Wheeling is so 1920!!

Reply #84

Ronnie316 — Thu, 23 May 2013 00:42:20 GMT

Did an unexpected event befall Jammy, making him unavailable to post relevant information on LP

Reply #83

Ronnie316 — Wed, 22 May 2013 15:34:14 GMT

I would much prefer playing 12 numbers using a 4 if 4 wheel, which is 113 combinations.

Reply #82

Stack47 — Wed, 22 May 2013 00:49:25 GMT

A 4 if 4 wheel (30 lines) has less than a 3 to 1 chance of having a five number match (20 to 7) when five numbers are matched.

Reply #81

Ronnie316 — Tue, 21 May 2013 23:23:58 GMT

All I know is that on the day when I have the correct bonus number and play 5 lines my ticket has a 1 in less than a million chance of hitting 5+1 instead of the 1 in 175,000,000 chance everyone else is playing with.

1 in 780,940 to be exact.

Reply #80

Morningstar! — Tue, 21 May 2013 22:52:11 GMT

Have you found any flaws with your system ever since August till now? Or has it been somewhat accurate

Reply #79

Ronnie316 — Tue, 21 May 2013 22:41:34 GMT

Sometimes I just pick and other times I look for hot numbers to repeat. MM stats page at www.usamega.com

http://www.usamega.com/mega-millions-stats.asp

Mega Ball

Sorted by Times Drawn

# Times

Drawn % of

Drawings Last

Drawn

36 28 3.39% 12/25/2012

07 22 2.66% 2/26/2013

09 22 2.66% 10/2/2012

38 22 2.66% 5/14/2013

42 22 2.66% 4/16/2013

44 22 2.66% 3/8/2013

20 21 2.54% 3/1/2013

21 21 2.54% 3/29/2013

35 21 2.54% 3/19/2013

02 2... [ More ]

Reply #78

Ronnie316 — Tue, 21 May 2013 22:37:22 GMT

The 9 number full wheel has 126 combinations in it, and would have an expectancy of hitting every 39,000 draws or so.

Reply #77

Morningstar! — Tue, 21 May 2013 22:28:04 GMT

How did you came up with 8 for the MB? Or was that random

Reply #76

Morningstar! — Tue, 21 May 2013 22:18:56 GMT

Hey Ronnie, sorry for butting in you guys conversatioin, but your method really caught up my attention. I'm working on a system of my own right now using the method you described. I was wondering, wouldn't it be possible to pick 9 of the most likely numbers to be played tonight and buy all tickets with possible combination? Do you get what I mean

Reply #75

Ronnie316 — Tue, 21 May 2013 14:57:21 GMT

Did you get bored with our discussion Jammy

Reply #74

Ronnie316 — Tue, 21 May 2013 14:56:10 GMT

Is it woking well now

Reply #73

SergeM — Sat, 18 May 2013 19:55:18 GMT

While you were discussing I fixed my 4/6 tonight.

Reply #72

Ronnie316 — Fri, 17 May 2013 15:38:40 GMT

YW Jammy, I know you feel far superior to me Jammy and suffer from loss of perspective so I will take the time to digress with you for a moment. I'm fully aware that you were asking a semi-rhetorical question, but I was responding the your inference that you clearly believe I'm innumerate which I'm NOT.

Reply #71

jimmy4164 — Fri, 17 May 2013 14:28:26 GMT

Thanks for bringing me up to date Ronnie316.

Sorry, but I didn't say you claimed one plus one is three. I asked what YOUR RESPONSE would be if someone called you a skeptic for disagreeing with such a claim. There's a difference - go back and check. What WOULD your response be?

BTW, what did you have for breakfast this morning? You should make it your daily fare. It might just be what dramatically improved your writing style, grammar, and coherence, in the above post.

--Jimmy... [ More ]

Reply #70

Ronnie316 — Thu, 16 May 2013 23:53:48 GMT

Let me help you Jammy,

#1. One plus one is NOT three.

