How to Unseat Stack47 & Sergem from their Perch!

Reply #81

Stack47 — Fri, 29 Aug 2014 04:23:24 GMT

jimmy4164 Texas Cash 5 3 of 5 01-11-12-21-22 01-07-12-14-21 $10

jimmy4164 Texas Cash 5 3 of 5 01-02-11-12-21 01-07-12-14-21 $10

jimmy4164 Texas Cash 5 3 of 5 01-02-12-21-22 01-07-12-14-21 $10

Those 3 lines don't look like QPs to me and neither does any of your pick-5 predictions; looks more like an abbreviated wheel. But anyways, congrats on your $30 hit and good luck trying to unseat me.

Stack47 Texas All or Nothing Night Match 11 02-05-07-12-13-14-15-17-19-20-22-23 02-05... [ More ]

Reply #80

RJOh — Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:34:20 GMT

When are you going to show all of us how easy it really is?

He's probably waiting for a game with these odds.

CALCULATE ODDS by RJOh

combination size 2-9 9

basic pool size up to 100 100

(B) Bonus pool size 100

smallest match no (B) number 3

largest match with bonus 9

smallest match with bonus 0

tickets/chances per draw

possible combos of 9/100 + 1/100 numbers = 1.90223181E14

MATCH ODDS WINNING COMBOS ODDS 1 LINES MATCHES

9/9+B 1:1.90223181E14 1 1:1.90223181... [ More ]

Reply #79

RJOh — Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:23:07 GMT

MM is still $1 per regular ticket however my chart is based on lines played not the cost per ticket.

Reply #78

Stack47 — Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:22:23 GMT

I can't speak for Serge, but my being at or near the top of Hit Ratio is a side effect from mathematically arranging 24 numbers into groups.

and easily get their Hit Ratios in the Georgia and Texas All or Nothing games up to 20%.

What would be the point of anybody easily getting a Hit Ratio lower than the game probability; 22.2%?

When are you going to show all of us how easy it really is

Reply #77

jimmy4164 — Wed, 27 Aug 2014 02:46:53 GMT

AS I should have expected. The purpose of this thread was to make people aware that Hit Ratios are of no value in lotteries, and consequently, having a Top Predictors category based on them is a waste of time. Anyone who wishes can quickly and easily get their Hit Ratios in the Georgia and Texas All or Nothing games up to 20%. This is true because of the structure of the games, NOT because of any particular skill on the part of people like Sergem or Stack47.

It's really quite pathetic how... [ More ]

Reply #76

SergeM — Tue, 26 Aug 2014 22:36:02 GMT

Isn't that a 2 dollar combination game

Reply #75

RJOh — Tue, 26 Aug 2014 22:27:49 GMT

CALCULATE ODDS by RJOh

combination size 2-9 5

basic pool size up to 100 75

(B) Bonus pool size 15

smallest match no (B) number 3

largest match with bonus 5

smallest match with bonus 0

tickets/chances per draw * enter P for prize amounts

possible combos of 5/75 + 1/15 numbers = 258890850

MATCH ODDS WINNING COMBOS ODDS 15 LINES MATCHES PRIZE

5/5+B 1:258890850 1 1:17259390 0.00 $ 15000000

5/5+0 1:18492204 14 1:1232814 0.00 $ 1000000

4/5+B 1:739688 350 1:49313 0.0... [ More ]

Reply #74

Stack47 — Tue, 26 Aug 2014 21:24:38 GMT

That's interesting stuff, RJ and it really shows how much the odds are stacked against us. It doesn't look like someone will be knocking anyone off a perch predicting either of these games.

