Anyone ever try Author Encoe's strategies?

Reply #63

fbarnes — Fri, 10 May 2013 20:35:47 GMT

me too.. I am laughing all the way to the bank...

Reply #62

PlayToWin47 — Thu, 09 May 2013 22:24:39 GMT

SozzledBoot wrote:

MENTAL NOTE: never place the Vicks Vapo-Rub next to the jalapeno dip.

I can't stop laughing!!! HeeHeeHaHaHa

Reply #61

fbarnes — Thu, 09 May 2013 14:58:20 GMT

Hey skyline,

I have purchased all of his books including the book that you mentioned in your post. I have contacted this author on facebook (search for Eze Ugbor) and he has spent alot of time explaining his methods to me. It is frightening how accurate his method is. This week he gave me three pick 3 numbers that came out straight 816, 216 and 350.

I would admit that his methods are advanced but also simple enough for everyone to understand. All in all he is a super cool guy with a method... [ More ]

Reply #60

fbarnes — Thu, 09 May 2013 14:55:46 GMT

canjunwin4 this book is completely different from any other system available on the internet. I would suggest you buy his latest book on amazon 'lottery little super book' He teaches people how to calculate trends and uses three main methods that are mathematically based.

Reply #59

LottoChica23 — Tue, 07 May 2013 00:15:57 GMT

I consider myself a seasoned lottery player.

I realize that when looking at numbers and the possibilities of manipulating them I sometimes have tunnel vision. From time to time I do purchase lottery books to see how the other guys are thinking when it comes to playing the lottery. Sometimes I don't learn anything and other times I learn how to think outside of the box. I'm very happy when I learn something new.

My goal is to become more proficient at selecting Pick 4 numbers. I recently p... [ More ]

Reply #58

Ronnie316 — Sat, 20 Apr 2013 23:00:41 GMT

Jammy is a disgruntled lottery player who lost a lot of money and cant find a way to get over it.

Reply #57

Ronnie316 — Sat, 20 Apr 2013 22:59:07 GMT

Your starting to sound demonic again Jammy.

Reply #56

eddessaknight — Sat, 20 Apr 2013 22:54:44 GMT

Hey Jimmy, et al, good stuff again Thanks,

I put before all, for consideration:

Allow yourself to believe. No one ever learned to do something he knew was impossible. If you disbelieve, in principal, either you will deny the validity of any psychic experience you may have or simply may not permit yourself to have such an experience. ~Dr Alexander Tanous, author 'Beyond Coincidence' former Prof St John U Manhattan College

Highly recommended reading for revealing fun experiences includin... [ More ]

Reply #55

jimmy4164 — Wed, 17 Apr 2013 04:07:47 GMT

It's of my opinion that a computer program that's seeded by 'A' programmer may not be as fluctuant and dynamic as a Human's interpretation when choosing numbers.

You seem to be thinking that random number generator programmers are trying to produce sequences that will match (predict) the lottery draws. This is NOT the case at all. They are trying to produce sequences that are as unpredictable as possible which score high on the randomness tests discussed in the NIST paper. Here's a good la... [ More ]

Reply #54

onlymoney — Wed, 17 Apr 2013 03:05:04 GMT

Yes, I saw that in an earlier post of yours. I don't have the time do read all that, but may find time In the following days, so I can't comment about the content.

Even if I conceded with you on the content, I still propose the Idea I mentioned earlier. It dealt with the Human touch. It's of my opinion that a computer program that's seeded by A programmer may not be as fluctuant and dynamic as a Human's interpretation when choosing numbers. A bad example would be If I predicted that the last... [ More ]

Reply #53

jimmy4164 — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 22:17:34 GMT

But do those tests account for the many pre-tests, post-tests, rotation of the ball tubes, and the rotation of the machines? You know, the butterfly effect.

Yes.

http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/toolkit/rng/documents/nissc-paper.pdf

Please take the link above to Mr. Soto's paper at the National Institute of Standards Technology and take a closer look. If you do, I think you will agree.

