Any Pick3 system with past performace proof?

Reply #104

chrissy16 — Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:48:56 GMT

Do your thing, I can't wait to see what you come up with.

Reply #103

chrissy16 — Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:47:52 GMT

Thanks, onlymoney.

Reply #102

onlymoney — Tue, 21 Jan 2014 06:40:41 GMT

Yes and Yes, but like I said, I'm testing. I refuse to spend until I find out how Peter tweaked it. If not, I'll find my own.

Reply #101

mmx1 — Tue, 21 Jan 2014 06:27:17 GMT

onlymoney, have you purchased the system as you said?

Can you make any money

Reply #100

onlymoney — Tue, 21 Jan 2014 04:18:50 GMT

The links below will help, but if you have time, read more posts from me on that thread. When clicking on the link, allow it enough time to take you to the specific post I made in the thread. In other words, don't try to adjust the page by messing around with the side bar on your computer. let the link do it's job. This link is called a permalink . It takes you directly to a post made by a certain member (me in this case) within a thread. In this way, you don't have to scroll the whole page up o... [ More ]

Reply #99

chrissy16 — Tue, 21 Jan 2014 02:35:54 GMT

Onlymoney, how do you know that he used this system

Reply #98

Kola — Sun, 19 Jan 2014 21:03:26 GMT

Hello Candlelight777,

You're welcome and yes, you did explain yourself well despite your fever. Thanks for being so open, and willing to think outside the box. I too find it often gets you the farthest. I wish you an exceptional descent on your lotterological journey into the rabbit hole .

Please get some great hot bath soaks with some deep rest, and may the litres of water, bowls of broth, and healing herbs go down well. Take good care.

May your numbers be true this day,

Kola... [ More ]

Reply #97

Kola — Sun, 19 Jan 2014 20:03:05 GMT

Hello Lucky Loser,

Thanks for the good exchange and the well wishes. I hope that you continue to surprise and top yourself in your approach to the games. Take care.

May your numbers be true this day,

Kola

Reply #96

Candlelight777 — Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:11:20 GMT

Been real sick and now running a fever so i am just gonna say this before i crawl back under my pillow. I rarely play the P3 or P4 games, but after i posted yesterday i decided i was going to spend some time going over a lengthy history of winning numbers for the P3 games because the numbers are easier to work with. My goal was to go into it keeping in mind what Kola had shared because i must admit it sparked my curiosity on many levels. It was after spending much time with the P3 midday numbers... [ More ]

Reply #95

Lucky Loser — Sun, 19 Jan 2014 15:28:24 GMT

Okay, thanks for your response and I hope you find what you're looking for at some point. This logic is pretty much way out of my league so I'm gonna leave it to you's guys to figure it out and put it all together.

L.L.

Reply #94

Kola — Sun, 19 Jan 2014 07:29:27 GMT

Hello adobea78,

I agree that the human brain is very limited in this dimension, and that we often over-rationalize many things in in order to find the connecting dots. And yet I think that at the end of doing it, we are not wholly wrong. We are often on a decent path, and there will be kernels of truth in our conclusions, especially when they are flipped around and observed from different perspectives.

I respect that you honestly pursued the question of what is random. The 'Markov Chain Mo... [ More ]

Reply #93

adobea78 — Sun, 19 Jan 2014 01:35:59 GMT

Hello Kola,

From philosophical perspective, one can rationalize anything and find the connecting dots, the human brain deals with theories(it could be factual and disputed in span of time). We're very limited in this dimension, so we pose questions and form rational paths, most of which are tentative, nothing is certain, words like 'compelled' and 'believe' in your text comfirms this. I say disconnect when you try in abstract terms to assert that the energy of the balls and corresponding numb... [ More ]

Reply #92

Kola — Sun, 19 Jan 2014 00:08:14 GMT

Hello adobea78,

I'm sorry, but I'm not exactly sure what you think my disconnect may be. Please re-phrase it for me.

In the meantime...Yes, I agree with you. The visible universe is all pattern, so are we, and by extension we are compelled to seek it. I also agree that the balls may not be aware of their identity by the ways in which human beings identify them. In specific regard to the lottery I said , if there are no numbers on the ball, the game is null and void , because of what I beli... [ More ]

Reply #91

Kola — Sat, 18 Jan 2014 23:38:25 GMT

Hello Candlelight777,

I so appreciate your thoughtful exchange.

