Kidzero's 6-3 System for Pick 4

Reply #52

gunjack — Thu, 19 May 2016 18:00:24 GMT

is this correct?

ohio midday pick 4 7220

7220

6119

813

904

095

631 123

540

469

Reply #51

izzybelle96 — Thu, 19 May 2016 17:14:19 GMT

5/18 eve = 5247

3872

424 (345)

535

646

250

169

078

Off by one number again! But I know I'll still get those hits this week

Reply #50

kreative1 — Wed, 18 May 2016 20:45:28 GMT

theo redid it, this is the new link

Reply #49

bigmon — Wed, 18 May 2016 20:29:15 GMT

Can someone please forward the pick4 link to me? When I clicked on the link I get this mgs from drop box That file isn't here anymore could some one please help me out? Thanks in advance.

Reply #48

izzybelle96 — Wed, 18 May 2016 20:23:17 GMT

It's not too late at all. Most of the hits come towards the end of the week. I use Sunday and Monday to figure out what method works best. Whatever method produces the hit, or close to the hit, on Tuesday eve I use that method for the rest of the week. Sunday and Monday are usually pseudo hits, as in I fix the order of the numbers to match the hit. Then on Tuesday, I use both methods to see which one works. Then from Wed-Sat I use the method that works to produce hits.

Reply #47

gunjack — Wed, 18 May 2016 19:10:39 GMT

i guess its to late now huh? since its the middle of the week? you did say, you can see whats coming sunday or monday. got to get a better understanding of your system. I'm certainly gon try it.

Reply #46

izzybelle96 — Wed, 18 May 2016 18:15:00 GMT

Using method #1, these will be the numbers I will play for tonight 5/18 eve

3872

424 (345)

535

646

250

169

078

*Remember that hits are not necessarily back to back so while a hit may or may not come tonight, they're bound to come between now and Saturday. I'll be posting everyday

Reply #45

theo1946 — Wed, 18 May 2016 18:13:11 GMT

Thank you and you are welcome.

Reply #44

izzybelle96 — Wed, 18 May 2016 18:07:09 GMT

Alright y'all! Method #1 is the winner for this week.

May 17th eve = 6089

5205 - ? (METHOD #1)

667 (678)

778

889

493

302

211

Yes this is off by one digit, but it has the other 3 which is an indication that the method was close and it was just one of those days when there isn't a hit. Still have 4 days left to get those 3-4 hits. This method produced a hit on Sunday, so there's 3 more hits to go.

Reply #43

izzybelle96 — Wed, 18 May 2016 17:57:52 GMT

You can try it out for your state in different variations and see what works for you. I cannot guarantee the hits. The order of the methods change weekly and they're not necessarily back to back, but every week there are at least 3 or 4 hits using one of the methods from my backtesting of January to May. Good luck

Reply #42

izzybelle96 — Wed, 18 May 2016 17:53:45 GMT

You're great Theo! That's literally all the different methods so everyone can see what works better for them. Thanks

Reply #41

theo1946 — Wed, 18 May 2016 17:36:50 GMT

OK folks. Let's try this one.

izzybelle, please proof read this.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/jc8ygl6g4sfe24l/izzybelle96.xlsx?dl=0

Reply #40

gunjack — Wed, 18 May 2016 16:33:24 GMT

does this work only in the peach state or can it work in other states? thats unheard of winning in the pick 4, 3 or 4 times in one week. maybe this can work in ohio pick 4 as well huh? ya play 18 numbers a draw. i play 6 a draw. just gotta understand it better. can you gurantee it? holla

Reply #39

amber123 — Wed, 18 May 2016 15:33:02 GMT

Don't apologize, you are the Man

Reply #38

theo1946 — Wed, 18 May 2016 14:27:31 GMT

I'll go check and hope I can find the screw up. Sorry folks.

Reply #37

amber123 — Tue, 17 May 2016 21:02:21 GMT

Maybe this is the reason I wasn't getting favorable results when back testing. I'm sure he'll fix it.

Reply #36

lakerben — Tue, 17 May 2016 20:49:42 GMT

Consecutive experience. Add the fist two digits and it shows 11. The consecutive digit 56...7 is there. Add this calculation.

