Mathematics and the Lottery

Reply #725

Mr-B 216 — Mon, 30 Oct 2017 01:10:05 GMT

I totally agree with RL.

I play along with MADDOG's MM and PB contest, but I don't wager on either game, so no worries for me with sharing jackpots.

Reply #724

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sun, 29 Oct 2017 05:46:41 GMT

JKING

The total vote is far less than the membership of LP, a very small percent of people took the time

to vote. I also don't think the prediction boards show us anything. We don't know how they are

picking numbers they post. IMHO, no one with a winning method is going to post on the prediction

board for reasons that should be clear to all. I look at the prediction board as I would Mad-dogs

challenge, just sort of a bragging rights contest. If I were a power-ball or mega millio... [ More ]

Reply #723

lakerben — Mon, 09 Oct 2017 21:07:15 GMT

Reply #722

RJOh — Mon, 09 Oct 2017 18:12:40 GMT

The only stat that really matters is if you are making money on a somewhat consistent basis.

The only players making any money are those winning the jackpots or second prizes and no one is doing that consistently.

Reply #721

JKING — Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:24:14 GMT

Hi,

While making decisions by group consensus is interesting, it is not always right. I sure there was a common consensus that the world was flat in the 1400's.

The only stat that really matters is if you are making money on a somewhat consistent basis. Given the prediction tracking on this site, the jury is still out on what is the best method or approach for winning.

Best of luck to all. *S

Reply #720

Ricklou — Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:32:24 GMT

7899% math

Reply #719

JADELottery — Sat, 02 Sep 2017 13:27:32 GMT

Can a winning lottery system be created with existing math formulas?

Yes-It's all in the math books. [ 249 ] [43.30%]

No-Anew math for will have to be created. [ 83 ] [14.43%]

Math won't beat the lottery regularly. [ 243 ] [42.26%]

Total Valid Votes [ 575 ]

Discarded Votes [ 58 ]

As of this reply:

The top two both imply math is the answer, therefore, math is winning 249 + 83 = 332 or 332 / 575 = .5773 or 57.73%.

Proved mathematically.

Time to train one's... [ More ]

Reply #718

play4shekels — Fri, 04 Aug 2017 23:45:25 GMT

I'm for option 2, but I don't think it's strictly math that will solve the endless enigma. I've had more days that I hit because I had the feeling , or because I have my own patterns that I look for, and more recently, something I call hit zones. And I'm not making a profit, just like everyone else LOL.

Reply #717

Spot9 — Thu, 27 Jul 2017 19:00:13 GMT

Hi,

If anyone wants to try this I have uploaded the zip file.

As it is a 16 bit application it only runs on 32 bit XP and 32 bit Windows 7.

https://tinyurl.com/yd9wuwzp

Spot9

Reply #716

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 26 Jul 2017 10:23:14 GMT

Spot9

Given this information one might create a similar algorithm but I doubt it would be exact.

One problem I have found in back-testing stuff like this is that one needs to remove the

set being tested from the analysis. Back many years ago I wrote a prediction algorithm and

designed it so that the set under test was not to be included in the analysis.

I ran the program and started getting some very nice hits and even had a few 5-of-5 hits

in around 30 games. I was so excited... [ More ]

Reply #715

Spot9 — Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:38:04 GMT

Hi RL,

Found this text file in the Freq folder:

I generated the best set of 30#'s for draws 1-449 of NZ lotto using the

reduction method in GH program. Got 109 6# hits ( 24.3% ). I made a single

column file of the hits from draw 415 to 445 to analize with FREQ.

| --------- | --------- | -Period 4- | --------- |

| | | |

Hits 6 5 6 4 4 6 5 5 5 5 4 5 6 6 6 | 3 3 6 5 3 6 5

|

Draw # 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 | 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 | 4 4 4 4 5... [ More ]

Reply #714

Spot9 — Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:08:58 GMT

Hi RL,

I managed to find the Freq program, but can not get it to run on Windows 10.

However I did manage to open the help menu and this is how the program works.