Its true that the drawings may not be pin-point clockwork. Thats okay, and I will tell you why its okay a little later. There is great merit in having the draws come in at exactly the same time though. In my opinion, it creates an even deeper resonance with all the draws that have come before it and those that will come after it, at that time. By the way, if your state has 2 draws, there is also a resonance between the midday

Reply #90

Kola — Sat, 18 Jan 2014 21:53:01 GMT

Hello Lucky Loser,

Pardon the high-falutin' language in my posts. Sometimes I can't help myself. Its true, our discussion doesn't have to be, as you say, rocket-science worthy, and yet maybe for some thats whats needed depending on the some total of who you are which again informs how you see the world. So what may be the best way of trying to analyze predicting the lottery will only be the best for some, but the 'worst' for others(Though there may be systems that can transcend best and worst... [ More ]

Reply #89

adobea78 — Sat, 18 Jan 2014 18:06:17 GMT

If there are no numbers on the balls, the game is null and void, The numbers on the ball help give the ball its essential identity. The ball is energy, or a field of energy. Coherent energy is information. So putting a numbers on a ball impacts the information in the field of that ball, and impacts the information in the field for all numbers.

There seem to be a disconect here, the human mind is seeking information, but has no relation to the balls perse, i do not think the balls are aware of... [ More ]

Reply #88

Candlelight777 — Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:50:08 GMT

First let me say thank you so much for taking the time to share what you have. You certainly have flipped a switch and left me thinking about some things that i had not considered or thought of that i found not only interesting, but fascinating. I really enjoyed reading your responses as i always love to look at things from all angles and expand into uncharted territories that i had not considered before.

But i do have a few things i am curious about that you stated.

In my opinion, when i... [ More ]

Reply #87

Lucky Loser — Sat, 18 Jan 2014 13:48:24 GMT

Logically speaking, its true for the lottery too.So the draw of 208 has a different personality than 745, but through their relating, we can better see more of their traits and functions. Logically speaking, its true for the lottery too.So the draw of 208 has a different personality than 745, but through their relating, we can better see more of their traits and functions.

Okay, let's just simplify this to the max. I mean, I can definitely have an appreciation for all the thought, logic, and... [ More ]

Reply #86

Kola — Sat, 18 Jan 2014 06:39:58 GMT

Hello adobea78,

If there are no numbers on the balls, the game is null and void, The numbers on the ball help give the ball its essential identity. The ball is energy, or a field of energy. Coherent energy is information. So putting a numbers on a ball impacts the information in the field of that ball, and impacts the information in the field for all numbers. It may be irrelevant that the digit of a preceding draw is not the same as the digit of the successive draw. What matters is that they

Reply #85

adobea78 — Sat, 18 Jan 2014 01:05:07 GMT

'Consider the possibility that the draws are not random'

I think the inverse of above should be assumed to see the big picture, the abstract explanation is all good, but does not negate the fact that all the balls are memory-less, your only connection or how you relate to the ' dynamics'of the event is digital identification.

Lets assume all the balls have the same color wthout numbers before the event, how do you identify the precceding/successive draws? I thought all the balls has the s... [ More ]

Reply #84

Kola — Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:05:09 GMT

Hello Candlelight777,

Consider the possibility that the draws are not random. Consider that from a scientific point of view, the only action that could possibly be called truly random in the universe is whatever the first cause or spark was that set this Wheel, or Uni-wheel(universe into motion). I'm not saying that we're in a pre-determined universe, I'm just saying that once anything comes into being, be it a rock or a person, it is quite stuck in the loop of time, and thus subject to cause... [ More ]

Reply #83

onlymoney — Fri, 17 Jan 2014 04:55:26 GMT

Ok Peter, let's get to work buddy. I have a genius plan. between you and me, we'll spend about 280 grand a year on losing tickets to make ourselves look good. Now here's the best part. We;ll do this until the end of time, all the while crossing our fingers that some genius is gonna see the trick and fall for it. And after five years, and 1.4 million losing tickets, If this schmuck convinces another 12 or 20 other schmucks to buy our system, then we'll recover about 0000.18 percent of the losses.... [ More ]

Reply #82

onlymoney — Fri, 17 Jan 2014 04:49:57 GMT

Sorry, you still haven't proven that the statement you posted really came from the NH lottery, and you won't be able because it's just a SUPPOSED email by an LP member.

Like I said before, get a grip.

Reply #81

Coin Toss — Fri, 17 Jan 2014 03:50:53 GMT

There's paperwork for any win over $500, no?

So every time 'Steve Player' won more than that 'he' had to fiil out such paperwork to get paid, and a W2-G or is it W4-G. THINK and stop assuming you know it all.

