Worst system Ever

Reply #43

Lotterologist — Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:35:01 GMT

Most times, they would

Reply #42

Lotterologist — Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:34:30 GMT

No problem, rdgrnr.

The only thing I know about you is that you're funny.

I don't know about your history with Joker or anything else about you, though.

Being a veteran of the military, i've been around a lot of men and can tell when they're joking.

Sometimes guys get their laughs by pushing other mens buttons, but unfortunately, not everyone can take a joke.

Reply #41

Lotterologist — Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:18:38 GMT

As the great physicist, Niels Bohr, once said, Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future.

That said, almost ANY SYSTEM is extremely horrible at producing next draw hits.

Just close your eyes and pick a system.

Good luck

Reply #40

Jordans121 — Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:30:17 GMT

Thanks for the advice but that is off topic. I already have my own systems and they work for me.

Reply #39

cobalt179 — Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:27:32 GMT

Hey,

No disrepect intended. I understand what he is wanting to do. Problem with that is that, AS THEY SAY, THE NUMBERS ARE RANDOM . Meaning, that each number has the same odds of winning. Unless the numbers are generated by a computer. If that is the case, the computer knows one thing for sure, Which Numbers Are Being Played For A Particular Game . It might be a random game, yet the master computer, knows for sure.

As an IDEA ONLY , he might want to try a different approach. This appr... [ More ]

Reply #38

Jordans121 — Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:04:57 GMT

Read b4 commenting.

Reply #37

haymaker — Sun, 17 Jul 2011 23:30:44 GMT

did you read all the posts ? he wanted to use it in a reverse manner to exclude bad nos.kinda of a reverse psycollogy if you will.

Reply #36

cobalt179 — Sun, 17 Jul 2011 23:19:54 GMT

Jordan121,

Why, would anyone want a system that is extremely horrible at producing next draw hits? I thought the idea was to win, not lose. Maybe you are just frustrated with your system of picking numbers. If that is the case, start a new system of picking numbers.

w

Reply #35

rdgrnr — Sat, 16 Jul 2011 19:26:19 GMT

He was only joking. Being that you are the joker you should know that!

Thank you, Lotterologist.

Actually, I was just trying to pay him a compliment. No one would know more about what doesn't work than him.

I just caught him in a bad mood I guess. I still think the world of him though.

Reply #34

grwurston — Fri, 15 Jul 2011 23:30:43 GMT

You could use the sums and root sums also. And use mid and eve based on the colors of the board. It would even work for the jackpot games. There are endless possibilities. Good Luck, I guess

Reply #33

grwurston — Fri, 15 Jul 2011 23:22:43 GMT

Well you could close your eyes and throw darts at a dart board. It would even provide you with doubles and triples.

Reply #32

thealfa — Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:27:38 GMT

wouldn't results and outcomes vary by state and or country or location

Reply #31

sully16 — Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:29:15 GMT

Just pick numbers out of a hat.

Reply #30

Lotterologist — Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:56:11 GMT

Oh, you were Pacattack the guitar player???

I remember you

Reply #29

Lotterologist — Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:45:17 GMT

He was only joking. Being that you are the joker you should know that!

Everyone who reads your posts knows that you are as knowledgable as anyone about predicting and lottery systems.

I find your ideas to be informative, creative, and entertaining.

I always enjoy reading your posts.

Good Luck

Reply #28

Coin Toss — Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:44:41 GMT

True, but exposing some commercial ones might save someone a few bucks.

Reply #27

RJOh — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:07:26 GMT

Do you really expect anyone to designate any system as the worst system ever ? Some posters might take such a designation personal.

Reply #26

danyo1332 — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 21:25:33 GMT

A little harsh..I like reading his systems he posts...

Reply #25

Teamprofit — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:46:13 GMT

I tried something like this a while back....it didn't work out so well.

I still had to many combinations.

I now believe it's best to come up with a gameplan and follow it, I really think this is the way to go.

Reply #24

Coin Toss — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:32:51 GMT

Along with that goes deep pockets.

Reply #23

Jordans121 — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:31:31 GMT

Yeah, I am familiar with all the names you put out. They all are good at what they do.