The usual frequency analysis approach is to pre-process your data, apply a Fast Fourier Transform to the series, and plot the power spectrum. Peaks in the FFT spectrum may correspond to interesting frequencies. However, it is difficult for anyone but a signal processing expert to know how much power in the time series is actua... [ More ]

Reply #713

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 25 Jul 2017 08:20:45 GMT

Spot9

Maybe it's possible to predict the changes in dominant frequencies rather than the actual

frequencies?

I have tried predictions based on gaps, skips etc but had little success. Changes in dominant

frequencies might, never tried it.

About the best I have found as far as prediction goes is something like the steps program I

included in many of my programs. The steps amount to digit coding where each digit 0 to 9

is converted into a 3 digit code.

Example

0 =121... [ More ]

Reply #712

Spot9 — Tue, 25 Jul 2017 01:23:02 GMT

Hi RL,

I like your cartoon!

The problem with predicting a lottery time series is its non-stationery frequencies.

I used to have a free program called freq which would find the dominant frequencies

and phases in a time series.

Maybe it's possible to predict the changes in dominant frequencies rather than the actual

frequencies?

All the best,

Spot9

Reply #711

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sun, 23 Jul 2017 18:26:43 GMT

Chance is always going to play a role, when we win and when we loose.

RL

Reply #710

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sun, 23 Jul 2017 18:21:05 GMT

Spot9

AI programs keep getting smarter and smarter but they are not designed to predict random.

It's possible to produce a solution using just about any type of data but when dealing with

random the next event is not bound by the rules the predictor built to make it's prediction.

Lets say I presented you with a string of data without telling you how it was generated, how

would you be able to tell? I have seen random strings of data that looked non-random and

non-random that loo... [ More ]

Reply #709

Spot9 — Fri, 21 Jul 2017 19:53:27 GMT

Hi RL,

There has been a breakthrough with deep learning neural nets.

Google has just upgraded their Google Translate service to use

Deep Learning from thousands of books to improve translation

of whole sentences.

Here are some links which you might find interesting:

https://tinyurl.com/yaske8lq

https://tinyurl.com/ycq6g4p6

Do a YouTube search: How Deep Neural Networks Work by Brandon Rohrer

Spot9

Reply #708

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:52:35 GMT

RJ

Not sure what you mean, the list is just a few draws taken from my 5-39 game history. Nothing

special about them. They were posted to show that most of the time when a drawings lowest

number is 10 or greater than we can expect another like drawing within the following 3 draws.

When I see one of these type draws then I am likely to adjust my play for the next 3 games by

removing numbers 1 to 9.

Doing this removes 75% of the total possible combinations from play. It does not

Reply #707

RJOh — Thu, 20 Jul 2017 19:11:27 GMT

Just to prove there isn't anything special about winning pick5 combinations, I check those 64 winning combinations with the 4531 combos of Ohio's RC5 and the best any of them did wa a match4.

Reply #706

Johnebench — Thu, 20 Jul 2017 16:13:43 GMT

I also notice that you only have 8 out of 67 non 30-39 in the last column. So would it be fair to say that if you picked 30 thru 39 on 10 cards you would hit 1 number about 88% of the time.

Small sample for my MO 5-39

07/19/17 12 13 27 31 36

07/18/17 05 12 24 37 38

07/17/17 15 16 27 33 34

07/16/17 01 21 27 31 35

07/15/17 04 07 08 19 29

07/14/17 11 14 22 29 34

07/13/17 06 11 17 31 37

07/12/17 04 17 24 33 35

07/11/17 09 20 25 30 38

07/10/17 13 25 27 29 35

0... [ More ]

Reply #705

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 20 Jul 2017 03:41:53 GMT

Spot9

It's kind of like hunting for Bigfoot. Boatloads of claims but most won't pass simple analysis.

