Middle of tweeking this system ( PROFITS- Day 180 + $4,123)

Reply #35

topnail — Wed, 27 Jun 2012 05:47:28 GMT

play H.O.L.E. formats.

Reply #34

onlymoney — Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:16:32 GMT

why would someone start a thread about a system that's working and not give details? I guess teasing people gives this person a thrill. I just don't understand some people.

Reply #33

mayhem — Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:46:27 GMT

THIS! This method of play is the best way to play in any lottery. It can be most easily adapted to Pick 3. I don't care about big payouts and small bets. To do so is foolish. I'm happy with having a few grand in my account to shoot with and making a consistent few hundred dollars per week. It does add up and the larger the bankroll then the worse odds you can play with and still garuntee a profit. Being exceptionally patient and disciplined is the key. I had over a thousand tied up in an online... [ More ]

Reply #32

SergeM — Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:26:54 GMT

Some systems are so dumb that they shouldn't be shared.

Reply #31

jackpotismine — Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:58:58 GMT

It's a system if you think it is. It doesn't have to be shared (would be nice though).

Reply #30

SergeM — Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:27:58 GMT

Machine roulette is not for high bets, like 3000 euros and more. Also if you like some style you go to the table with a dealer. When the smokers and whiners are gone, it is doable.

Patterns come and go.

I never saw a win in 3 or 5 guarantee, if it wasn't just a 80% probability or so to guess right.

Reply #29

Lucky Loser — Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:22:25 GMT

Machine Roulette is much better so stick with that. I'd have to travel in order to get on a live table, which is doable, but that's only for trips to the casino every now and then. He goes to the casinos and does well there also, but the convenience at home is unbeatable. As you've stated, the software can be tricky if you're not on your A-Game at all times...and greedy.

Can't display a pattern of any kind for more than a couple of spins or so. The sofware is told what to do whereas a real ta... [ More ]

Reply #28

SergeM — Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:08:37 GMT

Here we have a live roulette and software roulette. I pick the machine roulette because I don't trust software.

I have recorded like two hundred spins and analysed those with Excel. You have to adapt to the situation, but I am sure that you might be able to formulate some function to replace your intuitive thinking.

Reply #27

Lucky Loser — Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:50:29 GMT

When I say high roller , I mean in terms of the amount of money he's spending to remain consistent with his wins. Okay, let's look at it another way. Roulette is a match play game...basically dollar for dollar. If a player is betting $100 on Red (Even/Odd or a range of numbers), they have 50/50 chance of winning on that one bet for $100. Either they win or lose $100 on a single bet/spin. In my opinion, these are not reasonable odds for making money. After studying the software used by specific o... [ More ]

Reply #26

SergeM — Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:16:11 GMT

Playing one complete format is better than bits and pieces of several formats because ALL THE NUMBERS are there... as opposed to just a couple of numbers from two or three formats. Maybe this makes no sense at all

------------------------------------------------------

It requires more fine tuning to play smaller combinations.

Reply #25

SergeM — Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:11:04 GMT

Is 310 dollars a spin a high roller?

What do you mean by intelligent software? I figured we were talking roulette table

Reply #24

Lucky Loser — Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:59:40 GMT

You're close. He's a high roller and spends $310-$320 per spin on a $360 payout. This is a lot of coverage, in terms of numbers, and he maintains his strategy with constantly adjusting his numbers as the software is very intelligent in which he's playing against. All it takes is 3-5 spins with this kind of profit built in. Just can't be greedy 'cause the software is always looking to find what's lacking, and if you stay on the table too long, it will find the weak link.

There's a way to throw... [ More ]

Reply #23

SergeM — Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:44:14 GMT

To win 150 to 200 bucks net, in a few, your starting bet needs to be around that size. Let's say that you bet 1-2-4, you need 7*200=1400 bankroll. This can easily go wrong. If you risk this game, you need some plan beside the betting amount. If you won 7 times and lose 1 time playing 3 bets every time, then your win is zero. If you can win 50 a day average net after tax, you can live of it. They tax 33% around here for professional play (src:HLN). Lotto is tax free.

Reply #22

Lucky Loser — Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:40:17 GMT

Buddy, if you'll look around, I've been preaching this same sermon ,and, have done so for years. Even recently, I've mentioned picking one or two COMPLETE combinations (FORMATS)and just remaining consistent with it until it hits...AND IT WILL. It has to be drawn. People are just impatient and won't spend the right money to ensure they get the hit...they make this game much, much harder than it really is.

This is almost the same principal as Roulette...cover as many bets as possible and simply... [ More ]

Reply #21

SergeM — Fri, 18 May 2012 21:50:46 GMT

The chance of surviving Russian roulette seems to be (1-p)n.

Reply #20

SergeM — Fri, 18 May 2012 21:32:23 GMT

It is spelled roulette, there isn't any roullette.

The game with the gun is called Russian roulette.

Reply #19

LottoBoner — Mon, 14 May 2012 17:14:07 GMT

Roulette is a game where you put a single bullet in a revolver, spin the barrel, then point the gun at your head and then pull the trigger...

your chances of landing in red are 1/6....

Reply #18

SergeM — Mon, 14 May 2012 16:45:10 GMT

Yes, what is roullette by the way

Reply #17

RJOh — Sun, 13 May 2012 23:52:23 GMT

No one ever gives away the farm, just the crap and some even sell the crap.

