Can Pick 3 Bee Easier To Solve Then We Thought?

Reply #69

ducksafloat — Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:33:47 GMT

hey now lottolaughs,

just read through ur entire thread. u r waaaaay awesome! thanks 4 sharing!

keep on having fun and for ducksafloat sake,

~Please Keep Sharing

Reply #68

LAVERNE MALONEY — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 02:49:32 GMT

Start reading here, it is very easy.

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/270854/3430294

Reply #67

deloris12 — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 02:41:11 GMT

nc please

Reply #66

LAVERNE MALONEY — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 02:40:12 GMT

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No problem, you are welcome

Reply #65

winninmofo — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 02:37:28 GMT

Thanx Ms Maloney, that was pretty simple ! I guess reading is fundamental. Thanx again GL

Reply #64

LAVERNE MALONEY — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 02:12:21 GMT

Start reading here:

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/270854/3430294

Reply #63

winninmofo — Tue, 14 Jan 2014 02:00:48 GMT

So where did the 463 and 503 come from

Reply #62

LAVERNE MALONEY — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 21:55:42 GMT

Hello rhonda69, I got this answer below:

048

+ 445

_____

483

So the range would be:

463 483 503

Reply #61

rhonda69 — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:30:37 GMT

tk u so much i am going to try and keep this workout as a tester in ky in all honesty i have been waiting on 346 to show so that actually raised the radar thanks for ur method and i appreciate this help

Reply #60

Nodda4me — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:28:49 GMT

correct

Reply #59

rhonda69 — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:27:00 GMT

i am just trying to understand ky got 048 sunday evening so we would look for numbers before 403 and after 463 would this be correct or wrong

Reply #58

Lucky Loser — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:23:02 GMT

Let me be the first to clarify my end of this. My thoughts aren't a stab at the system/approach at all, okay, because I can see where real thought goes into something. Most of the systems are actually and quite simply iterations of one another because we're only dealing with a 0-9 number set and only so much can be done with. Sums range, odd-even/even-odd, high-low, and it goes on and on. Still, it all comes back to the same thing in the end and it's so basic. I was actually trying to understand... [ More ]

Reply #57

Nodda4me — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:07:32 GMT

ranman17,

I used my Pick 3 program. I just implemented this 445 system to do a statistical backtest.

Reply #56

helpmewin — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:57:52 GMT

Would that been called a Bee STING

Reply #55

ranman17 — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:52:46 GMT

Nodda4me,

Nice work. I have two questions.

1. What site/program did you use to do your analysis?

2. Can you do an analysis on which cross sections of the spreadsheet had the most to the least hits?

Thanks,

ranman17

Reply #54

ranman17 — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:47:49 GMT

Hey guys, if you were to enter 677 in the spreadsheet I created you would get some negative numbers. CarliG gave me the formula to correct the problem. Here is the revised spreadsheet:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/11yh5q8prg92aiz/Could%20it%20Bee.xlsx

Reply #53

CLOVER$BAY — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:25:47 GMT

Reply #52

m3ikaChiz007 — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:58:05 GMT

Great research Nodda; thanks for sharing. Lottolaughs please keep on doing your thing with these great systems. A lot of us here on LP enjoy them and appreciate all of your insight. Again thank you both, now lets win some moolah on this beautiful Monday

Reply #51

Nodda4me — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:52:30 GMT

Testing using previous 500 draws.

All numbers are ran as STRAIGHT DRAW + 445 and using -20 / +20 and checked as BOX for BOX HITS.

This is if you keep the numbers for 4 draws.

VA

HIT: 319 (63.8%)

MISS: 181 (36.2%)

TRI

HIT: 300 (60%)

MISS: 200 (40%)

NC

HIT: 274 (54.8%)

MISS: 226 (45.2%)

NJ

HIT: 294 (58.8%)

MISS: 206 (41.2

Reply #50

Nodda4me — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:41:10 GMT

Testing using previous 500 draws.

All numbers are ran as STRAIGHT DRAW + 445 and using -20 / +20 and checked as BOX for BOX HITS.