Reply #52

onlymoney — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:55:28 GMT

But do those tests account for the many pre-tests, post-tests, rotation of the ball tubes, and the rotation of the machines? You know, the butterfly effect.

I always wondered how many times the combos I was betting on showed up in the pre and post draws.

Reply #51

jimmy4164 — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:39:32 GMT

I agree OnlyMoney. There are statistical tests for evaluating [pseudo]random numbers. These tests can also be applied to numbers produced by mechanical lottery machines. Here's a good source:

http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/toolkit/rng/documents/nissc-paper.pdf

BTW, the long sequence [222...233] that SozzledBoot wondered about is not one I would want to wait for if it's a string of Pick-3 hits! The probability of that happenning randomly is the same as any other specific string of 12... [ More ]

Reply #50

onlymoney — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:31:27 GMT

I know.

Reply #49

Ronnie316 — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:15:44 GMT

I like McDonald's pancakes the BEST.

Reply #48

Ronnie316 — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:13:03 GMT

And never put salt in the sugar bowl.

Reply #47

dallascowboyfan — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:02:48 GMT

Reply #46

SozzledBoot — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:00:42 GMT

That's funny. I like that.

Reply #45

Ronnie316 — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:19:58 GMT

Sounds like all that would require a very large stack of pancakes

Reply #44

Coin Toss — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:03:39 GMT

onlymoney,

Sometimes amazon reviewers who pump up a book are selling that book. Just an FYI.

Reply #43

MonEl — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 10:01:02 GMT

Hello Ridge.

I was.

AOL bought Mailblocks and I lost that email address and I never changed it here at the Lottery Post, so one day when I tried to change my password to one that was very long the Lottery Post made the change to the new password, but later when I tried to log in with it, LP would not take neither the new nor the old password and since I no longer had the Mailblocks email address I could not try to recover some sort of password for LANTERN, I changed to Laterne and when I s... [ More ]

Reply #42

rdgrnr — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:51:12 GMT

Is that you, LANTERN

Reply #41

SozzledBoot — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:44:29 GMT

I'm funnier in Canada.

Reply #40

onlymoney — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:42:05 GMT

Is that a new motel chain?

I live in Florida, in a house, no motels. What does living in a motel have anything to do with vats of maple syrup

Reply #39

New York — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:37:24 GMT

Nice... But my head hurts thinking about it. Now it's a discussion about the way how the numbers flip, their surface, vacuum, and all that cool awkward stuff lol.

Well, in a pick 3 machine, there's 3 slots:

Slot 1 has numbers 0-9

Slot 2 has numbers 0-9

Slot 3 has numbers 0-9

5 even numbers and 5 odd numbers.

Mirrors:

0 5

1 6

2 7

3 8

4 9

Odds are 1000:1

Simply take this bit of info and consider that the ping pong balls flip.

For ex... [ More ]

Reply #38

SozzledBoot — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:32:59 GMT

I get it...you're from the Moose Lodge, aren't you

Reply #37

SozzledBoot — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:32:06 GMT

Yes I saw the links. Thanks.

Been there with the filters thingy too.

Reply #36

onlymoney — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:31:06 GMT

The dimensions, thickness and pouring geometry of the vat represents the overriding random control element for that particular system; the syrup represents the random numbers; and the way you pour out the syrup represents the control over the randomness.

But deep within the way the liquid flows is behaving random, even though you may think you have control over randomness because you have the power to tip over the vat. But do you have any control as to how that syrup will flow over? Mean... [ More ]

Reply #35

SozzledBoot — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:25:33 GMT

I just figured out how to explain my sense of randomness using an analogy:

Imagine a giant vat of syrup that you are able to tip over to spill the syrup.

The dimensions, thickness and pouring geometry of the vat represents the overriding random control element for that particular system; the syrup represents the random numbers; and the way you pour out the syrup represents the control over the randomness.

I will go to my grave not believing in randomness

Reply #34

MonEl — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:24:26 GMT

Maybe you would do better if you just study such things as Low-High, Even-Odd, In-Out, Width, Sums, Last Digits of Sums, Root Sums, Etc.

You can find all those here at LP, use L.P.'s search engine.

