Are QPs randomly generated numbers?

Reply #181

RJOh — Sun, 09 Dec 2012 21:46:34 GMT

The companies that contract with the states to run their lotteries have their own software developers.

Reply #180

Ronnie316 — Sun, 09 Dec 2012 19:54:13 GMT

Perhaps the Lotteries could brand LP on their play slips in exchange for the software...

Reply #179

Ronnie316 — Sun, 09 Dec 2012 19:42:47 GMT

I'm talking about a checked box on the play slips that will generate (non-pseudo) LP QPs.........

No filling out slips required.............

Reply #178

RJOh — Sun, 11 Nov 2012 01:15:11 GMT

Perhaps the day will come when we have the option of buying......

1. Terminal generated QPs

2. LP generated QPs

You have that option now, you just have to put your LP generated QPs on a play slip before playing.

I personal perfer playing QPs picked by my personal RNG which also requires I fill out play slips.

Reply #177

Ronnie316 — Sat, 10 Nov 2012 23:49:20 GMT

Thanks for all your hard work Lottonomics, it has not gone unnoticed.......

Perhaps the day will come when we have the option of buying......

1. Terminal generated QPs

2. LP generated QPs

Reply #176

Lottonomics — Sat, 10 Nov 2012 04:56:24 GMT

Well tonight was the conclusion of my 5 week (10 draw) small scale experiment from the MM Elimination numbers thread.

1 terminal QP vs 1 Lottery Post QP played live head to head for 10 straight draws and here were the results.

The best the terminal QP got in the 10 draws was a: 0+1, 1+0, 1+0

The best the Lottery Post QP got in the 10 draws was a: 2+0, 1+0, 1+0, 2+0, 1+0

In a previous post Todd said Quick Picks should be totally random numbers, devoid of patterns , and in that regard

Reply #175

Stack47 — Sun, 14 Oct 2012 02:36:56 GMT

What they should have said is that it will prevent duplicates as a result of flaws in the system.

Ten tickets were printed with ten lines on each ticket and two of the ten tickets had ten identical combos. It was a real flaw and probably be unnoticed hadn't one player bought 100 tickets.

If QP's are random we should expect duplicates in direct proportion to the odds of the game.

Maybe, but after more than half of all the combos are sold, the odds favor one of those combos repeating.... [ More ]

Reply #174

KY Floyd — Sat, 13 Oct 2012 06:00:01 GMT

if the computer was really counting then it would hemmorage when it had to calculate the sales in all the states to see if that partiular QP had been played before.

If there's any confusion, I wasn't suggesting that there should be a filter based on whether or not a combination had been already been played. It would be reasonable (and probably desirable) to check the combinations being generated for a single ticket to make sure a line isn't duplicated on that ticket. If your QP happens to ha... [ More ]

Reply #173

savagegoose — Sat, 13 Oct 2012 01:24:02 GMT

something like mm or pb you should expect a duplicate as often as the winning jackpot

Reply #172

LottoBoner — Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:53:07 GMT

What they should have said is that it will prevent duplicates as a result of flaws in the system.

Since there is no official list that has combinations removed after quick picks are sold, it is undertandable that with almost 1 billion tickets sold there may be some duplicates. What you dont want to see is 10 million Qp tickets with the combination 1 2 3 4 5. (Is there any accounting for this?)

Take into account the fact that some people play PQP, (p meaning partial), that if the computer w... [ More ]

Reply #171

SergeM — Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:38:29 GMT

There is nothing wrong with duplicates generated. Two or more persons can play the same combinations and more of the same combination if they want to.

Generating unique combinations starting for each drawing? I suppose that is meant.

Reply #170

KY Floyd — Fri, 12 Oct 2012 06:53:39 GMT

There was a story several months ago about duplicate tickets, but IIRC, entire tickets were duplicated the next time a QP was printed. Whether it's in the QP generator or some other part of the overall system, that's clearly the result of a flaw. If the lottery says the fix prevents duplicates I expect that it's a simple case of not being precise. What they should have said is that it will prevent duplicates as a result of flaws in the system.