Personally I am not ready to give up on the possibility as there might be some sort of cosmic

connection that has yet to be discovered. Cracking a RNG might be possible but I think the

real gains will be made using standard mathematical analysis. I guess it all depends on what

level of prediction one is willing to accept. There are many things we can apply that will help

but ma... [ More ]

Reply #704

Spot9 — Mon, 17 Jul 2017 03:54:00 GMT

Hi RL,

I don't know whether this is just a joke or not, but here are some quotes from Deep Learning Predicts Loto.pdf (found by Google)

The date was the 1st of April!

Randomness is conceptually more interesting and cannot be reduced to few dimensions: a higher dimensional model is required.

We would like to emphasize this point: even though the neural

network in my brain can not identify the underlying structure of the data, the liberties given to the

deep neural network giv... [ More ]

Reply #703

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Mon, 17 Jul 2017 02:22:33 GMT

Patterns in random data are often deceiving as the next value can be anything. Here are two

examples where the next value looks somewhat easy to predict. In the lower graph a (0)

red looks very strong to show in the next game however the overall hit rates suggest the

values are almost equal, 0=18 and 1=19.

In the upper data block we see that the value reversed 30 times, ie went from 0-1 or 1-0

while 14 games the same value repeated.

This would say that it is better to play th... [ More ]

Reply #702

bossman48 — Sat, 08 Jul 2017 15:29:36 GMT

yes me i would like to know that wen it hade up wining big is very good math

Reply #701

psychicSEER4u — Thu, 06 Jul 2017 14:46:15 GMT

I really enjoy reading the posts on LP, I am a newbie here just about 10 days and so I am still just looking around and getting a feel for things. So many of these systems and theories are amazing, in the fact that everyone has a different way to apply MATH and their own trials and errors to predicting lottery outcomes. Let me put forth another opinion which as always I state is my own and is based on real world experience in the Gaming Industry going back to roughly 1990.

I believe a lot of

Reply #700

psychicSEER4u — Wed, 05 Jul 2017 12:57:35 GMT

alec33,

Well said about the fair returns, that is the easiest thing to understand but HARDEST thing to pass over. I lived and worked in Vegas a short stay (27 months) and with the slot return payback which (you are correct) stated over some of the slot banks normally falls in the 88%-95% range but with the understanding (part no ones knows or understands or wants to hear) is that a huge chuck of that % comes out in the Jackpot or larger payouts, the payback would be over say 100,000 to 1,000,... [ More ]

Reply #699

alec33 — Wed, 05 Jul 2017 09:14:01 GMT

The great thing about the mega jackpots is nobody can understand the odds. Yet people still play the number. Those odds are easy to figure. It is unlikely that the odds on the mega lotteries are better.

A fair bet returns money in the same proportion as the odds of winning. If you match coins, each of you have a 50:50 chance of winning. Winner gets 2, loser gets 0.

So if the number were fair, there are 1,000 combinations, so it should pay the winner $1,000. Instead it pays $500. The

Reply #698

psychicSEER4u — Tue, 04 Jul 2017 21:23:05 GMT

In my very humble opinion not math, not anything can beat the LOTTERY, anything that does NOT pay true odds is unbeatable, ever game is set up to pay at best 1/3, 1/4 of what you are risking to what the reward will be. In the end they get it all just like a casino, the lottery is a tax on the poor, when you bet you are tax and when win you are taxed again. As a started this this is my opinion, it was derived from 20+ years in the gaming business and even longer if you count on both sides of the

Reply #697

Soledad — Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:55:14 GMT

Lol. Take last draws in NY from 972 to 219.

D: 014 219

N: 972 362

What's the difference between 972 and 014? 142. What's the difference between 014 and 362? 358.

Add 142, 358, 014, and 362 on a calculator. What do you get? 876. Divide 876 by 4. 219 is the answer. 219 STRaight midday yesterday in NY.

Ok, yeah coincidence. Ok, now what's the difference between 362 and 219? 957.

Well, Add 358, 362, 957, and 219 on a calculator. What do you get? 1896. Divide 1896 by 4. What do you... [ More ]

Reply #696

wander73 — Mon, 03 Jul 2017 19:51:15 GMT

I have tried math and found that is does work. It all depends on which lottery game you play. Lottery pyramids by looking at previous draws has proven it.

