The Wave Matrix - Excel 2007 Addin

Reply #253

MillionsWanted — Mon, 02 Sep 2013 19:29:05 GMT

We're waiting in anticipation

Reply #252

lakerben — Mon, 02 Sep 2013 17:22:14 GMT

Reply #251

JADELottery — Fri, 30 Aug 2013 20:40:30 GMT

Lots, but this server move and platform change has been fairly involved; study, research, networking, programming, and more.

Reply #250

lakerben — Thu, 29 Aug 2013 04:14:53 GMT

How is everything going? Any new ideas

Reply #249

JADELottery — Mon, 05 Aug 2013 12:44:32 GMT

If you're trying to download, you'll have to wait a bit.

We're having network problems.

We hope to have it fixed by today, 2013-08-05.

Reply #248

JADELottery — Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:13:14 GMT

Been busy with lots of research and alternatives to Silverlight, but it's not looking well.

We would like to think we could get something like Silverlight.

It would make things much better by allowing more computation to be performed on the client side rather than the server side.

Also, my actual real job has us pretty busy with install / upgrade work at the same time; try to squeeze in a vacation or two.

Reply #247

lakerben — Thu, 13 Jun 2013 15:24:30 GMT

Any word about the site

Reply #246

dr san — Fri, 24 May 2013 17:44:09 GMT

Hello, ok jade, the hypergeometric equation, can be used to simulate the probabilities of success in your system regression?

Ever heard of the disaster wanda?

Jade, we could do with your system, look for patterns,

repeated arrears in relation sweepstakes past

then, one would have two options in, predict, numbers, and patterns

Reply #245

JADELottery — Fri, 24 May 2013 15:53:56 GMT

can't say we has.

we're working a different factored solution.

Reply #244

dr san — Sat, 11 May 2013 20:40:18 GMT

Hello, jade is possible to cross their experiment with theory lorenz? thank you

Reply #243

lakerben — Wed, 01 May 2013 20:11:05 GMT

Thanks

Reply #242

JADELottery — Wed, 01 May 2013 15:49:57 GMT

Got a new toy for my birthday and have been learning it intensely the past few days.

It's a TI-nspire CX CAS.

Also, downloaded the software for it to one of our development laptops.

This is way better than our old TI-89 Titanium.

We've been busy plugging in our new counting method and the early stages of the expanded multi-polynomial regression.

Currently, we're reworking some of the combinatorial programming for both VB and C#.

It was made for an Excel spread... [ More ]

Reply #241

JADELottery — Wed, 01 May 2013 15:35:48 GMT

If you're awake, you'll know.

Reply #240

Ronnie316 — Sun, 21 Apr 2013 18:04:37 GMT

Who the crap is Jehocifer. A friend of Lucifer

Reply #239

dr san — Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:28:10 GMT

Hello, jade I have excel2010andversionwindousseven,estsgiving errorwhen I goto installthe add-in,or am Idoing it wrong,myexcel is2010comupdates. Thank you

Reply #238

JADELottery — Sat, 30 Mar 2013 06:37:38 GMT

We're Morphing the Ultimate Wave Predictor.

Back in a while.

Reply #237

lakerben — Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:08:14 GMT

Reply #236

SergeM — Mon, 18 Mar 2013 22:42:10 GMT

Jade, did you check at what point there are playable reversals in balance? For groups of numbers or characteristics

Reply #235

sandnan — Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:55:33 GMT

Hello Jade

Thanks for the reply

Reply #234

dr san — Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:52:01 GMT

Hello, lottonomic, jade is doing a great job, but we have to remember

That in lottery games can only get to a certain point mathematically, ie a lottery 49/6 can be expected 3-4 numbers, part numca, never let dominating total mind, mainly a large lottery (over 13 million possibilities) the random factor will always regret, not when you have quantum computing, or 5000 years from now, but hit 4 of 6 numbers in a lottery numbers

It's a good job Jade, 75% accuracy and 25% random, 75% with the... [ More ]

Reply #233

Lottonomics — Tue, 12 Mar 2013 04:22:33 GMT

Thanks a bunch! I expanded it to try it with a slightly different idea I had. I'm not too overly concerned with the actual projection part at this point as much as learning how to get the optimal settings by reading the BMA degrees like you said in earlier posts. I ended up using amplitude only for this particular test.