If QP's are random we should expect duplicates in... [ More ]

Reply #169

Ronnie316 — Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:46:08 GMT

Thanks LL. only two numbers away from a perfect 5 of 5. I wasnt live with these numbers but I like the way the wheel goes round..........

Reply #168

Lucky Loser — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 01:38:25 GMT

Well, looks like line #38 matched (3) numbers, Ronnie! Nice going!! The payout on 3+0 looks to be $7 which is a lot better than nothing in my book. Not sure if you went live with 'em, but I see an immediate $39 deficit. The closest I got with mine was on line C where I had 07-22-36-38 which is really not bad considering the numbers are QP's...and almost twenty days old.

We can try again some time if you'd like. Maybe next time, I can tweak my lines a bit for comparison.

L.L.... [ More ]

Reply #167

Ronnie316 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 17:04:01 GMT

Why would I want to........ Buy lottery numbers that are more likely to win the lottery

Reply #166

jamella724 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 16:32:19 GMT

Yes, there are software that generate random numbers. You can check out site such as snip so you'll better understand how the system happens.

Reply #165

savagegoose — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:53:44 GMT

ill play to. this is my every number once , well almost i only have 10 lines. same 10 lines on pb and mm. bonus number just random. asssingment to lines is randomly generated.

11-26-32-51-52 +35 ** 14-19-21-39-45 +11 ** 4-24-25-49-53 +14 ** 13-18-33-38-47 +28 ** 3-27-36-37-46 +17 ** 1-9-30-48-54 +33 ** 2-8-16-17-44 +34 ** 10-29-40-55-56 +25 ** 12-31-35-41-43 +2 ** 15-20-22-23-50 +12

Reply #164

Lucky Loser — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 03:04:10 GMT

Okay, I'm in, too. I want only the same (10) lines I posted here earlier from the 9/21/2012 draw to be entered, okay. You'll have (50) combos to my same (10). How will this deal be graded? Whoever matches the most numbers on a single line or what?

This will definitely determine whether or not all the additional MONEY, numbers, time, and effort is truly worth the return if any. I'm likin' this already.

Ya'll have my numbers...

L.L.

Reply #163

Ronnie316 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:56:14 GMT

Quite a few people wont post predictions for me or the boards for that very reason.....

I learned to get over it. lol. lol. lol.

Reply #162

mcginnin56 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:55:51 GMT

Best of luck! I'm sure some extra cash would come in handy for Halloween.

Reply #161

mcginnin56 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:53:41 GMT

That would be a hoot if I hit a 5 of 5, cause I'm not playing these live.

Reply #160

Ronnie316 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:52:35 GMT

I posted the 2 if 2 of 20 that Im playing live. https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/247020/115

Reply #159

Ronnie316 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:50:53 GMT

I did pick all 56 numbers... lol. lol. May the planets all line up in a row.... and the stars too.....

Reply #158

mcginnin56 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:50:27 GMT

Are you playing these numbers live

Reply #157

Ronnie316 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:47:54 GMT

Best wishes my friend,

May beginners luck give me a spectacular first showing.....

Reply #156

mcginnin56 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:45:13 GMT

May my QP's kick your self picks behind

Reply #155

mcginnin56 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:43:11 GMT

Just saw them on the board, nice work

Reply #154

Ronnie316 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:42:26 GMT

I pasted then added the bonus numbers and removed the line numbers.... lol. lol.

