Stonito Lotto software

Reply #17

lottoarchitect — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:34:38 GMT

Again, I do not talk about testing on existing data, I talk about real play results, this is forward-testing where data are unavailable when a prediction is made to estimate those same data. That's the whole point, isn't it? Results obtained on this forward-testing clearly suggest official lotteries performed in a barrel (that is important) are not that random.

Reply #16

adobea78 — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:20:10 GMT

If your data for testing is 'prior' then you're back-testing. I did not infer in my comment about finding equations or algorithms for predictions. You seem to have certainty how lottery should work, hence a different point of view is pointless. I subscribe to the event been random, this approach has work well in all my predictions in my numerous threads.

Reply #15

lottoarchitect — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 17:43:32 GMT

Who said anything about back-testing? I talk about actual results of real play here, these are by definition forward-testing . You can't be certain when you talk about prediction, where did this come from? If you know the equation in advance, then it is not prediction. 2+2=4 because we have defined it to be like that, pointless comment. You approach lottery prediction using multiple variables, you think it is an equation that has to be found. Lotteries do not work like that, sorry to disappoint... [ More ]

Reply #14

adobea78 — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 16:11:55 GMT

The premise of all lottery matrix is randomness, else the game will be biased. Even if you assume the game is not random, any algorithm you come with will be purely a guess work.

I still haven't seen anyone offer proof that lotteries are pure random events, what all you people say is just your belief that it is pure random and those that attempted to predict using faulty approaches (AI, NN etc) conclude faulty results as well.

The keyword to your answer or proof is PREDICTION, am certain... [ More ]

Reply #13

CARBOB — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 10:28:04 GMT

I don't believe the lottery is random. I believe when you do test draws, it throws off all of the static stats, O,E,H,L, even the digits positional. Which are all we have to test.

Reply #12

lottoarchitect — Sun, 22 Mar 2015 09:54:15 GMT

With wrong tools and wrong assumptions, you'll get that lottery is just too random . AI, NN, hot/cold/due, skip charts etc and everything that assumes balls have memory are destined to fail as you have discovered. What you say however doesn't prove at all that lotteries are pure random outcomes. It is like trying to extract crude oil using a straw (your tool), obviously you can't but that doesn't mean you can't extract oil in general; you have to use the right tool/approach and understand your d... [ More ]

Reply #11

eddessaknight — Sat, 21 Mar 2015 21:39:55 GMT

Hi Amanda,

Candidly I agree with RJOH, even decent software can help you organize a strategy playing tactics PERIOD

Just picture what would happen to Lotteries world wide if any Holy Grail programmable system could repeatedly WIN. Only the software sellers make money on product sales other wise they would play their own program not be bothered trying to marketl the stuff that dreams are made of

Have a better chance better off using Eastern European spiritual intuition meditation

Reply #10

riscknight — Thu, 12 Mar 2015 22:22:34 GMT

Forget AI and everything else for now; 'miracles' can be seen with just 64kb if you *really* know how to code.

You have the best 'Lottery Library' here on Lottery Post; you'll find anything you might need... just *search

Reply #9

adobea78 — Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:31:00 GMT

Well said, I hope this dose of sanity will hit home. The ideal that algorithm can predict a random event which are mutually exclusive is delusional.

If you dwell too much on the odds you will not do well.

Statistics and probability are offshoots of the Binomial theory, so why not focus on the underlying concept.

Reply #8

AmandaJX — Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:20:21 GMT

Nice answer, thank You!

Maybe You can suggest some good software? Something for OS X also. I found so many for windows, but so little for OS.

Reply #7

bobby623 — Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:22:51 GMT

Amen

Reply #6

bootleg233 — Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:01:14 GMT

Reply #5

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:02:29 GMT

AI and NN along with many other methods of prediction can be applied to lotteries, just don't expect

them to work. I have written at least a dozen of each and the lottery is just too random. Trying to

predict the lottery is a waste of time IMHO but that does not mean that we can't play smarter. Study

the data and then make your best guess. Forget the odds, don't apply to much math and trust your

gut instincts. AI and NN can be used to make forecast for some events like sales, stocks,... [ More ]

Reply #4

Gwoof — Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:56:22 GMT

WinHunter was a lottery program that used a form of AI. Don't know if it is still available though . It was a very good program if you took the time to learn it.

Reply #3

AmandaJX — Thu, 12 Mar 2015 08:49:39 GMT

Estonia is in Europe. You can adapt Stonito lotto software for any type of lotto all over the world. AI is artificial intelligence and NN stands for neural networks.

Reply #2

destinycreation — Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:32:56 GMT

Where is Estonia located ?? Is Stonito lotto American lottery software, or European lottery software ??? What is AI NN ??

The Lottery Post membership is primarily American. Thus, the LP membership may not be as familiar with European lottery games, and European lottery software.

Reply #1

RJOh — Wed, 11 Mar 2015 21:59:26 GMT

There is no such thing as AI or NI when it comes to lotteries, anyone saying something different I challenge them to prove it.

Stonito Lotto software

AmandaJX — Wed, 11 Mar 2015 21:53:48 GMT

Does anybody know other software like Stonito lotto ( working with AI and NN )? Stonito seems really cool software, but a pit expensive...