Working on algorithm

Reply #30

RJOh — Mon, 30 May 2016 20:57:03 GMT

So far a few questions about my results but as anyone knows who check my predictions there is no improvements yet. If it happens, the results will speak for themselves.

Reply #29

frenchie — Fri, 13 May 2016 22:27:39 GMT

RL,

Nice work, very promising software, what's interesting is that multiple system get involve and you don't even have to fill them up

completely in order to work, let see what will be the result after you finish the order system, it should be even better.

Thanks RL for sharing.

Reply #28

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 13 May 2016 03:07:49 GMT

Frenchie

I had 3 lines that matched 2 numbers of the 4 I played. I had all 4 correct digits just not on the same line.

I hit all the rogue values but missed a couple Steps on the lexie tool. Not too good but it will take me a

while to get back into the analysis.

RL

Reply #27

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 13 May 2016 02:14:37 GMT

Frenchie

I played two lines the other night and hit 2 numbers on each line so it was a bust. I played 4 lines tonight

but the drawing has not been made yet. The numbers should be updated any time now and I will report

back on how they did. I finished the 3rd game engine so I have 3 more to go. I am hoping that I can hit

twice a month playing every game which should earn a nice profit. In another post I made a while back

playing just the S/C option using the DMP-DG program I manage... [ More ]

Reply #26

frenchie — Fri, 13 May 2016 01:55:39 GMT

I'm curious to see how your new software 's gone do ? it look good and better than the previous one according to your video.

Reply #25

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 10 May 2016 17:32:59 GMT

Frenchie

It all depends on how we do with our predictions guesses. If the data we analyze does not give up some

useful information then we must find new data to work on. Most of my new stuff is still lexie based but I had

to break it down into smaller chunks that have greater hit rates. After 25 or 30 years I finally smartened up

a bit and decided to just use data that gives me a decent chance of guessing correctly. I finished the 3rd game

engine today and think I might try playin... [ More ]

Reply #24

frenchie — Tue, 10 May 2016 05:40:05 GMT

RL,

When you say the rogue will reduce to zero lines if one or two values are incorrect

Personally I think it's a good thing, because it means that you have a wrong value (s) somewhere, Rogue, S-C or Steps,

it would be nice if the software could tell you where it is, it would ease the correction, and get you a step closer.

Also you said The stuff shown in the video is really just old stuff used a new way

To me that old stuff like you say, is really good, no matter how old it is,... [ More ]

Reply #23

RJOh — Sun, 08 May 2016 22:57:18 GMT

The stuff shown in the video is really just old stuff used a new way, the other stuff is Top Secret, at least for now.

Hope the top secret stuff work for you, good luck.

Reply #22

RJOh — Sun, 08 May 2016 15:39:41 GMT

Any form of gambling can be frustrating to the average person if it's not entertaining and losing is a part of it. In lottery lots of dollars have to be lost for a winner who only spent a few dollars to end up winning millions of them.

Reply #21

RJOh — Sun, 08 May 2016 15:20:43 GMT

Your are welcome.

Reply #20

bigmon — Sun, 08 May 2016 14:45:12 GMT

Thanks RJOh

Reply #19

flossdog — Sun, 08 May 2016 14:16:21 GMT

'Last days I've made up my mind to quit playing lottery for good. Too many things goes awry and it's been taking too much of my time so it's time to move in some other direction where random is not that random and the odds are more balanced.'

Finally some common sense. Unfortunately most people here don't march to that tune. And that's ok. At some point they will look back and have the same outlook you do. It took me awhile too. It's a losing proposition in the short and long run and I... [ More ]

Reply #18

adamcustom — Sun, 08 May 2016 13:06:01 GMT

Craig

Nice to see that you are on the path to something very promising. I hope it pans out ok for you.

Last days I've made up my mind to quit playing lottery for good. Too many things goes awry and it's been taking too much of my time so it's time to move in some other direction where random is not that random and the odds are more balanced.

Keep up that great work of yours and thanks for all you've decided to share.

Adam

Reply #17

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sun, 08 May 2016 12:05:45 GMT

Frenchie

I just ran last nights power-ball numbers and got 67K lines in the lexie stage but the rogue reduced

them to 10 lines using the same number of settings. Another thing I find interesting is that many times

the rogue will reduce to zero lines if one or two values are incorrect. This does not always happen but

I find it interesting that it goes the other direction so to say reducing to zero lines instead of picking more.

Anyway, still testing and working on finishing the res... [ More ]

Reply #16

frenchie — Sat, 07 May 2016 21:48:41 GMT

RL,

I just finished watching your video, your new software is another Genius product of yours, it look very promising.

I'm very impressed by how little selections you can make and end up getting the JP in just 7 lines, the Rogue program seems to

be very efficient in the play, Congratulation for your new program.