Reply #73

RJOh — Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:39:31 GMT

CALCULATE ODDS by RJOh

combination size 2-9 5

basic pool size up to 100 75

(B) Bonus pool size 15

smallest match no (B) number 3

largest match with bonus 5

smallest match with bonus 0

tickets/chances per draw * enter P for prize amounts

possible combos of 5/75 + 1/15 numbers = 258890850

MATCH ODDS WINNING COMBOS ODDS 258890850 LINES MATCHES PRIZE

5/5+B 1:258890850 1 1:1 1.00 $ 999999999

5/5+0 1:18492204 14 14:1 14.00 $ 1000000

4/5+B 1:739688 350 350:1 350.00

Reply #72

RJOh — Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:27:19 GMT

CALCULATE ODDS by RJOh

combination size 2-9 5

basic pool size up to 100 39

(B) bonus numbers none

smallest match 2

tickets/chances per draw * enter P for prize amounts

possible combos of 5/39 numbers = 575757

MATCH ODDS WINNING COMBOS ODDS 575757 LINES MATCHES PRIZE

5/5 1:575757 1 1:1 1.00 $ 420000

4/5 1:3387 170 170:1 170.00 $ 300

3/5 1:103 5610 5610:1 5610.00 $ 10

2/5 1:10 59840 59840:1 59840.00 $ 1

Reply #71

Kristy42 — Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:00:20 GMT

Lol..just read all the threads..you guys funny...let me interrupt this debate to ask...what do you see for NC pick 4 today. Whoever is correct wins the debate....lol

Reply #70

Stack47 — Sun, 24 Aug 2014 18:40:49 GMT

Some 5/39 games like the Florida Fantasy Five, payout a free ticket for matching 2 numbers while some of the states with a smaller pick-5 matrix pay nothing for matching 2 numbers. I'm assuming because all the pick-3 prediction games payoff at $250 for straight and $40 for box, the pick-5 prediction games all have the same set payoffs too.

Reply #69

SergeM — Sun, 24 Aug 2014 08:53:36 GMT

1. SergeM 25.53% 47 12

I slipped upwards with playing one combination for two drawings. Not many players try to attempt to go for winning more often in simulation. They probably play all kind of different games. Notice that with a 3/12 or 9/12, there would have been a net win for yesterday.

win 0,220347

no win 0,779653

I won 1 of 2, that was 0.5 against the 0.22 probability, this time.

Reply #68

RJOh — Sat, 23 Aug 2014 15:59:25 GMT

Does all states pick5 games pay for a match2 or is that unique to only some pick5 games such as Ohio's Rolling Cash5

Reply #67

RJOh — Sat, 23 Aug 2014 15:54:24 GMT

Do you think any lottery commissions care what the high Hit Ratios at Lottery Post are? That information is only for LP members to compare themselves with each others.

Reply #66

SergeM — Sat, 23 Aug 2014 09:32:54 GMT

Are there any lottery commissions paying bonuses for high Winnings at Lottery Post

Reply #65

Stack47 — Sat, 23 Aug 2014 04:40:04 GMT

I'll give credit where credit is due because at least you make predictions unlike most of our wana-be system/numbers sellers. LP's pick-5 prediction program doesn't show a $1 payout for matching 2 numbers so it couldn't give an accurate prize or hit ratio.

Now, ask yourself why MOST people average 12-20 cents return on their Pick-5 purchases.

One out of every 9 tickets wins something so on average 8 players win nothing and if the win is a 2 number match, the ninth player wins nothing too... [ More ]

Reply #64

jimmy4164 — Fri, 22 Aug 2014 21:21:57 GMT

Are there any lottery commissions paying bonuses for high Hit Ratios at Lottery Post

Reply #63

SergeM — Fri, 22 Aug 2014 21:08:50 GMT

Probably the best coach to win is Natalie.

