<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Systems only 100% accuracy</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/235969</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/235969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Systems only 100% accuracy</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/235969/2188353</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/235969/2188353</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:40:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dr san</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello, jking, which mean that we focus on systems which show 100% accuracy in one part of the bet (getting 3 or 4 in 6), develop systems for closing hits 100% but not a lot to play drawings by up to 20 or more. In looking at 80% of the draws in the matrix, it seems that the numbers drawn in a more concentrated industry than another, there is never a uniform distribution, often focusing more on a sector of the array of rows and columns, perhaps a system of rotation (a dimmer) to get this concentr... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/235969/2188353">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>dr san</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/235969/2188340</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/235969/2188340</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:27:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br /><br />You may want to double check what you are saying against the historical data. My tracking is telling me that your stategy is not as straight forward as you make it. If you were to make a generalizion, I would think it would be.....that no matter what you are tracking, the values will be a mix of high, medium, and low values as a rule. It&#x27;s just the nature of random.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JKING</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Systems only 100% accuracy</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/235969</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/235969</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dr san</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>hello=systems funcionan 100% of the time? Systems may be close Pairs and trios and pick 5 and 6, in fact, only strategies that work 100% of cases at most 80% of the sweepstakes! The whole course of the lottery is possible but not a part of it! example System pik3 to choose pairs with 100% success rate, fixed pairs of pick five six etc</p>]]></description>
			<category>dr san</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

