Why do people give away their lottery system?

Reply #184

Scientistman — Mon, 01 Oct 2012 11:34:23 GMT

Anfang your post is the kind I humbly like to see, if there were more who had your spirit I'd almost be tempted to share.

You are open to the ridiculous in life, the sillyness of life, the random craziness of how life is....that type of spirit is exactly what helps people win the lottery.

Each day has its instructions for you personally. All you have to do is listen. The answer is most times right in front of you. We just dont want to accept it.

Reply #183

Anfang71 — Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:16:32 GMT

Madscientist man, I've read through this and I will say I do believe you had a thing going there when you had all 6 numbers a few times.

I'm intrigued with your system or prediction. Also when you mentioned about sometime finding the numbers online. Honestly I can believe that..but there are millions of sights...which ones is this? Major news sites? Lotto sites?

Well I'll be glad to hear from you.

I'm very interested in something anything....even sharing. I just hope no one wins any... [ More ]

Reply #182

Scientistman — Sun, 30 Sep 2012 06:02:12 GMT

This is scientistman who started the post. I have not revealed my system yet. Only advice.

My system that I was able to attain all 6 winning numbers you wouldnt believe it even if I did reveal it because many people are too sceptical to believe it or too intellegent for their own good. Many people do not believe in systems unless they have some proof behind them that make sense to them intelectually. Some people on lotterypost and other boards live to get their ego stroked by their lofty way

Reply #181

bobby623 — Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:10:05 GMT

Ronnie316

The plan requires that each collaborator, participant, be responsible for a single set of data.

I could worry about the single digits, you could worry about the teens, etc.

The Controller would receive the individual recommendations, 3 numbers from each player, use the 18 total numbers to generate 30 combinations and then give each participant 5 combinations to buy. Verification of purchase would be required.

Thus, six players times $5 equals 30 combinations.

Of course,

Reply #180

Ronnie316 — Sat, 29 Sep 2012 21:18:41 GMT

$5. Bobby. Really?? And for this you need a controller?? I don't understand and Im confused.

Reply #179

mcginnin56 — Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:24:36 GMT

I agree with your collaboration approach bobby623.

As you point out however, too many are more interested in self interest, or ego trips.

Perhaps one day the right group of people can get together, and pull off a major jackpot

Reply #178

bobby623 — Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:39:54 GMT

In my humble opinion, the next winner of a major jackpot using 'self picks' based on a system will be a small group of folks who realize that 'collaboration' is the best approach. And, by dividing the work and sharing ideas, they are making plays that may be paying off.

They are doing the smart thing and keeping their work private.

Again, IMHO, we seem to have a lot of 'cowboys' here who are content to 'do their own thing,' and really don't have much to show

for their efforts, at least,... [ More ]

Reply #177

mcginnin56 — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:09:32 GMT

Perhaps after having success with this super system, he would expect members to voluntarily make a donation, to this non-profit gift to us all.

Reply #176

savagegoose — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:57:44 GMT

this cant be the real system you would never give that away

Reply #175

mcginnin56 — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:40:12 GMT

Got it

Reply #174

Scientistman — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:31:07 GMT

The way to increase your odds and possibly win the lottery is that you have to pick your numbers like you always do, the ones you think have the most probability of showing then throw those numbers away and pick all the numbers you didnt pick. And play those instead. You will increase your odds by 50%

Heres why? If you ever noticed the numbers that show are always numbers that you didnt play or numbers that you thought about playing but didnt, or numbers you had a hunch about but shook it off... [ More ]

Reply #173

Ronnie316 — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 21:17:39 GMT

It is a dubious badge of honor, but anything remotely related to the word doobie sounded good to me.

Reply #172

mcginnin56 — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:29:42 GMT

Nice pun on words Ronnie316, but this ship will never come in again. It is better this way, as I become seasick very easily.

My dropout dreams are dashed, it is a high cost to pay, but pay it I shall. My credit rating is very important to me.

Reply #171

Ronnie316 — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:03:11 GMT

So instead of leaving on the ship, your waiting for your ship to come in

Reply #170

mcginnin56 — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:56:57 GMT

That was a one time only boat arrival. I will need a time machine to catch that one again.

I can live with that however, bittersweet memories are better than no memories at all.

Reply #169

Ronnie316 — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:47:24 GMT

No worry, a new boat sails most every day.

Reply #168

mcginnin56 — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:43:40 GMT

Sadly, I only missed the boat by five minutes.