Type = Linear BMA Degree 1 BMA Degree 2 BMA Degree 3 BMA Degree 4 BMA Degree 5 BMA Degree 6 BMA Degree 7 BMA Degree 8 BMA Degree 9 Algorithm Predictor

A = 1.998426436 -1... [ More ]

Reply #232

JADELottery — Tue, 12 Mar 2013 01:27:42 GMT

It's a good starting point.

Run a few samples and see what kind of waves are produced.

With little variation in the interger pool set of numbers you might need to use less waves.

We have run a few random samples with a set of {0, 1}.

It seems to work well with the defaults.

This also runs in to a problem of two kinds.

One, an event that has an actaul wave frequency that changes beyond the sampling frequency.

Two, the samples don't change very much from sample to sample, ie.... [ More ]

Reply #231

Lottonomics — Mon, 11 Mar 2013 05:54:20 GMT

Hello Jade, for a data set made up of only 1's or 0's would the default settings be alright or would you suggest other settings entirely

Reply #230

JADELottery — Mon, 11 Mar 2013 01:50:10 GMT

We have to get back to this later.

Reply #229

JADELottery — Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:49:17 GMT

In Wave 8 we can see the wave is high and could go higher.

This means the hit frequency is in the short term running low.

The graph for Wave 8 shows the current point in the wave heading in to the next draw.

Looking at all the waves and their Projections added in, we can see most of the waves remain high.

This would be an indication the hit frequency is still running low, but it could be increasing in the short term to long term.

Reply #228

JADELottery — Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:24:23 GMT

This is a rewrite of an earlier post.

We usually get this one backward because the wave acts opposite of what the Draw occurrence is doing, Draw occurrence meaning hit frequency.

For this type of data, we will point out a few things to look for when reading the waves.

In this we will look at Wave 1 for the previous waves.

Different places in the wave can have different meanings.

As shown below, we can see the timing for when the number 5 in column A is going to b... [ More ]

Reply #227

JADELottery — Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:07:52 GMT

Ignore this one.

Hang on a moment.

We have to rewrite this one.

Reply #226

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:40:08 GMT

For this type of data, we will point out a few things to look for when reading the waves.

In this we will look at Wave 1 for the previous waves.

Different places in the wave can have different meanings.

As shown below, we can see the timing for when the number 5 in column A is going to become more frequent or less frequent.

Keep in mind, this is a long term wave and any changes that may result from future draws must be over many draws.

When reading this wave w... [ More ]

Reply #225

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:23:40 GMT

Going to take a break for a bit.

Later.

Reply #224

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:18:27 GMT

The individual waves that were used in each summation can be used to make long term to short term guesses or projections from the Regression line.

We can see each of the waves in the graph below.

Reply #223

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:09:29 GMT

In the stretched out graph below, we can see when we sum more and more waves, it becomes more and more like the original wave.

Reply #222

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:49:41 GMT

When we sum Wave 1 and 2 together it begins to approach the original wave we are looking for.

As we see in the following graph, the sum of Wave 1 and 2 are much more closer to the actual wave than if they were separate.

Reply #221

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:41:48 GMT

Here's where it gets interesting.

We will now bring in Wave 2 in to the graph, see next.

We can see here that wave also follows the Deviation from Regression fairly well.

However, that's not where the real Mathemagics come in.

Reply #220

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:34:38 GMT

Now we will add in Wave 1 of our Wave Matrix.

We can see Wave 1 follows the general pattern of the Deviation from Regression, graphed below.

Reply #219

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:22:44 GMT

When we remove the Regression part, we are left with a deviation from the regression as seen below.

As we can see, the original data appears to oscillate about the Regression line like some kind of wave.

This is where the Wave Matrix comes in; it makes a best guess as to what waves might be present to generate the wave like pattern we see here.

Reply #218

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:08:28 GMT

There are a few ways to look at the Wave Matrix to guess a projection for this type of data.

The data we are looking at is a much more familiar line than the other data sets we've been looking at.

We can look at a graph of the data and its Linear Regression and see the fairly straight line the data is.

Reply #217

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 18:47:32 GMT

In the following Wave Matrix, we had a setting of Amp / Freq = 0.90 and everything else set to default.

The short list that follows shows the first 10 lines and the last 31 lines with the Quantum Projection.