Reply #695

Inner G — Mon, 29 May 2017 08:01:16 GMT

The 4th demension awaits

Reply #694

Soledad — Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:03:27 GMT

Got another silly way I try to calculate numbers. Take 767. 767x(.7)=536, and 767x(.6)=460.

So 536+536+460=1532. Divide 1532 by 3 = 510. 767 + 510 = 277. Next number was 277 straight.

So do the same thing with 277. 277 x (.2) = 55. 277 x (.7) = 193. So , this time add it lottery math style,

193

193

+055

231 . The next number was 231 straight.

Now do it for 231. 231 x (.2) = 46. 231 x (.3) = 69. And 231 x (.1) = 23.

So do the adding both lottery math style and calculato... [ More ]

Reply #693

Soledad — Tue, 25 Apr 2017 19:34:51 GMT

Interesting. Yeah that was all I was trying to do really, pinpoint vague data into something more precise. I had a little fun with it for a time. I was just looking back at it to see, and kind of noticed that 1 example. I believe whatever way you do , its best to just stick with it until it either suits you or it doesn't. Sometimes I move so fast with calculating stuff I have a hard time remembering what I did. This was just something I remembered trying out. Thanks a lot King.

Reply #692

JKING — Tue, 25 Apr 2017 17:16:00 GMT

FYI

A nice simplified write up for Bayes Theorem

https://phys.org/news/2017-04-bayes-theoremthe-maths-tool-day.html

Reply #691

Soledad — Fri, 21 Apr 2017 17:37:05 GMT

I'll explain what I did, why not. That's the information criterion formula. I simply put 1000 for the amount of numbers that can be picked. And 30 for the amount of balls that are used. Simple. I also sometimes just add the results, (166), and see if there's a pattern. I believe that math can always show you the number no matter what or when. But the problem for me is it's a lot of time spent doing all that math for each draw. Sometimes it gets boring. Got lucky with this one. 403 worked out gre... [ More ]

Reply #690

Soledad — Fri, 21 Apr 2017 16:42:23 GMT

And look at that 100 midday New York Straight. Midday pattern. You just gotta find what works. Not everything can be a pattern. But when it is there is no question about it. How's that for all you Bayesians out there. My math is good.

Follow your own rules. Books and teachers and programs can only lead you so far.

Reply #689

rdensel15 — Wed, 19 Apr 2017 21:17:18 GMT

Well show me that it is not all in the math, math is where the lottery numbers come from.

Reply #688

Soledad — Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:04:28 GMT

This is for King and any others that believe that Math is and should be FUN-damental.

-2ln(1000)+30ln(last number drawn) = try it.

Let's use the 403 draw that came up in NY on 4/2 evening. OK the result was 166.

Take 166 and x and / (times and divide) by 4. You get 664 and 41.5.

Then add 664 and 41 (forget the stupid decimals) you get 705. OK and then lastly take 705 and divide by 7. You get 100.

Take all of these 5 answers and add them on calculator. Add 403 to it (the last numbe... [ More ]

Reply #687

JKING — Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:35:39 GMT

Fyi -

The seven deadly sins of statistical misinterpretation, and how to avoid them.

https://phys.org/science-news/mathematics

Reply #686

lakerben — Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:39:14 GMT

Reply #685

JKING — Tue, 28 Mar 2017 02:37:31 GMT

FYI,

Regression to the mean -

https://phys.org/news/2017-03-regression-rarely.html

Reply #684

Novan60 — Mon, 06 Mar 2017 07:14:03 GMT

I think the bigger question is if someone won a major prize why on earth would they broadcast that information. Winning a major prize in most states means having the winner's full name and town put out there for public consumption. If a winner post their success here it would then not be hard for someone who trolls these forums to start harassing that winner in real life for the strategy that was used to win. When I win, I will not be broadcasting it.

Reply #683

ElinaSammy2081 — Thu, 02 Feb 2017 06:44:56 GMT

Reply #682

Sunglasses — Wed, 04 Jan 2017 16:13:07 GMT

I like your positive attitude. Keep it up.

