My system suggestion for the next PB drawing

Reply #26

RJOh — Mon, 05 Oct 2015 17:18:53 GMT

Also before playing that many combinations, u wanna make sure that its profitable hitting 4 or 5 numbers, if the game cause for 6 numbers , even if you don't get a jackpot hit

Since MM pays $500 for a match4, Ohio's Classic Lotto(6/49) pays $75 for a match4 and Ohio's Rolling Cash5(5/39) pays $300 for a match4 I don't even bother looking at wheeling, I just stick with playing 10-15 lines when I play and take what I get which is usually very little. MM always pays a dollar if I play all 15 me... [ More ]

Reply #25

Goseahawks — Mon, 05 Oct 2015 06:01:45 GMT

I can get 4 to 6 numbers for the 6/49 states lottery ........4 to 5 for the 5/39 games, within 22-30 possible pool pairs.. Each game putting out @ 2500- 3000 possible combinations, using a full wheel option . The problem is , when it comes to the mega mill/ PB, the 5 regular balls I can get 4 -5, but the wheels doesn't differentiate the mega ball..it just gives u 5 or 6 digits depending on game type, sheading out @( 2500-3000) combinations from low to high for games like fantasy 5, regular 6/49... [ More ]

Reply #24

Goseahawks — Mon, 05 Oct 2015 05:59:10 GMT

I can get 4 to 6 numbers for the 6/49 states lottery ........4 to 5 for the 5/39 games, within 22-30 possible pool pairs.. Each game putting out @ 2500- 3000 possible combinations, using a full wheel option .The problem is , when it comes to the mega mill/ PB, the 5 regular balls I can get 4 -5, but the wheels doesn't differentiate the mega ball..it just gives u 5 or 6 digits depending on game type, sheading out @( 2500-3000) combinations from low to high for games like fantasy 5, regular 6/49 g... [ More ]

Reply #23

garyo1954 — Sat, 03 Oct 2015 19:11:22 GMT

Skyline,

Probably a GOOD thing for me you don't throw more out. LOL

I seem to have problems when I integrate new/more ideas. I had the 10, 15 on one line and the 21 on another, but that's been the norm all month.

Too much information is as bad as not enough. And more often than not adding something new affects the parameters that were working.

Last night I tinkered with them adding Gianelli's breakdown. In the pretest plus live draws, one group hit 44.1% of the time (3318/7521). The... [ More ]

Reply #22

RJOh — Sat, 03 Oct 2015 14:42:58 GMT

You're probable right I don't need as much history as I think. But with PB at $300M+, I wanted to try that system before the matrix changed. Now that I tried it I probably won't play PB again for a while or aleast until it reaches $300M+ again and by then will have looked some different methods for picking my combinations. Sounds like you're ready whatever they throw at you. Good luck.

RJOh

Reply #21

SkyLine69 — Sat, 03 Oct 2015 13:24:46 GMT

RJ,

even though I use history to determine a decent pattern I really only look at the last 3 draws for my answers for the next draw I'm not one for too much to look at in determineing my answers so keep the clutter out. That being said my system can be complicated if you let it be I need a min of 10 draws but prefer 100 to get a decent pattern. The matrix change honestly doesn't bother me. They can 100 numbers I can care less. As I mentioned I look at the past 3 draws. What I look at is hiw m... [ More ]

Reply #20

garyo1954 — Fri, 02 Oct 2015 22:06:27 GMT

RJOH, I don't let any of that bother me anymore. It did until I became the creepy old grumpy animal loving crazy guy in the neighborhood. It doesn't matter what game you post about, somebody read something somewhere else that won't be the same.

For the most part, I look in to see what people are asking about between watching for the mailman, trash pick up, and spying on the neighbors (like ordinary creepy old grumpy animal loving crazy people do). Can't wait for someone to post:

Would som... [ More ]

Reply #19

SergeM — Fri, 02 Oct 2015 20:03:46 GMT

RJoh, you might add other filters to your suggestion. How many low numbers? How many odd numbers

Reply #18

RJOh — Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:29:35 GMT

I use to talk about it a lot more until several members said I was starting to repeat myself and not saying anything they hadn't heard before.

With the PB matrix changing after Saturday and MM having only 203 drawings since its last change, the only games I have enough data on to try it are the local Classic Lotto and Rolling Cash5 which are only of interest to local players.

Reply #17

garyo1954 — Fri, 02 Oct 2015 16:38:00 GMT

It surprises me every time you say something about your system. You say so little about it, but when you do you throw out some interesting ideas.

I reduced the Texas 2Step to 25430 4 digit numbers using your ideas and the quads, triples, doubles stuff from the other thread.

Then I thought, Self, since there has been two double digit numbers in a row, in the first position, the outlook is dismal for that to happen again. I eliminated everything above 10 in the first position leaving 14395 c... [ More ]

Reply #16

JADELottery — Fri, 02 Oct 2015 14:03:50 GMT

To get an even spread, use the formula: 0.67448975

This will create 25% ranges with each column.

% Range A B C D E

25% Under 50% Spread 01 - 05 02 - 15 03 - 26 04 - 38 05 - 52

25% Below Average 06 - 12 16 - 23 27 - 35 39 - 47 53 - 58

25% Above Average 12 - 17 23 - 31 35 - 43 47 - 54 58 - 64

25% Over 50% Spread 18 - 65 32 - 66 44 - 67 55 - 68 65 - 69

Here's a graph of the ranges on a Standard Normal Distribution

Reply #15

SergeM — Thu, 01 Oct 2015 21:24:16 GMT

Input: [[11, 12], [23, 24], [35], [46, 47], [58, 59]].

Count of combinations: 16. Limit display: 3000.