Did you look at the posts that I posted links to?

Well can't wait for you to look at the links got to go now it is getting too late.

Reply #33

onlymoney — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:23:42 GMT

Believe it or not, musical notes, even when It may seem like it's the wrong note to the average listener can have what's called a Poetic License , meaning even though the wrong note is being played within a certain key that forbids it to be there, the Poetic Licence can make it justified, how? The right/wrong note at the correct moment, and that's the key. It's sort of like a loophole, but not frowned upon. lol

There's a DOORS song where the guitarist plays a couple of notes off key, but it f... [ More ]

Reply #32

New York — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:13:15 GMT

Only money, well said.

With lottery, don't get caught up with randomness and theories or pre-determination. Simply do your workouts that work for you and play some lines. That's all there is to it.

Reply #31

SozzledBoot — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:12:47 GMT

If numbers and number sets could be correlated to musical tones from various instruments, would a gifted musician with a perfect ear be able to detect random number patterns that our math couldn't? After all, isn't it true that some lotteries give a *ahem* drum roll as the number is being played

Reply #30

MonEl — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:09:09 GMT

Try not to get too hung-up on names like random, non random, true random pseudo-random or whatever, thinking about such things is non productive, all that matters is to know what works and what doesn't work, prediction-wise and how to go about it.

Reply #29

onlymoney — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:09:08 GMT

Evolution of the species has absolutely nothing to do with randomness involving numbers.

Species evolve by adaptaion, numbers are not animated so they can't adapt.

The strong survive weeding out the competitors. This is why the Kodak Corporation went out of business. They're internal consultants were opposed to change. Meanwhile, digital advances in the video realm by competing companies, forced Kodak out of business because they became obsolete.

Reply #28

New York — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:05:35 GMT

No one will ever know that's why we're left predicting. We look at past results (well I do) and apply formulas to past winning numbers to create new winning numbers. This is what I believe in.

I simply record, connect, and apply a formula to create a new winning connecting number. I'm always close or the day I post numbers, the numbers that I posted appear 6 draws later.

Anyways, I'm interested in this book!! I want it

Reply #27

MonEl — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:02:07 GMT

What do you think about these:

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2362634

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2362642

-------------

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2364008

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2364074

-----------

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2365443

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/240717/2365522

-----------------

By the way don't bother trying to contact LANTERN he is gone to never be back unless somebody h... [ More ]

Reply #26

SozzledBoot — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:59:41 GMT

So the theory of evolution IS wrong

Reply #25

onlymoney — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:57:39 GMT

The reason you don't often see 1-2-3-4-5-6 is for the same reason you probaly won't see 1-2-37-42-43-59 anytime soon. I'll bet you 500 hundred bucks everyday for the rest of my life that the sequence above will never show in full, all six numbers in my lifetime.

Sequential numbers are an Illusion, only because they have a bias and nothing more. Pattern seeking Humans always trying to make sense of things. That's a good trait to have, but not in the world of numbers.

Random means= anything... [ More ]

Reply #24

helpmewin — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:54:14 GMT

Reply #23

New York — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:51:55 GMT

Lol oops :D

It's almost 12:00 AM and I'm sleepy lol.

Reply #22

SozzledBoot — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:51:10 GMT

Yeah I'm Canadian eh? Ontario Pick-3. And we have Pick-2 also.

Reply #21

helpmewin — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:50:02 GMT

looks like their trying to do A TTT some sort

Reply #20

SozzledBoot — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:49:18 GMT

I don't have any contact info. None on Amazon that I can see; none in his books.

I used to be very good at math and subscribe to the school of thought that math is a highly structured form of intuitive insight. Random numbers, in my opinion, are like math structures that can't get past the intuitive plane without exploding like a zit.