Type = Linear BMA Degree 1 BMA Degree 2 BMA Degree 3 BMA Degree 4 BMA Degree 5 BMA Degree 6 BMA Degree 7 BMA Degree 8 Algorithm Predictor

A = 28.31013765 -2.116 -1.24 -0.636 0.021 0.664 1.276 1.854 2.15 Wave / BMA = 0.50 Depth = 25

B = 9.734994807 Amp / Freq = 0.90 L... [ More ]

Reply #216

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 18:39:10 GMT

From that we are able to create an Index list of when the number 5 hit in column A.

The list of Index numbers, below, are then used to make a Wave Matrix to analyze and approximate the next time a 5 will occur in column A.

Number 5 Draw Index in Column A

1 996 1977 2960 3931

26 1001 1985 2973 3935

53 1003 1990 3000 3939

65 1008 2005 3020 3941

81 1013 2011 3023 3949

103 1019 2039 3025 3950

112 1023 2058 3039 3954

129 1024 2061 3043 3964

Reply #215

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 18:31:45 GMT

In this next data set, we looked at the occurrence of the number 5 in column A for our Pick 3 samples.

It looks at when the number 5 is picked relative to a draw Index assigned for that draw.

Below is a repost of the short list pick 3 data with 5 and its associated Index number highlighted in red.

Index Year Month Day A B C

1 2000 1 1 5 3 0

2 2000 1 2 6 9 7

3 2000 1 3 4 9 6

4 2000 1 4 3 1 0

5 2000 1 5 7 5 7

6 2000 1 6 2 9 2

7 2000 1 7

Reply #214

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:34:50 GMT

For those that like statistical numbers to play with, we can extend the number of copy and pastes to 1,500 and see what kind of average, standard deviation and distribution the Quantum Projection will produce.

For our sample set, on our computer, we get an average of = 544.4913333 and a standard deviation of = 260.8769233.

The 50% range we like to work with comes out to 368.5325225 to 720.4501442 for this sample set.

This means we could expect a whole number to be somewhere in

Reply #213

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:02:26 GMT

As we have shown before, we can copy and paste the Quantum Projection line several times to see what other numbers can be generated.

The following shows an additional 9 lines to give a set of 10 numbers to play or work with.

Type = Linear BMA Degree 1 BMA Degree 2 BMA Degree 3 BMA Degree 4 Algorithm Predictor

A = 497.8033156 -0.266 0.153 0.177 0.236 Wave / BMA = 0.50 Depth = 25

B = 5.88688E-05 Amp / Freq = 0.67 Level = 25

Index Regression Wave 1 Wave 2 Wave 3 Wave 4 Rema... [ More ]

Reply #212

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:35:37 GMT

In the Quantum Projection line we can see the number generated is a decimal.

We need to modify the decimal number to be an integer and within the range of possible numbers for this analysis.

In this case, the set of numbers we working with are 000 to 999, or in terms of math for our Integer-Modulus, 0 to 999.

The Integer-Modulus works out to ' = INT(MOD( X , 1000)) ' for this set of integers.

Below we have added in the Quantum Projection line the modified number for that... [ More ]

Reply #211

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:12:08 GMT

Something to note.

If you see numbers like 78, as see in the table, it means 078 because the leading 0 drops off in Excel.

You can format the cell to include the leading 0 by selecting the cell or cells and then right clicking the selected cell or cells.

Click on 'Format Cells...', then select the 'Number' tab if not already selected.

In the 'Category:' list select 'Custom'.

Under 'Type:' is a text box possibly with the word 'General' in it, click in the text box an... [ More ]

Reply #210

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:01:19 GMT

In our earlier pick 3 example we looked at the Whole # for analysis.

Below is a short table of the numbers.

Index Year Month Day A B C Whole #

1 2000 1 1 5 3 0 530

2 2000 1 2 6 9 7 697

3 2000 1 3 4 9 6 496

4 2000 1 4 3 1 0 310

5 2000 1 5 7 5 7 757

6 2000 1 6 2 9 2 292

7 2000 1 7 2 2 7 227

8 2000 1 8 6 5 8 658

9 2000 1 9 4 0 3 403

10 2000 1 10 1 3 7 137

We used settings of Waves = 4 and Amp / Freq = 0.67; all o... [ More ]

Reply #209

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:33:47 GMT

To change the Integer-Modulus for other integer sets that are not zero based, we need to consider the limits of the set of numbers.

Also, the integer values must change by only 1 between each number in the set.