1. 14-19-23-27-34 2. 03-28-34-35-38 3. 03-17-18-34-36 4. 03-27-34-49-51 5. 03-11-16-31-34 6. 14-17-23-28-31 7. 14-16-18-23-38 8. 11-14-23-35-36 9. 03-14-23-49-51 10. 16-27-28-36-51 11. 11-18-19-28-49 12. 04-06-07-22-24 13. 04-24-25-41-42 14. 04-09-24-37-44 15. 05-08-12-52-53 16. 12-29-32-39-55 17. 03-10-12-27-40 18. 12-13-32-48-52 19. 02-12-21-45-48 20. 19-31-36-38-49 21. 11-17-27-38-51 22. 08-39-48-53-55 23. 05

Reply #153

mcginnin56 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:37:51 GMT

Are you pasting, or manually posting your numbers

Reply #152

mcginnin56 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:33:50 GMT

Yes.

Reply #151

Ronnie316 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:32:37 GMT

It still says Im posting more than 50.... Do I need to delete the line numbers

Reply #150

mcginnin56 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:32:06 GMT

So Ronnie, are you going to post your numbers on the prediction board?

I think this would be the best venue, so that all 133,733 members can view immediately our results and corresponding prizes, if any.

Reply #149

Ronnie316 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:28:38 GMT

Its interesting LL, but its my understanding that I can take a 28 number pool (98,280 lines) apply a 4 if 4 wheel and have a 1 in 5 chance with 9431 lines. You do the math.....

Reply #148

mcginnin56 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:26:48 GMT

Correct

Reply #147

Lucky Loser — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:25:35 GMT

Just thought it would be interesting information, that's all.

L.L.

Reply #146

Ronnie316 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:24:45 GMT

Oh.... I think I got it... Do I put the bonus number at the end.... like a 6th number

Reply #145

Ronnie316 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:22:38 GMT

I tried to copy and paste 46 in there and it said I was posting over 50

I feel like Im on a first date

Reply #144

mcginnin56 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:20:21 GMT

As I mentioned earlier, give yourself an extra 10 lines on the house, my compliments.

Reply #143

mcginnin56 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:18:28 GMT

I just got back to forums now, already posted 50 QP's

I'm unable to edit.

Reply #142

Ronnie316 — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:13:49 GMT

I believe there is mathematical proof LL, but I will need stack or someone who does wheels to demonstrate.

Reply #141

Lucky Loser — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:00:20 GMT

Okay, I had to dig around a bit to find the ticket... which ended up still being hidden within my wallet. Go figure, because retaining old losing tickets isn't something I make a habit of doing. The ticket in question is a MM's ticket which I purchased on 9/21/2012 and I told the story of why I bought the ticket. For reference, the clerk had over printed $10 worth and nobody wanted them...they were just sitting there as I went to check out so I bought the ticket for two reasons. First, it was th... [ More ]

Reply #140

Ronnie316 — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 23:43:51 GMT

LOL. Im playing a 46 line wheel, so how bout you play 46 lines....

Reply #139

mcginnin56 — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 23:43:17 GMT

I will post right now.

Reply #138

mcginnin56 — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 23:42:19 GMT

How about I give you a 10 line advantage, if you stop feeling sorry for me

Reply #137

Ronnie316 — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 23:40:59 GMT

If you want to post on the prediction board thats fine too.... I just dont know how

Reply #136

Ronnie316 — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 23:38:03 GMT

50 high quality LP QPs will do just fine........

Im giving you a 4 line advantage because I feel sorry for you. lol. lol. lol.

Reply #135

mcginnin56 — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 23:30:51 GMT

Since I already posted two numbers for tomorrows MM's, I have only 48 remaining on the prediction board.

I would be happy however to post 48 high quality true random QP's, from LP's QP generator.

Reply #134

Ronnie316 — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 23:19:31 GMT

Ok then, how about a little friendly competition???

mcginnin56 Seems to be in your corner on this discussion so we will let him pull 50 LP QPs and post then for MM draws and I will play against him with a 2 if 5 of 56 LP wheel.

This is self pick VS. QP so I get to choose the input order for the wheel and choose the bonus numbers.

I'm predicting that I will win hands down lol. lol. lol.

