pick 3 reduction using mathematical methods and the scientific calculator

Reply #65

lakerben — Sun, 02 Sep 2012 04:41:24 GMT

I have to work on a couple of my computers and then I'll download. Thanks.

Reply #64

AlgorithmGuru — Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:32:38 GMT

I'll keep it up for a little while longer, however i do need to take it down at some point. If someone wants it after its taken down they can let me know via a private message.

Reply #63

donn94 — Thu, 30 Aug 2012 22:41:07 GMT

thanks

Reply #62

lakerben — Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:07:55 GMT

If you can keep the download for awhile longer it would be appreciated. I know some people who would like it.

Reply #61

AlgorithmGuru — Tue, 28 Aug 2012 20:07:23 GMT

Just as a heads up, since this thread has no more activity and I haven't heard back from LKMIKE the originator of this thread I'm going to assume no one else is interested. I'll be removing the program for download at the end of the week. Thanx everyone.

Reply #60

AlgorithmGuru — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:46:57 GMT

Cool I'm glad you liked it! :) Glad to hear it runs on XP though good info about the netframework. Also a side note, the 3 digit seed (as I'll call it) can be anything really. The calculations will be performed on regardless. In other words, use any 3 digit number that you think will help eliminate improper numbers. Also you can run calculations back to back... and keep going at that. There is no limit to the number of times you can do the calculations. So essentially if you had a list of seeds... [ More ]

Reply #59

lakerben — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 03:07:10 GMT

Thanks again to Carlig and Algorithmguru.

Neat program. I run xp and I had to download netframework4 which was no big deal. I really like the math selections. I've been using a lot of these on my different look thread. Nice. I have to try the feature with the entering of two draws back to back. Keep up with the good work.

Reply #58

AlgorithmGuru — Mon, 20 Aug 2012 23:43:52 GMT

The last one is the correct address. Thank you so much CarliG! To everyone: I coded it using VisualBasic 2010 express edition. I only tested it on windows 7. If you're running an older version of windows (say XP or vista) it should still work, but may not. If you do decide to download it please read the help section FIRST (the big button at the bottom of the program). The reason being I put a few disclaimers in there. Just want to make sure everyone is on the same page. The program is not design... [ More ]

Reply #57

CarliG — Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:08:32 GMT

Laker

Try ths one , I think I left part of the link off on previous post

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8NeGRdJIep1YXJVbDRFd1BlM2s/edit?pli=1

Reply #56

lakerben — Mon, 20 Aug 2012 15:16:01 GMT

Thanks to both of you. However, I just tried the download and it says it doesn't exsist.

Reply #55

CarliG — Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:33:07 GMT

AlgorithmGuru asked that I post this stand alone program for use with method discussed in this thread.

He will be able to address any questions regarding using it.

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8NeGRdJIep1YXJVbDRFd1BlM2s

CG

Reply #54

AlgorithmGuru — Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:44:31 GMT

The program is finished. I'm trying to find a way to release it now. I'll let everyone know when the program is available and how to obtain it. Thanx. Good luck to all.

Reply #53

SergeM — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:42:42 GMT

Good luck with your program! I hope that you use it yourself to play the lottery.

Reply #52

AlgorithmGuru — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 09:11:45 GMT

So I've essentially finished programming this project. All the functions work, user interface is complete and all functionality is good. All I'm adding now are the help page of the program and a few personal touches. Next all I need to figure out is how to get it to the people that want it. :) I back tested it a little bit and seems to be a reliable system although doubles and triples coming up is not figured in and the elimination using the current functions doesn't remove a lot of values. I'd... [ More ]

Reply #51

billybouy — Wed, 08 Aug 2012 15:24:20 GMT

Yeah I am British, speak english and I understood, I hope someone does say good by as well, or post some thing interesting, rather than be a critic, and pest.

Regards,

billybouy...

Reply #50

SergeM — Sat, 28 Jul 2012 18:54:30 GMT

What if I prove that your elimination is wrong

Reply #49

AlgorithmGuru — Fri, 27 Jul 2012 07:22:17 GMT

Thanks for the go ahead, I do have to admit though there was a slight mix up of user names. I'm terrible sometimes about seeing who wrote what and I when I put your name into that first response I actually meant to address that question to LKMike as I was referring to what he described as the first post under this topic. As much of a geek as I am when it comes to computers, I actually don't join to many forums as they can be time consuming and I'd rather be coding, doing homework, or trying to g... [ More ]

Reply #48

aquariuslottery — Fri, 27 Jul 2012 01:06:07 GMT

And AquariusLottery, I'm asking your permission to code based on the method's you prescribed. I have or will make some modifications to your methodology as I deem necessary, but since it is your system (as first described) I'd prefer your okay to share it with others. Please let me know if you have any problems with that.