So if you're the NH lottery and a number of individuals representing 'Steve Player', or an agent saying, Oh, I'm not Steve Player, it's a corporation , have filled out the necessary paperwork to get paid - then DUH, genius. THINK.

The Steve Player folk monitoring this board are goi... [ More ]

Reply #80

onlymoney — Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:08:48 GMT

And you say I'm the gullible one?

How the hell does the NH lottery know WHO is buying tickets at what store? Really?

Are you saying that If i play at 12 different locations, the Florida lottery will know it was me?

The casino days really screwed up your brain.

Secondly, this excerpt you show is from some LP member that SUPPOSEDLY sent an email asking them about Steve Player. It could be written by the LP member. DUH ! This is not posted on the NH website, so it's just heresay.... [ More ]

Reply #79

Lucky Loser — Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:32:07 GMT

I agree, 'Toss. This would be the equivalent of a company that sells a premium product of some brand, then markets either the same thing or a very similar product under yet another brand name. In the end, it's all the same with only minor variations if any at all. It's about the skill of marketing one's product in this case. Just my strong opinion...which is fact-based.

L.L.

Reply #78

Coin Toss — Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:27:56 GMT

One more time, onlymoney, from the NH lottery:

Yes, Steve Player is a corporation and not an actual person. The corporation does try to sell a system for determining what the winning numbers will be. What you see on that website and on our website are the times that he has won. The lottery can see from the stores where the tickets are purchased that a great deal more is spent on buying the tickets then what is won. If you do intend to make such a purchase, please be aware that lottery winning... [ More ]

Reply #77

onlymoney — Thu, 16 Jan 2014 01:32:02 GMT

Thanks Emily.

I understand the skeptism, but I wouldn't put so much faith in Steve's systems unless I saw a correlation between Peter and Steve. I already said that most of Steve's systems suck, but this guy Peter is using Steve's system and tweaking the numbers, I'm sure of it.

Between Steve and peter, they'd have to spend well over 20 grand or more a month in losing tickets just to prove that it was their system that made that money. And i believe there's no way they are selling that man... [ More ]

Reply #76

onlymoney — Thu, 16 Jan 2014 01:23:38 GMT

If you look in many dumpsters long enough, you may find something valuable.

Again, Steve's private stock system may not work on it's own, but based on the evidence which I've posted so many times now, It's apparent to me that Peter has figured out a way to tweak the numbers, especially with the p-4.

If anyone really thinks Steve and Peter are spending tens of thousands a month on losing tickets just to sell a few systems, they really don't have a clue. The cost would eclipse any profit to... [ More ]

Reply #75

onlymoney — Thu, 16 Jan 2014 01:18:36 GMT

If you believe there is a Steve Player despite the response from the NH lottery, what's the point of discusing this with you?

If you want me to take you seriously, you first have to at least address the specific points I brought up. If you can't, then you either don't have a good explanation, or you lack basic comprehension.

It really wasn't a hard question that I asked.

The more you elude the issues I bring up, the more I think you can't answer them. Don't worry though, you're not... [ More ]

Reply #74

emilyg — Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:46:01 GMT

Why all the negative comments. If onlymoney bought the system - let him enjoy and and let us know how it works.

Reply #73

mmx1 — Wed, 15 Jan 2014 22:29:23 GMT

Correction:

These 2 lines:

1. After each win played 1 x 80 combos.

2. After first loss played 1 x 80 combos.

Should be:

1. After each win played 1 x 70 combos.

2. After first loss played 1 x 70 combos.

Reply #72

mmx1 — Wed, 15 Jan 2014 21:55:07 GMT

I like and believe in your signature: There is always a way ... .

You deserve a proof. Here is one of them.

This is a part of somebody's never published system (anlysis) of one Pick3 lotto for the last 2.5 years (946 days).

Maximum skip: 7

Current skip: 4

Next number to play: 568

--- unmatched loss

--- double loss

-- win (any double or unmatched)

Condition:

unmatched ----- (1 or 3) from 3 played numbers

doubles ----- 2 of 3 played numbers (in other... [ More ]

Reply #71

Candlelight777 — Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:39:58 GMT

No, i never stated the lottery was in cahoots with either of these people in question. Also, I get the logic your working with, i really do. Given you already previously purchased one of steve's systems and referred to it as garbage, maybe repeating that action will produce a different result by purchasing another....see i get it.

