Best Mahematics Course for Successful Lotto Predictions?

Reply #20

dr san — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:27:14 GMT

Hello, most games, is a combination of chance and calcuculo. Podemosusar mathematics and statistics to some extent, but there is luck, such a game 46 / 6

You can mathematically predict number four the other two are random, so there will always be a flaw in the construction of mathematical models, the game has the physical part and random synchronicity

Reply #19

redhot7 — Tue, 28 Jun 2011 03:51:54 GMT

I think playing lottery would give you a good motivation to learn Math, no matter which branch of Math would be applicable. And even though it is not directly applicable, it is still good to learn Math.

Knowledge is power

Reply #18

Number19King — Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:50:25 GMT

I can assure you math is applied to lottery,but the last ball or 2 is by chance. By using applications of math as a combination the probability you will hit are increased. for ex. you 2 hot number in pick 3 are 30X...x= the chance,but the chance is more likely to be what has been hanging around 3 or 0. A perfect example is if you hang out with a group of 5 people which who are you likely to be seen with regardless of the combination. You will notice that two or three may tend to hang more often,... [ More ]

Reply #17

mrbg — Sun, 19 Jun 2011 20:54:04 GMT

Reply #16

JosephusMinimus — Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:09:51 GMT

Proven success? The most financially successful lottery players are those who are able to balance their checkbooks and weigh the advisability of the various spending options. A course in checkbook balancing, along with some predictive ability concerning the blanks after the last entry that should read, groceries , rent , car payment , roses for the little woman would be helpful.

Reply #15

lotterybraker — Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:53:34 GMT

WIND...I can answer a couple of these for sure...

THE BEST ODDS.. is any 3 digit number..there are more..which means they will show more

then the next ones will be DOUBLES..there are 90 of them box..and I never really liked that DOUBLES RATIO ...120 6 way combos to 90 boxed doubles...that is not REALLY A HUGE DIFFERENCE in amount of combos..BUT DOUBLES SURE SEEM to run much slower than the 3 different digit combos for sure...and since I am a betting MAN hahaha..I would say since the payout... [ More ]

Reply #14

WIN D — Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:35:51 GMT

I see what your saying about it not being simple math........as far as finding a new formula for random events.

After many years of looking ...and over heating my brain on several occasions .......my conclusion is that it's way above my pay scale.

What I see out there now is this.......

There are no perfect circles in the universe...

Random is normal and our idea of standard is well .....the real random.

.... and most seekers out there have skipped several steps on t... [ More ]

Reply #13

JKING — Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:49:28 GMT

From my perspective, trying to discover the new formula(s) for random math has been anything but simple math.

You are probably right though, it has taken the fun out of being a gambler. On the flip side, it has created the fun of being a puzzle solver with a mathematical twist. *S*

In that way, the journey has it own rewards on the way to achieving the goal.

If you look at my other thread, The End Game , you will hopefully see the seeds of multidimensional distribution analysis that

Reply #12

WIN D — Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:51:11 GMT

Let the data create equations .......rather than beating equations to death.

I like the simple truth in that sentence.....I think it says....... it's not going with a higher math ....it's really going back.

It's going back to Simple Math.

We already have the answers to our questions about the bad odds in Lottery by just using simple math. We just refuse to accept it. LOL

The trouble with that reality is...... it takes all the fun out of being a stubborn gambler.... [ More ]

Reply #11

time*treat — Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:03:54 GMT

That's how calculus came to be.

Reply #10

JKING — Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:38:50 GMT

Maybe the proper math hasn'nt been created yet!!!! If so, you would have to let the data create equations rather than beating inadequate equations to death.

Reply #9

Jomacinrow — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:45:08 GMT

I guess the general consenus is Probabliity and Statisics is where it's at when considered for useful application of the lottery process. Only reasons I asked this was I am taking Calculas I and/or Elem. Stats this fall in college, and was wondering if any advanced study of Math would do me any good for my Lottery hobby. Thanks for replies.

Reply #8

GASMETERGUY — Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:06:21 GMT

I could be wrong (and according to my wife, I am) but math is too rigid to be applied to a random process.

There is an area of math known as collapsing the wave function . But this only works AFTER the results are known; not before.

Reply #7

jimjwright — Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:05:52 GMT

The ellipse is your friend when trying to use math to predict future drawings.

Jimmy

Reply #6

RJOh — Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:04:30 GMT

If you need their cooperation then it doesn't matter how you come up with your prediction. I was thinking maybe you had backward engineered something.

Reply #5

Raven62 — Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:54:51 GMT

Yes! They need to coopperate: By Drawing the Numbers Predicted

Reply #4

time*treat — Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:43:36 GMT

If you think you've exausted everything that probability and stats can do for you, take a break consider a little reading on chaos theory.

Reply #3

RJOh — Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:16:51 GMT

Do you have a differential equation to predict tonight's PowerBall winning numbers

Reply #2

Raven62 — Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:06:37 GMT

Differential Equations

Reply #1

RJOh — Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:31:00 GMT

You should seek out the advice of some one who's had some success at lottery predictions.

Best Mahematics Course for Successful Lotto Predictions?

Jomacinrow — Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:14:26 GMT

It may be me but I feel Probability and Statistics the most useful, but are there better or higher level of mathematics better proven for lotto predictin success? Or, is it not even possible to relate math to lotto predicting? Is any higher level of math such as Calculus III useful with lotto predicting than Basic Probability/Statistics??

Thoughts