5660

117

5777

Rundown

5777

6888

7999

8000

9111

0222

1333

2444

3555

4666

Trial for 8 draws.

Reply #35

izzybelle96 — Tue, 17 May 2016 20:45:44 GMT

If the -1111 method is being used first, which it looks like it is, then the numbers in the fourth position should be 890. It seems the spreadsheet is pulling from the first method without subtracting -1111

Reply #34

izzybelle96 — Tue, 17 May 2016 20:43:26 GMT

Something is wrong. If it is the -1111 method then the last digits are supposed to be 456

Reply #33

amber123 — Tue, 17 May 2016 20:20:30 GMT

Either I'm missing something or something is very wrong. The 3 numbers in the fourth position are 4,5,6, yet in the results box in green, they all end with 6,7,8.

Monday

1254 1 2 5 4

0 1 4 3

1 4 8 4 1486 1487 1488

2 3 9 5 2396 2397 2398

3 2 0 6 3206 3207 3208

9 8 1 9816 9817 9818

8 9 2 8926 8927 8928

7 0 3 7036 7037 7038

Reply #32

amber123 — Tue, 17 May 2016 20:14:02 GMT

Theo, I have a question. Is it supposed to be 9,0,1 or 8,9,0 in the fourth positions?

Monday

0518 0 5 1 8

9 4 0 7

0 7 4 8 0749 0740 0741

1 6 5 9 1659 1650 1651

2 5 6 0 2569 2560 2561

8 1 7 8179 8170 8171

7 2 8 7289 7280 7281

6 3 9 6399 6390 6391

Reply #31

amber123 — Tue, 17 May 2016 20:01:22 GMT

Thank you Theo..

Well I did two random weeks in may. The first week had no hits, and the second week had two boxed wins, but they were both in midday drawings, so I'd have to play both mid and eve.

Maybe this formula is more suited for GA.

There was one combo that was very close to a straight hit. The last number was only two numbers away from a str8.

Reply #30

izzybelle96 — Tue, 17 May 2016 19:32:31 GMT

This looks great! Thanks

Reply #29

theo1946 — Tue, 17 May 2016 19:22:49 GMT

https://www.dropbox.com/s/4nk2ci96w403z49/izzybelle96.xlsx?dl=0

izzybelle,

please check to make sur it is correct.

Reply #28

Harve$t Moon — Tue, 17 May 2016 18:57:49 GMT

I would love a copy of the excel for Pick 4, Theo1946. Thanks

Reply #27

bigmon — Tue, 17 May 2016 18:57:14 GMT

Theo I would like a copy of your excel sheet. Thanks.

Reply #26

izzybelle96 — Tue, 17 May 2016 18:56:02 GMT

Since my midday was 5205 I took that number and broke it down using both methods above. If you notice, they are both practically the same except for counting down on the second or third digit and the -1111 method. Whichever method works for tonight's draw will be the method I stick to for the week. And an Excel file would be lovely to share

May 17th eve

5205 - ? (METHOD #2)

4194

543 (567)

634

725

386

297

108

5205 - ? (METHOD #1)

667 (678)

778

889

4... [ More ]

Reply #25

theo1946 — Tue, 17 May 2016 18:15:12 GMT

izzybelle96,

Since your midday was 5205, how do you determine which system to use?

Also I did an excel sheet if you are interested.

Thanks,

Ted

Reply #24

izzybelle96 — Tue, 17 May 2016 17:16:54 GMT

*As I've said I use Sunday and Monday draws to figure out a method. There are two different ones, whichever method works for tonight's draw is the method I will stick to for the rest of the week. Remember, there are at least 3 hits per week so no need to worry about missing out for Sunday and Monday because the hits usually come towards the middle or end of the week.

Methods for Week of May 15th:

(5/15) 8634 From 8, count up 3. Then from 8, count down 3 From 6, bottom up, count down From... [ More ]

Reply #23

amber123 — Tue, 17 May 2016 15:58:51 GMT

Okay, whether it's the same or not, or a variation, I decided to go with the rules whatever they are and apply it to the p-3. I know this is p-4 version, so I'll only do this one example from Florida. I don't want others to accuse me of hijacking.