#2. The Bible is a collection of Canonized books.

#3. I know plenty about yoga and its related meditation style.

#4. I have my own meditation style that is exponentially BETTER than yours.

#5. I won't be needing help from yoga anytime within the next few thousand years.

Reply #69

Ronnie316 — Thu, 16 May 2013 23:18:37 GMT

Jammy Jammy Jammy, try to keep up. My comment was not crude, nor meant to be offensive.

It was not even related to your yoga experience...........

It was in response to your claim that I said one plus one is three and the fact that you thanked me for a book recommendation that I never gave............

How are we supposed to talk to each other if you cant carry on a coherent discussion?

How does having a meditation style that I believe to be BETTER than yours translate into:

All y... [ More ]

Reply #68

SergeM — Thu, 16 May 2013 19:43:35 GMT

This is Weinstein

Reply #67

Ricklou — Thu, 16 May 2013 16:11:18 GMT

I will very briefly explain........

History forms patterns,patterns repeat, repeat paterns contain filters, if the filters are set correctly Bingo -winning the lottery per example 6/49 your chances are roughly 1 in 14 Million. With wahat I explain above you have given yourself a chance to 1 in 7000 chance to win the lottery.

I am using my own system and although I havent won the first devision - I have won a second devision and 3 times 3rd devision. Thats why I say wheeling sadly... [ More ]

Reply #66

jimmy4164 — Thu, 16 May 2013 04:50:56 GMT

Ronnie316,

Twisted and devious? There are hundreds of millions of people around the world who would take offense to your crude remarks and their implications. All you managed to do with your post is reveal, in no uncertain terms, your lack of understanding of yoga and its related meditation style. It could even help someone like you.

http://www.livestrong.com/article/330774-what-are-the-health-benefits-of-yoga-meditation/

--Jimmy4164

Reply #65

Stack47 — Wed, 15 May 2013 00:49:13 GMT

Bet Rothstein's book is more interesting than Epstein's.

Reply #64

Ronnie316 — Tue, 14 May 2013 15:10:42 GMT

Thanks for putting yourself on display as the truly twisted an devious individual that you are. Happy to hear that your content going nowhere with your yoga and meditation (on nothing)

Just for the record Jammy, the bible quotation I gave you was NOT a book recommendation for you to scoff at. It was merely a small glimpse into how the true act of meditation is carried out.

I hope you continue to be content with going nowhere (or in circles) using a cheap empty imitation.

Reply #63

Ronnie316 — Tue, 14 May 2013 14:58:35 GMT

Reply #62

jimmy4164 — Mon, 13 May 2013 18:46:21 GMT

Did you watch Part 1? It only takes 10 minutes.

If you make it to the end of Part 2, you will be on your way!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpC6R77YpdY

It just might help you select numbers...

Reply #61

SergeM — Sun, 12 May 2013 18:37:14 GMT

The good ones

Reply #60

Ronnie316 — Sun, 12 May 2013 15:30:23 GMT

Which numbers did you pick

Reply #59

jimmy4164 — Sun, 12 May 2013 06:03:33 GMT

...your doubts and skepticism are quite prolific in most all your posts.

If, after disagreeing with someone who claimed that 'One plus one equals three', they called you a skeptic, what would your response be?

Thanks for the book recommendation but I'm content with Yoga and Meditation.

http://gita-blog.blogspot.com/2009/03/indian-yoga-and-meditation.html

Reply #58

SergeM — Sat, 11 May 2013 16:01:37 GMT

While you are discussing, I use my time for picking numbers

Reply #57

Ronnie316 — Sat, 11 May 2013 14:33:47 GMT

Quite a unique johnny Jammy. I admire your attempts to keep things separate, however your doubts and skepticism are quite prolific in most all your posts. Meditation on nothing will lead you nowhere.

New Living Translation ( 2007)

Study this Book of Instruction continually. Meditate on it day and night so you will be sure to obey everything written in it. Only then will you prosper and succeed in all you do.

