<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Gap Strategy - Revised Play Worksheet, Part 1</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/230018</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/230018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Gap Strategy - Revised Play Worksheet, Part 1</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Gap Strategy - Revised Play Worksheet, Part 1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/230018</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/230018</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:35:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bobby623</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/229461<br /><br />Gap Strategy - Revised play worksheet procedures, Part 1<br /><br />Two members of the Gap Strategy team raised some questions regarding the manner<br /><br />in which the data streams are used to choose numbers to play.<br /><br />To make a long story short, an investigation revealed the questions<br /><br />had merit and that the selection method needed to be changed.<br /><br />Two Texas Pick 3 players did some back testing and said that two of their losses would<br /><br />have been winners ha... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/230018">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>bobby623</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