Examples of a good integer set to apply the Integer-Modulus are {11, 12, 13, 14, 15} or {-100, -99, -98, -97} or {-10, -9, -8, -7, -6, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}, all these have numbers that are 1 away from each in the set.

Examples of not good... [ More ]

Reply #208

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:05:09 GMT

Ok, we're back on.

Before we continue, we need to go over the math of the Integer-Modulus.

In Excel, the basic formula is ' = INT(MOD( X , N )) ' where X is the number being modified and N is the evenly divided set X is being compared with.

In the previous example this worked well with the integer set of {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}, because it is zero based and there are only ten integers in the set.

The Excel formula then easily works out to ' = INT(MOD( X , 10 )) ' w... [ More ]

Reply #207

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 04:37:25 GMT

Alright, enough for today, need some sleep.

But, before we continue on.

We would like you to expand your understanding that this part of the example isn't restrictive to just the column B.

This is just the example for one kind of data set.

The basic idea is knowing the Wave Matrix tries to project for that next possible outcome, not just for this example, but for other forms of data with different values.

Since there is no way for the Wave Matrix to know exactly wha... [ More ]

Reply #206

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 04:34:55 GMT

From another Quantum Projection sample we can find the distribution of numbers with an Integer-Modulus applied.

The following table and graph show the distribution of our Quantum Projections.

Number Frequency

0 93

1 145

2 269

3 298

4 282

5 221

6 147

7 44

8 1

9 0

You can see the peak is at 3 and falls of nicely in both directions when using the Integer-Modulus.

We find that a rounding tends to put a bias at either end o... [ More ]

Reply #205

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 04:19:20 GMT

If we copy and paste the Quantum Projection line 1,500 times, we get in our sample set an average of = 2.835478373 and a standard deviation of = 1.761052363 for this instance and on our computer.

You'll get slightly different values due to the Quantum variations in your selections.

If we look for a statistical probability that is 25% above and below the average we can calculate a range of values from our average and standard deviation.

That would be 0.674489750196082 , this wou... [ More ]

Reply #204

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 03:59:39 GMT

So, you like statistics, here's where you can generate all the statistics you'd like.

For this example, we will copy and paste the Quantum Projection line 1,500 times.

This should give a nice statistical based to work with.

With those 1,500 Quantum Projection lines we can look at a few things like, average projection, standard deviation of the projection, distributions of the projections.

We can see how this all fits in to selecting numbers for the next draw.

Reply #203

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 03:34:54 GMT

In this example of Quantum Projections, we can see the values are in decimal form.

We need to apply a uniform way of getting the integer value we need to play or work with.

To do this we can use either a rounding or an integer-modulus.

For this we will use the integer-modulus because it works well in wrapping numbers around and keeps everything well balanced, as we will see later.

Below is the same table with the Integer-Modulus adjustment.

Type = Linear BMA Degr... [ More ]

Reply #202

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 03:26:47 GMT

If you take the Quantum Projection line and copy / paste it several times, you'll see the Data column has mostly different values for each line.

What you are seeing is the Quantum Selection in action; no one single outcome.

For everyone else, if you're doing this on your computer, you'll have a different outcome.

However, the outcomes will have fairly similar values.

Below is an example of the copy / paste.

Type = Linear BMA Degree 1 BMA Degree 2 BMA Degree 3 BMA Degr... [ More ]

Reply #201

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 03:12:50 GMT

Does this always workout like that, where the regression and waves are perfectly positioned near the next draw? No.

It just happens to work for this instance.

This is where the other way of looking at it takes a turn in to Quantum Projection.

In Quantum Projection, there is no one single outcome; there are many.

This is where the remainder comes in.

The remainder acts as a random component that works to simulate the randomness of the phenomena we are looking at.

Reply #200

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 02:59:45 GMT

Based on just the waves and regression, summing the regression and waves, the projected outcome would be about 2.82093387 for a number in column B.

Being that it's between numbers, it could be either 2 or 3, only on regression and waves.

The next draw for this data set is for 2013-03-02 and the draw (A B C) for that day was 4 2 2, so 2 was the next number in column B.

Reply #199

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 02:20:37 GMT

Keep in mind, the wave projections are based on the Ultimate Wave Predictor equation.

The Quantum Projection line uses the Ultimate Wave Predictor Settings to project the wave in to the next draw.

These settings are based on the last 25 draws and average at a level of 25.

To know more about how the settings affect the projection, see the Ultimate Wave Predictor.

