Pick 4 idea

Reply #80

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:05:26 GMT

Bob

I remember watching Retton in the 84 games, I agree and the funny thing is that Mary lou and Biles are the same

height, 4'9 . Think I will play 4949 today.

RL

Reply #79

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 11 Aug 2016 12:44:21 GMT

95% of the time you can count on 1 or more digits from yesterday's games,

This is a bit misleading because only 36% of the games will have one digit repeat. If

we combine them we muddy the water unless we plan to cover 1, 2, 3, possible repeat

digits. My game shows 79% of games will have at least one or more digits repeat but

for the method to be effective we somehow need to choose the best possible choice for

the next game. Trying to cover them all might sound good but e... [ More ]

Reply #78

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 11 Aug 2016 11:44:08 GMT

I made a mistake also as I posted the data for positional repeats not overall. Here is a pic of the actual hits

for non-positional repeats.

RL

Reply #77

Tialuvslotto — Thu, 11 Aug 2016 10:46:45 GMT

Your game must have been on a hot streak when you did your estimation.

Statistics for repeats from last game are:

0 20%

1 38%

2 28%

3 12%

4 2%

So, 80% of the time you will get 1 or more digits from the last game.

For Yesterday's games (i.e Mid, Eve of the day before the current draw):

0 5%

1 16%

2 35%

3 30%

4 14%

95% of the time you can count on 1 or more digits from yesterday's games, 65% of the time a pair or a triad will come from the last 2 games an... [ More ]

Reply #76

Soledad — Thu, 11 Aug 2016 10:21:46 GMT

No its not based on fact, just sort of an expression or estimate on my part. I looked back to July 1st from yesterday, and counted all the times 2 digit repeats occurred from mid-to-eve, as well as eve-to-mid. Out of the 82 total draws, 2 digit repeats occurred 24 times. So yes that is exactly 30% as you remembered it to be. But that is just from now back to July 1st. I know what you're doing takes real hard evidence.

I remembered finding an old post from Win D where he said to make pairs fr... [ More ]

Reply #75

CARBOB — Thu, 11 Aug 2016 08:51:13 GMT

I am a big fan of gymnastics. Have been following Bile's for a while, never seen a gymnast with so much energy. She reminds me of Mary Lou Retton.

Reply #74

adulane62 — Thu, 11 Aug 2016 05:58:05 GMT

Hi RL! We are willing to wait, take your time! Just test it and re-test it, so it will be the awesome-st and ultimate software ever! Thanks a lot

Reply #73

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 11 Aug 2016 03:04:57 GMT

The decision to release or not release is based on rather or not I could find the time. Most don't understand the

time it would require as I would first have to build maybe hundreds of databases. Next it would require writing a

50 to 60 page manual. Then posting it would mean that I have to answer maybe 1000s of questions. I would be

overwhelmed with request to add this or that. Fight off the trolls, help with install or incompatibility issues, asked

to build linix and apple versions... [ More ]

Reply #72

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 11 Aug 2016 02:22:29 GMT

Is the 90% factual or just an estimate. Some of the stats released for these games I find hard to believe

and two digits repeating is not enough to win on a regular basis unless you know the exact two digits that

are going to hit and if playing straight we also need to know the exact positions.

Again lets say that we think the next draw will be a 12-way and we somehow know the 3 digits that will show.

Wheeling 3 digits in a p-4 will produce 81 lines from which we still ne... [ More ]

Reply #71

MoneyMike$ — Thu, 11 Aug 2016 01:01:48 GMT

That's the truth.. I used to only play evening draws before I came up with a strategy

Reply #70

Soledad — Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:49:25 GMT

My secret for Win4 is that 90% of the time, you will see 2 of the digits that appear in the midday drawing appear also in the evening drawing. That's why some people say it's easier to play evening. NY midday 7677, NY evening 7075. It's true. That's definitely a trick to Win4 here in New York.

Reply #69

helpmewin — Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:40:04 GMT

My Favorite Game Is Keno.

Reply #68

LottoBux — Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:37:49 GMT

My Favorite Game Is Keno.

Up Here It's A 10/20/70 Game.

This Would Definitely Be On My Wish List For Xmas If You Do Decide To Release It.

It Surely Looks Like An Awesome Program.

Reply #67

watch out — Wed, 10 Aug 2016 23:35:14 GMT

Here is a pick of speed-wheel I like to start for JP games. The numbers in the list are generated at random and the database is current so I will check to see if all 5 numbers are in the list after the drawing tonight. I say it's a 50/50 chance based on past attempts.

WOW just WOW

Reply #66

notmyday — Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:17:01 GMT

what you have done since your video looks amazing. great job.

Reply #65

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:13:00 GMT

Pic of Keno option, not had a chance to test it against live play yet but it's ready when I find the time.

RL

Reply #64

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:08:00 GMT

P.S.

There are many good systems out there and most have a few settings that are fairly easy to hit game to game but

to reduce to a average play budget one has to take greater risk which is where most fail. It's not really the system

that fails it's that the odds are just too great for any one method. What I did was put together a number of my old

systems that each have a different game core. Lets say I feel good about my settings in the first game engine but

the run produces 100K... [ More ]

Reply #63

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 10 Aug 2016 19:20:50 GMT

I write my own, my newest is called CF-251. It's a multi game-engine cross-platform filtering system.