VA

HIT: 109 (21.8%)

MISS: 391 (78.2%)

TRI

HIT: 108 (21.6%)

MISS: 392 (78.4%)

NC

HIT: 86 (17.2%)

MISS: 414 (82.8%)

NJ

HIT: 95 (19%)

MISS: 405 (81%)

NY

HIT: 112 (22.4%)

MISS: 388 (77.6%)

FL

HIT: 90 (18%)

MISS: 410 (82%)

GA

HIT: 102 (20.4%)

MISS: 398 (79.6%)

PA

HIT: 96 (19.2%)

MISS: 404

Reply #49

blessings0424 — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:59:09 GMT

Reply #48

lakerben — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 04:35:38 GMT

Reply #47

lottolaughs — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 04:30:04 GMT

Let me just say this....I now understand why people quit posting their systems. This system,like any of mine,is just a guide to help people narrow down numbers. I find this FUN. Some of the comments on here are getting a little,shall we say,analytical? We all know the odds here...yeesh. These are just ideas,nothing written in stone. Just a method to try out and tweak if you need to.

I rarely get annoyed at comments but ....Can you say irritated? Yes...guess I am a little at how this thread is... [ More ]

Reply #46

Lucky Loser — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 04:19:27 GMT

Actually, when I said 'ghost runs', I meant to put together $2-$3 worth of numbers using this approach and simply post them in an effort to establish your claims. It seems you're trying to compare betting on Pick 3 numbers to betting on horses...you want to try and pick one or two on both fronts. Okay, let's see just how well this works out 'cause I'm very curious and this will prove to me that I'm seriously waaaaay over spending to obtain my str8 hits. You say $2-$3 and a max of $10 on a very g... [ More ]

Reply #45

Jack-C — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 02:53:42 GMT

Evening = 475 + 445 = 810 Range = 790-830 193

Missed lost $40.

Reply #44

lakerben — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 02:22:39 GMT

GhOST RUNS? Your analogies remind me of a guy who bets on every horse to win the race. It doesn't take a fortune to win. I've been doing this for a long time and I would not bet if I had no clue how much to spend .....

Reply #43

Lucky Loser — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 02:07:42 GMT

If it works and it maintains efficiency with the timing in which you implement it, then stick with it and don't change. Your last sentence is what'll tell you whether it's a true system or not and if it's worth while...it must work when implemented more often than not on the same conditions to make you some money. Period.

L.L.

Reply #42

Lucky Loser — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 02:01:08 GMT

This is understood but, with $2-$3, just how soon would you realistically expect to hit str8 outside of luck? Then, how long do you think it'll take to hit yet again even boxed with only a couple of dollars? Finally, be ready to subtract all the money you've spent losing when you finally do hit whether it's str8 or boxed as that will be your true profit. Everything else, if any, will be pure recovery with the amount of money you're working with.

Most of the time, a box hit is realized...corre... [ More ]

Reply #41

lakerben — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 01:47:21 GMT

If a straight pays close to or more than $2k than 2 to 3 bucks spent is well worth it. It would take me a long time to spend $2k on p4. I'd say its a few dollars well spent for a straight and in three days maybe 10 bucks for $2k is well worth it.

Reply #40

kreative1 — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:25:00 GMT

Thanks ranman for the quickie test for PA!

LL

I look for some kind of consistancy but realize it won't last long so I hit try to hit when somethings working

If you backtest too long you probably missed it...my experiance anyway

I thought I had something by using spookys 317 version for pick 4, eve draw and mid draw as additive

It gave consistant box hit 5 days later mid draw...last 2 columns or 10 numbers (only playing on 5th day)

It did it for 5 days last week and none this we... [ More ]

Reply #39

Lucky Loser — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:21:38 GMT

Try to be as efficient as possible and you'll be much better off. Also, I really dig your sig at the bottom!!

L.L.

Reply #38

ranman17 — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:15:00 GMT

Of course, everything you have said is accurate. One of the things I like to do with a system that produces as many numbers as this system does, is to create a grid like this one:

1

2

3

4

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

Reply #37

Lucky Loser — Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:05:54 GMT

Yes, my mistake on the days/draw confusion, but it's still all the same which I'm sure you'll agree. If a specific type of hit isn't obtained within those 3-4 draws to cover real time expenses, then there's gonna be a deficit. Progressive wagering is very good as I do it with my plays also. But, it only works providing the system has very good efficiency...it allows the player to play more times for a given type of win and profit made. Still, HIGH EFFICIENCY must be present in order to take full... [ More ]

Reply #36

ranman17 — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 23:54:34 GMT

LL,

Most of what you have said is correct (and further back-testing is required) with the following exceptions:

1. I did not say that the hits came 3 and 4 days from the number(s) used but rather 3 and 4 DRAWS.

2. You did not mention pregressive wagering (not to be confused with the Martingale method).

ranman

Reply #35

Lucky Loser — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 23:47:56 GMT

This is very interesting...and it picks at my brain. So, one had a hit (3) days later and the other had one (4) days later. Does this mean the consistency falls within 3-4 days on average for the hit? Then, what type of hit took place...str8 or boxed or both? Finally, what's it gonna cost the player to LOSE on each draw BEFORE they obtain the hit in this instance? This is how a system's efficiency is truly defined because it'll give an average of how long it takes to recover and/or profit.