Reply #56

jimmy4164 — Sat, 11 May 2013 07:25:49 GMT

It's hard for any of us to be totally separate from our beliefs, even when we try.

But it really helps to try sometimes.

Give this an honest effort. I'm serious...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpC6R77YpdY

Reply #55

Ronnie316 — Fri, 10 May 2013 22:47:15 GMT

No but its clearly an important part of everything YOU post Jammy.

Reply #54

LottoBoner — Fri, 10 May 2013 20:55:51 GMT

I think RAE is saying in your signature that betting is a spiritual endeavor. Thanks for the heads up!

Not so much that putting money down is spiritual but that using logic (god given) and intuition (god given) to get BETTER ODDS, in a minute solar system of lottery balls ( also god given) is therefore by default Spiritual.

And since my money says IN god we trust then maybe I am hoping god will guide me in my bets and my playing

After all,

0123 doesn't hit in pick 4 everyday in my s... [ More ]

Reply #53

jimmy4164 — Fri, 10 May 2013 17:42:50 GMT

I don't recall ever visiting Distain.

Are religion and politics important aspects of your system development work

Reply #52

LottoBoner — Fri, 10 May 2013 16:02:00 GMT

That was arnold rothstein.

Reply #51

Ronnie316 — Fri, 10 May 2013 14:48:15 GMT

Yes Jammy it's true, I have abiding faith in the book you call myths and fairy tales .

Reply #50

Ronnie316 — Fri, 10 May 2013 14:35:24 GMT

Jammy, you spoke a word of truth in distain................

All things are possible, but only for those who believe.

Reply #49

jimmy4164 — Fri, 10 May 2013 03:53:07 GMT

I suppose anything is possible in your world, but in mine, the Richard Arnold Epstein who wrote The Theory of Gambling and Statistical Logic, was born in 1927.

Reply #48

Stack47 — Thu, 09 May 2013 21:56:40 GMT

Was Arnold Epstein the guy who fixed the 1919 World Series

Reply #47

LottoBoner — Wed, 08 May 2013 18:23:59 GMT

Nice find Ronnie. It seems RAE was also a Rocket Man

Reply #46

Ronnie316 — Wed, 08 May 2013 16:17:33 GMT

YW, I'm sure your colleagues have missed you.

Reply #45

jimmy4164 — Tue, 07 May 2013 06:41:09 GMT

Thanks for prompting me to reconnect to http://www.skeptic.com/ .

It's a gread site.

Another site you might like is http://www.santafe.edu/about/ .

Reply #44

Ronnie316 — Mon, 06 May 2013 15:46:07 GMT

I think you would be BETTER served posting your questions here:

The Skeptics Society Forum

Reply #43

jimmy4164 — Sun, 05 May 2013 17:08:45 GMT

Ronnie316,

What would Richard know about spirituality Jammy?

Based on my understanding of the meaning of spiritually and his clever use of it in the formation of his simile, I would guess he understands it quite well.

What do you think?

--Jimmy4164

Reply #42

Ronnie316 — Sun, 05 May 2013 14:17:04 GMT

Betting systems votaries are spiritually akin to the proponents of perpetual motion

machines, butting their heads against the second law of thermodynamics.

The Theory of Gambling and Statistical Logic by Richard Arnold Epstein

What would Richard know about spirituality Jammy

Reply #41

Ronnie316 — Sun, 05 May 2013 14:13:30 GMT

I'm sure it was difficult for you to compose a post containing only two sentences. I'm also certain it is even MORE difficult to comprehend a single line. Simplicity can be a multitude of illusions for you Jammy.

Reply #40

jimmy4164 — Fri, 03 May 2013 17:20:32 GMT

I'm sorry for missing your post Ronnie. Some of us are not accustomed to following a person's thoughts over multiple single line posts, but I'll try harder in the future.

