But since he did win that would be my only reason to buy the book, it would be a l... [ More ]

Reply #17

Daveyl — Mon, 01 Nov 2010 03:21:57 GMT

B$Rizzle, someone made a point about the lottery headquarters informing players (scratch off, that is) that all of the jackpot winning tickets were purchased for a particular game. They countered by claiming people don't cash their tickets right away, so they don't have an accurate means to determine if all the biggies are cashed. I stopped buying scratch offs last month. It's like you say; they're pratty random.

Reply #16

Goalisamillion — Mon, 01 Nov 2010 01:39:53 GMT

Just like with anything pertaining to gambling the more you money risk increases your chances of WINNING big. Of course the reverse of this way of gambling is the more you risk also means if you dont win the more you lose! I have been around a lot of gamblers who dont hold back when it comes to spending and betting some serious cash! They all say the same thing, if you dont spend big you wont hit big ! In this case this guy went from a leaking roof and some unpaid medical bills to a lottery winn... [ More ]

Reply #15

tiggs95 — Mon, 01 Nov 2010 01:11:59 GMT

markp1950 you said the magic word...LUCK..That's it...Good LUCK..

Reply #14

markp1950 — Sun, 31 Oct 2010 23:40:47 GMT

I used to subscribe to the theory that once there was a winner, that they used up their luck. Yet there are many places that have multiple winners. So I will often go back to a big winner store, though I will give it a little break.....

MarkP

Reply #13

rdgrnr — Sat, 30 Oct 2010 03:54:50 GMT

Good one.

Reply #12

Longarm — Sat, 30 Oct 2010 03:19:58 GMT

I think he uses a coin. He might use one of those plastic tokens some lottery retailers give away.

Reply #11

basil19 — Sat, 30 Oct 2010 03:09:13 GMT

Everything you need to win is on LP, it is right in your face.

Reply #10

tiggs95 — Sat, 30 Oct 2010 02:37:37 GMT

HAHAHAHAHA...If you believe in a scratchoff method then you would probably believe ridge runner,he's the one who's always on here drunk...He's easy to spot he has a big red nose...

Reply #9

rdgrnr — Sat, 30 Oct 2010 02:15:30 GMT

There's a guy here that will be glad to hear that there's another geek on board.

He's one too.

Not a computer geek though, he's the old fashioned kind.

He's what you call a pencil-necked geek.

tiggs is the name.

Reply #8

Mr-Smith — Sat, 30 Oct 2010 01:43:27 GMT

Would that be excel, sql, perl. or php?

And yes im a geek... lol.

Reply #7

B$Rizzle — Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:32:47 GMT

Danyo, in a nutshell, I built a computer program that analyzes past draws. My program essentially give me the most probable sets that will pop up.

Of course, most people will claim the past drawings will have little to do with future drawings BUT, I have my own thoughts on that. My program has worked out pretty decent for me.

It would take way too long to explain exactly how it works, and honestly Ive spent soo many hours on it I won't go into great detail. I also keep an eye out for... [ More ]

Reply #6

B$Rizzle — Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:28:23 GMT

The only method for scratch-offs is the keep a close eye on which tickets have the most top prizes remaining. Also I personally would not buy games that just had a big winner. I especially don't buy the games from the same store that a big winner was just purchased at. For example, if a person wins $1 Million (Top Prize) on the XYZ scratchoff at Grocery King. The chances of another big winner on that same game popping up at Grocery King is very very slim.

Scratch-offs are soooo random yo... [ More ]

Reply #5

danyo1332 — Sat, 23 Oct 2010 17:12:44 GMT

Anyone know his scratch off method

Reply #4

Nino224 — Sat, 23 Oct 2010 05:49:58 GMT

So far two people on LP have bought the book, and don't seem too impressed.

Reply #3

danyo1332 — Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:08:14 GMT

Care to share your method

Reply #2

B$Rizzle — Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:37:02 GMT

I am also interested in hearing what some of his Methods are (besides just playing alot of $$ and analysing past draws).

Anyone care to share?

I use my own method that I created, and for the amount that I play daily, I consider it to be quite effective. Of course If I had $50-$100 per drawing it would be ALOT more effective and that is what I am thinking Richard Lustig does. All it takes is one big win, to bank roll yourself have better chances at winning multiple times.

I am assum... [ More ]

Reply #1

Raven62 — Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:13:29 GMT

https://www.lotterypost.com/news/222312/1818891

Serial Lottery Winner

Nino224 — Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:19:54 GMT

Richard Lustig was in the news this week. He's the Orlando man who's won seven grand prizes plus hundreds of thousands in minor prizes. He makes clear he can't guarantee a win, but promises a way to win more often in his new book, which he's selling for $40.

Has anybody tried it