Reply #62

SergeM — Fri, 22 Aug 2014 21:06:32 GMT

Texas all or nothing

Hot Predictors (Last 30 Days by Hit Ratio)

Member Hit Ratio Picks Hits

1. Wendy G 23.52% 68 16

2. SergeM 23.18% 69 16

jinxsrt 23.18% 220 51

4. Stack47 23.09% 1,940 448

5. lamarrstar 21.86% 590 129

6. MADDOG10 21.76% 5,650 1,230

7. geos*5666! 21.66% 3,600 780

8. Lee 21.50% 1,060 228

9. helpmewin 21.30% 5,050 1,076

10. tastylovebug 20.31% 320 65

Highest Lifetime Hit Ratio

Member Hit Ratio Picks Hits

1... [ More ]

Reply #61

SergeM — Fri, 22 Aug 2014 21:03:03 GMT

Pick 5 is not a game to obtain a high percentage of hits. You would have to bet on one combination and raise the bet.

Eventually the small Texan pick 5 game is good to play.

Reply #60

jimmy4164 — Fri, 22 Aug 2014 20:24:54 GMT

Click here for more recent detail...

...and then compare to other Pick-5 predictors.

I wonder why this guy doesn't predict Pick-5?

Now, ask yourself why MOST people average 12-20 cents return on their Pick-5 purchases. And why do my odd 2 digit Pick-5 selections seem to do no better or worse than MOST people?

And then look up the meaning of Convergence.

Reply #59

Stack47 — Mon, 18 Aug 2014 19:18:05 GMT

Maybe they would because Jimmy is way overdue for win, but like most of us, I doubt his predictions are meant for actual play. While I might close to the top in Hit ratio , my predictions on average lose over 50% of the wagers. I can't lose compared to what Jimmy is suggesting because his predictions will on average lose more every drawing than the cost of my tickets.

jimmy4164: Statistics Summary

Summary

Statistic Current Month Last Month Current Year Last Year Lifetime

Picks 5,... [ More ]

Reply #58

RJOh — Mon, 18 Aug 2014 15:18:06 GMT

Why would anybody ever use any numbers of Jimmy when he's never won anything using them

Reply #57

Stack47 — Sun, 17 Aug 2014 22:30:53 GMT

Jimmy was positive his numbers could do better, but apparently nobody used them.

Reply #56

RJOh — Sat, 16 Aug 2014 22:25:12 GMT

Haven't seen any posts on this thread for a while so I'm assuming everyone has moved on to other topics.

Reply #55

Stack47 — Fri, 01 Aug 2014 02:56:45 GMT

His [roughly] 20% hit ratios and 50% prize ratios in the Georgia and Texas All or Nothing games are the probabilistically expected results of random play.

Instead of suggesting I read a 43 year-old articles on the probability of Dr. J making his next dunk attempt, you really ought to read and understand the rules of these All or Nothing games. Or better yet, just look at the same chart Serge first posted well over a year ago. There are 2,704,156 possible outcomes and it costs $2 to buy each

Reply #54

SergeM — Thu, 31 Jul 2014 22:06:23 GMT

AON TX 12/24

12 1

11 144

10 4356

9 48400

8 245025

7 627264

6 853776

5 627264

4 245025

3 48400

2 4356

1 144

0 1

win 595852

no win 2108304

total 2704156

win 0,220347

no win 0,779653

total 1

Your average hit score might be: 22%

I am busy.

Reply #53

jimmy4164 — Thu, 31 Jul 2014 21:41:13 GMT

Your definition of expected obviously differs from that of scientists, mathematicians, and engineers.

Click here for a better understanding...

People's intuitive conceptions of randomness depart systematically from the laws of chance. It appears that people expect the essential characteristics of a chance process to be represented not only globally in the entire sequence, but also locally, in each of its parts. For instance, people expect even short sequences of heads and tails to refle... [ More ]

Reply #52

Stack47 — Thu, 31 Jul 2014 17:59:21 GMT

How about explaining how a 50% prize ratio is probabilistically expected when it's closer to 25%?

You really surprised me by taking the bait and responding in the where in the world is Carmen Santago? thread and now you're almost an outcast. But after thinking about it, you are terrible at understanding common sense.