Reply #39

Ronnie316 — Fri, 03 May 2013 15:50:24 GMT

Stack has good reason to be confident JAMMY, he clearly READ the post where I clearly stated that my intentions for spending a $1 on KY pick 3 numbers as offer by Keith Price were to see what I get .

Reply #38

jimmy4164 — Fri, 03 May 2013 05:33:29 GMT

Stack47,

Well, I guess I need to learn not to make assumptions when it comes to Ronnie316 - he's just too complex. I assumed he was truthful about his state of residence, AZ in his Profile, and therefore assumed he purchased AZ Pick-3 picks...

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/259455/3034207

...so, when he reported a winner in KY, I got curious...

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/259455/3045311

Now, since you are confident my reading comprehension is lacking, ple... [ More ]

Reply #37

Stack47 — Thu, 02 May 2013 23:09:37 GMT

BTW, I'm still curious why you posted a Pick-3 win claim by matching an AZ pick with a KY result. (?)

LMAO!

You're reading comprehension is horrible. Go back and read the thread and if you still can't figure it out, have someone explain it to you.

Reply #36

jimmy4164 — Thu, 02 May 2013 18:34:20 GMT

Ronnie316's response on 4/28/13,

Now THIS is classic Jammy.........................

Your propensity for posting minor inaccuracies and false assumptions is really quite fascinating.

MM draws are twice per week, not daily .......

Sorry about that. Do you think this means a back-test or simulation is inappropriate to test your strategy?

What made you assume I needed an investor ?

I thought it was a fair assumption that someone who works the night shift and posts here [as you... [ More ]

Reply #35

Ronnie316 — Wed, 01 May 2013 19:21:47 GMT

Thanks for explaining yet again Stack. Your logic is perfect as always.

Reply #34

Stack47 — Wed, 01 May 2013 04:42:57 GMT

There are five ways to match four out of five number and because of the 4if4 guarantee, the wheel uses all five. That's five chances to match the other drawn number out of 24 numbers.

So any demonstration winning 5/5 involved luck for the 5th number if you had all winning numbers and the extra ball.

The wheel I used wasn't the minimum amount of combos necessary to get the 4if4 guarantee so there can be more than five four number matches. When five of 28 numbers are drawn, there are 115 f... [ More ]

Reply #33

Ronnie316 — Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:52:42 GMT

I understand that it is inconceivable to people with Jammy's apptitude that a jackpot can be won by intelligent design, nevertheless had I put my $5k per draw into live action I would have won on the 18th draw.

Friday, August 10, 2012 10 18 36 38 44 + 08 4 $29 Million

Reply #32

Ronnie316 — Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:49:13 GMT

Realistic discussion with Jammy is nearly impossible because of his convoluted and confused way of thinking. This is why I blocked him for the past few months. It makes no sense to keep going round and round in circles like a dog chasing his tail. But I'm sure Jammy is VERY used to it and cant find a way to stop.

Are you still smoking those cigarettes Jammy

Reply #31

Ronnie316 — Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:44:44 GMT

Now THIS is classic Jammy.........................

Your propensity for posting minor inaccuracies and false assumptions is really quite fascinating.

MM draws are twice per week, not daily .......

What made you assume I needed an investor

Reply #30

RJOh — Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:55:05 GMT

Although the process of determining which 28 numbers to discard might get a little sticky, an adept programmer should be able to crank out a back-tester for you in short order.

Actually Jimmy has had a list of the depth of the winning numbers in a list of the previous 56 numbers posted in his threads several times so he probably knows which 28 numbers are likely to be the most productive.

Backing testing only prove what you knew happened did happened.

Reply #29

jimmy4164 — Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:37:20 GMT

OK, all of the past draw results are available and this sounds like a fairly simple strategy. Although the process of determining which 28 numbers to discard might get a little sticky, an adept programmer should be able to crank out a back-tester for you in short order. So, why not employ one and find out, finally, just how well your strategy works?