Wh... [ More ]

Reply #34

capett02 — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 23:42:32 GMT

I second that! Thank you

Reply #33

Harve$t Moon — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 23:23:52 GMT

A BIG thank you, Lottolaughs Ranman17!!

Pick 4! .... Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Let the good times ROLL

Reply #32

ranman17 — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 22:56:51 GMT

I just did a quick test for PA and using 6058 which was the first P4 drawn in January of 2014 and using 1234 as the Process #, there was a hit 4 draws later with 4627.

Using the Eve number from the first which was 0448 and 1234 as the Process number you had a hit 3 draws later with 6188.

Reply #31

kreative1 — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 22:46:16 GMT

awesome!

thanks for doing both

I'm gonna play while watching the game

Reply #30

ranman17 — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 22:36:17 GMT

WOW...The P4 version works in NY using 1234 as the Process

Reply #29

ranman17 — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 22:31:35 GMT

OK, here is LL's system for P3 and P4 and you can enter your own Process Number.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/11yh5q8prg92aiz/Could%20it%20Bee.xlsx

Reply #28

ONEDAY — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 22:22:01 GMT

thanks for your system(s)LL

Reply #27

Jack-C — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 21:27:17 GMT

Midday = 928 + 445 = 363 Range = 343-383 753

Winners: 357 375

I played them str/box which paid $30 each for a win of $60 - $40 = $20. Not too bad. Looking forward to tonight!

Sure is a lot of work doing all those playslips. I wish Congress would wake up and change the law so we can bet online again. So much easier and such better payouts.

Reply #26

kreative1 — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 15:47:07 GMT

It's all the buzz! lol

I like to play around with it too for PA to try to get more consistant or next day hits

soooo I was wondering if the spreadsheet gurus could make the additive user input vs 445 and a pick 4 verson too lol

Thanks lottolaughs

Reply #25

JonnyBgood07 — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 15:39:07 GMT

you're stuff is always neat!...also it is something someone can get creative with to backtest like using the first 3 of the mid4 or eve4 also for the next days P3 draw...so many ways to do things with just one method we couldn't fathom how much really probably gets overlooked.

Nice Job LL

Reply #24

lottolaughs — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 15:27:13 GMT

You kids are all so cute :) After I posted this I didn't have time to come back but it's so fun today to see all the hustle and bustle that's been going on in the beehive!

A Special to the worker bees who worked their magic on the spreadsheets! You know you are appreciated

Reply #23

helpmewin — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 04:04:23 GMT

https://app.box.com/s/f0pz28u4grfnlxl6iepl

Thanks

Reply #22

CarliG — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 04:01:55 GMT

Okay, got it this time

same link

https://app.box.com/s/f0pz28u4grfnlxl6iepl

Reply #21

ranman17 — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 03:55:48 GMT

I re-emailed it. I don't know why you couldn't down load. Scan it before opening it just in case.

Reply #20

CarliG — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 03:52:40 GMT

Wont let me download the new version that you emailed ????

Carlig

Reply #19

ranman17 — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 03:40:58 GMT

If you enter 651 some of the results are only two digits. I needed to format the cells to show three characters. I emailed a corrected spreadsheet.

Sorry,

ranman

Reply #18

CarliG — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 03:31:55 GMT

Here is download link

https://app.box.com/s/f0pz28u4grfnlxl6iepl

Reply #17

Jack-C — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 03:27:40 GMT

Trying this in California for tomorrow (01/12).

Midday = 928 + 445 = 363 Range = 343-383

Evening = 475 + 445 = 810 Range = 790-830

Looking forward to a winning system!!

BTW, I don't see a need for a spreadsheet to do this

Reply #16

Igamble — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 03:15:20 GMT

'Can Pick 3 Bee Easier To Solve Then We Thought?'-YES it is much much easier then they thought.

Reply #15

ranman17 — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 03:11:06 GMT

I emailed it to you Carli

Reply #14

helpmewin — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 03:10:12 GMT

oopsy daisy i used the calculator Thank you LAVERNE MALONEY

Reply #13

CarliG — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 03:00:52 GMT

Box.net looks like it is working, if you want me to upload for you

Carlig

Reply #12

LAVERNE MALONEY — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 02:29:27 GMT

helpmewin, I did the same for Florida only I did mine as lottolaughs instructed (I hope).