Reply #51

Stack47 — Thu, 31 Jul 2014 17:21:06 GMT

Take a careful look at the last two months.

Stack47: Statistics Summary Summary

Statistic

Current Month

Last Month

Current Year

Last Year

Lifetime

Picks

4,420

4,420

23,515

48,902

75,604

Hits

996

996

5,136

4,240

10,048

Hit Ratio

22.53%

22.53%

21.84%

8.67%

13.29%

Winnings

$4,072

$3,896

$21,972

$31,362

$55,931

Prize Ratio

46.06%

44.07%

4... [ More ]

Reply #50

Stack47 — Mon, 28 Jul 2014 21:29:57 GMT

Maybe it's never occurred to me to look highly on that random result because 56.25% was well within the first standard deviation from the expected 50.00%.

Just the fact you said expected 50% proves you don't have a clue how to apply a mathematical house edge. But than again, you're always quoting Don Calin and his clear as mud explanation of leaving a place bet ON for a come out roll as an example, is probably the reason for some of your confusion.

Yes, if the seven is rolled on the com... [ More ]

Reply #49

Stack47 — Mon, 28 Jul 2014 18:07:14 GMT

Will you be posting the hit ratio of your 50 QPs or are you all talk and no action?

Hot Predictors (Last 30 Days by Hit Ratio)

Member Hit Ratio Picks Hits

1. Stack47 22.36% 4,400 984

2. SergeM 21.86% 407 89

3. Richardlustig 20.00% 20 4

4. tony869 14.01% 107 15

5. lamarrstar 13.05% 7,306 954

6. Shunan45 10.76% 130 14

7. JADELottery 6.66% 15 1

8. alden321 6.62% 181 12

9. pointspread 6.04% 5,710 345

10. aux8b 5.58% 609 34

Reply #48

jimmy4164 — Mon, 28 Jul 2014 02:20:47 GMT

Getting back to the thread topic...

Reply #47

Stack47 — Mon, 28 Jul 2014 01:32:32 GMT

Jimmy thinks he simulates actual lottery play, but all he was doing was randomly distributing 50% of the ticket sales as prizes. The only thing I was trying to prove was that I could systematically create 20 pick-3 lines and get at least a box hit in every jurisdiction in a month and 29,360 trails were more than enough to prove that Jimmy's QP house edge can be beaten.

Reply #46

rcbbuckeye — Sun, 27 Jul 2014 22:28:15 GMT

Well jimmy, it's ok with me if you want to be proud of your prize ratio.

Reply #45

jimmy4164 — Sun, 27 Jul 2014 21:38:15 GMT

In that case, maybe I should be proud of my 56.26% Prize Ratio last year in the Pick-4. And that was done by strictly betting on the same set of 4 digit numbers made up of zeros and ones only. Maybe it's never occurred to me to look highly on that random result because 56.25% was well within the first standard deviation from the expected 50.00%. Besides, the $31,260 losses were somewhat off-putting.

Reply #44

rcbbuckeye — Sun, 27 Jul 2014 20:53:24 GMT

How was that possible?

My guess is that the question doesn't need explaining or an answer. It was a rhetorical question.

52.25% is ahead of the game.

Reply #43

jimmy4164 — Sun, 27 Jul 2014 20:35:59 GMT

Stack47 asked, How was that possible?

If he doesn't know, I'm not going to waste my time trying to explain it to him. Perhaps someone else will.

BTW, we were discussing his predictions this year in the Georgia and Texas All or Nothing games, which are posted in the Other category on the Boards. Why do you think he wants to change the subject to his predicted $14020 LOSSES in the Pick-3 LAST year?

--Jimmy4164

Reply #42

Stack47 — Sun, 27 Jul 2014 19:31:16 GMT

What no comment on the 52.25% pick-3 prize ratio that contradicts your house edge mumbo jumbo?