Reply #167

Ronnie316 — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:38:40 GMT

You had your chance to drop out a long time ago mcginnin56, sorry you missed the boat,.,.,. ;lol.

Reply #166

Ronnie316 — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:36:44 GMT

Here is another way to look at it LottoPerro,

A blog was created here at LP a while back called One in 1000 where 175,000 MM lines were played on every single draw to simulate One in 1000 odds........

The odd part about the short lived blog is that it never even hit second prize (5 of 5) not even once.

My predictions (using 98.280 lines) produced four 5 of 5 hits in 18 draws and one of them was a 5+1.

Now, if you want to stand by your opinion thats fine. But if you are going to insi... [ More ]

Reply #165

mcginnin56 — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:30:41 GMT

A valid point Mr-Smith. Indeed Bill Gates was a college dropout. Wonder how he would fare in number prediction?

I hope you can find the key, to unlock the lottery mysteries that have baffled us for so long. Best of luck

Reply #164

Number19King — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:17:36 GMT

What i have learned since I have started playing is I can tell you my system but it doesnt mean

you will hit with it..Just like making Kobe's,Tigers, Dean Smiths,etc...You have to find what works

for you and My Systems work for me in the games i choose to play...The goal is to narrow the odds

thats really it!!! When you do you make the chances even better in any game!!! No perfect solution

unless we would have no money in the lotteries to give! What would be the fun if watching sport... [ More ]

Reply #163

Mr-Smith — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:08:08 GMT

Ivy league school, mathematical geniuses, programmers, analysts or system pro's

It Does not mean that they are smart because it also takes imagination of the impossible to MAKE it possible.

The majority of business and inventions are made by collage dropouts...

Some dropped out of high school Just look a the Forbes list of the richest in America...,

I believe that the lottery can be figured out .... I just have not done it yet....

Reply #162

Ronnie316 — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:46:28 GMT

No offence taken......

Many people have confronted me personally and strongly believe that no possible way exists for reducing the odds and that's ok.... You could be right, but in my mind it is a falsehood because I have proven it to myself through the process of trial and error..... Just opinion, that's all.

Reply #161

LottoPerro — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:41:52 GMT

If I offended any of you, I sincerely apologize. However, I will still stand by my opinion.

Reply #160

Ronnie316 — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:23:41 GMT

RJOh is right in that you are very presumptuous to speak for the ENTIRE LP community LottoPerro,

I will give you credit for being right about a few things, but for the most part you are believing falsehoods.

How could you possible know what I (or anyone here) would do if they won a jackpot???

Are you me?? Do you have control over my decisions I make?? Somehow, I don't really think so!!!

It has already been proven that the overall odds can be improved upon, but you think whatever you... [ More ]

Reply #159

RJOh — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:10:37 GMT

I thought maybe he was trying to make a point but I guess he wanted to say something even if it was nothing.

Reply #158

RJOh — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:03:14 GMT

The way you used the word we made it sound like you were speaking for a group that included you. I know I've never been in that group and I been a LP member for years.

Reply #157

LottoBoner — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:01:23 GMT

Why are you wasting energy replying to a person who doesn't have enough time to to find a suitable avatar, let alone find a suitable way to crunch the numbers and beat the odds?

All one has to do is watch the movie 21, and you will learn that odds do change over time, or better yet,

The overall odds dont change, but the degree of certainty of a certain outcome does change over time.

Reply #156

LottoPerro — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:42:00 GMT

Never said anyone was wasting their time. And I'm not part of any group. We means the entire Lottery Post community.

Reply #155

RJOh — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:11:10 GMT

You use the word we as if you are part of the group that analyze and come up with ideas for picking winning lottery numbers and yet you say they are wasting their time. What is your point

Reply #154

mcginnin56 — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 01:10:57 GMT

Good point LottoPerro.

I doubt there are that many ivy league school, mathematical geniuses, programmers, analysts or system pro's that have actually won a jackpot.

That being said, there are many of us here who believe that Ronnie316 has a decent crack at it.

The person who would win 2-nites MM, or tomorrow evenings PB, will most likely be some Plain-Jane or Joe-Schmo, with little or no lottery stradagy.

Reply #153

LottoPerro — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:59:15 GMT

I didn't have time to read all eleven pages of this thread, but I can sum up what I did read into two statements:

1. No matter how much we analyze, no matter how we break the numbers down, and no matter how much money we spend putting our ideas to use, the odds of winning that elusive, life-changing jackpot will always be the same - 1 in 176 million.

