Megamillions prediction format

Reply #10

stanyslaww — Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:55:54 GMT

It s been a few drawings been busy, but I m predicting X() () () ( ) ()X winning format format basically no doubles I predicted the last winning format double-double 12 20 25-50 51. My predicting winning JACKPOT NUMBER for Friday 6-22-32-43-65 mb 01

Reply #9

lo-down — Wed, 31 Dec 2014 06:38:22 GMT

Seems like 3, 67,and 12(MB) dropped from the 21 Nov draw while

7 droped from 23-Dec draw; 67 from 31-Oct draw; 44 from 11 Apr draw

Good effort

Reply #8

stanyslaww — Sat, 27 Dec 2014 15:56:58 GMT

You win some you lose some! I could of looked at within the last 20 drawings seeing the possibility of X of the last 3 cols being X returning X again for last 3 col for last night drawing. This is what it s all about the same format s repeating itself. I m targeting the most fluent ones that return.

So my next Tuesday Prediction format will be doubles for the last 3 pretty much my last prediction for this next drawing X() () (d) (d) (?)Doubles. So my prediction of the jackpot based on this p... [ More ]

Reply #7

stanyslaww — Wed, 24 Dec 2014 18:25:43 GMT

Another correct format prediction X() () () () ()X, no doubles! Eliminating the thousands of other formats bringing you to the ballpark of the actual winning format each drawing. So my next prediction for Friday s winning format will be: The last 3 coluums (d) (d) (?) the first 3 coluums will be X () () () no doubles. Next winning format (1?) (2?) (4?) (4?) (5?)

My predicting of the winning number based on that format is: breaking down my system each coluum (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) of predicting... [ More ]

Reply #6

stanyslaww — Sat, 20 Dec 2014 15:29:54 GMT

for next tuesday I m predicting the winning format is X for the last 3 coluums and X for the first 3 coluums (s) (1?) (2?) (3?) (4?) basically no doubles at all! My predicting of the winning Jackpot with that format is 6-15-28-30-41 mb 3

Reply #5

stanyslaww — Sat, 20 Dec 2014 14:53:26 GMT

I said if your money right play both X and doubles ()--- (d) (d) (?), either one of the 2 are coming! my prediction format was acurate for first 3 col (1?- 1?- ?)--- 4? 6? doubles came instead of X of last 3 col 58-59-68 ()--- (d) (d) (?), () () (?) (d) (d

Reply #4

SergeM — Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:03:13 GMT

If you had a pick 3 lotto 1 to 10.

[1,8] 1

[2,9] 1

[3,10]1

Always true.

Reply #3

SergeM — Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:59:51 GMT

Regex, or sometimes like(), singles are digits. ... Maybe you could simplify: [0?-2?-6?-6?-7?]. The range is too big, you are basing on groups, so you might write [1,9]*1 [20,29] * 1 ... . There are are ways to write this. Maybe you should do: 1 of 1 to 9, 1 of 20 to 29.

Reply #2

stanyslaww — Thu, 18 Dec 2014 01:35:50 GMT

There are a few formats that will keep you in the ballpark on Megamillions

() () --() () () the last 3 digits I label X when there is no double numbers like the 3 coluums last drawing 68 72 73 or it could have been doub-doub- (?)

When it s no doubles at all in the last 3 coluums it s called X

A sequence out of the last 3 col are like 30 s -40 s -60 s, mixed up 50 s-60 s-70 s or 40 s-50 s-60 s and 9 out of 10 times I notice that it s always two coluums out of the 3 it s a patteran that

Reply #1

adulane62 — Wed, 17 Dec 2014 06:01:10 GMT

Semi-close but no cigar!

12/16 MM 41-58-68-72-73

Megamillions prediction format

stanyslaww — Mon, 15 Dec 2014 00:57:00 GMT

last drawing (2) (31) (46) (58) 65) mb(7)

my prediction format (s) (2?) (6?) (6?) (7?)

collum 1 () col 2 () col 3() col 4() col 5 ()

3 and 4 will have the same either two 20's two 30's,two 40's, two 50's, two 60, or two 70's

col 5 will be 70's col 2 will be 20's col 1 will be singles 1-9 A guess at the winning jackpot will be 6-23-61-68-74 mb 1