Randomness is only a phenomenon of human beings. Only humans perceive it. The universe makes no distinction. Why is that so? Who or what is preventing t... [ More ]

Reply #19

helpmewin — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:48:21 GMT

clearly P3 I meant which canada Ontario, Quebec, Western Canada

Reply #18

onlymoney — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:48:09 GMT

Think about it. If a set of numbers over the course of a year or so are truly random, why dont we see random snippets of purely sequential numbers as often as non sequential

But you do see them. They just don't conform to your models. How can you differentiate between random and non-random sequences? There is no Universal definition of what random is. In reality, anyone making a claim that they understand the inner workings of randomness Is shooting themselves in the foot. Think about th... [ More ]

Reply #17

New York — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:45:22 GMT

Great question. I'm guessing pick 3

Reply #16

helpmewin — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:44:13 GMT

which Canada Lottery do you play

Reply #15

New York — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:43:31 GMT

No way! Lol.

I suggest studying the book carefully and try contacting him so you can ask him questions on where you're having difficulty understanding.

Never quit the lottery. With lottery, it's trial and error, until you get it right. I read the reviews on amazon and they spoke highly about the book. Usually, all lottery books on amazon get flamed. However, this book had 3 reviews.

Anyways, stay positive, don't give up on learning the techniques this book has to offer. I would... [ More ]

Reply #14

SozzledBoot — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:39:03 GMT

So you're saying I should forget lotteries and become a monk!

MENTAL NOTE: never place the Vicks Vapo-Rub next to the jalapeno dip.

Reply #13

helpmewin — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:37:19 GMT

Reply #12

New York — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:36:26 GMT

Thanks. Unfortunately I have no idea what he means. I may have to purchase the book and study it to see what I come up with and hopefully understand his techniques, so I can share my experience with others.

Reply #11

SozzledBoot — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:33:27 GMT

See my redited reply where I thanked people.

He generates sets of numbers that have relationships based on mapping columns to boxes (whatever that means).

Reply #10

New York — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:31:24 GMT

What exact methods does the author use? Formulas, charts, etc? And, does his methods pinpoint to the next potential winning number? Or is it another method where you create a pool of new winning numbers and wait until they hit

Reply #9

SkyLine69 — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:26:21 GMT

Reply #8

SozzledBoot — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:23:17 GMT

Thank you all for responding. There isn't much info out there on this guy but...

he seemed to be heading in a direction I've often thought about and that is this:

In order for a random number to be truly random, there has to be a kind of meta math (math outside of math) to insure that patterns are always separated from non-patterns.

Think about it. If a set of numbers over the course of a year or so are truly random, why dont we see random snippets of purely sequential numbers as often... [ More ]

Reply #7

SkyLine69 — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:19:22 GMT

Reply #6

onlymoney — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 02:35:06 GMT

I did look on Amazon a few mintues ago and got mixed reviews by the purchasers. I have a hard time believing reviews because a lot of them are based on complaining or praising about a particular system in a way that for them, unwittingly reveals themselves as inexperienced players. Also, the way they explain what they learned is so obvious. Their explanation was geared towards a more fundamental learning experience. As If they just found out what patterns are, or what trends are.

I checked ou... [ More ]

Reply #5

onlymoney — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 02:10:26 GMT

Thanks Ridge, i just realized my stupidity and edited the post, and at the same time you corrected me. ha ha

It's the vodka and plant material.

Reply #4

rdgrnr — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 02:08:26 GMT

I think he's saying he did buy it but can't understand it.

Reply #3

onlymoney — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 02:06:31 GMT

I'm confused. Do you currently own the book, or are you asking for someone who has it? If you haven't purchased his book, then how do you know about his bad explanations and that his brand of English is bad?

If you did buy it, then I understand the question. Ha ha, sorry, I get a little tipsy sometimes (every night), lol.

Reply #2

CajunWin4 — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 01:52:15 GMT

Save your money !!! No need to buy someone elses book when all the information is here on Lottery Post . Abou 99.9 % of any of the information or systems bought from others is from Lottery Post . Invest your money into Lottery Post Membership

Reply #1

rdgrnr — Tue, 16 Apr 2013 01:26:15 GMT

Sorry, I never heard of him but how did your boot get sozzled

Anyone ever try Author Encoe's strategies?

SozzledBoot — Mon, 15 Apr 2013 06:38:03 GMT

If you did and you purchased his books, can I get help interpreting his brand of English to discover what the heck he is trying to reveal