Reply #198

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 02:14:49 GMT

We can sum all the waves and see the effect each has all at once.

This is the variation from the regression line.

Index Waves Sum

4780 -2.75047

4781 -3.03585

4782 -1.68851

4783 0.090435

4784 1.408865

4785 2.291049

4786 0.758433

4787 -0.20885

4788 1.761879

4789 1.566016

4790 0.081705

4791 0.033247

4792 2.698964

4793 3.585944

4794 2.315104

4795 -1.59892

4796 -3.65846

4797 -3.7864

4798... [ More ]

Reply #197

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 02:03:46 GMT

Ok, now the fun part, projection.

Projection can be looked at in a few different ways depending on if you are looking for a single outcome or many.

A single outcome could be estimated based on the regression, waves and remainder in general or by using the Quantum Projection line itself.

In the first example of looking at pick 3 column B, we had 8 waves, by Amplitude Only and Wave / BMA = 0.13.

The last 30 draws and Quantum Projection line with a graph can be seen below.

Reply #196

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 00:43:25 GMT

For this data set, we find a setting of 'by Amplitude Only' and Wave to BMA RMS Ratio = 0.29 works best.

The short list below for this Wave Matrix.

Type = Linear BMA Degree 1 BMA Degree 2 BMA Degree 3 BMA Degree 4 BMA Degree 5 BMA Degree 6 BMA Degree 7 BMA Degree 8 Algorithm Predictor

A = -3.44546332 -1.513 -1.291 -0.895 -0.297 0.311 0.731 1.131 1.491 Wave / BMA = 0.29 Depth = 25

B = 8.771000615 Amp / Freq = 0.50 Level = 25

Index Regression Wave 1 Wave 2 Wave 3 Wave... [ More ]

Reply #195

JADELottery — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 00:28:34 GMT

The last example, then on to some projections.

We will look at the number 1 in column A.

Here are the relative draw index.

Number 1 Draw Index Column A

2

24

31

39

40

44

56

57

64

77

81

85

117

127

134

136

137

149

156

163

171

181

203

211

219

226

239

249

264

269

270

291

295

307

311

328

336

34... [ More ]

Reply #194

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 23:24:01 GMT

time for eats.

back in a while.

Reply #193

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 23:21:20 GMT

For this example we find that a setting of 'by Amplitude Only' and Wave to BMA RMS Ratio = 0.12 works well for 8 waves; everything else default.

Here's the short list for the Wave Matrix.

Type = Linear BMA Degree 1 BMA Degree 2 BMA Degree 3 BMA Degree 4 BMA Degree 5 BMA Degree 6 BMA Degree 7 BMA Degree 8 Algorithm Predictor

A = 763985.1424 -1.343 -0.456 0.111 0.551 0.901 1.141 1.311 1.451 Wave / BMA = 0.12 Depth = 25

B = 28.86518294 Amp / Freq = 0.50 Level = 25

Inde... [ More ]

Reply #192

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 23:10:13 GMT

We can transform the combination to an Index and back to a combination using an Excel file we have created.

It contains some functions for going between the two.

The file can be found at http://www.jadexcode.com/files/excel/combinatorialindex.xls

or at ftp://www.jadexcode.com/excel/combinatorialindex.xls

The functions in the file that do the transformation are documented in the sheet tab labeled 'Function Information'.

The two used in the transformation are ' =Index2Combi... [ More ]

Reply #191

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 22:56:49 GMT

Next example is the Combinatorial Index.

The Combinatorial Index is the number assigned to a combination when all possible combinations are sorted with lower ball number combinations first and higher ball number combinations last.

Here's the short list of Combinatorial Index for this example of Pick 5 of 47.

Combinatorial Index A B C D E

1 1 2 3 4 5

2 1 2 3 4 6

3 1 2 3 4 7

4 1 2 3 4 8

5 1 2 3 4 9

6 1 2 3 4 10

7 1 2 3 4 11

8 1 2 3 4 1... [ More ]

Reply #190

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 22:33:13 GMT

When we play around with the controls, we find that we need only 2 waves to generalize a Wave Matrix.

Also, we tweaked the Amp / Freq to 0.60 to get the BMA values near equal and opposite.

Below is a shortened table.