Reply #681

garyo1954 — Wed, 04 Jan 2017 02:55:14 GMT

LOL...can't deny that's true. I've been that dummy who played $39 and only hit a box! Yep, that was me

Reply #680

Sunglasses — Tue, 03 Jan 2017 18:01:08 GMT

Maybe pick 3/4 filter spam should be removed automatically from system forums.

Reply #679

RJOh — Mon, 02 Jan 2017 21:05:58 GMT

The day that any single system proves its ability to pick winning numbers will be the day the state decides to operate at a loss, or get out of the lottery business. After all, the state only allows gambling because they make money doing so.

Any system will pick a winner if allowed to pick enough combinations, the trick is to constantly pick a group of combinations that cost less to play than it win. In other words, constantly show a profit.

Right now the prevailing theory is any lottery

Reply #678

eddessaknight — Mon, 02 Jan 2017 20:45:19 GMT

my Reverberating friend JKING

The invisible forces, that we don't know, affect us much more than what we do know.....

Good Vibes Good New Year Wishes

Eddessa_Knight with Invisible Ultra High Violet Light

Reply #677

bobby623 — Mon, 02 Jan 2017 20:13:14 GMT

Been having problem posting images for unknown reason.

Believe I found a solution.

This the $5,200 Tx Daily 4 win I had using my Substitution Workout with VALUE strategy

It was a $2 play, STR and ANY order.

Regarding some of the posts.

I have searched high and low for a substitution workout similar to mine.

I'm confident there are none.

It's a totally new and different Paper and Pencil multi-dimensional workout where the User

has to use his/her intellect to make three cor... [ More ]

Reply #676

lottolot — Mon, 02 Jan 2017 18:32:17 GMT

After all, the state only allows gambling because they make money doing so.

So far no system, whether software, or hand tracking, has proved that ability.

Some prefer paper saying it helps them visualize their plays better; some prefer having the computer make the calculations .

Reply #675

garyo1954 — Mon, 02 Jan 2017 18:04:54 GMT

The day that any single system proves its ability to pick winning numbers will be the day the state decides to operate at a loss, or get out of the lottery business. After all, the state only allows gambling because they make money doing so.

So far no system, whether software, or hand tracking, has proved that ability.

Some prefer paper saying it helps them visualize their plays better; some prefer having the computer make the calculations.

No matter how many times this issue has been d... [ More ]

Reply #674

JKING — Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:46:59 GMT

Hi,

Thanks for your reply.

Like I said from the beginning, individuals use the prediction methods that feels right to them. The debate between your approach and my approach in lottery prediction methods is and has been a classic debate at the LP for the ten years plus that I have been coming here. I have seen the approach and mindset you are using repeated over and over by a number of very good mathematicians here with the same frustrated results. Who knows, maybe you will do better. As

Reply #673

RJOh — Mon, 02 Jan 2017 11:22:06 GMT

I'm just saying that Trend analysis can be good to those who are willing to give it a try.

Are you sure other players aren't using trends to pick combinations to play too, just different trends than you use?

For example, when all past 334 MM drawings since its last matrix change are sorted into an ascending order, 90% of the numbers in column one are 1-25, in column two are 7-41, in column three are 17-54, in column four are 31-68 and in column five are 49-75. 31% of the time all five... [ More ]

Reply #672

Sunglasses — Mon, 02 Jan 2017 10:57:18 GMT

What have chances to do with predictions and beating the lowered payout?

You wouldn't win a coin toss.

Reply #671

aquariuslottery — Mon, 02 Jan 2017 00:07:38 GMT

Hi,

In picking/predicting lottery numbers, it is about the probabilities, not the possibilities.

You hit the right spot again. That's exactly my line of thinking - probabilities.

Which one of these is more probable to predict correctly (hint provided)?

1. Coin toss (50%) - not applicable in lotteries.

2. Dice roll (about 17%) - again, not applicable in lotteries.

3. 1 number out of 10 (10% - Pick 3.

4. 1 combo out of 1000 (0.1%) - again Pick 3.