2. It's funny because while we as lottery analysts crunch numbers down and put our minds into hitting the big one, it's mostly those who DON... [ More ]

Reply #152

mcginnin56 — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:44:19 GMT

Reply #151

Ronnie316 — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:27:21 GMT

I Want You Back

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3Q80mk7bxE

Reply #150

mcginnin56 — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:17:24 GMT

Dancing, dancing dancing.

She's a dancing machine.

Ah babe.

Move it baby.

Automatic Systematic.

Full of color self contained.

Tuned and channeled to your vibes.

Captivating Stimulating.

She's such a sexy lady.

Built with space age design.

She's moving, grooving, dancing to the music stop now.

Yea!

Rhythematic acrobatic.

She's a dynamite attraction.

Dancing Machine - The Jackson 5

Reply #149

Ronnie316 — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:03:58 GMT

Even the best non-system is systematic.

Reply #148

mcginnin56 — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:26 GMT

The best system is a non-system.

Reply #147

kyokushin187 — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:58:18 GMT

BECAUSE THEIR IS NO SUCH THING AS A LOTTERY SYSTEM

Reply #146

mcginnin56 — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:18:13 GMT

I always wanted to be a house, but I had to settle for a small storage shed.

Reply #145

Ronnie316 — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:03:56 GMT

I think he is talking about being the house

Reply #144

RJOh — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:00:54 GMT

How is that any different than not buying a ticket in the first place? Not losing by not playing is not winning.

Reply #143

savagegoose — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:27:42 GMT

theres 1 system that works every time, sell the tickets for the draw.

Reply #142

mcginnin56 — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:06:24 GMT

Sounds like a great way to start the day! Goodbye Wheaties , hello Rum and Coke.

Reply #141

jmw8138 — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 05:42:23 GMT

the best recipe that i have found for coke is as follows...

take 1-16oz cup.

fill with ice.

add 4-6oz of captain morgan's spiced rum.

add a splash of coke from a can.

mix and enjoy!!

(drink responsibly and remember, dont drink and gamble...lol

Reply #140

RJOh — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 05:06:40 GMT

If by works, you mean wins a lot then you are wasting your time, no such system has ever been given away.

Reply #139

asinglerose — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 02:27:06 GMT

Jap69 what system do you have that works

Reply #138

Lucky5of5 — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 04:03:04 GMT

Ive seen some who give away their lottery system on LotteryPost, just curious why anyone would ever give away their lottery system?

But yet in your post If you knew the numbers before the drawing? - originally started on 2-25-12, you stated:

If you knew HALF of the 6 numbers in advance.

What type of method would you play to go about getting the other 3 to win the jackpot?

I am very very very interested in hearing from anyone on this forum.

And because I only know 3 of t... [ More ]

Reply #137

bigguy5 — Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:02:03 GMT

they do have systems help to lower ur odds, i have systems that help me to win some, but u no what the problem is

players think that supose to hit everytime they play. it don,t work like that, i been in the number game for many many yrs,

before lottery was out, sharing is the way to go,

Reply #136

lakerben — Mon, 17 Sep 2012 05:55:19 GMT

By sharing I have gained. I've learned a lot from this forum and have downloaded many systems.

Reply #135

savagegoose — Mon, 17 Sep 2012 02:24:50 GMT

his is similar to my goose elimination method.

get any numbers savagegoose plays. and eliminate them from your pool and wheel the remainding set.

Reply #134

gra8*2win — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 22:39:12 GMT

This whole thing is a scam......it's the bait and switch..........first of all he gets your attention......insults a few people.....so idiots like me read the whole

thread......then he turns the tables on you veterans.....asking you to .....give your systems.....to him........madscients is a playa period.....

Reply #133

Lucky Loser — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 15:15:45 GMT

I would speed up the process to make sure it never happened again.

This is what I was getting at, 'Stack. With a system that can supposedly net (6) of (6) even remotely consistent, and within four months, I'd have my numbers ready and played 2-3 days prior to each draw. This way, I have no excuse for missing the opportunity several times over. As it stands, I have a specific time which I begin to check results for the little games so that I can find what I need for the next draw.

Opp... [ More ]

Reply #132

mcginnin56 — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 15:13:26 GMT

At least a cave is nice and dark, bet it's a great place to grow some mushrooms

Reply #131

bigguy5 — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 15:06:29 GMT

who care about your system, go back to ur cave dude, this post a bout helping player to make money,

so take ur system back to ur cave,

Reply #130

Lucky Loser — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 14:57:40 GMT

Actually, there's a systematic approach to every numbers game because we're only dealing with numbers and their relevant variances. As the number count increases, though, so does the variance and renders it harder to control , if you will, a reasonable and affordable outcome. With PB, it can be won as well...with an associated cost and very good timing. Believe it or not.