If it looks good, your next step would be to calculate how many days in a row you could potentially lose a big chunk of your daily $5K outlay,... [ More ]

Reply #28

Ronnie316 — Sun, 28 Apr 2013 21:29:37 GMT

Playing a 4 if 4 of 28 wheel IS an effective win by design strategy that only requires $5k per draw.

Reply #27

Ronnie316 — Sun, 28 Apr 2013 21:25:41 GMT

Right, except playing one line per draw is NOT an effective win by design strategy.

Reply #26

SergeM — Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:57:53 GMT

Reply #25

dr san — Sun, 28 Apr 2013 12:49:47 GMT

Hello, there will only be preview-shaped arrays, or matrices of different shapes and curves, as a cartesian type within each array, a predictor of wheels, and predicting the ends (last digit) of each number, last digit only even or only odd

Example of a lottery 49/6, predict the last digit of the 49 numbers to hit 4 numbers

Hitting the last digit is half of the process, because the initial digit number

From 0 to 4, then the work wheel has only termian oes 0 to 9

Reply #24

SergeM — Sun, 28 Apr 2013 12:22:55 GMT

No report available: dr san has not posted any predictions.

Overruled

Reply #23

dr san — Sun, 28 Apr 2013 12:18:04 GMT

Hello, sergem the big problem is that the wheels have not found a structural defect of its composition, it is possible to create wheels that guarantees prizes to play

A certain number of sweepstakes? Example create a structure which ensures wheel

Prizes to play up to 15 sweepstakes? thank you

Reply #22

SergeM — Sun, 28 Apr 2013 11:41:03 GMT

Playing a 4if4 wheel only guarantees that 4 win with 4/5, it doesn't guarantee 5 win with 5/5. So any demonstration winning 5/5 involved luck for the 5th number if you had all winning numbers and the extra ball. Picking 2 extra balls, dilutes the payouts even more.

Reply #21

jimmy4164 — Sun, 28 Apr 2013 03:58:19 GMT

Actually, I believe it's been DEMONSTRATED over and over again that the correct numbers CAN be chosen and a jackpot CAN be won by playing ONE(1) line per MM draw. So, which would you rather have or a nickel

Reply #20

Ronnie316 — Sat, 27 Apr 2013 23:07:39 GMT

I like to play dry. It is educational.

Reply #19

SergeM — Sat, 27 Apr 2013 23:05:42 GMT

I don't like dry play, I like to play for real.

Reply #18

Ronnie316 — Sat, 27 Apr 2013 23:04:45 GMT

You know so much about worthless how

Reply #17

SergeM — Sat, 27 Apr 2013 22:58:55 GMT

A winning amount of combinations that isn't played is absolutely worthless!

If your aunt had balls, then she was your uncle

Reply #16

Ronnie316 — Sat, 27 Apr 2013 20:46:49 GMT

I have already PROVEN that the correct numbers CAN be chosen and a jackpot CAN be won by playing 98,820 lines per MM draw. Furthermore, Stack has already PROVEN that the exact same jackpot COULD have been won on the exact same day using 95% FEWER lines by playing a 4 if 4 WHEEL...........

Stack used wheel input order exactly as I posted the numbers.........

Posted Aug. 10, 2012...... https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/247020/45

02 10 13 38 05 18 21 29 41 04 08 43 09 51 44 50 52 13 49 5... [ More ]

Reply #15

LottoBoner — Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:05:25 GMT

You are correct!

It is a fundamental principle of gambling.

Wheels dont win anything with the wrong numbers.

I think we should elect you president of LP for your great depth of lottery wisdom

Reply #14

SergeM — Sun, 31 Mar 2013 10:16:29 GMT

I believe that your jpb wheels don't win anything with the wrong numbers.

Reply #13

LottoBoner — Fri, 29 Mar 2013 20:34:19 GMT

I use basically a grid to make my wheels. I focus on mainly two repeats, two 1 day skips. (If I can endure the losses when the trend is cooling)

However two 5 day skip, two 7 day skip two 13 day skips come at their own regular intervals.