And so on for the jack... [ More ]

Reply #670

Sunglasses — Sun, 01 Jan 2017 23:44:13 GMT

We don't have pick 4 here or games like All Or Nothing. There is no pick 1 and also no game under 1 euro.

Several years ago, I went a few times to the casino. My small budget didn't allow much. A minimum bet of 5 euros on a number is quickly exhausting your budget. It is quicker than pick 3 and pays more.

I believe that some are faster there with programs and observation than calculations. Wheels are probably all done with computers. I suppose that they are perfect by now. I don't reinvent... [ More ]

Reply #669

bobby623 — Sun, 01 Jan 2017 22:30:06 GMT

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/307879

This is one of 4 Daily 4 wins I had in December.

I have a $5200 winning ticket but all of my attempts to post the image have failed.

Will keep trying.

Maybe one of these days a mathematics supporter will post some evidence demonstrating that

dead as dirt lottery balls can come alive and produce a win for the believers.

Somehow, I doubt it.

All I'm seeing are fancy statistical charts and Excel programs that, in my Trend world, a... [ More ]

Reply #668

RJOh — Sun, 01 Jan 2017 21:11:29 GMT

I doubt it, people come to LP looking for iron clad explanations of how to win not to explain them. Besides those who think they know how to win have never shown they have ever won a major prize. .

Reply #667

Soledad — Sun, 01 Jan 2017 20:46:23 GMT

Last year mathematicians found patterns in random numbers. Prime numbers to be specific. Prime numbers are the basis for the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. They didn't use the word 'alive'. They used the word shocked to describe their reaction.

Reply #666

bobby623 — Sun, 01 Jan 2017 19:36:13 GMT

Maybe 2017 will be the year when someone will provide a cast-iron explanation how dead pieces of plastic really are alive and know how to win

Reply #665

Sunglasses — Sun, 01 Jan 2017 19:00:28 GMT

There once were five balls making a deal with the machine. Collusion

Reply #664

lakerben — Sun, 01 Jan 2017 18:00:22 GMT

After reading these last few posts I'm ready to go to sleep. Boring

Reply #663

JKING — Sun, 01 Jan 2017 04:19:01 GMT

Hi,

First of all, I would like to thank all that responded to my post.

Almost everybody here has a different on how to predict the winning lottery numbers if indeed that con be done. The method chosen is whatever feels right to the individual.

I would like to make a couple comments to aquariuslottery regarding the amount of elements. There might be a whole lot more there than you are seeing. Perhaps, it isn't just the history of the lottery numbers themselves, but the historical prop... [ More ]

Reply #662

bobby623 — Sun, 01 Jan 2017 03:52:23 GMT

Substitution Workout with Value Strategy

Example of trend analysis for Position 1 in a Pick 3 game.

The last 3 digits in a 3 column tracking chart are 125.

What's Next?

1231 Evening

1|2111213| What's next? 1, 2, 3. I chose 2

2|3222324| What's next? 3, 2, 4. I chose 3

5|4333435| What's next? 3, 4, 5. I chose 4

Actually, I chose 2 in Line 1. The choices for Lines 2 and 3 are by default.

The numbers for the three lines, 234, 123, etc, are Vertical Followers generated by p... [ More ]

Reply #661

aquariuslottery — Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:38:03 GMT

Happy New Year to you and all others in LP as well.

With all the due respect I agree with you that your point of view is controversial and often goes against tangible evidence.

1. Randomness.

It is indisputable dogma that numbers in numeric lotteries are randomly selected. Cannot argue that point. But it is also indisputable that there are significant deviations in this randomness in short spans of time. I'm glad that you mentioned Pick 3 as an example because I have some fresh evidence... [ More ]

Reply #660

bobby623 — Sat, 31 Dec 2016 19:22:41 GMT

In my humble opinion, lottery workouts where choices are based on some mathematical model are destined to fail.

I realize this is a controversial view, but please consider the following.

Reality.

1. 10 ping pong balls are placed in an enclosed vessel and mixed via compressed air.