Hi AlgorithGuru,

Feel free to code according to the principles I described, or modify at will. Once I published them on LP forum or blog these ideas are free for anybody... [ More ]

Reply #47

LKMIKE — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 20:06:46 GMT

thank you slots

well said

like i always said we are all here to help each other

im not in competition with anyone here

we all put are heads together and try to beat this or at least profit alot

we all try our best here

this is a great site with brilliant people

i feel priviliged to be on here

Reply #46

slotsarefun — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:06:42 GMT

Humble is as humble does. Those of you who bring positive keep on pushing! those of you who bring negativity, good-bye. Not sure if that is good english but oh well.

Reply #45

SergeM — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:46:02 GMT

You are not the only one. I haven't seen any useful code in here that was working, beside of two VBA codes and one was mine.

Most of you have a mouth full of nothing. I haven't seen any of your work! Good English isn't enough

Reply #44

AlgorithmGuru — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 02:55:37 GMT

Yes many codes are for free. Some are not. Since I'm looking to be a programmer for career purposes I don't want ALL my code to be for free. Did microsoft get so big by giving their code away for free? Some code is open source, some is free, some is not. Be that as it may, I'm willing to share some of my work but not all of it. If that doesn't appeal to you, then my apologies. Find free code online and use that.

Reply #43

LKMIKE — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 02:18:10 GMT

yes please pm me

thank you

mike

Reply #42

SergeM — Wed, 25 Jul 2012 19:23:30 GMT

Right on posted codes?

Many codes are for free on internet. MSDN, Oracle, Wiki, blogs and so on.

To win you mainly need money to play, than make no mistakes, the payout is only 50% and less

Reply #41

AlgorithmGuru — Wed, 25 Jul 2012 19:10:16 GMT

So I started working on a program based upon your methods. I'm programming it in VB as it is my most fluent language. (and easier to build complex user interfaces.) Essentially the interface is set up to allow the user to input the last drawn number then calculate numbers to eliminate based upon the mathematical functions you described in this and your previous post of another thread, then display the numbers TO play. I'll be coding the functionality of it soon. It is a little more complex than... [ More ]

Reply #40

aquariuslottery — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 04:04:19 GMT

LKMIKE,

Don't be so humble. We are all here to learn new things. I already picked up several interesting ideas from other people's posts, even if I did not acknowledged that. So far I find LP a pretty fertile ground for brain stimulation, at least the portion responsible for lotteries. Could not do it without you guys. Another proof that many heads are always better than one.

Aquarius

Reply #39

LKMIKE — Mon, 23 Jul 2012 04:51:44 GMT

wow you guys are deep

i thought i was smart

thats great

we got to to lick this pick 3 once and for all

Reply #38

aquariuslottery — Mon, 23 Jul 2012 01:40:53 GMT

Hi Algorithm Guru,

I've been programming for years, first in VB but fairly quickly switched to C in different flavors - currently C#. Java is related to C, main syntax is very similar, you should find it easy to switch. However, if you are thinking about mobile apps, stick to Java.

My personal experience with numeric lotteries indicates that there are definitely patterns in the chaotic world of totally random numbers. They do exist, they can be detected and utilised in predicting future nu... [ More ]

Reply #37

LKMIKE — Sun, 22 Jul 2012 19:40:21 GMT

to post a new topic

for example in the mathemaitcs forum

on the page where you wrote me

near the upper right hand corner near of the page pull downs there ais a new topic button

just click on that and start a new topic and of course give it a name

make sure you are in the right forum though

please fell free to write any time

im sure you will be a valued addition to the LP family

Reply #36

LKMIKE — Sun, 22 Jul 2012 19:16:48 GMT

thank you for writing

i am very impressed with your knowledge and programming skills

i do hope we can work together and i will be in touch with you here and in private mail

its just makes sense to me because the majority of combos and times people play pick 3 the numbers are incorrect

i mean sometimes they come out but very rarely in the next draw

so just away from the numbers you usually play that are not winners most of the time

Reply #35

AlgorithmGuru — Sun, 22 Jul 2012 07:30:51 GMT

I like your system so far. It's actually a small part of the program I'm working on. I think elimination is a key to finding the pick 3 pattern. And essentially my orginially theory was: If a system is random, then there can be no pattern. If there can be no pattern, establish a pattern. That pattern can not be, so eliminate the result of that pattern. Which basically is what you are doing. You're finding what would constitute a pattern between a draw and its next draw. I think using the previou... [ More ]