Good luck and i hope it works out for you

Reply #70

Coin Toss — Wed, 15 Jan 2014 05:00:11 GMT

onlymoney,

If you believe there is a Steve Player despite the response from the NH lottery, what's the point of discusing this with you?

Someone early on in this thread (was it you?) mentioned they intended to buy a $125 system on Monday, in a later post you mentioned something about a lot of effort to sell a $49.95 system, etc...yada yada yada.

There is no Steve Player and something tells me you've told plenty of people what a great time you had at the 1994 World Series.

Again, Sven... [ More ]

Reply #69

onlymoney — Wed, 15 Jan 2014 03:23:10 GMT

So you're saying the NH website is in cahoots with steve player? You people are funny.

Yeah right, Steve would have to sell tens of thousands of systems every month to break even for the cost of losing over 70 grand a month, much less to make a profit.

I tell you, I laugh so hard when I see what some people write about his supposed schemes. Digging at the bottom of the barrel is an understatement. lol

Reply #68

onlymoney — Wed, 15 Jan 2014 03:17:11 GMT

Until you address the points I brought up, It's just your uneducated opinion on the subject. And don't tell me your Casino days was enough to apply it in this particular subject.

A lot of people never address points I bring up. They just reiterate what they wrote in the previous post.

Reply #67

mmx1 — Wed, 15 Jan 2014 02:39:54 GMT

Balls are not perfect as nothing else is, especially materials whatever balls are made of.

Most of drawings today are done by a computer code, less random than balls.

The most important, more random means more often repeats of either strategy or actual nembers that makes things easier for smart guys.

A good strategy means RIGHT NUMBERS, RIGHT TIMING and RIGHT AMOUNT to play.

Reply #66

adobea78 — Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:39:42 GMT

Where do you place the intuitional part?, it seems everything is relegated to this machine. Seriously, you think you need SERIOUS analysis for this random event?

SCENERIO Imagine 9 white balls without identification(Digits) in a hopper, can you differentiate the outcomes of preceeding and sequent draws? All your analysis is based on the fact that the balls are numbered, take the IDs out of the picture and try to predict these outcomes. The balls have no memory, hence preceeding has no impact

Reply #65

bobby623 — Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:12:34 GMT

Winning Data

Base Structure: RACA

Lottery Numbers: 0539

I misread the 'tea leaves' in a couple of places!

It happens!

I don't expect to win every draw.

But, I'm winning often enough to make the work worthwhile, for my situation.

I think I've said enough.

Final comment: Substitution works

Reply #64

mmx1 — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 23:03:49 GMT

You need computer programming skills in order to make any serious analysis and predictions.

You cannot get any reliable, long term results manually.

Too much work for nothing.

Reply #63

bobby623 — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 21:04:13 GMT

Responding to feedback.

Here is ADVANCE extract of my Playsheet for Texas Daily 4 0114 Evening Drawing.

Base Structures: ABAC ABBC ACBC ABCR BCBC CACB

Lottery Numbers: 9852 9862 9283 9820 8263 3938

I usually play six combinations: Three with double letters, a single (no repeat letters) a double-double and a double lottery number.

I play both ways but only bet 50 cents each way.

Total spent: $6

All of my choices (guesses) based on appropriate tracking charts and trend... [ More ]

Reply #62

bobby623 — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:15:52 GMT

Responding to critiques, questions and other feedback.

Here is an extract from my Playsheet for Texas Pick 3, Day Drawing, 0114.

Choices based on trends in several tracking/trend charts.

Base Structures: BAB ACA CBC ARB CCC

Lottery Numbers: 581 968 016 821 006

Usually, I choose 3 structures having a double letter (ABB, CCA, AAB, etc), one Single structure (no repeat letters, ARB) and

one Lottery number structure (could be a triple or double letter structure)

The order

Reply #61

bobby623 — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:57:46 GMT

Hello, lottoburg

The link in my previous post takes you to an Excel posting by winsumloosesum.

Instead of providing guidance on how to use his program, he provided links to some of my original postings regarding

my tracking methods based on substitution (ie diving the 10 digits into 3 major groups and using tracking

charts to reflect trends).

Only winsum can explain his program.

I firmly believe that the best way to win the daily games is to track draw history and make choic... [ More ]

Reply #60

olplugger — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:07:40 GMT

If only such a thing existed....however, I wish you good luck in your endeavors.