2. The balls are numbered 0 to 9.

3. The balls are not self-aware. They don't know their individual numbers, cannot perform any kind of mathematical function, have no memory and don't know who their neigh... [ More ]

Reply #659

aquariuslottery — Sat, 31 Dec 2016 08:41:29 GMT

There are a lot of things in this world that once were considered impossible. Beating the lottery with a system may or may not be one of them.

This may largely depend on the definition of beating the lottery. For some it will be jackpot only, for others occasional lesser prizes will do; for me breaking even or above would be a good reason for satisfaction.

Isn't it amazing, with all the analysis tools (hot/cold, skip....etc.) that nobody can triangulate wins in a somewhat consistent ma... [ More ]

Reply #658

Soledad — Sat, 31 Dec 2016 06:20:46 GMT

What most people don't undertsand is that even if you find some way to calculate the next number, the intermix of all the numbers past and present make any specific formula not specific because it has to now intermix with the possibility of future numbers, which is not entirely possible because they haven't been drawn yet. So what I'm trying to say is there is no simple 'set in stone' formula that can guess right every single time, because the balls coming up are technically random. The formulas... [ More ]

Reply #657

Sunglasses — Fri, 30 Dec 2016 23:14:58 GMT

Sleep

Reply #656

RJOh — Fri, 30 Dec 2016 17:40:44 GMT

So, as for me, save your sophisticated formulas, and the effort put in them, for the important things in this world, and let us lotto players play.

How do some LP members discussions of lottery systems effect how you or anyone else play lotteries? There are members who think there has to be a better way of picking combinations to play than a random quick pick.

Reply #655

ElinaSammy2081 — Fri, 30 Dec 2016 05:22:44 GMT

Reply #654

JKING — Fri, 30 Dec 2016 05:18:11 GMT

Hi,

There are a lot of things in this world that once were considered impossible. Beating the lottery with a system may or may not be one of them. If one thing is for sure, if nobody tries, a system solution to beating the lottery can never occur, if there is one. You are wise to look at all systems at the LP with a very critical eye.

On a side note:

Isn't it amazing, with all the analysis tools (hot/cold, skip....etc.) that nobody can triangulate wins in a somewhat consistent manner... [ More ]

Reply #653

Groppo — Fri, 23 Dec 2016 06:23:13 GMT

.

You know, I'm going to put this out there, for everyone to see. And that is that I'm not and have never been convinced of a system, or that even Mathematics has any role whatsoever in the random set of games known as the lottery.

Some of you are likely Math experts, Phds, whatever (All of whom I have a lot of respect for).

But, the existence of this Math forum does not convince me one bit. I know that a random game is random. It's as simple as that. I'm not going to be sucked into the... [ More ]

Reply #652

Catpickednumber — Fri, 09 Dec 2016 17:35:23 GMT

I bet you do not sleep at night. You brain does not shut off.

Reply #651

Sunglasses — Fri, 09 Dec 2016 16:51:16 GMT

The usefulness for Americans are the drawings that are mostly correctly and immediately displayed. For the systems and tools it isn't much. The datasource is good and probably complete. Pyramids built just randomly are just good for trying your luck or like picking some of many quickpicks in front of you. If you consult some, you will find the best way to loose money if you are not just lucky by nature. Eventually there is one human being running naked in the bushes of Africa that never played t... [ More ]

Reply #650

RJOh — Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:40:28 GMT

Why are some buying software and different programs but yet I have yet to see if it proves to winning especially hitting 4 or 5 numbers.

Some players use software to track their numbers and test their their strategies rather then to predict outcomes of future lotteries.

Reply #649

wander73 — Thu, 08 Dec 2016 15:21:31 GMT

Here is what I found interesting about both big jackpots. Why are some buying software and different programs but yet I have yet to see if it proves to winning especially hitting 4 or 5 numbers. In fact I have found since upgrading that this site is actually useful from different members. Anyway.

Lets take the date current for example.

I did this the other day and wow should have played it.

What I do is I add and subtract any numbers that I think . For ex take 12072016.

