<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>The odds say 1:397...so you</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/231652</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/231652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: The odds say 1:397...so you</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/231652/2065733</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/231652/2065733</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 15:48:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ohhhnoomrbill</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I don&#x27;t know James ....from the posts here....79% (a percentage out of the air), seems to come up short on the payoffs! The same principle could apply to 3-different rolls---with overall better results. Still a random gamble...</p>]]></description>
			<category>ohhhnoomrbill</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/231652/2064838</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/231652/2064838</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 19:51:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>B$Rizzle</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Very true indeed James. But in hindsight, buying a roll you WILL buy some losers.</p>]]></description>
			<category>B$Rizzle</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/231652/2063837</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/231652/2063837</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 23:45:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>James1</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think the opposite, you are guaranteed multiple winners on a roll. you can go to the store and buy 10 straight of any game and they could all lose.</p>]]></description>
			<category>James1</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/231652/2063103</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/231652/2063103</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 13:59:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>B$Rizzle</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Nah actually I never buy rolls. I know plenty of people who have over the years. I stick to instinct and buy 1-2 here and there. Ive always thought of it like this: If you buy a roll, you know you are gauranteed some losers (if not most) on that roll. If I pick and choose 1-2 here and there off instint, I know I exclude the feeling that some of them are gauranteed losers. To me, buying 1-2 means that they could both be winners or losers, but doesnt garauntee them losers right off the bat.</p>]]></description>
			<category>B$Rizzle</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/231652/2063089</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/231652/2063089</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 13:30:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ohhhnoomrbill</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>You must be a real-shooter to buy a rolls-at-a-time; I haven t been that gutsy yet. Still kind of a hit and run player here. So if I run across a string of 12 losers---I go back to betting on the ponies. I wish I could get a handle on a simple system for finding the winners, but it still eludes me. I get frustrated to find all the bigger winners in the states bigger cities the lottery states simply more sales----then more winners to a given area. Questionable----but partly logical. Seemly random... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/231652/2063089">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>ohhhnoomrbill</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/231652/2062826</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/231652/2062826</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 03:41:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>B$Rizzle</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>That is a very very common misconception about lottery odds. Many people think that since the odds are example 1 in 4, that if they buy 4 tickets they WILL have a winner. That is completely untrue. I have seen rolls with 10-12 losers in a row, however there could also be 4 winners in a row later on in that roll. Also there could be some rolls of 30 tickets that only have 4 winners total. Then there could be another hot roll that has 15 winners.<br /><br />The odds posted are total odds for the enti... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/231652/2062826">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>B$Rizzle</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The odds say 1:397...so you</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/231652</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/231652</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 15:55:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ohhhnoomrbill</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>So you buy #4 tickets and get a winner right? Not! The odds appear as pecentages....so a $100.00 winner can cause 5--7 losers in a row! Hit a winner walk away. trouble is the last guy may have done the same thing----so typically buy two tickets and you&#x27;ll up yer odds. Anyone else feel this way</p>]]></description>
			<category>ohhhnoomrbill</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

