So 1-2-3-4-5 has never came up in a lottery draw?

Reply #6

Boney526 — Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:49:09 GMT

Same for NJ. Lucky, I don't live far from Philly, and my friends and I are thinking about forming a small syndicate. The odds on this game aren't bad, so that's what I wanna play...

Reply #5

sully16 — Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:26:41 GMT

I've played it a few times myself, never got anything, I like to mix it up now.

Reply #4

Guru101 — Thu, 10 Feb 2011 05:34:36 GMT

Holy crap. I wish Indiana had that game.

Reply #3

savagegoose — Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:52:14 GMT

wow ive never seen a 1 2 3 4 5 6 come out, thats the closest and wow, 50+ winners. its still more than the people who didnt play 1 2 3 4 5 won , but yeah i think ill skip that sequence

Reply #2

time*treat — Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:19:50 GMT

From Dough! to Doh

Reply #1

ameriken — Wed, 09 Feb 2011 06:08:01 GMT

That's one of the worst combinations to play...not because it has any less chance than any other number, but because (according to Gail Howard) it's one of the most played combinations. If you play those numbers in any lotto, you can rest assured that you'll be splitting it with lots of other people, just like these folks did.

That must really suck...seeing your numbers come up and thinking you've won $60,000 and then have to split it with 48 other people.

So 1-2-3-4-5 has never came up in a lottery draw?

Boney526 — Wed, 09 Feb 2011 04:28:14 GMT

Perhaps not a ball draw game, but Pennsylvania's Treasure hunt did come up with this combination of numbers in December. I was scrolling through the numbers to see if a certain wheel would be viable in that game because of the better odds - and came across this...

http://www.palottery.state.pa.us/payout.aspx?id=436 drawId=37293

49 people split the jacpot, each recieving 1266 dollars.