We have lots of members who predict 50 or more pick-3 lines good for all month and I proved I could create 20 lines that did get at least one box hit in every state/provincial jurisdiction in one month. The LP prediction board simulates using 50 cent str/box bets with payoffs of $290 and $40 respectively so the box bet has a house edge of more than 50%.

I made 29,360 str/box bets and according to... [ More ]

Reply #41

jimmy4164 — Sun, 27 Jul 2014 03:24:45 GMT

Great! Too bad your stats this month didn't respond much.

Reply #40

Stack47 — Fri, 25 Jul 2014 01:33:55 GMT

Just two of the eight winners I had from 7/23 Georgia Evening drawing:

Match 9 -- 01-02-04-08-09-11-12-13-16-19-21-24

Match 3 -- 03-05-06-07-10-14-15-17-18-20-22-23

Now that you figured out nobody actually wins or loses predicting, maybe you'll start using big words like systematic and simulation correctly.

Reply #39

Artist77 — Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:50:35 GMT

TY Miss Sully.

Reply #38

jimmy4164 — Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:33:37 GMT

RJOh,

My suggested list of sets above were generated at Random.org. A system? I don't think so.

Again, systematic lottery play produces no better results than random selections.

Stack47's Perch is based on Hit ratios, not Prize ratios. There are no payoffs for high Hit ratios. His [roughly] 20% hit ratios and 50% prize ratios in the Georgia and Texas All or Nothing games are the probabilistically expected results of random play.

The fact that you don't understand what the sa... [ More ]

Reply #37

sully16 — Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:22:43 GMT

lol lol

Reply #36

sully16 — Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:22:19 GMT

Congrats

Reply #35

Artist77 — Thu, 24 Jul 2014 23:04:49 GMT

hmmphhhh yet no one noticed I moved up SUBSTANTIALLY in FJA's rankings???!! ONE DAY SOON I will be QUEEN of the Almosts!!!!!! BAWWWAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Reply #34

RJOh — Thu, 24 Jul 2014 17:19:01 GMT

there is very little support here for my position that, over the long haul,

systematic lottery play will produce no better results for its proponents than

random selections.

Do you even support that position?

In part of this thread you suggest if members wish to raise their prediction ratings and unseat Stack47 and Sergem from their perch they should make their predictions using your suggestions which I define as a system.

Then you claim systematic lottery play will produce no b... [ More ]

Reply #33

Stack47 — Wed, 23 Jul 2014 03:50:08 GMT

With a few notable exceptions, there is very little support here for my position

I saw no support or any takers trying out for latest interest, a perch contest.

Reply #32

jimmy4164 — Wed, 23 Jul 2014 02:29:01 GMT

There is one thing you're right about. With a few notable exceptions,

there is very little support here for my position that, over the long haul,

systematic lottery play will produce no better results for its proponents than

random selections. This is a sad fact. Whether this reflects a weakness

in my presentation or that the [Posters] at Lottery Post are, for the most part,

a collection of innumerates and illiterates, is for the reader to decide.

Reply #31

Artist77 — Tue, 22 Jul 2014 23:31:37 GMT

Is Jimmy 4164 the father of B2b????? lol

Reply #30

sully16 — Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:45:51 GMT

You're welcome Miss Artist.

Reply #29

Artist77 — Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:44:15 GMT

TY Miss Sully.

Reply #28

sully16 — Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:41:50 GMT

WTG Stack

Reply #27

sully16 — Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:40:53 GMT

Well said

Reply #26

Artist77 — Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:38:37 GMT

You are the king of circular reasoning and double talk. First you want to utilize a team (can't achieve it by yourself?) to unseat 2 members with a good hit ratio (green eyed monster?) and then one of the members tells you upfront how he achieved the ratio, then you are unhappy with his answer.

The most dangerous people in the world are people who consider themselves self-anointed geniuses.