I took a random eve draw to do my first test. It was unsuccessful, but my second random test was incredible. I'll have to do more back testing.

734--minus each number by 1.

623---new workout number.

Then follow the instructions on... [ More ]

Reply #22

amber123 — Tue, 17 May 2016 03:25:49 GMT

ha ha, love it, so much great information...Now this to me is pure BLISS

Reply #21

izzybelle96 — Tue, 17 May 2016 01:56:13 GMT

It's also a great way to find triads. On the days that it doesn't produce a hit it's usually because one number doesn't fit with the rest

Reply #20

izzybelle96 — Tue, 17 May 2016 01:51:11 GMT

I'm not sure how to put this. The basic method stays the same, but the order of the numbers change. If you look at my examples from Week 1 and Week 2 then you'll see that I used the same method of counting up and down by 3, but in Week 1 I started by subtracting 1111 from the hit. That's why I start from Sunday and Monday to see which way to count the numbers that'll produce a hit. Once I test it, I stick with that one method throughout the week.

You can definitely choose one method and use i... [ More ]

Reply #19

izzybelle96 — Tue, 17 May 2016 01:45:53 GMT

Yes KidZero! Great system you produced and it's awesome to play around with

Reply #18

destinycreation — Tue, 17 May 2016 01:37:41 GMT

What about this system changes from week to week ??? Do you mean the system itself changes [if so, how ?], or do you mean that the numbers change - which is to be expected

Reply #17

KidZero — Tue, 17 May 2016 01:22:29 GMT

Glad to see my brain child of a system evolving...... if only you knew how hard it is to sleep with numbers running through your head gotta let them out some kinda way lol

Reply #16

amber123 — Tue, 17 May 2016 00:56:56 GMT

I'm not meaningfully skipping the numbers. That's just a coincidence.

I'm aware of this, I knew there had to be a reason, and I was trying to find why you are skipping in the second position.

As far as Excel goes, no worries, we have brilliant minds on this great site. Let's all let Todd, the owner of this site know how much we appreciate his efforts.

Reply #15

izzybelle96 — Tue, 17 May 2016 00:43:56 GMT

I'm not meaningfully skipping the numbers. That's just a coincidence. When I wrote it out, the way it worked best for me was to think of it just as 7,6,5,4,3,2. Didn't even notice the numbers skipped in the first three lines.

I'm not sure how well this would work in excel because it changes from week to week

Reply #14

amber123 — Tue, 17 May 2016 00:39:37 GMT

That's not where I'm confused. I get putting the lower numbers on top.

What I don't get is how you are going up from 8 after skipping 3. So are you saying your way works better by skipping by 3 in the middle, just like the third position? Because in the OP's method, he ONLY skips by 3 in the third position.

That's why I ask this. I'm aware that this is a modified version, but earlier you mentioned something about how it it still resembles some of his protocols, so that's why I was asking.... [ More ]

Reply #13

izzybelle96 — Tue, 17 May 2016 00:35:38 GMT

These examples are just backtesting. The method for this week is slightly different as well and that will be posted tomorrow.

Reply #12

izzybelle96 — Tue, 17 May 2016 00:30:02 GMT

I see why you're confused.

Count down from 8 in the second column but place the numbers bottom up

When I say count down, I mean 7,6,5, etc. But instead of having those numbers directly below 8, start from the bottom

7892

820 (345) -- 8203 8204 8205

931 (345) -- 9313 9314 9315

042 (345) -- 0423 0424 0425

658 (345) -- 6583 6584 6585

567 (345) -- 5673 5674 5675

476 (345) -- 4763 4764 4765

This is not KidZero's method but a modified version of his method. And it chan... [ More ]

Reply #11

amber123 — Tue, 17 May 2016 00:28:56 GMT

Maybe your skipping 3 and that's how you got 2,3,4. Unless you're saying that you have tweaked it this way, the OP's version only skips by 3 in the third position.

I have another question. In the second position, it may be that you are using 234 because you're skipping 3.

Counting up from 8 and skipping 3 first would look like this, which is what you posted. And of course put it bottom up.

2

3

4

Reply #10

amber123 — Tue, 17 May 2016 00:06:08 GMT

I may have to wait till someone else gets this, cause I'm confused. The second one below I get. 890 and 654.