L.L.

Reply #129

Ronnie316 — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 14:35:20 GMT

Reply #128

JAP69 — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 14:31:51 GMT

I gave all my ideas away for pick 3 and 4

why?

Do not feel like taking the time and hassle to market the system.

Have no desire to set up a website for paid subscribers for my predictions.

Show the system and let the players work on it to figure out what to play. No doubt serious players feel more comfortable selecting their own plays. Once they figure out wether they can pick winners or not from a system they have that knowledge for life.

Reply #127

Ronnie316 — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 14:25:59 GMT

Looks like your pondering a good idea mcginnin56

Reply #126

Ronnie316 — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 14:24:11 GMT

Eliminating random numbers is a good start.

Reply #125

Ronnie316 — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 14:22:15 GMT

It has already been proven, you just werent paying attention.

Reply #124

Ronnie316 — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 14:19:30 GMT

You dont need to buy QPs to generate 10 random numbers.

Reply #123

bayram — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 14:10:08 GMT

if you pretend your so-called system -works prove it or use it to get rich

Reply #122

savagegoose — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 11:10:32 GMT

i read his system

Reply #121

mcginnin56 — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 11:05:45 GMT

Reply #120

savagegoose — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 11:00:02 GMT

so buy 2 qp's then wheel all other numbers but them. because qp's never win?

out here we can get refunds, so i say buy 2 quick pics, write the numbers down, then cancel the qp's?

then wheel all other numbers.

Reply #119

onlymoney — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 03:18:25 GMT

Well it sounded good.

Reply #118

Ronnie316 — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:34:23 GMT

Thanks onlymoney, I always felt like the answer was 'No sound but could never explain it.

You are the man, onlymoney.

Reply #117

onlymoney — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:28:29 GMT

No. It makes vibrations/waves. You need a receiver to complete the transaction, and then you can call it sound.

Just like light, it's only waves/particles until something or some entity's brain transcribes those waves into what's perceived as light.

The same reason why bees can see Ultraviolet light, but humans can't. Human's eye's aren't designed to see that frequency, but it's all around us in waves.

All life's perceptions are personal experiences by the observer, and that's where Ein... [ More ]

Reply #116

Ronnie316 — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:56:54 GMT

Now thats good news. You have restored my faith in wishing upon a star.

Reply #115

mcginnin56 — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:51:46 GMT

Of course it does, what a silly question.

Reply #114

Ronnie316 — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:48:51 GMT

Does a shooting star grant wishes

Reply #113

mcginnin56 — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:43:45 GMT

Does a falling tree make a sound if no one hears it

Reply #112

Ronnie316 — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:33:19 GMT

Is it still considered giving it away if no one accepts

Reply #111

Ronnie316 — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:19:48 GMT

And dont forget about the hazards of chasing cold numbers.

Reply #110

onlymoney — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:57:00 GMT

Many of the systems rely on past results even though everybody should know the next drawing is random as where all the previous drawings

That is true, however, there are patterns and trends that one can track to at least filter out numbers that have less probability to show in the next draw.

Today's Florida midday's winning Pick-3 number was 055. It has the same chance of showing up in tonight's draw in the exact order. Combos do repeat in the pick-3 in consecutive draws, but are rare... [ More ]

Reply #109

Stack47 — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:23:44 GMT

Systems are nothing more than what a player feels is a logical way to pick their numbers. Some players call the time of day they buy their QPs a system. The legal Pick-3 game has been played somewhere for over 30 years and illegally for over hundred, yet every day somebody comes with what they believe is a unique way to pick the numbers. There may be an infinite number of ways to pick a three digit number, but the odds are still 999 to 1.

A true system would give one winning result on any pic... [ More ]

Reply #108

Ronnie316 — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 17:05:06 GMT

Your only saying that because my system works, and your system DOESNT.

Reply #107

mcginnin56 — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 17:00:48 GMT

That still gives me about 2 weeks, I will try to win this Jackpot ASAP!

I am highly motivated to get your $2.

Reply #106

RJOh — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 15:10:44 GMT

The offer only good this month so hurry, you don't have much time.

