<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>new  sistem</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255962</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/255962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: new  sistem</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255962/2892316</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255962/2892316</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:19:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dr san</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello, jking, when you talk about 80/20, you are referring to pareto law?<br /><br />The Pareto Law, also known as Principle 80/20 shows that 80% of the drawings have the same numbers of 20%. Well, 20% of the numbers the digits are drawn 80% of the time. This theory confirms the need to analyze the frequency of numbers or digits separated, ie you should always bet on randomly selected 20% more!<br /><br />I could do a conference of 100 consecutive contests in a certain range of sweepstakes and had the following... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255962/2892316">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>dr san</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255962/2892265</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255962/2892265</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:59:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dr san</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello, jking, when you talk about 80/20, you are referring to pareto law? The Pareto Law, also known as Principle 80/20 shows that 80% of the drawings have the same numbers of 20%. Well, 20% of the numbers the digits are drawn 80% of the time. This theory confirms the need to analyze the frequency of numbers or digits separated, ie you should always bet on randomly selected 20% more!<br /><br />Alpha</p>]]></description>
			<category>dr san</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255962/2891600</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255962/2891600</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 05:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br /><br />That&#x27;s alot of work. How is it tracking against actual draws?<br /><br />I&#x27;ll bet you will get better results if an 80/20 distribution method is inclused as a reduction criteria to your intial solutions.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JKING</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255962/2891366</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255962/2891366</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:44:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>retxx</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dr. San get ahold of carlig right away. Watch her simplify your program so we can digest it more easily. She is great at solving these programs.</p>]]></description>
			<category>retxx</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255962/2891312</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255962/2891312</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:23:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>mikmerkury99</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This is not a new sistem : https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243708</p>]]></description>
			<category>mikmerkury99</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255962/2891065</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255962/2891065</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 23:27:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dr san</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello, ok laker, you can adapt to pick3, making pick3 each column, using the last six contests, then we can use the concept or even better, you can use a 49/6, analyzing the final digits from 0 to 9, like two pisck3., ie can adapt in various lotteries, the carlig, can help us, he can use the concept.</p>]]></description>
			<category>dr san</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255962/2890870</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255962/2890870</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:59:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lakerben</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p></p>]]></description>
			<category>lakerben</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>new  sistem</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255962</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255962</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:52:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dr san</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Let us take events of a lottery of daily draw. Let the following numbers be the results of daily draw of a single digit lottery<br /><br />1, 5, 8, 3, 6, 7. If you look at the numbers, you will find that the events are totally at random in occurrence and absolutely with no relevance in between them. You cannot predict the next lottery number however expert you may be in statistics. There is a total uncertainty in forecasting next number. The BEST method in forecasting the next event is conditional proba... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255962">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>dr san</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