Reply #59

helpmewin — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:51:14 GMT

Thanks for the preach

Reply #58

Candlelight777 — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:44:20 GMT

I find it odd that this steve and peter are regular winners noted in the NH winners list. Are they connected or is it two different gigs? who knows for sure but it looks like part of a marketing scheme to purposely make it look like oh this guy must be using one of steve's systems and it must work. This website and it's long list of systems looks like it's been around for a long time....how many systems can there be? how has the rest of the world completely missed the 100's of ways one can beat... [ More ]

Reply #57

onlymoney — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 05:38:32 GMT

So the group spent hundreds of thousands in the hole to gain a few suckers for 49.95 a pop? I need to know what drugs you are taking, cause I want some..lol

Reply #56

Coin Toss — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 05:12:49 GMT

onlymoney,

There is no Steve.

'Steve Player' is a non-existent person created by a corporate think tank that comes up with systems and gets its customers to road test them.

So yeah, that plan did work and keeps working because people who desperately want to believe in a system believe in Steve Player.

There's only one consistent system - the last line of my sig describes it.

Reply #55

lottoburg — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 04:58:56 GMT

Hi, Bobby:

I want to know if your Tracking system is the same thing with your SLS (Substitute Lottery System )?

Thanks for your sincere sharing!

Best regards,

lb

Reply #54

onlymoney — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 04:33:24 GMT

Reply #53

Stack47 — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 04:24:56 GMT

For some reason it goes way over some heads that Peter St. Pierre has never claimed he uses Player's methods and Player has never claim any knowledge of St. Pierre's wins. The speculation that St. Pierre is using Player's methods is based on the similar winnings.

Winning pick-3 and 4 games and 5 minute Keno games are all in the timing and any system can work at the right time. Even a broken clock gives the right time twice a day.

Reply #52

Stack47 — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 04:11:59 GMT

Player's strategy depends on how the 12 ten number groups are constructed. If each of the groups are mathematically arranged with a 2 if 3 digit match guarantee, they should produce hits. After reading a number of LP predictors claiming their 50 lines were good for all states for a month, I tested two groups of ten (20 lines) and got at least one hit (box and/or straight) in every pick-3 state/jurisdiction. The obvious question should be did my two groups show a profit and the answer is overall... [ More ]

Reply #51

onlymoney — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 03:31:14 GMT

Yes, I read about Steve, but I thought I covered this aspect of the story a while back. Someone brought up the same point as you just did, saying Peter is cohorting with Steve, and I responded by writing that if indeed this was a marketing plan by Steve to sell more systems, it was created by a really bad marketer. They cross their fingers, after spending thousands of dollars on losing tickets to prove they are really winning, when they're not, and in the hole. lol

They cross their fingers ho... [ More ]

Reply #50

Coin Toss — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 00:54:25 GMT

onlymoney,

You read the info. from the NH lottery about 'Steve Player' and you believe there is a real Peter St. Pierre?

Probably another agent for 'Steve Player'.

Svengali says hello.

Reply #49

Lucky Loser — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:35:37 GMT

As a follow up, yet on a much larger scale, here's an old article I saved from the UK about some intelligent MIT math gurus that used math to figure how to make millions with the RIGHT AMOUNT OF COMBOS + TIMING. This, on a large scale lotto game mind you...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2183070/MIT-maths-geniuses-netted-8million-Massachusetts-state-lottery-discovering-loophole.html.

Now, these smart folks knew that the same system I preach about right now would work if th... [ More ]

Reply #48

adobea78 — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 21:33:04 GMT

Scenerio Imagine all balls with the same color, how do you find patterns dued to their behavior? The so called 'patterns' is located because of each ball's ID(digits), right?. Balls do not have memory and 'is not the biggest misconception', I think it should be a starting concept to understand randomness.

Reply #47

Lucky Loser — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 18:32:44 GMT

I agree with your analysis here except the following: But, be cautious. Don't listen to folks who say that there is a 'mathematical' solution - there isn't one!

You must have a mathematical solution in reference to a proper balance of representative combinations, the money to play them, and the time it takes to hit...all while still ensuring a profit. If you're saying that you don't use math to keep up with how much you've spent, loss, and profited over 'X' amount of plays and time then you r... [ More ]

Reply #46

Lucky Loser — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 18:06:25 GMT

Okay, no problem for Lucky...trust me. Also, if this makes absolutely no sense to you on any level whatsoever, then you really don't understand the true mathematics in relation to the game. Let's take your $3 deal and play it twice per day for seven plays, not seven days. This comes to $42. If you hit the least boxed payout amount which is what $40 or something after seven plays, on the tenth play, what you have accomplished is a hit with a still $20 deficit. Do you agree or disagree?