Type = Linear BMA Degree 1 BMA Degree 2 Algorithm Predictor

A = 24.41198094 -0.07 0.108 Wave / BMA = 0.50 Depth = 25

B = -1.70397E-06 Amp / Freq = 0.60 Level = 25

Index Regression Wave 1 Wave 2 Remainder Data

1 24.41197924 -0.832644354 -0.363340618 3.78... [ More ]

Reply #189

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 22:20:28 GMT

Now for our next set, we will look at my state's lottery Gopher 5.

It's a Pick 5 of 47 numbers.

Below is a shortened list of draws for the dates from 2005-09-23 to 2013-03-01.

Index Year Month Day A B C D E

1 2005 9 23 4 25 27 44 45

2 2005 9 27 1 8 15 26 38

3 2005 9 30 7 8 12 37 39

4 2005 10 4 19 30 31 32 37

5 2005 10 7 12 22 27 40 46

6 2005 10 11 20 26 29 33 45

7 2005 10 14 2 13 24 25 34

8 2005 10 18 19 20 24 41 43

9 2005 10 21 10 18 25 34... [ More ]

Reply #188

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 21:11:53 GMT

For the Draw Index example, we made a change only to the Amp / Freq Ratio = 0.90

Below is the shortened table.

Type = Linear BMA Degree 1 BMA Degree 2 BMA Degree 3 BMA Degree 4 BMA Degree 5 BMA Degree 6 BMA Degree 7 BMA Degree 8 Algorithm Predictor

A = 28.31013765 -2.116 -1.24 -0.636 0.021 0.664 1.276 1.854 2.15 Wave / BMA = 0.50 Depth = 25

B = 9.734994807 Amp / Freq = 0.90 Level = 25

Index Regression Wave 1 Wave 2 Wave 3 Wave 4 Wave 5 Wave 6 Wave 7 Wave 8 Remainder Data

Reply #187

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 20:47:07 GMT

Yep, right about that, not standard.

But this is still early in the explanation.

We're giving examples right now.

Later we'll look at Projection.

That may include what you are more use to, Statistics.

What you are looking at now are the Dynamics.

Reply #186

SergeM — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 20:38:26 GMT

Looks very well done, but honestly, I don't understand what the values stand for.

I have a good basic background for statistics, but this, I don't know

Reply #185

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 20:25:52 GMT

Next pick 3 example, Draw Index of a number.

The Draw Index is a relative value dependent on the number samples.

For this set we have 4809 draws and each draw has a set of numbers associated with it.

Likewise, each number has a set of Draw Indices associated with it.

Index Year Month Day A B C

1 2000 1 1 5 3 0

2 2000 1 2 6 9 7

3 2000 1 3 4 9 6

4 2000 1 4 3 1 0

5 2000 1 5 7 5 7

6 2000 1 6 2 9 2

7 2000 1 7 2 2 7

8 2000 1 8 6 5 8

Reply #184

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 19:17:28 GMT

There are some data sets where you're not going to get that nice setup of equal and opposite.

What you should be trying to achieve then is a relatively smooth transition between BMA degrees.

Increasing waves and/or BMA Iterations might help a bit, but each does what it can to find reasonable waves in the data set.

Adding more waves may or may not give better insight in to the possible waves need to replicate the observed data.

Adding more BMA Iterations can help with gett... [ More ]

Reply #183

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 18:20:44 GMT

If you find that changing the Amp / Freq Ratio isn't getting the BMA values to come out equal and opposite, then you might need to reset the value to default of 0.50 and start making changes to the 'Wave to BMA RMS Ratio'.

The Wave to BMA RMS Ratio only affects the way the Amplitude analysis is done.

Settings that are closer to 0.00 tend to have more smooth wave like patterns and wave heights lower than the original data.

In addition, the closer to 0.00 the BMA values tend to c... [ More ]

Reply #182

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 17:54:35 GMT

If you find that you are moving the Amp / Freq setting all the way to 1.00, then it means you are analyzing only by Amplitude.

You can help speed the Wave Matrix generation up by selecting 'by Amplitude Only'.

Also, the same is true for the other end.

If you are setting the Amp / Freq to a value of 0.00, then it means you are analyzing only by Frequency.

Selecting the 'by Frequency Only' will only run the frequency analysis.

Reply #181

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 17:40:10 GMT

Ideally we would like to see the BMA Degree start negative and become more positive; with Wave 1 and Wave 4 BMA Degrees near equal and opposite.

To do this, we need to make some setting changes in the Algorithm Settings first and if needed, changes to the Wave Find Algorithm.

