Goseahawks PB and Mega jackpot matrix for TUES 3rd /WEND 4th only!!

Reply #43

lakerben — Fri, 06 May 2016 17:44:46 GMT

Reply #42

kreative1 — Fri, 06 May 2016 17:21:39 GMT

Thanks lakerben but it's too late to play it so I'm not sure if I want it to come out or not! lol

I thought jayhawks comments were excellent

Reply #41

lakerben — Fri, 06 May 2016 17:09:58 GMT

Well said!

I like for PA

876

Some people enjoy working to win and others enjoy being a critic.

Reply #40

kreative1 — Fri, 06 May 2016 17:02:42 GMT

You might want to read what this forum is about

Discuss systems for predicting lottery numbers.

It says predicting numbers,some systems are based on facts and some aren't, it also doesn't say fact only systems.

It does not say post a system with proof that it wins all the time because wisconsin3054 feels that until he came along everyone else apparently does not know how to test methods out and we should all be grateful for his facts.

Really? and then you wonder why... [ More ]

Reply #39

flossdog — Fri, 06 May 2016 16:22:13 GMT

Hey ..even I, the great Floss does not agree with the cheesehead. I just chose to disagree with some on certain points. People are here having fun with their little systems that they make up for what they are and if it wins for you knock yourself out

Reply #38

lakerben — Fri, 06 May 2016 16:10:51 GMT

Reply #37

Wisconsin3054 — Fri, 06 May 2016 15:49:47 GMT

How about this? If you see some post of mine that you don't find believable, point it out and refute it. I've not no issue with that.

Back to the topic of this thread, if you feel so strongly that what I've said about this matrix is unbelievable, or incorrect, this is a discussion forum so go ahead and refute what I have to say. Go ahead and point out where it is wrong.

Reply #36

Wisconsin3054 — Fri, 06 May 2016 15:46:30 GMT

Where did I target Lakerben's system or systems? When did I say his method is no better than random?

As far as I can see, I have commented in one of Lakerben's threads. There, I asked questions about the system and tried to figure out what predictions it was making. Yes, I made an effort to see if it was going to work better than random. However, he said I wasn't getting the predictions right from his system or something along those lines so I don't think I was ever able to come to a conclusi... [ More ]

Reply #35

lakerben — Fri, 06 May 2016 15:11:39 GMT

It's right on the mark. Paragraphs of bs do nothing to help the members. Take some time to about it and maybe you will agree.

Reply #34

Jayhawk58 — Fri, 06 May 2016 15:11:13 GMT

He is stating his opinion as you did in far less words.

And you have stated doubt in any person's success. If I have that success, I would not be totally honest about it. I would share if it works. You want to know how much? Test it.

People must have success or they would not be doing what they do still. Again that level of success depends on what they want to achieve.

Quite frankly, most of what you posted wasn't believable. You should go back and read your post's.

Reply #33

Jayhawk58 — Fri, 06 May 2016 15:06:26 GMT

I think we have probably moved past the area of systems to discussion .

I will take a few things of what you say and address it. You say you have an open mind..........

I will take a few of the person's you have targeted. Lakerben has produced methods that have had success. Some more than others. Yet you say his method is no better than random. Really?

Remember the definition of random? 1A: Lacking definite plan, purpose or pattern.

2A. relating to, having, or being elements or event... [ More ]

Reply #32

Wisconsin3054 — Fri, 06 May 2016 14:58:59 GMT

jayhawk-

Is this the type of helpful and insightful post you prefer

Reply #31

lakerben — Fri, 06 May 2016 14:39:57 GMT

Reply #30

Wisconsin3054 — Fri, 06 May 2016 14:36:25 GMT

I don't think I've said that nobody has success with what they do. I try to look at the specifics and not just generalities.

I think you are wrong when you say some systems may work for some people and not for others. The numbers are the same numbers for everyone. The system either produces or doesn't. Shouldn't matter who it is playing. And in my view, producing means results better than what randomly generated numbers would give.

Its not me who pushes the big idea that the lottery... [ More ]

Reply #29

Jayhawk58 — Fri, 06 May 2016 13:13:42 GMT

People see things differently. I personally don't use a matrix. I find it produces as many numbers as others. Doesn't mean it doesn't work for some. Find a pattern, see groups, whatever.

In actuality, you are wrong. You are wrong in that people don't find success in what they are doing. They do. The determination of how much success is up to them. If they hit this or that, it's a hit. If they miss, it's a miss. My goal is to hit the pick 3 consistently at a 70-75 % rate. Maybe I play every da... [ More ]

Reply #28

Wisconsin3054 — Fri, 06 May 2016 12:32:38 GMT

Thank you for the feedback Jayhawk. As I've noted before, I find it interesting that this is a place to discuss lottery systems, yet if I or others simply point out the facts that someone accidentally or intentionally missed, I am jumped on and told to stop posting and go away.