Does it... [ More ]

Reply #45

bobby623 — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:55:09 GMT

After reading of the posts.

No offense, but, allow me to LOL!

The basic question is: Is it possible to develope, or is there a winning prediction system for any lottery game?

Winning system being one where the user punches a key and automatically receives a winning combination for the next drawing often

enough to ensure a profit.

Answer: Not No, but Hell NO!

Cut it, slice it any way you want. There is no way anyone or any 'system' can know exactly which numbers will come out... [ More ]

Reply #44

lakerben — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:39:06 GMT

Reply #43

Lucky Loser — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:45:39 GMT

The idea is to be efficient enough to win within 'X' amount of draws with 'X' amount of money. Then, each time the player wins by the 'deadline' or end of funds already won, a new amount of plays is realized due to the profit + recovery of real time money. Does this make more sense now? Here's a simple example: It costs the player $30/draw and they already have $150 in winnings (profit). This means that they can play a total of (5) times at this amount, and, they must also win enough money on th... [ More ]

Reply #42

bobby623 — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:56:53 GMT

At present, I'm holding about $500 in winning pick 3 and daily 4 winning tickets for the past 60 days.

The wins come and go, depending on my analysis of game trends.

Recently, I played combinations with structures having double letters.

However, the actual drawings were in a long streak where there were no repeat letters in the winning combinations.

So, I switched to single letter combinations. Guess what, the trend went back to double letter combos.

Winning Daily4 is a much tough... [ More ]

Reply #41

Lucky Loser — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:42:44 GMT

but patterns created by the behavior of the balls can somewhat be predicted on a relatively timely basis.

There are many more examples.

Yes, they can and there are and it's why I continue to preach that this is a game of patience and timing...everytime. Even so, it's still gonna cost more than what most of these folks wanna spend to really win and establish some efficiency. It all goes hand in hand...one piece of the solution left out foils the whole approach.

L.L.... [ More ]

Reply #40

Candlelight777 — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:11:01 GMT

Lucky, i wish you well in your endeavors and the best of luck..happy gaming

Reply #39

lottoburg — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:11:25 GMT

onlymoney,

I do hope your guess would be true.

I'm looking forward to your tweaking strategy about the system.

Reply #38

onlymoney — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 07:08:05 GMT

If you ever find out Peter St. Pierre's email or home address, send this to him. I'm sure he'd get a kick out of it.

Reply #37

Coin Toss — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 06:39:03 GMT

Re: 'Steve Player'

From an archived post: https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/247180

This is from a a 2010 post right here on LP from a member named Mink404Ski:

Hi All,

The New Hampshire Lottery lists all the big winners on their web site and Steve Player has won mucho money there and after 27 plus years and using his systems to this day still have won squat on them so if you decide to spend the money on his products I wish you LUCK with them ....see message that I received from NH l... [ More ]

Reply #36

mmx1 — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 06:14:13 GMT

Pick3 can be beaten and is being beaten by smart strategy based on analysis of previous drawings.

Publishing a long term winning system and winning strategy would kill Pick3 and possibly some other lotteries.

That wouldn't make anyone happy.

Today's computers are fast enough to analyse and beat Pick3.

Next draw is always a result of previous numbers and their frequency.

Most of systems being sold today are just SCAM and FRAUD.

They are just math games and surface scratchin... [ More ]

Reply #35

onlymoney — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:11:09 GMT

But I'm still not sure why do you firmly believe Peter is using Steve player's Private stock system

instead of other systems?

I noticed the same exact amount won over and over again by Peter, which reflected a steve player check from his website showing proof of his win with the same amount, $4160.00 I believe. Coincidence? That's one heck of a coincidence.

Reply #34

onlymoney — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:01:52 GMT

Right, the testing never ends.

Reply #33

onlymoney — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 04:55:38 GMT

You're right, it's a gamble. 75 bucks worth of beer, or 75 bucks worth of steve player?

Hold on, Am I on the right website?

Thanks Good karma.

BTW, I have some good relaxtion tapes on 8-track.

Reply #32

onlymoney — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 04:51:07 GMT

that even if by some miracle balls had memory and could remember how many times they were drawn and could somehow store that information

That's the biggest misconception thought of by unseasoned players. Balls can't have memory, but patterns created by the behavior of the balls can somewhat be predicted on a relatively timely basis. The most basic example is, I can confidently bet you 500 bucks that tomorrow's midday won't repeat in straight form in the evening drawing, you pick any state you... [ More ]

Reply #31

CajunWin4 — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 04:31:06 GMT

Reply #30

good karma — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 04:21:29 GMT

Dear Onlymoney, GOOD FOR YOU !! GO FOR IT !! No need to defend your actions, You are right!!