Reply #16

temptustoo — Sun, 13 May 2012 21:31:11 GMT

MORE. C R A P. Keep the FARM. NO ONE CARES

Reply #15

RJOh — Sun, 13 May 2012 21:17:15 GMT

..........remember until you share ,it is not a system.

Did you come up with that line on your own or did you read it somewhere else?

Once in a while, there's a story about someone or group using a system or strategy to beat the odds of winning more than it cost to play lottery games such as the Michigan couple who traveled to Massachusetts to spend $300K to win their game when there was a row-down and lotteries investigate them and if they have overlooked such a possibility they either di... [ More ]

Reply #14

LottoBoner — Sun, 13 May 2012 19:18:11 GMT

Reply #13

LottoBoner — Sun, 13 May 2012 19:14:37 GMT

your system will not work in other states...as only your state allows the type of bet that you are exploiting...New York would not dare try it...or maybe they would....who knows these things...

my understanding is...(and please correct me if i am wrong), that you are allowed to bet on 1 number only in the pick 3 and 4...

the best you can get in new york is to bet two numbers...and you cant purchase straddle numbers...ie bet pos 1 and pos 3

you can only bet front pair/ back pair...

Reply #12

SergeM — Sun, 13 May 2012 18:42:57 GMT

Martingale: play red/black. Bet one unit on red after black came out. If you win you get 2 units.

If you lost, double the bet. Keep doubling up until you win. The maximum bet size is the limit.

Lotto: pick one set of numbers = one combination. Work the same way until you won.

Mathematically speaking this always works. Problems are that there is a fixed limit, or you cannot keep up doubling.

Advantages are that if you guess right, you will find it easy money.

Strategies are up to y... [ More ]

Reply #11

nickbrownsfan — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 03:55:13 GMT

although I love sarcasm as much as the next guy sometimes people are actually asking and seeking answers to problems that have eluded them and when they do they get hammered with this or that doesnt work.

Yes if your looking for a quick fix hits every day number chnaces are you wont find it but when some people see some things they want to talk about it, its a natural part of being human. Then once they strike up a discussion they can elaberate on it or get posts like yours which make them wa... [ More ]

Reply #10

ACPutz — Sat, 14 Apr 2012 20:10:40 GMT

I would just like to see some winning numbers (before the draw) rather than the old standby's I've been working on this for years , It doesn't win millions but makes a tidy sum and my favorite, I don't know how I'm going to profit from this but I have a few ideas.

You can't swing a dead squirrel around here without hitting someone who's got it all figured out. But until they post some winners it's all talk we've heard before.

If you really want a great system.. I've got a Powerb... [ More ]

Reply #9

ogivens15 — Sat, 14 Apr 2012 19:48:31 GMT

Why would anyone want to share a winning system.WOULD YOU....NO,NO.

Reply #8

tntea — Sat, 14 Apr 2012 19:26:00 GMT

Just because the system isn't shared, doesn't mean it is not a system. It means it is not available to the public.

Reply #7

lottobrain — Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:03:36 GMT

There is also the group that won the VA lottery for many millions. They were staticians from Europe who pooled their money together to purchase 300K tickets and won 23 million dollars. Again this is proven.

A clarification on this statement: the group was from Australia and they attemted to buy the entire set of 7 million+ tickets. They arrived in VA with boxes of computer printed bet slips and spread out across the state to purchase the tickets. They managed to buy 5 million or so of t... [ More ]

Reply #6

nickbrownsfan — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 04:13:38 GMT

Interesting to use that type betting on lottery. I have always thought about it but never really came up with a time that would be good to increase on. Normally as with most systems they run in streaks so hard to know when you are going into a streak or just skipping along to the next real streak. The other problem is once you realise your in a streak it almost to late.

The major problem Ive always seen with the Martingale system is you need an unlimited pot to play with, and even the lottery... [ More ]

Reply #5

temptustoo — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:09:12 GMT

exactly.. we have heard it all before...

Reply #4

Winningsystem — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:01:19 GMT

there are plenty of books on the martigale system, you can google. It's a proven winning strategy but many casinos but rules into place to prevent the strategy from winning like Max table bids of 1500 or 2500 that prevened the system from working. The daily lottory does not have those restrictions. However, that s only part one of this 3 part syste. Progressive betting, probabilities, and understanding and recognizing triggers. 3 years I have toyed witht his. Tweeked, and now finalized I believe... [ More ]

Reply #3

ESR54 — Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:46:43 GMT

Winningsystem,Well if you have a system and it is working ,more power to you .But remember until you

share ,it is not a system.We want to see what you mean by MARTINGALE-ROULLETTE-SYSTEM.

Reply #2

Winningsystem — Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:24:58 GMT

Hit for 42.00 more today... Wish I was utilizing my progressive multiplying bes but the funds need to be there. Lots of possibilitties here and getting excited that I may have found away to BEAT this system. Long time in the making

Reply #1

CajunWin4 — Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:16:26 GMT

Interesting concept The use of Roullette Methods .

Middle of tweeking this system ( PROFITS- Day 180 + $4,123)

Winningsystem — Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:34:26 GMT

Without giving away the farm here I have been a system better for many years. Many spreadsheets, many calculation, and much headache! Im 180 days into this new systema nd I feel it's promising for sustainability. For 180 days of work its low profit. However, I think once I build up bankroll and increase my bets I can make a living. We will see I guess.

I'm under 100% belief that everyday your chances once again diminish to the same starting odds. I have based my system off probabilities.... [ More ]