Reply #34

LKMIKE — Sat, 21 Jul 2012 18:26:41 GMT

oh no laker my comments werent meant anything against you at all

you do alot here and post alot

i admire and respect you and your hard work here as i said to you before

i dont know you keep your head on straight with all these systems and numbers

i notice some people like to tease on here thats all

and then they leave you flat or they taunt you even

we are all here to help each other

i share everything i know

ive been having some medical issues but i have alot more to sh... [ More ]

Reply #33

lakerben — Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:22:00 GMT

I have had system wher I make at least 3 changes a day. That is why I say I'm still working on it. There is nothing abouyt disclosure etc.

Reply #32

LKMIKE — Sun, 01 Jul 2012 19:03:38 GMT

thanks for the pm tom

but i dont how much clearer i can make this for everyone

i dont post numbers because i dont have the time and do not have a program for this either

i dont post numbers also because i gave you the system(s) directly and 2 fully worked out examples

which is way better

alot of people on here just post but they dont give away their syatem

they say its a family secret ,they are still working on it etc..................................

they should just be upf... [ More ]

Reply #31

LKMIKE — Sun, 01 Jul 2012 02:12:37 GMT

everyone please use my other topic also i posted under lottery systems on this site

there you reduce these combos by 30 or 40 more and the methods are much simpler

for now if you want just use the ten equations i initially posted on this topic post on page 1

i tested these and they work well

so between the two systems you can cut these combos down 40 %

but please read my other post also

Reply #30

LKMIKE — Sun, 01 Jul 2012 01:48:34 GMT

012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 023 024 025 026 027 028 029 034 035 036 037 038 039 045 046 047 048 049 056 057 058 059 067 068 069 078 079 089 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 134 135 136 137 138 139 145 146 147 148 149 156 157 158 159 167 168 169 178 179 189 234 235 236 237 238 239 245 246 247 248 249 256 257 258 259 267 268 269 278 279 289 345 346 347 348 349 356 357 358 359 367 368 369 378 379 389 456 457 458 459 467 468 469 478 479 489 567 568 569 578 579 589 678 679 689 789

thanks retxx... [ More ]

Reply #29

retxx — Sun, 01 Jul 2012 00:41:08 GMT

first we need the 120 numbers to work with. post them here please.

Find it interesting reading, but will wait for excel. thanks

Reply #28

retxx — Sun, 01 Jul 2012 00:36:48 GMT

if you need help get carlig to excel it. She is great.

Reply #27

LKMIKE — Sat, 30 Jun 2012 18:08:12 GMT

lol i wish i was

thats probably where all the big money is

Reply #26

SergeM — Sat, 30 Jun 2012 06:45:16 GMT

You are a pimp.

Reply #25

LKMIKE — Sat, 30 Jun 2012 05:51:20 GMT

most of the numbers i eliminate come from my other post (40 - 50 combos)

there is only 10 here if they all work out so far

i added more equations but i havent tested them yet

there are infinite possibilties here its just finding the right equations to use

Reply #24

LKMIKE — Sat, 30 Jun 2012 02:35:08 GMT

okay one other important matter i forgot

how did i test these equations ??????????????? how do i know they work or dont work ???????????

so i went back 60 draws or one month

i tested every single combo draw that came out winning in the last month

i plugged each one of these individual combos into each equation i listed

not one came out using these equations in the next draw

maybe two losses - for the 1/x equation and sin x

but thats good enough for me 2 losses in 60 draws as... [ More ]

Reply #23

LKMIKE — Sat, 30 Jun 2012 00:12:29 GMT

im sorry lakerben its really not to difficult ill go thru it again for you

1. first of all i work from draw to draw only / singles combos / no doubles / box only

2.we play only box here so there are 120 boxed single combos to play if we played them all correct ?

way to much $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ cant profit this way so we want to make that maybe 50 - 60 single combos to play

3. go to your last singles winning draw say it was 328 for example / we call the last singles draw x so x=328

4.

Reply #22

lakerben — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:45:39 GMT

Congrats on your hits but I have no idea what you are saying. The not to play and the deleating numbers makes no sense to me. I'm sure you understand since you are the originator of your system, but I don't have a clue what you are doing. Maybe a clearer explanation with steps or something would help.

Reply #21

Kwashata — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:29:01 GMT

How about me in ontario how does it work

Reply #20

SergeM — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:12:02 GMT

Excel is programmable. No need for drawings, I guess, unless you use geometry

Reply #19

LKMIKE — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:05:04 GMT

you are right lol

i dabbled in it in the office just for minor small reports but nothing as extensive as this

i primarily use CAD packages and matlab in my design wiork

Reply #18

SergeM — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:01:37 GMT

Get Excel.

