Castaway

Reply #29

annn mundy — Wed, 22 May 2013 12:55:53 GMT

am a newbie trying to figure out the system do you break down previous number played am lost

Reply #28

Naiveplayer — Tue, 21 May 2013 01:18:56 GMT

I see now. that makes things a little more clearer lol. Thanks bud

Reply #27

ranman17 — Tue, 21 May 2013 01:11:38 GMT

The coversion you were seeing yesterday were root sums. You arrive at a root sum by adding the digits together and then adding those together like this:

917 = 17 = 8

If the original number is not greater than 9 it is only one step like this:

123 = 6

Reply #26

Naiveplayer — Tue, 21 May 2013 01:09:20 GMT

Thank you. I'm trying to get into the swing of things. Definitely a numbers crunching game. Methods, madness...oh and did I mention madness

Reply #25

ESR54 — Tue, 21 May 2013 00:02:20 GMT

Welcome,Naiveplayer here on LP,we have a lots to Share and plenty to learn.

Goodluck.

Reply #24

helpmewin — Mon, 20 May 2013 23:23:22 GMT

Cute

Reply #23

Naiveplayer — Mon, 20 May 2013 01:45:55 GMT

I'm already shaking in my boots.

Reply #22

CarliG — Mon, 20 May 2013 01:26:23 GMT

Welcome to Lottery Post Naiveplayer ..

Dont let us scare you off ...lol

Carlig

Reply #21

lakerben — Mon, 20 May 2013 01:13:07 GMT

I wrote one similar to this a few weeks ago but I didn't post it. Try subtracting the resulting root from 999.

999

-528

471 then mirror 926.

add 001

472 927

473 928

474 929

Reply #20

Naiveplayer — Mon, 20 May 2013 01:11:24 GMT

I'm a newb to the whole conversion stuff

Reply #19

ranman17 — Mon, 20 May 2013 01:04:09 GMT

Woulda, shoulda, coulda...

Reply #18

CarliG — Mon, 20 May 2013 00:59:04 GMT

I finally figured that out .. I was getting excited for a minute ... lol

Gonna test in a bit... But that was crazy wild . Too bad you didnt see that earlier, you just might have played it ..

CG

Reply #17

ranman17 — Mon, 20 May 2013 00:48:56 GMT

What I'm saying is that almost EVERY number I enter gives me 1899 which is really 999 which is 9.

Reply #16

ranman17 — Mon, 20 May 2013 00:48:18 GMT

Nope

Reply #15

Naiveplayer — Mon, 20 May 2013 00:45:56 GMT

Think you're onto something

Reply #14

CarliG — Mon, 20 May 2013 00:43:34 GMT

Well Dang .. Im on it .. Hope you played something.. get it while its hot ..

Thanks

Carlig

Reply #13

ranman17 — Mon, 20 May 2013 00:37:02 GMT

lol....almost every number I put in there gives it to me...

Reply #12

ranman17 — Mon, 20 May 2013 00:33:51 GMT

Check it out, using yesterdays midday also gave me tonights wilnner:

Enter #

2508

Sets

1899

3339

2169

1809

2259

1899

and using the eve from the 17th also gave it to me:

Enter #

7643

Sets

3936

3339

2169

1809

2259

1899

Reply #11

ranman17 — Mon, 20 May 2013 00:29:54 GMT

You guys won't believe this, I tried this for P4 and using eve to eve it gave me the P4 in NY for tonight:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/mkwtjrsrrmbr0oa/Castaway%20P3_P4.xlsx

Enter #

7125

Sets

2709

2349

1989

3429

2259

1899

Reply #10

ranman17 — Sun, 19 May 2013 23:36:31 GMT

Maybe I will add a component that would utilize the 105 and 138 from above. In an instance where the result of addind the pairs gives a two digit sum I would have to write an if null statement for position one.

Carli, do you feel like giving that a whirl

Reply #9

kreative1 — Sun, 19 May 2013 23:36:04 GMT

usually doubles don't work but the 311 gave the 977 str8!

as far as the sets, it will depend...some numbers don't give as many as others

let me check some more

Reply #8

ranman17 — Sun, 19 May 2013 23:28:56 GMT

That would result in a lot of sets.

Reply #7

kreative1 — Sun, 19 May 2013 23:27:51 GMT

don't throw in the towel yet...going up and down by one, if it holds up is still worth it

especially str8

Reply #6

ranman17 — Sun, 19 May 2013 23:25:02 GMT

Yeah, I was excited when I thought this up but so far, it hasn't proven to be worthy.

Reply #5

kreative1 — Sun, 19 May 2013 23:21:43 GMT

ok gotcha

I did try other numbers with more results

for PA so far backtesting..the front pair is str8! but last digit is off by one..

Reply #4

CarliG — Sun, 19 May 2013 23:21:03 GMT

Thanks Ranman...

Gonna do some backtesting later

Carlig

Reply #3

ranman17 — Sun, 19 May 2013 23:20:54 GMT

It works regardless. If you do this on paper you would get 297 from 297

Reply #2

ranman17 — Sun, 19 May 2013 23:17:57 GMT

That means that the only number produced by this system using 297 is 297. If you enter a different number you will have different results.

Last night NY had 482 and today we had 682:

Enter #

482

Sets

361

158

947

694

826

614

472

715

269

836

Reply #1

kreative1 — Sun, 19 May 2013 23:14:00 GMT

thanks ranman!

mine doesnt look like yours and I just put in the number 297

all the sets are 297?

Enter # 297

Sets 297 297

297 297

297 297

297 297

297 297

Castaway

ranman17 — Sun, 19 May 2013 22:39:35 GMT

Here is something I just dreamt up:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/zp073gr9wegg2ew/Castaway.xlsx

Here is how it works (in the example to follow you would only get two number sets to play but ather numbers will give you more):

4

1

7

Root

sets

5

2

8

4

1

-

5

7

4

1

4

7

-

2

1

7

-

8