<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Something Better</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/299720</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/299720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Something Better</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/299720/4520599</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/299720/4520599</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:20:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>osmannica2001</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, gradient descent is a monster topic itself. But in a few words; gradient descent is what Visually will allow you to see how an output is close to zero after reiterating training examples. Evidently, the closer your output is to zero, the higher chances your have of your prediction being 100% accurate.</p>]]></description>
			<category>osmannica2001</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/299720/4489946</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/299720/4489946</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:54:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Kosh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Osmannica2001,<br /><br />In plain English please, what is a gradient descent as it relates to this kind of software?<br /><br />Thank you very much in advance for any light that you can shed on this matter.<br /><br />Kosh</p>]]></description>
			<category>Kosh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/299720/4478697</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/299720/4478697</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:27:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>SergeM</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#x27;t this the project of three bored ex-students who got drunk in Mexico</p>]]></description>
			<category>SergeM</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/299720/4478690</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/299720/4478690</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:24:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>osmannica2001</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>So far I have spent about $50 in plays since July of 2015. But, I still find it very complex to use as it is lacking many features. Don&#x27;t get me wrong however, they have very fast servers.</p>]]></description>
			<category>osmannica2001</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/299720/4478681</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/299720/4478681</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:19:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>osmannica2001</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>best of lucks having your money sucked away. I recently submitted a recommendation to at least show what the gradient descent looks like based on your plays. Meanwhile, you&#x27;re running in blind mode.</p>]]></description>
			<category>osmannica2001</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/299720/4478656</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/299720/4478656</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>SergeM</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Much too long!<br /><br />Chart - Decision - Play</p>]]></description>
			<category>SergeM</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Something Better</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/299720</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/299720</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 23:26:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Kosh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think that I may have found something that is even better than Neural Net Lottery Picker and Percep-Lotron.<br /><br />It is called Neural-Lotto. You will have to Google it to see what I mean. Do not forget the dash in the name when you Google it.<br /><br />It just went live in January of this year.<br /><br />It has eight parameters. They are as follows:<br /><br />Learning Rate --- from 0 to 1<br /><br />Neurons / Layers --- from 10 to 990<br /><br />Layers --- from 1 to 999<br /><br />Stepping --- from 1 to</p>]]></description>
			<category>Kosh</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