Reply #22

lakerben — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:26:07 GMT

My last answer to this positive discussion is :if you can do better produce something that works. Lets have a Lp challenge in which the masterminds and excel experts work together to make great programs. Alas, they may still not hit every time but thats why they call it gambling. In the meantime find something that works and stick with it. There are many great systems out there: Lottolaughs has many systems. get it straight , 90 degrees right pair are excellent ,24k ,donuts by Diamondpalace is e... [ More ]

Reply #21

Jordans121 — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:10:07 GMT

I remember this...thanks joker17

Reply #20

joker17 — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:59:36 GMT

Thanx, but the 7 days system had too many numbers. But for anyone who'd like to try it, Puarths was nice enough to create a program that does all the work for you. That was when I was Pacattack05 years ago.....lol I just tested it for fun using Florida from July 9 mid- 750 and had 3 straight hits in about 5 days I believe...But again, way too many numbers.

Just click on the image on the bottom and it'll ask you If you want to open it or save it.

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138056/64... [ More ]

Reply #19

Jordans121 — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:44:25 GMT

Thanks diamondpalace. I'm a big fan of ur excel sheets. Will test them out...

Reply #18

diamondpalace — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:41:18 GMT

The systems I have will work for eliminating. While some states it works good, for many other ones it does not work at all so you can try them and see. While aiming for hits is something I keep in mind when working on new system, I often use it to eliminate numbers instead since they have a very low hit rate.

Reply #17

joker17 — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:27:11 GMT

To say that they've never won anything is a bold statement to make. P-3 systems have come and gone. Most work to an extent then go dry, then come back. I've seen others post systems, including me, who have produced winners. Some do better than others. Danyo's number 9 focused system works on a consistent basis. They just need to be fine tuned and know when to play and when to not play.

You'd be correct If you said no system works all the time, but to say NONE produced any winners is false.... [ More ]

Reply #16

Jordans121 — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:24:28 GMT

Can you please share one or more of them

Reply #15

RJOh — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:17:42 GMT

There is no end to systems that members have come up with that continue to win nothing but how do you decide which one is better at losing when they all have never won anything

Reply #14

lakerben — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:12:43 GMT

In jokers defense and for all members to get along. Jokers 7 day system and others are very good. I've noticed some fickle posters and ones that don't want to share systems, but produce something better than Joker and then you have a point. If not, be cool and contribute.

Reply #13

Jordans121 — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:12:02 GMT

I need something to give me more than 1 number.

Reply #12

joker17 — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:03:47 GMT

I never claimed I was good at predicting, and don't see you doing any better.

I'd rather be bad at predicting numbers, than being a brainwashed loser like you. ANY DAY OF THE WEEK

Reply #11

Todd — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:47:39 GMT

Good idea, I like it.

Reply #10

Todd — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:47:10 GMT

Reply #9

Coin Toss — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:44:06 GMT

Almost anything from Win Track or Steve Player.

Win Track sells one called Delta Draw that give a whole new meaning to PU!

Someone here on LP was trying to use the Mid-Day Pick 3 and Pick 4 to predict the Evening Pick 3. since they posted it it never worked, in Illinois anyway.

It was the last digit of the Mid-Day Pick 3, the next to last digit of the Mid-dAy Pick 4, and the second digit of the Mid-Day Pick 3.

Let's say the Mid-Day Pick 3 and re:

562

2991

You would play 296... [ More ]

Reply #8

haymaker — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:41:16 GMT

thats interesting, how about marking numbers that do hit til. you get the same result,then eliminate those that seldom or never come out, or is that the same thing

Reply #7

HoLeeKau — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:23:24 GMT

I tried that a few times with Powerball. Took a playslip and started marking numbers I thought would hit until there were 5 whites and one red left, then I played those. I lost.

Reply #6

jimmy4164 — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:58:17 GMT

There is no difference between trying to devise a system that doesn't win from one that wins. The results from either effort will average out to be the same as buying QuickPicks, or, for that matter, habitually buying the same number[s] every day. The past results of Pick-3 are all available here. Check it out.

Reply #5

rdgrnr — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:26:41 GMT

For this particular task, I would highly recommend joker.

Reply #4

haymaker — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:16:16 GMT

ahh. thinking outside the box ! at work i love when the bosses say think outside the box .i say i would if there was any evidence that there was thinking going on inside the box.

Reply #3

Jordans121 — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:02:19 GMT

I want to use it to track it and see if it is good for excluding numbers.

Reply #2

haymaker — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:53:33 GMT

i don't play pic3, but if you want a system like that for pic6, okay just play the same nos. as me.LOL

Reply #1

joker17 — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:50:11 GMT

WHY

Worst system Ever

Jordans121 — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:46:14 GMT

I'm looking for a Pick 3 system that someone has created or know of that is extremely horrible at producing next draw hits. Please share it.