I am totally on your side and agree with you. I have many friends who routinely spend $75.00 to $100.00 a week on football, baseball, golf, bowling, drinking (Bars), BEER, the movies etc. Everyone has their own form of entertainment. Mine (and yours) happens to be the lottery. Nothing wrong with trying out a new system, even if it needs a few tweaks. Remember, thats why they call it gambling ! Ye... [ More ]

Reply #29

RJOh — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:52:52 GMT

I use a substitution workout that incorporates a variety of tracking/trend charts. |

It's a lot of work to keep the charts current, but, I'm winning often enough to make it worthwhile.

How often do you have to win to make it worthwhile?

I do something similar with jackpot games but I don't win often but I don't have a better way to pick combinations to play.

Reply #28

bobby623 — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:28:49 GMT

IMHO, tracking is probably the best method for choosing numbers to play.

There are many tracking schemes but only a few are needed to develope the intuition required in lottery play.

Knowing where the individual winning digits/numbers have been and where they might be headed is useful strategy.

I use a substitution workout that incorporates a variety of tracking/trend charts. |

It's a lot of work to keep the charts current, but, I'm winning often enough to make it worthwhile.... [ More ]

Reply #27

Lucky Loser — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 21:51:17 GMT

i do not believe there is a system (formula) based on math or science that can predict the next numbers to be drawn.

With respect to such an intelligent post, I will highly disagree with you on this main point. There is a science behind EVERY SYSTEM, otherwise you may as well just guess and/or use QP's to play. How the science is applied, when it's applied, where it's applied, and the right amount of funds to apply it...all part of the science/system/approach.

I still look at past numbers... [ More ]

Reply #26

lottoburg — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 17:31:17 GMT

onlymoney,

Maybe, your information from NH Lottery website is true.

But I'm still not sure why do you firmly believe Peter is using Steve player's Private stock system

instead of other systems?

Also, I find the truth you have not yet contacted with Peter until now from your posts in the link.

Reply #25

lakerben — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 17:21:01 GMT

It sometimes takes a lot of work and luck .

Reply #24

Candlelight777 — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 16:37:29 GMT

I do believe there are two possible explanations for those who win frequently. One, playing a lot and increasing the frequency of winning, or two, they have intuition. Yes, i believe people can have the gift of intuition when it comes to numbers. I don't claim to understand intuition, but i have seen enough from my own experiences and others throughout my life to know that natural intuition does exist in many forms. I am not necessarily speaking on a level of voodoo or magic per say, just referr... [ More ]

Reply #23

New York — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 05:47:00 GMT

I requested the link through Private Message though? You can't send it through PM? Why not?

We could talk about blowing up the moon with a marshmallow gun through PM. That's not against the rules because we're talking privately, not publicly.

**EDIT**

Just read the rules. It is NOT allowed to send members to banned sites, even through PM.

However, I'm pretty sure that site you're gonna purchase the$75 system is not on Todd's ban list.

Reply #22

onlymoney — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 05:37:44 GMT

Links not allowed. I gave enough general info. Look back a few pages.

Reply #21

onlymoney — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 05:33:00 GMT

I've mentioned this before a few times already.

The NH Lottery website stopped displaying the monthly winners a few months ago. No red flags come to your mind? Especially when I posted his wins. It's in the blue link I posted.

Where do you think I copied and pasted those wins from

Reply #20

New York — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 04:17:11 GMT

Hey OM,

I wanna invest $75 too, so I can twerk it my way.

Please send me a link in PM, please.

The lottery is random, ok I get it.

But, if we really do our research and give excellent effort to our workouts, we'll win very oftenly.

Who agrees

Reply #19

lottoburg — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 04:10:14 GMT

destinycreation,

I have made some backtests for NH both P3 P4 more than two months by using his system just

now. But it's still NOTHING!!!

Saying NOTHING means we can not get the real profit (not the wins) constantly.

I think firmly that no one wants to spend $200 plus for getting $100 or $0

by using a system weekly.

In fact, some members always said: these SYSTEMS should work if they are TWEAKED.