11 23 35 46 58

11 23 35 46 59

11 23 35 47 58

11 23 35 47 59

11 24 35 46 58

11 24 35 46 59

11 24 35 47 58

11 24 35 47 59

12 23 35 46 58

12 23 35 46 59

12 23 35 47 58

12 23 35 47 59

12 24 35 46 58

12 24 35 46 59

12 24 35 47 58

12 24 35 47 59

Reply #14

GoogilyMoogily — Thu, 01 Oct 2015 17:59:22 GMT

I quite liked it the way you first phrased it

Reply #13

RJOh — Thu, 01 Oct 2015 17:56:24 GMT

Excuse me, I meant to say designing a lottery system isn't like brain surgery........

Reply #12

RJOh — Thu, 01 Oct 2015 16:30:34 GMT

Designing a lottery system is like brain surgery where a strict procedure has to be followed, there's a lot of guess work and all kinds of directions that can be taken or even made up. I just explained what I did and why, what you decide to do is up to you.

I look at the combination drawn for 09/26/15 and based on what happened in previous drawings when those numbers appeared in those positions, tried to prediction what would happen with numbers in those positions on 09/30/15. In the case of... [ More ]

Reply #11

GoogilyMoogily — Thu, 01 Oct 2015 16:08:52 GMT

The only data I see is what number was drawn on what date. Given this info, in reported order, is the following what you mean?

How to read the chart: The last occurrence of number 7 was 18 draws ago for the first reported position, 5 draws ago for the second reported position, and 128 draws ago for the third reported position. The number 7 has not appeared in the 4th or 5th reported position.

That being said, the number 7 can be drawn in any position, so how can this help a calculation

Reply #10

RJOh — Thu, 01 Oct 2015 15:51:02 GMT

About three years ago Jadelottey post some charts tracking PB or MM numbers which showed their positions for all the previous drawings and I got an idea of how to predict the range of numbers in that position for the next drawing which I explained in my posts at the time of which there was little interest.

The posts are in the archives if you want to read them but the system basically boils down to which numbers have followed numbers in previous drawings and their range. I actually use those... [ More ]

Reply #9

JADELottery — Thu, 01 Oct 2015 15:41:02 GMT

New Powerball Matrix Pick 5 of 69 Part

Stat A B C D E

= 11.66666667 23.33333333 35.00000000 46.66666667 58.33333333

= 9.42809042 11.92569588 12.64911064 11.92569588 9.42809042

Reply #8

SergeM — Thu, 01 Oct 2015 15:09:14 GMT

I don't see Donald doing all the tickets by hand.

Reply #7

GoogilyMoogily — Thu, 01 Oct 2015 15:08:01 GMT

It's like walking into a 2.5 mile (4 km) square room and standing on ~71 million tiles simultaneously (one tile per play). Trump can afford that.

Reply #6

SergeM — Thu, 01 Oct 2015 15:03:06 GMT

Unfortunately I cannot play 71.453.158 combinations.

Reply #5

GoogilyMoogily — Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:58:59 GMT

Can you explain the system, or point me to earlier posts about this system so I can gain a better understanding of why these numbers are excluded? Or, why are no mid-range numbers excluded? What if 1-2-3-58-59-? comes up? Thanks

Reply #4

RJOh — Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:32:05 GMT

That chart would be correct if I used all 59 numbers with one power ball but my parameters were for 54 numbers which excluded 1 2 3 58 and 59 with 29 power balls

A correct chart using the parameters suggested would show 4 as the lowest number used 7,635,816 times and 57 as the highest number used 4,813,478 times. You need to add a counter in your program that count only the numbers in combinations within the parameters.

RJOh

Reply #3

GoogilyMoogily — Thu, 01 Oct 2015 12:59:35 GMT

Unfortunately, the post preview from earlier showed empty cells as valid table cells. Here is the correct chart with zeros as place holders to line up the chart columns. My bad...

PB 1 2 3 4 5

1 424270 0 0 0 0

2 395010 29260 0 0 0

3 367290 55440 1540 0 0

4 341055 78705 4455 55 0

5 316251 99216 8586 216 1

6 292825 117130 13780 530 5

7 270725 132600 19890 1040 15

8 249900 145775 26775 1785 35

9 230300 156800 34300 2800 70

10 211876 165816 42336... [ More ]

Reply #2

GoogilyMoogily — Thu, 01 Oct 2015 12:55:36 GMT

Why focus on the position at all? Yes, we can calculate the likelihood of any number being in a position at any time. We know the number 13 can be drawn 182,160 times in the 2nd position. This considers if the balls are drawn in numerical order. This method shows the number 1 and 59 can only be drawn in the first and last position, respectively. Every number can be drawn in any order. This is the chart for PB as reported and if balls are drawn in numerical order.

PB 1 2 3 4 5

1 424270

Reply #1

RJOh — Thu, 01 Oct 2015 12:35:01 GMT

Winning numbers were 21 29 40 55 59 +17, only two numbers and the powerball were within the suggested parameters. Of ten lines I matched 1+0 once. After Saturday, it's a new matrix and time to start collecting new data. It'll be a while before I'm ready to play PB again.

My system suggestion for the next PB drawing

RJOh — Tue, 29 Sep 2015 20:47:18 GMT

My system has suggested that the next PowerBall winning combination will be from the 71,453,158 combinations within the following parameters:

position 1 = 4-23

position 2 = 5-33

position 3 = 7-42

position 4 = 12-54

position 5 = 20-57

bonus = 7-35

By reducing the number pool from 59 to 54 and the bonus pool from 35 to 29, the number of combinations to be considered are reduced from 175,223,510 to 71,453,158 or 40.77% of the regular pool.

While I will be using no more than