Mechanical Lottery Ball Machine and RNG.

Reply #25

Sunglasses — Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:12:12 GMT

... so they went with a*x+b ...

Reply #24

Sunglasses — Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:10:52 GMT

Bernouilli, Bernouille (fr. noodle of Ber)

The extreme value is zero times.

The other extreme value is the count of experiments.

Reply #23

river26 — Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:29:22 GMT

i got milk want it

Reply #22

Elliptic7 — Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:52:55 GMT

Entertaining as ever. I suppose whistle blowers is slang for air lottery drawing machines. If not I am going with it and conclude it is the best defense against manipulation as the topic leader said. Also, agree winners aren't complaining either way.

Reply #21

Sunglasses — Fri, 24 Jun 2016 22:21:36 GMT

Whistle blowers

Reply #20

eddessaknight — Thu, 02 Jun 2016 22:55:51 GMT

The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance.

~Robert R. Coveyou, research mathematician titled published book .

Fortes Fortuna Harmonia

Eddessa_Knight w/Light

Reply #19

eddessaknight — Sun, 29 May 2016 01:27:03 GMT

Hi R/L

Thanks for the past performance results chart on the catch up number 39

Nota Bene:

*Limits of Extremes skips or streaks outcome *see Bernoulli Trials

Regarding out running extreme skips or streaks in all games, an old Wall Street adage: Trees grow tall but never to heaven.

Keep in mind as any repeated pattern of chance events continues, it's reversal becomes progressively imminent

You may recall my past post projection:

Hope I am not being redundant, but my exp... [ More ]

Reply #18

eddessaknight — Thu, 26 May 2016 21:46:23 GMT

Thanks RL, et al-

Most interesting how numbers that have been out, longer than expectation in any game, - make a an inordinate amount of comeback hits to bring overall balance to the fore.

Omnia in numeris sita sunt ( everything lies veiled in numbers)

Fortes Fortuna Juvat Harmonia

Eddessa_Knight w/Light

Reply #17

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 26 May 2016 05:41:18 GMT

Number 39 playing catch-up after a cold spell, MO. 5-39

RL

Reply #16

bobby623 — Tue, 24 May 2016 14:46:03 GMT

For What Its Worth!

Substitution is my game!

Machines/computers makes no difference!

It's the Gaps that drive the plan!

Finding the clues and good guesswork can bring on a victory parade

Reply #15

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 24 May 2016 14:12:19 GMT

I agree but the number of average games is dependant on the pool size. In other words a 5-39 will

be different than a game like mega-millions. For a 5-39 around 80% of the numbers will show within

10 drawings. As a general rule I don't play cold numbers until they start hitting again. Once a number

starts hitting again after a cold spell we often see a greater hit rate as if it's reclaiming it's average.

RL

Reply #14

eddessaknight — Thu, 12 May 2016 02:05:09 GMT

Hi Rl-

Hope I am not being redundant, but my experience show that most numbers will show within 20 games a few could extend the streak from 30 - 40 games - as long as the equipment balls are checked to be in proper operating order. Once, after a forced inspection it showed damaged ball and another time the machine only drew 19 balls out of the required 20 (live)- Casino anomaly response well these things will happen from time to time as there was no assigned pit boss, no one thought to ask fo... [ More ]

Reply #13

RJOh — Wed, 11 May 2016 22:20:32 GMT

I doubt if very many did since 75% of the MM winning combinations since the last matrix change had all five numbers hit in the previous forty drawings or less.

Reply #12

bobby623 — Wed, 11 May 2016 17:22:09 GMT

I wonder how much money folks who play MM regularly spent believing that 22 would in the next winning combination?

The problem with cold numbers is that there are no useful clues indicating which one will fall next.

Reply #11

RJOh — Wed, 11 May 2016 17:15:08 GMT

That also happened in the MM drawing last night, 22 which hadn't hit in 79 drawings finally came up.

Reply #10

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 11 May 2016 02:29:38 GMT

Tonight's draw was 12-16-25-26-39. Two of the longest out numbers hit, 25 and 39.

RL

Reply #9

Sunglasses — Tue, 10 May 2016 19:49:09 GMT

Hard searches over long periods have shown that winners didn't complain about winning.

Reply #8

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 10 May 2016 17:12:59 GMT

Frenchie

Years ago I ran some test and for the most part RNG's seem to hold closer to the expected than

ball droppers. While they both run very close over time the RNG seems to stay on track while the

mechanical will swing back and forth. That being said here in MO. the number 39 has not shown

in our 5-39 for 39 games and 13, 20 and 25 are all out more than 20 games. The expected average

for any number for the 5-39 is a little less than 1 in 8.

RL

Reply #7

eddessaknight — Mon, 09 May 2016 00:17:03 GMT

Hi frencie,

Your question is a worthy one, to be sure, just like the weight of one ball compared to another was found to differ because of the additional ink.

My humble experience report after approx 25 years @ gaming ground zero, Las Vegas is: although serious keno players of live ball vs RNG Video Keno machines, may differ if the effect on their game plan is positive vs negative - almost 95% concur that the distribution of of the number outcome is definitely different. Many say because t... [ More ]

Reply #6

frenchie — Fri, 22 Apr 2016 06:16:27 GMT

bigdaddy,

How do you make the difference if it's Mechanical or RNG ?

what are you looking at ? can you explain, Thank you.

Reply #5

frenchie — Fri, 22 Apr 2016 06:13:59 GMT

bigdaddy,

How do you make the difference if it's Mechanical or RNG ?

what are you looking at ? can you explain, Thank you.

Reply #4

Lildarryl — Thu, 21 Apr 2016 23:39:56 GMT

you're so funny

Reply #3

RJOh — Thu, 21 Apr 2016 23:12:38 GMT

like 94% VS 82% in my research

Do you have the two patterns? I like to compare them for myself.

Reply #2

ArizonaDream — Thu, 21 Apr 2016 22:44:16 GMT

Illinois switched from balls to RNG Oct. 1, 2015. I only started playing/watching p3 after the switchover, I don't know if it's any more or less winable now vs. before.

I wonder if anyone has backtested a good system on history before and after and seen much difference.

Just eyeballing the history, I didn't notice anything much. Maybe a few more triples now.

Oh, there is one thing. Lotto never used to be able to rollup past 10 million before. Since the change, it had a huge, long r... [ More ]

Reply #1

bigdaddy — Thu, 21 Apr 2016 21:44:25 GMT

compared to GA MECHANICAL VS. TN RNG..I would say that the rng pattern is easier to detect than mechanical ..not by much though..it's like 94% VS 82% in my research and play..

Mechanical Lottery Ball Machine and RNG.

frenchie — Thu, 21 Apr 2016 21:38:15 GMT

Hi all,

I wanted to know if they would be a difference about Mechanical Lottery Ball Machine and RNG draw ?

Did someone look if the patterns comparing both draw are similar are is there a deference ?

Personally, I do not like RNG become to my opinion it can be manipulated.

Thank you.