But according to the maxim that which is most likely occurs most often, well then its 0 day and 1 day skip ( however these can go cold)

I would say large wheels are not nice on the pocket unless you have a million dollars and are just trying to win anot... [ More ]

Reply #12

LottoBoner — Fri, 29 Mar 2013 20:22:34 GMT

I was only kidding when i said quantum mechanical theory .

However, from what I remember off the top of my head about locating a subatomic particle,

one would try to use as many variables as possible to maximize the correct potentiality wave of distribution.

So for instance, A) charge b) spin c) orientation d) mass etc, to be able to get a better picture

So the same would apply for the numbers. The more variables the better the picture

I,. a) skip b) spacing c) frequency d) odd

Reply #11

Ricklou — Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:12:49 GMT

Lottoboner look there is a few excellent wheels -I cannot shoot them down -but scientifcally you should be able to narow down the winning numbers if the right methods are used. Most times huge wheels is not so nice on the pocket. Why play 100 lines if you can win with 5 lines

Reply #10

Ricklou — Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:09:06 GMT

Yes if a budget is not a problem then this is an option.................but in 1920!!!!! lol

Reply #9

Ricklou — Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:06:44 GMT

Agree with you......if you used decent wheels then different story. But Rjoh since I stpped wheeling I won more.

Reply #8

tvpventures — Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:27:44 GMT

Hi,LottoBonner, thanks for sharing your info..

Is that wheel for pick3? Can you please give an example how it works. I am not really know wheels that much, but when I see or hear the words: quantum mechanical theory It is get my attention super fast..

Thanks,

tvpventures..

Reply #7

Stack47 — Thu, 28 Mar 2013 04:43:38 GMT

By definition the total amount of possibilities are a full wheel so logically every combination is part of a wheel.

Reply #6

LottoBoner — Thu, 28 Mar 2013 01:36:35 GMT

When you say wheel are so 1920's, do you mean they are so Rockefeller?

I was designing a wheeling algorithm based on some quantum mechanical theory.

It took me about 36 hours to perfect.

Here it is for all to share.

P1-P2-A-B-C

P1-P2-D-E-F

P1-P2 G-H-I

It is a two power number wheel, (P1 and P2) in three lines (11 numbers) with a 3 if 3 guarentee.

Please dont try to sell it. Its proprietary

Reply #5

SergeM — Wed, 27 Mar 2013 21:48:16 GMT

Full wheel

Reply #4

Stack47 — Wed, 27 Mar 2013 03:42:55 GMT

if you're comparing spending $20 on an abbreviated 3 if 5 wheel that guarantees winning 6 bucks by matching 5 of the numbers. The key to using any group of numbers less than all is to match five numbers, but getting a smaller prize guarantee can eliminate the one line that matches all five numbers.

But by playing less than all the numbers, you're still wheeling some of the numbers and only using the combos matching your perimeters as your guarantee. The odds of matching all five numbers on an... [ More ]

Reply #3

SergeM — Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:49:43 GMT

I simulated a 2 if 6 with 35 numbers for 6+r/45 before a drawing and had 3 in a line. Odds are small, payouts are smaller.

Reply #2

msharkey2001 — Mon, 25 Mar 2013 01:43:41 GMT

Ya RJoh, Einstein first experimented with lottery wheeling back then right after he came out with his theory of relativity.

Reply #1

RJOh — Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:28:52 GMT

Are the year 1920 and wheeling connected?

I don't wheel numbers because I usually play only 10-20 lines to cover 70% of the possible numbers and there aren't any wheels with a decent guarantee that do that.

Wheeling is so 1920!!

Ricklou — Sun, 24 Mar 2013 21:06:39 GMT

Just my opinion.......who still use wheels for their numbers ? . I used Bluskov's wheels but now I dont wheel anymore -chances to get a 5/5 increased 10 fold