Sat, Dec 7, 2013 Florida Cash 3 Evening 1-9-4

194

+445

_____

539

Now you want to look at the 20 Numbers BEFORE 539 and the 20 Numbers AFTER 539.

519 539 559

Sat, Dec 7, 2013 Florida Cash 3 Evening 1-9-4

519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528

Mon, Dec 30, 2013 Florida Cash 3 Evening 0-2-5

Wed, Dec 25, 2013 Florida Cash 3 Midday

Reply #11

ranman17 — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 02:28:09 GMT

Yep, I just confirmed it, DropBox is having service issues. They had an outage last night.

Reply #10

helpmewin — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 02:16:32 GMT

ranman17 I am having trouble opening mine to LAST time i tried then i said forget it then

Reply #9

helpmewin — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 02:13:22 GMT

I was just messing around with the ideas no-way am trying to change anything you did

This is the way you called for it

i did 982 for indy Dec 14th 327 bee-fore and 327 after if i am even doing this right

Mon, Dec 16, 2013 Indiana Daily 3 Midday 3-6-2

Mon, Jan 6, 2014 Indiana Daily 3 Midday 7-3-0

Thu, Jan 2, 2014 Indiana Daily 3 Midday 7-3-6

Sat, Dec 28, 2013 Indiana Daily 3 Evening 3-7-6

Thu, Jan 2, 2014 Indiana Daily 3 Midday 7-3-6

Sat... [ More ]

Reply #8

ranman17 — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 02:06:33 GMT

I created the spreadsheet but dropbox is giving me trouble and I can't seem to upload anything.

Reply #7

helpmewin — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 01:48:56 GMT

I think i had add and minus the 20 wrong after the number

instead i think i should have kept the 261 649

261

Wed, Jan 8, 2014 Florida Cash 3 Midday 9-6-2

Sat, Dec 28, 2013 Florida Cash 3 Evening 6-2-4

Fri, Dec 27, 2013 Florida Cash 3 Midday 2-8-6

649

Mon, Jan 6, 2014 Florida Cash 3 Midday 6-8-4

Sat, Dec 28, 2013 Florida Cash 3 Evening 6-2-4

Mon, Dec 23, 2013 Florida Cash 3 Midday 6-8-4

Sun, Dec 15, 2013 Florida Cash 3 Midday 1-6-4

Sat, De... [ More ]

Reply #6

Ilovecash3 — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 01:43:21 GMT

It is

Reply #5

helpmewin — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 01:38:11 GMT

would this be right

Reply #4

helpmewin — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 01:37:24 GMT

lottolaughs, Thanks for sharing

Could'nt you just minus -20 and add +20 and then do a rundown?

(for 20 numbers instead of 40 numbers)

i backtested Florida Dec 7th evening Number 194

194 - 455= 261

Sat, Jan 4, 2014 Florida Cash 3 Midday 2-2-4

Sat, Dec 28, 2013 Florida Cash 3 Evening 6-2-4

Thu, Dec 19, 2013 Florida Cash 3 Evening 2-4-1

Thu, Dec 12, 2013 Florida Cash 3 Evening 4-5-2

194 + 455= 649

Sun, Dec 29, 2013 Florida Cash 3 Eveni... [ More ]

Reply #3

mrlotto-nc — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 00:38:07 GMT

Yep, probably Ranmann or CarliG. They're very good at that stuff.

Reply #2

Cupcake10 — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 00:35:37 GMT

Cool, you can have someone create an excel spreadsheet for you, so we can easily verify.

Reply #1

mrlotto-nc — Sat, 11 Jan 2014 23:57:55 GMT

Hey there, anything you do, I 5star!!

Looks interesting, i will toy with this. Just got home from work, time for me to kick back in gear

Can Pick 3 Bee Easier To Solve Then We Thought?

lottolaughs — Sat, 11 Jan 2014 23:54:49 GMT

This is something I've been tooling around with. I'm always looking for a range of numbers that follow numbers.

Could this bee it???

Many times I'm asked for ONE number by someone to play. I wouldn't even know how to begin to answer that question. But if you ask me for a dozen or so...okay...I can roll with that.

This is going to give you 40 numbers. A lot? Not really. Anything lower then a 1,000 is beating the odds somewhat in my opinion,lol.

Providing that the winner is among them,... [ More ]