Reply #648

Sunglasses — Tue, 06 Dec 2016 23:33:02 GMT

Poor articles.

Reply #647

JKING — Tue, 06 Dec 2016 21:36:27 GMT

Fyi,

Math and roulette.

http://phys.org/news/2016-11-maths-roulette.html

Reply #646

SEA-Pick3 — Sat, 12 Nov 2016 18:07:25 GMT

by Ukrainian

Reply #645

Sunglasses — Tue, 08 Nov 2016 19:05:24 GMT

Are you advertising for Delphi and for Embarcadero

Reply #644

JKING — Tue, 08 Nov 2016 16:57:43 GMT

Hi,

Sorry, I don't play pick 3 or pick 4. There are already many posts regarding those games.

Good luck

Reply #643

Maverick2842 — Sun, 06 Nov 2016 19:25:32 GMT

Hi JKing;

Can you please send me one good one for the Pick4 lottery.... Please!

Or several, so I can take a look at what works good for me....

Thank you ..... Eddie

Reply #642

SEA-Pick3 — Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:08:34 GMT

Reply #641

SEA-Pick3 — Fri, 30 Sep 2016 05:57:24 GMT

good filters, but it needs more work

Reply #640

lakerben — Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:27:20 GMT

I do something similar by hand and in excel it really shows what is due etc. Are you going to post it

Reply #639

SEA-Pick3 — Sun, 25 Sep 2016 08:23:46 GMT

Borland Delphi 7

Embarcadero RAD Studio Delphi XE2

Reply #638

Sunglasses — Sat, 24 Sep 2016 20:32:15 GMT

which programming language is this

Reply #637

SEA-Pick3 — Sat, 24 Sep 2016 17:55:43 GMT

Example 12 Formula,

SumString - emanation (123=1+2+3=6)

v3[0]:=SumString(StringGrid4.Cells[0,a]);

v3[4]:=keno[4,1];

v3[5]:=keno[4,2];

v3[6]:=keno[4,3];

if trunc(abs(( abs(v3[0]-v3[4])-abs(v3[5]-v3[6]))) /4) 0 then x2:=1 else x2:=0;

if t1 x2 then x1:=1 ;

v3[0]:=SumString(StringGrid4.Cells[1,a]);

v3[4]:=keno[5,1];

v3[5]:=keno[5,2];

v3[6]:=keno[5,3];

if trunc(abs(( abs(v3[0]-v3[4])-abs(v3[5]-v3[6]))) /4) 0 then x2:=1 else x2:=0;

if t2 x2 then... [ More ]

Reply #636

SEA-Pick3 — Sat, 24 Sep 2016 17:47:50 GMT

program runs tests

Reply #635

lakerben — Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:29:55 GMT

And......

Reply #634

SEA-Pick3 — Thu, 22 Sep 2016 12:25:38 GMT

It is the basis of the formula

Reply #633

lakerben — Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:32:27 GMT

Why would you eliminate a root sum

Reply #632

lakerben — Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:27:08 GMT

Nice graphics but what do you use this for? Zero signifies what

Reply #631

Tialuvslotto — Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:45:59 GMT

OK, so this formula improves prediction. When the value is 1 you can safely eliminate the previous 4 Root Sums 90% of the time vs. expected 75% accuracy. I'll take any improvement I can get.

Reply #630

Sunglasses — Thu, 15 Sep 2016 20:37:30 GMT

Reply #629

SEA-Pick3 — Tue, 06 Sep 2016 17:27:58 GMT

software filter PICK3 (formula SEA-Pick3)

trunc(abs(( abs(a1[i+1]-a2[i+2])-abs(a3[i+3]-a4[i+4]))) /4)

i=0..i+1..

Reply #628

Dankq123 — Sat, 03 Sep 2016 11:24:26 GMT

hi, GA fantasy 5 i got 3 numbers. 3 8 35 factor the 18 down to 12. that 6 is the key.5 is the residual left over from factoring

09/01/2016 05 06 18 33 34

09/02/2016 03 08 12 13 35