Since you went back over all my posts, you probably saw that I stay on topic, and I dont call people names and tend to stay away from personal attacks. Also, that i dont tell people to stop posting and go away. Sure c... [ More ]

Reply #27

Jayhawk58 — Fri, 06 May 2016 03:30:48 GMT

I would have to say at least she offered another idea that may or may not tie in with the thread topic.

I'm going to make some statements and risk being disciplined by the site administrator.

From the Lottery Post About Us section:

What is Lottery Post? Our objectives have never changed: We aim to be a friendly, safe, all-encompassing web site where players discuss the lottery, share insights, and gain access to the Web's best lottery data, analysis, and tools.

Since you believ... [ More ]

Reply #26

Wisconsin3054 — Thu, 05 May 2016 17:39:04 GMT

Its sure not better, its just the only way its allowed to be said, apparently. What does Adobea's posts have to do with the topic of the thread, goseahawks' matrix

Reply #25

lakerben — Thu, 05 May 2016 17:04:54 GMT

Reply #24

Jayhawk58 — Thu, 05 May 2016 17:01:43 GMT

Well, that's better than your last post.

Yes, I saw it before it was deleted.

Ever anything positive

Reply #23

Wisconsin3054 — Thu, 05 May 2016 15:58:50 GMT

This is an interesting way to use Goseahawks' matrix. You're take on it is original.

Reply #22

adobea78 — Wed, 04 May 2016 23:36:08 GMT

Tue, May 3, 2016 28-29-33-36-45, Mega Ball: 15, Megaplier: 5Prize Payouts

Fri, Apr 29, 2016 05-06-37-55-74, Mega Ball: 10, Megaplier: 5Prize Payouts

Tue, Apr 26, 2016 14-16-17-28-48, Mega Ball: 02, Megaplier: 2Prize Payouts

Fri, Apr 22, 2016 02-19-21-42-60, Mega Ball: 13, Megaplier: 5Prize Payouts

Tue, Apr 19, 2016 09-28-40-57-65, Mega Ball: 02, Megaplier: 5Prize Payouts

Fri, Apr 15, 2016 09-10-34-37-73, Mega Ball: 09, Megaplier: 5Prize Payouts

Tue, Apr 12, 2016 07

Reply #21

nurse101 — Wed, 04 May 2016 23:11:55 GMT

hi adobea78

I just sent you a message in your inbox can you let me know if you got it. thanks so much

nurse101

Reply #20

nurse101 — Wed, 04 May 2016 22:37:24 GMT

Hi Adobea78

Thank you for for offering your assistance, if you give me few minutes i will pm you now with the last 20 draws of the uk lotto. appreciate your assistance.

nurse101

Reply #19

adobea78 — Wed, 04 May 2016 22:15:57 GMT

Standard deviation is the summary of spread in statistics, 2SD is usually the spread mostly used.

Let me explain to you how to find your spread(base numbers) to wage:

If you have a game with matrix 5/59, it means 5 numbers out of a pool of 59, so in general, a matrix can be x/N, where x= x1, x2,x3.....xn. For 5/59, my N=59,the deviations for my spread is the sequential differences between x1-x2, x2-x3,x3-x4,x4-x5. Applying 2SD you can locate your Spread for each of the four deviations(you

Reply #18

nurse101 — Tue, 03 May 2016 22:19:44 GMT

Hi Gooseahawks

again thanks for the matrix, it does work i managed to get 3 nos on today's euro millions using the matrix no 24 34 and one star no 03 thereby giving me a small win of 5.20. but i did notice that looking back that all the nos that came out were there in front of my eyes. thanks again cos i see it has potential. Would that matrix be good for the next euro million draw or does it change again? thanks again.

nurse101

Reply #17

nurse101 — Mon, 02 May 2016 15:49:15 GMT

thanks i will keep that in mind.

Reply #16

Wisconsin3054 — Mon, 02 May 2016 15:47:13 GMT

Just remember, if you filter, you may filter out the winning numbers...

Reply #15

nurse101 — Mon, 02 May 2016 15:44:16 GMT

thanks wisconsin3054

appreciate the time you took to break it down for me. i will study this and try apply it to the uk lotto.will need to do some sort of filtering as there is alot of numbers that could come next draw.

thanks again

nurse101

Reply #14

Wisconsin3054 — Mon, 02 May 2016 15:34:59 GMT

its pretty simple nurse, you start with the matrix:

630185

741296

852307

Now, trying to get some numbers for the May 3 draw. start with the end number of the last draw, which for Euro Millions was 3, cause I don't think you count the lucky star numbers.