I like the fact that you don't have to fill up all the cells for the Steps and also been able to use the, Steps, S-C and the Rogue all together,

that;s really an amazing n... [ More ]

Reply #15

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 07 May 2016 20:26:02 GMT

Here's a link to a video that shows what I am doing that might make it a little clearer. I only show

2 of the six game engines but they all have very similar user interfaces and data types. In the video

I do a after the fact setup for my daily P-4 and Power-ball games. Other than the number of choices

there is no difference between playing the two games.

RL

CF-251 video download link

https://app.box.com/s/mmeoh4uoepohi5uzojzje2iit8p594nu

Reply #14

RJOh — Tue, 03 May 2016 02:25:46 GMT

An interesting strategy, looks like you have a program already in the works.

Right now I have to run several programs to get the information I'm using but hopefully once I have some success I can combine the best of them into one program.

Reply #13

RJOh — Mon, 02 May 2016 19:53:58 GMT

Inspite of filtering out two of the winning numbers to reduce the pool to 57, the 10 lines I posted on the prediction board matched 2+1 for $5 which would have covered half the price of playing them. I would like to get the price of playing even lower.

Reply #12

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sun, 01 May 2016 02:57:23 GMT

RJ

What I have found is that by combining my different systems only using the parts which were easiest to predict

seems to be working well. Over the years I was able to trap the winning set in maybe 1K lines often enough but

always lost it in the final filtering stages. Using the main cores of several different systems as filters rather than

cores almost seems magical. Today I made a after the fact setup using the old DMP-Pro similar to what I used

in the past then took those lin... [ More ]

Reply #11

RJOh — Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:04:49 GMT

Did the 5 out 20 strategy ever work for you even before the matrix change?

There are several classifications that include all seventy-five numbers which reduces the active numbers to a group of 57 for tonight's drawing. Including the 15 bonus numbers, the odds of winning a jackpot are still five times harder than that of a 6/49 game.

Reply #10

Stack47 — Wed, 27 Apr 2016 04:32:28 GMT

Before the matrix changes, I always thought using recently drawn numbers was an interesting strategy, but only if the field can be reduced to 5 out 20 . And with limited drawing results, it might be a better way to go.

How many numbers are in each classification

Reply #9

RJOh — Tue, 26 Apr 2016 15:53:33 GMT

The numbers aren't secret, a few years ago I posted a thread explaining them. I stop posting to it when several members said it was becoming lengthy and boring. I tried locating it so I could post a link to it but couldn't.

Seems others have tried somthing similar without any success with jackpot games. Since jackpot games are my favorates I'll continue working on it privately and maybe mention it again when I have somethig worth mentioning.

Reply #8

dr san — Mon, 25 Apr 2016 20:38:48 GMT

Standards in the Cartesian plane of the numbers themselves and separate initial and final digit

Reply #7

bobby623 — Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:47:35 GMT

I've been using alpha-numeric substitution for many years, plus some important add-ons.

It's probably one of the best methods for TREND analysis, which we need to make good educated guesses.

I assume you are making the substitutions by Decades.

In a 75-integer game, there are 8 Decades - A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H.

A, of course, has 9 integers, H has 6 integers.

You may be including more integers per Decade, but, I've never been able to understand the

rationale for the modification... [ More ]

Reply #6

manual — Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:54:41 GMT

My last attempt at at Powerball (I tend to stick to Cash 3 but occasionally I branch out). I started trying to apply the same metrics I use on Cash 3. It didn't take long to realize that since there's one pool of many balls instead of three small pools of balls, I'd need to take a different approach. What lane the balls come in is false. The balls are all drawn out of order and then put in order on the website. So basing anything on the order seemed fruitless.

From there, I started working on... [ More ]

Reply #5

rcbbuckeye — Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:40:57 GMT

Probably dividing 75 numbers into 5 groups of 15 numbers.

Years ago, when the matrix was 56 numbers, I had a chart that listed how many times each number was drawn in each position. I could also use that to determine what groups such as 1-9, 10-19, 20-29, etc played in each position the most. Unfortunately, my computer got a virus, and I ended up losing my info. In the end, that info didn't really help me win anything significant.

Reply #4

Raven62 — Mon, 25 Apr 2016 02:00:31 GMT

The Secret Numbers...

Reply #3

LOTTOKING2016 — Mon, 25 Apr 2016 00:24:19 GMT

But which numbers

Reply #2

RJOh — Sun, 24 Apr 2016 23:37:43 GMT

I replace the numbers with letters.

Reply #1

LOTTOKING2016 — Sun, 24 Apr 2016 23:30:52 GMT

What do u mean by ABCDE

Working on algorithm

RJOh — Sun, 24 Apr 2016 23:28:02 GMT

Working on an algorithm for predicting combinations for jackpot games. Besides avoiding combinations that have already won, does anyone have any suggestions?

I've come up with a way to classify previous drawing using letters such that 04/19/2016 MM results were ABCDE/ACDEF. Checking all the MM drawings since its last matrix change, I found that 13% of the MM drawings were ABCDE/ and ABCDF/. So far there are 133 classifications with those two repeating 31 times.

Using what I've come up with... [ More ]