Reply #25

Stack47 — Tue, 22 Jul 2014 18:07:54 GMT

It looks more like he meant your genius isn't what you think it is .

Reply #24

Stack47 — Tue, 22 Jul 2014 18:05:48 GMT

Unfortunately, you've short-changed us.

There you go again, pretending you're representing a group of members. You're the only member who asked how I manage to stay near the top of the hit ratio.

Now that you've admitted there is no miracle required to attain a 22% Hit Ratio and a 50% Prize Ratio

Refresh my memory; show me where I even discussed my Georgia and Texas All or Nothing predictions, much less calling them a miracle selections. I'm not bragging about it and most lottery pla... [ More ]

Reply #23

jimmy4164 — Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:26:03 GMT

Stack47,

Unfortunately, you've short-changed us. Now that you've admitted there is no miracle required to attain a 22% Hit Ratio and a 50% Prize Ratio by exclusively posting in the Georgia and Texas All or Nothing games, it really raises the question of why you go to all the trouble to post there every day. I suppose you want people to believe your systematically chosen sets of 12 numbers are what allow you to maintain Hit and Prize Ratios close to what's predicted by probability with Quic... [ More ]

Reply #22

jimmy4164 — Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:36:57 GMT

You meant you're, right?

Thanks anyway.

Reply #21

onlymoney — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 19:39:21 GMT

I understand. There seems to be a double standard here sometimes. Actually, the word stupid isn't that bad. I'm sure you see most of what's written in the blogs on an everyday basis with words being used by others that I can't even repeat here.

So basically a person can call others really nasty names on the blogs, but not on the forums. My solution is to post as little as possible on the forums because it just gets deleted anyways, and just stick to predictions on the p-3 forum and an occasi... [ More ]

Reply #20

RJOh — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 18:52:31 GMT

There isn't a system to be cracked if lottery drawings are random. I think what Jimmy wants if for someone to come up with a strategy that predicts lottery drawings outcomes better than Stack47 and Sergem even though in the past he has said many times doing so is a waste of time.

Reply #19

bluerain — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:59:28 GMT

anybody who thinks thet can crack the system is in lala land, use all your brains to try and crack the pick three thats where all the pros are,

Reply #18

bluerain — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:52:08 GMT

your a genius 4164

Reply #17

Stack47 — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:43:38 GMT

A clerk told me lots of her customers play the same numbers on multiple lines in MM, PB, Cash Ball, and Keno. Playing the opposite set of numbers on AoN is the same as playing the same numbers twice.

Reply #16

Stack47 — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:36:26 GMT

I don't like to make it appear that Jimmy is clueless, but there is an obvious reason why I'm usually in the top five 30 day and lifetime all states, all games types hit ratio. It's no secret, I mostly predict numbers in games where every ticket has 22.2% chance of winning something. But I'm not even ranked in the Texas AorN top ten and I'm 3rd and 6th in Georgia.

At risk of hurting Jimmy's feelings more, I have to point out cause and effect is the reason I'm near the top of the overall hit r... [ More ]

Reply #15

RJOh — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 15:46:29 GMT

If it's that easy to be at the top of the Hot Predictors (Last 30 Days by Hit Ratio) and Highest Lifetime Hit Ratio lists, why aren't you there? If anyone could get there following your hints, you would be there.

The information you posted makes no sense at all, playing quick picks would make more sense even though it's not a real strategy.

Reply #14

rcbbuckeye — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:16:29 GMT

I won $250 on AoN a couple weeks ago playing the same numbers 5 times. Shooting for $1,250,000. Cool thing is I got the numbers from LP's RNG.

Reply #13

helpmewin — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:16:04 GMT

i will try them i have to wait. i keep the numbers, there is one person who i won't name that is over there

gee i hope these don't get in the wrong hands

Thanks

Reply #12

rcbbuckeye — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:50:12 GMT

Now jimmy. I didn't really call you an idiot. But you are quite grating with your constant barrage of telling everyone on a lottery forum what you think about strategies and systems ad nauseum. If you want to abandon your efforts at this site, that is ok. Personally, I don't want you to go away. Just know that it's ok for people on a lottery forum to discuss ideas on playing and you think they are out to make money off others.