Reply #17

LKMIKE — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 21:58:38 GMT

the hardest thing about both of my posts you have to recalculate for every draw

its alot of work

Reply #16

LKMIKE — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 21:56:17 GMT

serge,

try my other post also i previosly mentioned

its alot easier then this one and much less calculating involved and it works

its not flawless

when doubles come in you lose automatically

this one is for people who enjoy plugging into equations alot and understand algebra and trig

ill try to answer any questions you or anyone has when i can get a chance

Reply #15

LKMIKE — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 21:42:43 GMT

im sorry serge but i dont post numbers and never did

i have to grind these numbers out for about 2 hours a day

and i only play my own numbers

i dont have a program yet set up either so its like doing math homework on paper for 2 hours daily

and it involves alot more typing to post

unfortunately i dont have that time

i do these workouts on paper not on the computer using a paen and a calculator

but i did give you guys two systems to try and use

i held nothing back you do

Reply #14

SergeM — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 20:23:30 GMT

So we all suppose that you backtested the system and you want to tell us the results. Name the lottery and the period of time.

Reply #13

LKMIKE — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:29:30 GMT

whatever numbers that come from these calculations and my other system post

these are the ones not to play in the next draw only

so you copy and paste the 120 single combos and you delete one by one the numers that come out using these equations leaving you only the only numbers to play

i hope this is a little clearer now

Reply #12

LKMIKE — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:20:55 GMT

HI LAKERBEN,

i didnt know because i dont look or have the time at all to study all the forums or topics or posts on here

by the way i am very impressed with your knowledge of lottery topics and posts

there are thousands of posts and topics on here

however there are thousands of equations to use also

here is one example

i am engineeer and had 3 years of engineering math

x = last draw

sinx + lnx + 1/x = # not to play

i just made this up as i am typing talking with you

Reply #11

lakerben — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:41:01 GMT

Nice, but these are the same math procedures I've been using on my different look at pick 3 and 4 thread in the Lottery Systems forum since last year .

The only difference is the don't play method which still has me confused.

Reply #10

LKMIKE — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:36:49 GMT

lol

exactly thats why this method is in reverse outside the box

can you say the alphabet backward? we are not trained to do that

copy and paste the full 120 combos

then just delete the ones that come up with my systems and play them

youll be surprised

Reply #9

jeankedemetser — Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:35:04 GMT

And into gambling...

Reply #8

SergeM — Wed, 27 Jun 2012 23:37:49 GMT

I read plenty of don't play, I read no do play this. You are pushing people into alcoholism.

Reply #7

mjoyg1123 — Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:45:43 GMT

Oh, the good ole days when I used to get

A+ in math using all these formulas.

Wish I understood them now LOL

Reply #6

LKMIKE — Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:10:40 GMT

here is something for all you guys to try

ill get to it also but probably not till next week

take the reciprocal of the above calculations and see how they work out

you must bacjest it at least for a month 60 draws

so what i mean

1/ lnx

1/logx

1/sinx

1/cosx

1/tanx

1/x squared

1/x cubed

etc....................................................

Reply #5

Momma69 — Sat, 16 Jun 2012 17:57:11 GMT

489 fast cash

61 66 11 25 20 75

17 12 67 51 56 01

Reply #4

LKMIKE — Sat, 16 Jun 2012 17:45:51 GMT

hi ranman17

you are so right

its alot of homework but it works

im not big on programming even though im an engineer

i probably can do something in excel for both of my posts so you plug in the last 3 singles draws and all the numbers spit out

save alot of hand calculations

Reply #3

ranman17 — Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:23:42 GMT

It would be great if someone could automate this in excel.

Reply #2

CajunWin4 — Sat, 16 Jun 2012 07:42:21 GMT

Excellent Post !!! LMIKE

i don't play pick 3 games . But , I like where your going with this system ....

Reply #1

LKMIKE — Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:39:06 GMT

use 732 not 780 sorry

pick 3 reduction using mathematical methods and the scientific calculator

LKMIKE — Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:37:47 GMT

hi everybody

i wanted to post this under the mathematics category but also please use this in conjunction

with the link listed below

http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/247190

basically what im doing here is an extension of the above topic

eliminating box single combos to not play the pick 3 using math functions

no doubles here to play either at all

ill work out a full example for you

you only need the one previous single combo draw to work off of

hopefully you have som... [ More ]