What do you think LL

Reply #133

Lucky Loser — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 21:13:14 GMT

This further substantiates my original point. If you don't include any of the numbers from the last draw into your combos for the next one, and one of those numbers shows up, then you know for sure the jackpot's not yours. Correct? Then, if you DO include the last numbers into yours, and any of those numbers are drawn, then you know you've matched at least (1) and possibly more depending on the rest of your selections.

Is this not what I said a few posts back? I based this on the idea of rema... [ More ]

Reply #132

Original Bey — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:25:33 GMT

I include the numbers from the past drawing LL on my elimination list. That means I won't be using them to wheel for the upcoming drawing. There are no inconsitencies there.

Reply #131

Lucky Loser — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 19:35:14 GMT

Okay, I understand. Maybe I got a little squirrely with the ROI deal...my bad. However, Ronnie, with so many combos even narrowed to a wheel of (28) numbers, explain how any combos from that set are better than Quick Picks. To an extent, self picks can be useful...I'll meet you half way. Remove the E-E-E-E-E, O-O-O-O-O, 1-2-3-4-5, 2-4-6-8-10, 3-5-7-9-11, etc, etc. and you still have a very level playing field between QP's and SP's. Disagree?

Anything outside of what I just basically mentioned... [ More ]

Reply #130

Ronnie316 — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 19:10:22 GMT

Your the one who introduced ROI into the discussion LL. All I'm saying is that with a method and a system, it is possible to get BETTER ODDS that can NOT be obtained with QPs........ Its a simple FACT........

Reply #129

Lucky Loser — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 18:46:07 GMT

...more times than not, there are no repeat numbers.

and then...

...I must point out that part of that formula is to list those numbers that came in the very last drawing.

This isn't a very consistent approach to an inconsistent game, okay. Either you're going to play back some or all of the last numbers, or, you're not. Guess what? Either way, you're going to hit or miss on the same one's. A set Quick Picks is in the same batch of Self-Picks whether any of 'em win or not. Do yo... [ More ]

Reply #128

mcginnin56 — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:49:24 GMT

I'm in total agreement Ronnie316.

My only objective is to make a pile of money, could really care less about winning .

Winning is for lazy losers.

Reply #127

Lucky Loser — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:40:48 GMT

There are, in fact, lots of guys out there that have this kind of money to spend, Ronnie...I agree. Donald Trump, Bill Gates, Mitt Romney, the people on SHARK TANK, and many, many, many others...and I'm being very serious with you buddy. Problem is this: all these people are truly BIG BUSINESS PEOPLE that fully understand numbers, risk, and how to make (generate) money. Do you agree? So, I'm wondering why THEY haven't YET made a business out of winning MM's and PB with reasonable frequency.

T... [ More ]

Reply #126

Original Bey — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:26:29 GMT

LL

Your comments dismissing the 3:1 ratio are anecdotal at best. If you do the research, honestly, you will find that more times than nought there are no repeat numbers. The key to refining elements that combine to make a good system is to look for things that reoccur on a relatively consistent basis which again is the purpose of recording, tracking and analyzing data.

I take in your argumen,t though, I think one would achieve the very same goal by doing exactly opposite to what you are pr... [ More ]

Reply #125

RJOh — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:19:41 GMT

The Michigan couple that traveled to Massachusetts to spend $300K playing its WindFall game when ever it rolled back proved that. It's just that there aren't any creditable strategies for making a profit playing lotteries without getting very lucky as in gambling. When ever one does come to light, it's considered a flaw in the game and the game is discontinued.

Reply #124

Lucky Loser — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:58:25 GMT

OB, I get exactly what you're saying and trying to do, but there are still too many parameters in this game to even begin establishing consistencies. If I narrowed it down, effectively, to even 500,000 combinations there would still be so much room for variance from one draw to the next that matching (3) numbers is still a short trip down a long road for me. I don't knock anyone trying to apply a systematic approach here but, buddy, they've seriously got their work cut out...and how.