But the one below that I don't get. You write, in yellow.. First, why do you have 234?, shouldn't it be 901? You got the 567 right, but how did you get 234, when the rule is to also count up? Counting up from 8 is 9, 0, 1.

Count down from 8 in the second column but place the numbers bottom up

Count up 3 from 7, then count down 3 from 7. That's how I'm getting the numbers in th... [ More ]

Reply #9

izzybelle96 — Mon, 16 May 2016 23:51:05 GMT

I use the first 3 numbers as a triad, then the numbers in the parentheses as the fourth digit

Reply #8

izzybelle96 — Mon, 16 May 2016 23:42:48 GMT

Oh no, you're fine. What's the use of a method if people can't understand it lol.

I got 820 as a triad from 7892. Which I got from subtract 1111 from 8903.

Once I got 7892 I used KidZero's method but in a different order.

Count up 3 from 7, then count down 3 from 7. That's how I'm getting the numbers in the first column. Count down from 8 in the second column but place the numbers bottom up Count up 3 from 9, then count down 3 from 9 for the numbers in the third column

I'm using 3... [ More ]

Reply #7

amber123 — Mon, 16 May 2016 23:35:54 GMT

No no no, I got that part already, I'm asking how you got 820, also, why are you using 345 as the last number in every one of the combinations on the list?

You never wrote why you are using 820, or why you are using 3,4, and 5 as the last digit.

I'm not trying to be difficult, but this is too good not to understand the method.

Reply #6

izzybelle96 — Mon, 16 May 2016 23:32:32 GMT

I subtracted the WHOLE number.

8903

-1111

7892

Sorry if that was unclear lol

Reply #5

amber123 — Mon, 16 May 2016 23:30:20 GMT

Sorry, but I must be brain dead tonight..lol

I asked how did you come up with 820, and your answer was that I subtracted 1 from 8930, wouldn't that be 8929? What am I NOT getting here?

Thanks.

Reply #4

izzybelle96 — Mon, 16 May 2016 23:18:00 GMT

I subtracted 1 from 8930 and then followed the method listed.

From 8930 to 7892.

Then went up 3 on 7 and down 3 on 7. (Just noticed another error there)

8203 8204 and 8205 are the 820 triad matched with one of the three digits in the parenthesis from the last digit of 7892. 2 (3,4,5

Reply #3

amber123 — Mon, 16 May 2016 23:12:19 GMT

Thanks for taking the time to do this, but I'm confused. I get it up to this point below where it says week of may 1st sun-sat, but how are you getting the 820 and the rest of the numbers below it.. thanks

Week of May 1st (Sun-Sat)

This week's method: we're subtracting 1 from the hit, then using the 6-3 method From 7, count up 3 (8,9,0) then from 8, count down 3 (6,5,4) From 8, count down 3 from the bottom up and continue until you get to the top (7,6,5, etc.) From 9, count up 3... [ More ]

Reply #2

amber123 — Mon, 16 May 2016 23:08:13 GMT

I'm assuming you meant 7,6,5...not 6,5,4.?

From 7, count up 3 (8,9,0) then from 8, count down 3 (6,5,4

Reply #1

izzybelle96 — Mon, 16 May 2016 23:03:43 GMT

Again, the order of the numbers change from week to week, but the method is the same. Sunday and Monday are usually the days to figure which order works. Now of course there will be individuals that say it's easy to mold a system once it has already hit and I will agree with them in one instance that I use Sunday and Monday hits to figure out how to order the numbers. But once I figure it out on Monday, I use the same method throughout the week without any changes to produce hits or not. But so... [ More ]

Kidzero's 6-3 System for Pick 4

izzybelle96 — Mon, 16 May 2016 22:44:04 GMT

Found a way to use this for Pick 4 to find numbers from mid to eve. Backtested it from the beginning of the month and from January and there are at least 3-4 hits per week. Not necessarily back to back but the hits are still there within the week. Plus since it's only 18 numbers it won't break the bank.

9$ x 7 days/week = $63 spent.

3 hits= $300 gain

$300-63 = $237 profit

And that's with the minimum 3 hits and not counting if the hit is a double which will be an extra $100 gain.

T... [ More ]