Alright. I'm done. Sorry to hurt your feelings.... [ More ]

Reply #11

rcbbuckeye — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:41:43 GMT

LOL.

Well, I didn't say he IS an idiot. Stack just makes him LOOK like an idiot.

Frankly, I don't believe jimmy is an idiot. I do think he is quite intelligent. He's just irritates me along with others by saying the same thing on a lottery forum, convinced that anyone trying a system, or talking about a strategy is out to fleece people. Just like another member who constantly says don't play the lottery. But it's ok to play someday. Really?

Ok, onlymoney. I'll move on, and you and jimmy... [ More ]

Reply #10

MillionsWanted — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:21:32 GMT

That's ironic, coming from you.

Reply #9

Nikkicute — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 05:08:55 GMT

What did Todd take over OnlyMoney's account? lol

Reply #8

jimmy4164 — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 03:29:14 GMT

Your quoted post here is just one more reason for me to abandon my efforts at this site.

Too many blithering idiots.

(Edit: Sorry onlymoney - I've had to absorb too much of it.

Reply #7

onlymoney — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 03:26:28 GMT

makes you look like an idiot.

If you really need to express yourself by insulting people, then sign up for an account at Reddit and have at it. But if you're going to post stuff here, please be friendly, and if you find yourself tempted to insult someone, pause and count backwards from 10.

Reply #6

rcbbuckeye — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 03:18:03 GMT

Geez, I don't know. Oh, maybe because you said you want them unseated . The way you worded it made it seem like you couldn't wait to see them unseated . Plus the fact that Stack makes you look like an idiot, which unless you're a masochist, you don't like very much.

Whatever. Good luck in your endeavor...I guess.

Reply #5

jimmy4164 — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 02:38:31 GMT

What causes you to believe I am so bothered by their status as TOP Hit Predictors?

If this were true, why would I show others how to do the same?

Study this more closely rcbbuckeye; maybe you'll figure it out.

Reply #4

rcbbuckeye — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:17:39 GMT

Sooooo,

Why are you so bothered by their perch that you want them unseated ?

They, like everyone else on LP enjoy discussing and playing the lottery. That includes systems, and strategies. Nothing wrong with that, on a lottery forum.

Reply #3

jimmy4164 — Sun, 20 Jul 2014 23:21:45 GMT

Thanks for pointing that out helpmewin.

Yes, you are missing something. Their TOP ratings are for Hit Ratios, not Prize Ratios.

Reply #2

helpmewin — Sun, 20 Jul 2014 23:02:41 GMT

They are not even in the LAST 30 DAYS TOP 10 PRIZE Ratio Unless i am missing something

Reply #1

helpmewin — Sun, 20 Jul 2014 22:49:23 GMT

i don't see that they are any threat

pick 611 - hit 140

pick 4480- hit 974

How to Unseat Stack47 & Sergem from their Perch!

jimmy4164 — Sun, 20 Jul 2014 22:23:02 GMT

How to Unseat Stack47 Sergem from their Perch!

First click here to see where they Perch...

Then select from these sets to challenge them:

2 4 5 6 8 10 11 14 15 16 18 19

2 3 6 7 9 12 13 16 19 20 23 24

2 3 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 17 20 21

1 2 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 17 19 21

2 3 7 8 13 14 15 16 17 19 21 24

1 2 5 8 9 10 11 14 17 18 21 23

1 2 4 5 6 9 11 13 16 20 22 24

1 3 5 7 8 9 12 15 16 17 20 23

1 2 5 6 10 12 14 17 18 21 23 24

4 7 8 9 13 14 15 17 18 20 22 24

3