Here's w... [ More ]

Reply #123

Ronnie316 — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:19:23 GMT

I'm pretty good at cornering the winning numbers in a 0-9 game. But, with fifty times the amount of numbers to work through and then eliminate some, it becomes a cost, liability, and ROI (Return On Investment)

Everyone's argument seems to be you cant play that many lines when the fact of the matter is you can play as many lines as you have money to pay for........ ( up to around 100,000 lines because of logistics)

Then your argument will be, no one has that much to spend which AGAIN is sim... [ More ]

Reply #122

Ronnie316 — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:19:07 GMT

It all depends LL....... As i said earlier, if your objective is to play a few random lines for the fun of being part of the game your absolutely right and I agree 100%.

Just understand that YOUR objectives are not necessarily EVERYONES objectives.

Reply #121

Ronnie316 — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:42:57 GMT

In building a system, a person tracks specific elements or every element of the game to identify relative consistencies and try to leverage those to one's advantage. In the MM for example, more times than nought say 3:1, numbers do not repeat from the last drawing. So we use that as a starting point.

This is off the QP topic but I think it bears mentioning that you are using the word system in place of the word strategy or method . What you are talking about is a method for choosing the numbe... [ More ]

Reply #120

Ronnie316 — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:29:30 GMT

WAIT.... I thought we agreed that winning is not the objective when using QPss

Reply #119

mcginnin56 — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:16:37 GMT

Thank you L.L. for that pep talk!

Those QP's are just looking better and better all the time.

Ronnie I'm playing several of my games this week, with some LP generated QP's. I'll let you know how I fare.

Reply #118

Original Bey — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:49:27 GMT

In one post you just made an attempt to undermine the premisse of my dissertation in Numerology!

Needless to say, based on the above, I am a huge proponent of Number elimination as a strategic element to winning the lottery.

Ronnie and I only need this to work ONCE. I notice people around here discuss things as though the expectation of a system is for it to work for every single drawing. That would certainly be an impossible feat.

In building a system, a person tracks sp... [ More ]

Reply #117

Lucky Loser — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:35:54 GMT

Okay, let's take a quick looksie at something in an effort to substantiate my point. Point of reference is the past (2) sets of winning PB numbers, Ronnie, and what they have in common.

10/6/2012 15-26-34-36-59-35

10/3/2012 17-23-36-55-59-10

Now, had a player chose to do Quick-Picks here for 10/6, and it eliminated any numbers from 10/3's winning combination, they clearly lose and don't match any numbers at all. On the other hand, if it kicks out a couple of lines which contain any... [ More ]

Reply #116

onlymoney — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 01:04:06 GMT

Oh c'mon, beauty is in the eye of the beer holder.

Reply #115

mcginnin56 — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 01:02:05 GMT

Next they'll be coming up with a press on face, for those that are not pleased with their current one.

Reply #114

onlymoney — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 00:57:43 GMT

I just learned they have this thing called Press-on Veneers . For only 800 bucks you can get one row done all by mail, no kidding. They send you something to bite on for an impression, you mail it back, and they make something that looks like dentures that last 2 to 3 years. I may have to get them soon.

Reply #113

Ronnie316 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 19:25:28 GMT

Nice thinking, and I'm just about to hatch a plan for doing just that......... Stay tuned.......

Reply #112

mcginnin56 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 19:21:43 GMT

Hit the 5+1 with some live numbers, and you'll have the best choppers the lottery can buy.

Reply #111

Ronnie316 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 19:20:03 GMT

I want some real good teeth.

Reply #110

mcginnin56 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 19:18:57 GMT

Much like a gunslinger with notches in his pistol, millionaires consider a long string of divorces, an entitlement and an honor.

Reply #109

Original Bey — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 19:17:39 GMT

Touche

Reply #108

mcginnin56 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 19:16:04 GMT

As the old saying goes......if you have to ask.....you can't afford 'em.