We will start with the 'Amplitude to Frequency Ratio', this will tell us if the waves we need are more or less dependent on Amplitude or Frequency.

Settings that are closer to 1.00 have the effect of inclu... [ More ]

Reply #180

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 17:11:59 GMT

Now we analyze for the whole number.

We will start with Data Direction set to -Bottom of Sheet for this sample, because the newest data is at the bottom.

Everything else is set to the defaults.

The first 10 lines of the Wave Matrix are shown below.

Type = Linear BMA Degree 1 BMA Degree 2 BMA Degree 3 BMA Degree 4 BMA Degree 5 BMA Degree 6 BMA Degree 7 BMA Degree 8 Algorithm Predictor

A = 497.8033156 -1.351 -1.096 -1.058 -1.015 -1.054 -1.02 -1.026 -1.044 Wave / B... [ More ]

Reply #179

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 16:24:14 GMT

Next is looking at the whole number value.

It's taking the individual pick 3 numbers and putting them together as a single number.

Below is the shortened table for the same date range of 2000-01-01 to 2013-03-01.

There's an added column with the whole number we will be analyzing.

Index Year Month Day A B C Whole #

1 2000 1 1 5 3 0 530

2 2000 1 2 6 9 7 697

3 2000 1 3 4 9 6 496

4 2000 1 4 3 1 0 310

5 2000 1 5 7 5 7 757

6 2000 1 6 2 9 2 292

7... [ More ]

Reply #178

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 16:14:43 GMT

k, let's move on.

no more distractions.

Reply #177

lakerben — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 04:18:41 GMT

Reply #176

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 03:09:06 GMT

if you have to contact us.

it would be at jadexcode at mchsi.com

or dpsmall at scbglobal.net

or just go to our site, you can find in our profile.

Reply #175

sandnan — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 03:04:23 GMT

Jade, we will talk about linear algebra

Reply #174

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 03:02:50 GMT

no, we are immune to HIV.

last reply to this.

time to move on.

Reply #173

sandnan — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 03:01:11 GMT

Jade did not understand, you mean they already have a cure for HIV

Reply #172

sandnan — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:59:28 GMT

Jade did not

Reply #171

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:56:03 GMT

We've been exposed to HIV with no ill effects.

The code continues.

Reply #170

sandnan — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:54:07 GMT

We are all equal, Brazilians, Americans, Africans, Russians, Arabs, Jews, black white, I do not consider myself more and no less than anyone

Reply #169

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:51:01 GMT

Well, anyway... let's move on.

Reply #168

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:47:34 GMT

The more diverse your genetice code, the more superior you are.

the others will find out when the...

well, let's not give too much away.

Reply #167

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:45:23 GMT

Sounds like you have a mix like us.

You can consider yourself a superior being.

There are very few of US out there.

Reply #166

sandnan — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:44:01 GMT

My grandfather was from Portugal

Reply #165

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:38:40 GMT

Native Brazilian?

If so, we are related.

I'm Native American with European background.

If your genetic code contains any European descent, then your genetic code encompasses the Globe like us.

Reply #164

sandnan — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:23:57 GMT

SORRY

Reply #163

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:22:11 GMT

neither... but.

the teacher becomes the student at some point.

Reply #162

sandnan — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:20:49 GMT

and fell back

jade sorry, the question you are teacher or scientist

Reply #161

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:14:29 GMT

that's ok.

we will continue.

you will be back.

think 4th dimensionally like us.

just wait a bit.

we will be here.

Reply #160

sandnan — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:12:18 GMT

well said

and fell back

jade sorry, the question you are teacher or scientist

Reply #159

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:10:06 GMT

we are all black to some degree.

Reply #158

sandnan — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:05:39 GMT

with this black guy!!

Jade dropped the internet, we can not continue, so tomorrow I can talk to

you overnight.

Reply #157

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:02:45 GMT

Change comes from within and without.

We'll make it possible.

Jehocifer.

Reply #156

sandnan — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 01:53:35 GMT

They are things of politics.

The country with all its growth, still has great inequalities: social, technological, and so on.

Reply #155

JADELottery — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 01:48:25 GMT

Cable here... sometime.

static ip.

Reply #154

sandnan — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 01:46:35 GMT

ADSL

Here is still in the middle of the cave age, who wants to promote WORLD CUP AND OLYMPIC GAMES.