Reply #105

bayram — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 14:49:43 GMT

simply because there is NO system

Reply #104

mcginnin56 — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 13:25:50 GMT

I'll take you up on that generous offer RJ. Hell $2 will buy my morning newspaper, java and pick 3 QP

Reply #103

mcginnin56 — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 13:20:24 GMT

Excellent! Now we can all start benefiting from this system, and begin hitting those big elusive Jackpots!

Thanks for sharing Scientistman

Reply #102

Mr-Smith — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 12:25:22 GMT

Its posted on a public blog....sooooo, it is not private information....

I just pointed out what he has already posted.....

So it not a breech of confidentiality...... law 101.

Reply #101

RJOh — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 12:20:47 GMT

I'll do even better. I'm offering a reward of $2 to any LP member who actually wins a MM or PB jackpot this month. That way if any of you have a system that good, you can buy a ticket and not only win a jackpot but get a refund of your ticket cost.

Reply #100

mcginnin56 — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 12:12:44 GMT

Wow...I can't believe you just gave away his system Mr-Smith!

I pray that no pending lawsuits will be forth coming, as a result of this breech in confidentiality.

Reply #99

Mr-Smith — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 11:40:07 GMT

Im going to end this Madness..... If you want his system here it is......

He already posted it..........

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/244040/2503000

Do a little research and you will always find what your looking for even if you dont like the answer........

Reply #98

Lucky Loser — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 03:19:31 GMT

It took time for me to show how the same thing works on the smaller games, too. I don't bite at just any old worm...it has look a certain way.

L.L.

Reply #97

Lucky Loser — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 02:37:45 GMT

Ronnie, I have no argument here. If a player has the money to cover the combinations, then they can win. It's as simple as that, buddy. Numbers have never lied...and never will. You've already proven your point here with the possibilities of winning and there's no rocket science involved. Hey, just come up with the money and a person can win. Good job!

L.L.

Reply #96

Ronnie316 — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 02:00:36 GMT

Very nice logic as always LL,

but I have already proven that anyone with deep pockets who doesn't mind being down a few million at a time can not only cover the combinations but has VERY GOOD ODDS at coming out on top in a big way.

And it's not a matter of having a system to protect, its simply a matter of doing the math and having a winning perspective.

Reply #95

Lucky Loser — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 01:40:02 GMT

Okay, let's face it, there's no system for any large (6/56+ mega ball) type game...too many combinations to try and cover. If a player actually did have such a system which won even remotely consistent, they would never give it away due to purely self-preservation reasoning. What does that mean? Well, they wouldn't want anyone else to mess up their good thing. With the smaller games, it's much easier to help people because there's much, much, much, much, much less money involved for them to pay... [ More ]

Reply #94

RJOh — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 23:39:47 GMT

My system has never actually won a jackpot but there has been times it could have won if the numbers had come up at the right time. All the winning numbers were there just not in the right combination.

Reply #93

Ronnie316 — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 23:25:46 GMT

They were not using mine the night I hit 5+1 on MM because no one won that night.

And the other night when someone did win I didnt have the numbers, so that was not mine either.

Reply #92

RJOh — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 23:21:40 GMT

Some people just like to collect systems like they do old lottery programs. They seldom use them because if they did and they worked, they wouldn't be interested in collecting more.

Reply #91

marcie — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:17:37 GMT

I just read this LOl, you never know who is using it and thats a fact.. lol..

Reply #90

Ronnie316 — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:06:35 GMT

Its not giving your system away if no one wants it, or uses it. lol. lol. lol.

Reply #89

Ronnie316 — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:02:03 GMT

I agree RJOh, Dr. Pepper has them both beat.

Reply #88

Ronnie316 — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:00:37 GMT

The head of Ted is NOT dead.

Reply #87

Ronnie316 — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:59:45 GMT

Who cares if you did something once Scientistman, do it again if its a good system.

This time in the forum (like I did

Reply #86

Scientistman — Tue, 11 Sep 2012 22:46:05 GMT

Not a bad idea RJOh, YET as I said my system produced 4 jackpot wins in 15 months not 4 in a month or even 1 in a month, it produced them over a certain timeframe, so it is very possible one could play for a month straight and not win the jackpot and people have to ask themselves even with those odds how long have they been playing the lottery without a jackot win? YEARS!

Most likely years and years and years and most likely will continue for years and years and years because they keep playin... [ More ]

Reply #85

mcginnin56 — Tue, 11 Sep 2012 01:25:56 GMT

I'll further discuss this possibility with my team of financial adviser's, legal staff and IT system specialists.

Always wise to proceed cautiously regarding any type of contract.