Reply #107

Ronnie316 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 19:15:55 GMT

A divorce is nothing more than an inconvenience when you have that much money.

Reply #106

Original Bey — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 19:13:33 GMT

Teeth? Talk about that hair piece that survived typhoons and hurricane Katrina without a strand out of place. Let's not talk about the messy divorces.

Reply #105

mcginnin56 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 19:11:37 GMT

Surely you could spare more than a single

Reply #104

Ronnie316 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 19:10:56 GMT

I wonder how much those teeth cost

Reply #103

Ronnie316 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 19:09:42 GMT

SergeM ia a one spoil sport..........

Reply #102

mcginnin56 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 19:08:39 GMT

Many a millionaire owe their early starts of success to horeshoes.

A nice Derby would be the delicious icing on the cake

Reply #101

Ronnie316 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 19:08:06 GMT

Its my pleasure to serve the LP community. lol.

Reply #100

Original Bey — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 19:03:39 GMT

lol! I neeed that laugh

Reply #99

onlymoney — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 19:03:01 GMT

Hay wait a minute, that would be a stable income. I could even afford a nice Derby.

Reply #98

Ronnie316 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 19:01:48 GMT

Reality is a choice....... don't try to take that away from me......

Reply #97

mcginnin56 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:56:03 GMT

If it were horseshoes, you'd be a winner

Reply #96

onlymoney — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:52:54 GMT

I was close.

Reply #95

SergeM — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:51:56 GMT

You seriously don't mean that it will be the same all the time?

Time for you to get sober

Reply #94

Ronnie316 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:50:14 GMT

Can be but in reality its NOT.

Reply #93

Ronnie316 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:47:55 GMT

Sounds like I need to triple up on those if I want to finish in time to hit 5 of 5........

Reply #92

mcginnin56 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:47:43 GMT

Hey onlymoney!

I like your example BTW with the Hail Marys!

Not to take away from your excellent illustration of time, but: @ 5 seconds per Hail Mary = 12 Hail Marys per minute = 720 Hail Marys per hour

= 17,280 Hail Marys per 24 hours = 219.9 days of Hail Marys. 3,800,000 divided by 17,280 = 219.9074074 days.

I still wholeheartedly agree, that's a snip long time to be reciting anything, let alone 3,800,000 Hail Marys!!!

This post has been automatically changed by the... [ More ]

Reply #91

SergeM — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:47:43 GMT

Let me tell you that it can be exactly that, just like a roulette wheel can produce 1 to 9 in ascending order.

Reply #90

onlymoney — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:28:21 GMT

Do you any idea how long it would take to say 3.8 million hail mary's?

@5 seconds per hail, it would take 79166.666666666666666666666666667 days, or roughly 217 years.

Reply #89

Ronnie316 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:27:03 GMT

Thank you kind sir, I will be looking for one that's really really HOT. lol. lol.

Reply #88

Ronnie316 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:24:19 GMT

No so fast only, the 5 of 5 part of the game is 1 in 3.8 million. The rest is just bonus money.

Reply #87

mcginnin56 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:15:30 GMT

Hail Mary to that.

Reply #86

mcginnin56 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:13:53 GMT

Knowing your past success rate, I would suggest 'investing your $5K on the

Reply #85

onlymoney — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:10:28 GMT

When dealing with 175,000,000 to 1, a miracle is the only system.

Reply #84

Ronnie316 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 17:59:13 GMT

Great, you just validated my point....... And excellent work btw.

So if I decided I was going to spend up to $5k Tue. night on MM would you suggest a wheel or QPs

Reply #83

mcginnin56 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 17:51:37 GMT

I have always played Powerball the same way. Two tickets every drawing, one self-pick, one QP. That works out to 104 tickets per year.

At the time I won, the tickets were only $1. My total investment for those two tickets was $2.

Reply #82

Ronnie316 — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 17:47:53 GMT

I won $900. on a slot machine once..... Does that mean slot machines are a God-send to casinos