Now, find the 3s in the matrix above, your numbers will probably come from numbers touching the 3s, or a specialty number.

1st number could be 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,... [ More ]

Reply #13

nurse101 — Mon, 02 May 2016 15:13:00 GMT

thank and i and hopefully others like lakerben do appreciate your hard work and all your doing here, i have seen some very good systems that you and lakerben amongst others have produced. please do ignore the negative comments made by some people. Because those of us that benefit from your work will end up loosing out if you listen to the negativity some people come up with. continue the good work, well appreciated thank you.

nurse101

Reply #12

Goseahawks — Mon, 02 May 2016 15:08:00 GMT

That's what I and a lot of other good people do here, to help out..Not to bash others work . Sorry again and good luck to you

Reply #11

Goseahawks — Mon, 02 May 2016 15:04:09 GMT

Thks Lakerben, I thought i was the only one noticing that..

Reply #10

nurse101 — Mon, 02 May 2016 15:02:41 GMT

ok no problem, thanks for sharing the matrix Anway. i will just have to try figure it out myself. please do keep posting nice to see people here helping others.

nurse101

Reply #9

Goseahawks — Mon, 02 May 2016 15:00:02 GMT

NO, I WILL NOT, as its my personal matrix..I only share it for a limited time only to help out the team to get a shot at winning .SORRY

Reply #8

lakerben — Mon, 02 May 2016 14:59:18 GMT

Great job goosehawk.

Ignore the detractors they ruin every thread they post in. This is a site to help the members not constantly give their negative input.

Reply #7

Wisconsin3054 — Mon, 02 May 2016 14:57:55 GMT

You actually only explained how you look back and see the numbers on the matrix, you haven't explained how you look forward to the next draw

Reply #6

Goseahawks — Mon, 02 May 2016 14:53:57 GMT

Already posted ,it will come from the matrix posted for 3/4th games....don't want to argue over this, lets keep it kool..THX

Reply #5

nurse101 — Mon, 02 May 2016 14:49:45 GMT

hi goosehawks

thanks for the reply. I seem to be missing something here, but i can't workout how you got the matrix of numbers you used. forgive me for being a little slow to pick this up. Are the numbers of the matrix you used from the last draws?

sorry but could you give me a step by step guide using 27th April draw 12 24 29 34 39 57 bonus 28

and the draw that came out after on the 30th April was 01 02 05 38 53 56 bonus 31

thank you for your assistance

nurse101... [ More ]

Reply #4

Wisconsin3054 — Mon, 02 May 2016 14:44:21 GMT

Now, let's try to use this system to predict the Tue, May 3, 2016 draw? Can you explain how we do that Goseahawks

Reply #3

Goseahawks — Mon, 02 May 2016 14:37:29 GMT

it should depending on the end number

EURO MILLION GAME

EXAMPLE OF PAST RESULT

Fri, Apr 29, 2016 04-05-25-28-43, Lucky Stars: 06-11

Tue, Apr 26, 2016 10-17-31-32-42, Lucky Stars: 02-05...2 IS YOUR END NUMBER

418963

529074.............................Matrix Results 4,5,25,28 _ 6, (11) Speciality Number.....missed 43..All touching

630185

Reply #2

Wisconsin3054 — Mon, 02 May 2016 14:26:56 GMT

Of course it will work. It will work on anything. Nearly every potential number touches another number in some way, otherwise it is one of the special go-to numbers.

After every draw in any numbers lottery game, you will be able to look back and see where those numbers were. Its a small detail, but if you would like to pick the winning numbers before the draw, this one won't do a whole lot for you.

Reply #1

nurse101 — Mon, 02 May 2016 12:43:04 GMT

hi goosehawks

thanks for putting the system up, i was wondering if this would work with uk lotto.

thank you

Goseahawks PB and Mega jackpot matrix for TUES 3rd /WEND 4th only!!

Goseahawks — Sun, 01 May 2016 18:39:50 GMT

348 million Power ball numbers up for grabs / also 128 mil Mega mill numbers... both game draws will share this same Matrix. All u gotta do, is look within the matrix. The first number of both games will be touching the 4 or the 9. Note!! all numbers will connect in some way or another to make the combo within this matrix. Most, or all the numbers will show, along with or combining the pool of Speciality numbers.

630185

741296

852307

Speciality numbers that's shows frequently in mos... [ More ]