But we have never looked any tweaking activities about those systems such as... [ More ]

Reply #18

destinycreation — Sat, 11 Jan 2014 22:54:28 GMT

I own both of Steve Players Pick 3 and Pick 4 Private stock systems. The Pick 3 system is 12 groups of 10 Single Digit numbers to play, groups A - L. You do the workout and play only one group of 10 numbers, 3 days after a particular drawing. Likewise, Pick 4 Private stock is 12 groups of 30 Pick 4 DOUBLES to play, groups A - L. You do the workout and play only one group of 30 Double numbers, 3 days after a particular drawing.

ALL of Steve Players winning tickets that he depicts in his advert... [ More ]

Reply #17

flossdog — Sat, 11 Jan 2014 19:10:11 GMT

Well good luck with that. yes odds are better but anyone playing any lottery is still dreaming. I'm curious who else has seen his wins? Was he on tv?I contacted NH lottery months ago to see if he really existed when we first had this post. You insisted he was real, well they never heard of such a person. And if he was winning for 5 yrs, why did he stop? Where was his name posted? Unless you saw him with pictures holding a check or checks I refuse to believe it. The NH lottery doesn't believe it... [ More ]

Reply #16

onlymoney — Sat, 11 Jan 2014 18:39:51 GMT

Listen why would you have to tweak something that works so well?

Maybe it only works well when it's tweaked.

So you're saying the NH lottery is breaking the law by depicting a ficticious person winning for five years?

No, I'm not the only one who's seen his wins.

No, not everyone would be rich using that system, if indeed it does work. Why? Because 90% or more of people are like you who don't believe that it could possibly work, therefore you and the 90% plus, wouldn't buy it i... [ More ]

Reply #15

onlymoney — Sat, 11 Jan 2014 18:30:05 GMT

I know, I'd also spend more than I won for five years. Why? I just love to throw away money.

Reply #14

flossdog — Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:37:04 GMT

I know I've posted on this guy before. Onlymoney should save his money. Listen why would you have to tweak something that works so well? I said it before there is no evidence that this guy made all this money,. I believe it's fictitious. But yet onlymoney has heard of him. Steve PLayer calls it his private stock only to create the illusion that this is the system that he uses to make money. If that were the case and everyone won as much as St. Pierre the lottery would shut down the game. Steve P... [ More ]

Reply #13

aquariuslottery — Sat, 11 Jan 2014 07:07:24 GMT

That's nice to win 70 grand a year or even 10 grand in a month. But I would advise you, before you jump head first into this water, to find out from a RELIABLE SOURCE, how much was spent to win these big grands. Get some stats on that first. That's the bottom line. Don't look only at winnings, no matter how appealing they look. They never come for free.

Reply #12

onlymoney — Sat, 11 Jan 2014 05:50:05 GMT

Who is Peter? Why do you firmly believe Peter is using that system?

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/259455/3034168

Reply #11

onlymoney — Sat, 11 Jan 2014 05:39:10 GMT

Thanks tvpventures,

Will do.

Reply #10

onlymoney — Sat, 11 Jan 2014 05:37:57 GMT

And that's why I said that the combos must've been tweaked for a consistent win. My duty is to find what tweak makes it work..

Reply #9

lottoburg — Sat, 11 Jan 2014 03:48:32 GMT

onlymoney,

I have ordered the Both Pick-3 and Pick-4 Private Stock Systems ($125.00)

and made some backtests for more than 3 States (NY, CT, and NJ) but NOTHING!!!

I'm not sure why do you get the conclusion that they are working???

Who is Peter? Why do you firmly believe Peter is using that system?

In my opinion, the all are the AD from the company really.

Reply #8

tvpventures — Sat, 11 Jan 2014 03:22:06 GMT

Onlymoney, Good for you you found something, please let us know how it goes, if you can...

Who is looking for something and dont give up, will always find it (I did the best to translate from my native laungage this expression, hope it make sence and sound inspirational as its suppose to be

Reply #7

onlymoney — Sat, 11 Jan 2014 03:11:05 GMT

I am looking for any system that shows it's performance if played for the certain period of time in the past like 3, 6, 12 or more months.

This coming Monday I'll be buying Steve player's Private stock system. A person in New Hampshire by the name of Peter St. Pierre has been utilizing this system to win the p-3 and p-4 relatively consistently for the past five years. Approximately 70 grand a year on average. I firmly believe Peter is using that system.

I can only afford the p-3 versi... [ More ]

Reply #6

Cupcake10 — Fri, 10 Jan 2014 23:41:22 GMT

Sounds like the member has been hiding out or sleep.

Reply #5

ogivens15 — Fri, 10 Jan 2014 23:18:50 GMT

Member since 2010 and first post