It capable of playing any lotto game including Keno. It has 4 wheeling systems and 4 game engines

and the results from one can be passed to the next. I have not decided If I will ever release it to the

general public but if I do it will be freeware. CF-251 also includes over 30 analysis tools, calculators

etc.. that can take the user into the deepest realms of lottery analysis. Every... [ More ]

Reply #62

lottologix — Wed, 10 Aug 2016 19:03:05 GMT

What software are you using

Reply #61

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 10 Aug 2016 18:12:43 GMT

I think Phelps is amazing and maybe part dolphin. I also watched the final-5 do their thing, the wife is a big

fan of gymnastics and watches every performance. Those little gals are cute as buttons and tough as nails.

RL

Reply #60

dr san — Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:20:01 GMT

Congratulations. phelps the largest 21 gold medals in 2016 RIO Lottobux, now the volleyball selection of very good canada

Reply #59

LottoBux — Wed, 10 Aug 2016 05:10:45 GMT

Gold Medal # 20 For Phelps

Congrats...

Reply #58

adobea78 — Tue, 09 Aug 2016 22:50:22 GMT

Sure I can consider the ratio 1/1296 (order with a digit repeat), in this case your test starts 32 months prior ,filter out all hit with front pairs till playable combos.

Reply #57

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 09 Aug 2016 22:34:56 GMT

12-way draws make up close to 50% of the games and also pays $500 vs $250. If you could produce a list

of 12-way lines with the same hit rate then it would win more than the cost of play as long as the total hits

stay around the same. Just a thought but it seems logical given 12-way hits.

Here are a couple pics showing the overall hit rates for single, double, triple and quad hits.

Midday

Evening

Reply #56

adobea78 — Tue, 09 Aug 2016 22:34:15 GMT

Date draws hit cost($) Prize($)

11/04/15 1 - 360 0.00

11/05/15 2 24 box, 1 str 720 6000.00

11/06-12/01 26 24 box, 1 str 10,800 6000.00

12/02/15 1 24 box 1 str 360 6000.00

12/01/16 30 24 box, 1 str 10800 6000.00

Current draws 60

current cost 23040.00***(not actual)

current prize 24000.00

NB

**The 360 combos reduces when you have a str hit, eg a hit of 6057 filters all front 60x, i.e, 12 picks reduction , so your test was a success, thanks.

Reply #55

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 09 Aug 2016 22:02:44 GMT

adobea78

I don't have the kind of budget for this sort of play so I always play using a digit by position analysis. I also don't

play static sets and change my lines every game. With a large budget I might try something like your testing here

but for now it's digit to digit, game to game. As much skill as I can muster and the rest is left to chance.

RL

Reply #54

adobea78 — Tue, 09 Aug 2016 21:52:10 GMT

RL

Thank you, more test needed, this is one of 4 options. The whole ideal is to create your own 'prior ratio' for a time frame.

Reply #53

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 09 Aug 2016 21:29:17 GMT

Here are the results for the second set of lines using evening draws. 11-04-15 to 08-09-16 = 280 games. Playing 24-way

lines would loose because of the lower payouts.

RL

Box- 07/15/16 2756 Test set- 6725

Box- 07/15/16 2756 Test set- 6752

Box- 07/15/16 2756 Test set- 6275

Box- 07/15/16 2756 Test set- 6257

Box- 07/15/16 2756 Test set- 6572

Box- 07/15/16 2756 Test set- 6527

Box- 07/15/16 2756 Test set- 7625

Box- 07/15/16 2756 Test set- 7652

Box- 07/15/16 2756 T... [ More ]

Reply #52

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 09 Aug 2016 20:26:08 GMT

adobea78

Turns out there was nothing wrong with the code, it's a balance of digits in the lines. Here are the results of the

first set of data you posted over a 250 midday game backtest. The results are labeled for straight and box hits.

I will post the results for the new data in a few.

Box - 06/30/16 07 08 04 00 Test set- 7804

Str8 - 06/30/16 07 08 04 00 Test set- 7840

Box - 06/30/16 07 08 04 00 Test set- 7084

Box - 06/30/16 07 08 04 00 Test set- 7048

Box - 06/30/16 07... [ More ]

Reply #51

adobea78 — Tue, 09 Aug 2016 19:09:42 GMT

Thanks, trying to establish the a time frame for selected 'prior' ratios.

Reply #50

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 09 Aug 2016 18:59:06 GMT

adobea78

No problem it just takes a couple seconds to run but it will be later this evening before I get the chance to

fix the error in the box calculations.

RL

Reply #49

adobea78 — Tue, 09 Aug 2016 16:43:11 GMT

I need the total str/box count from dates 11/04/2015 to 08/09/2016 for MO-4(eve draws).

Bet: split

Total cost

Total Prize

Balance

Reply #48

adobea78 — Tue, 09 Aug 2016 07:49:07 GMT

Lets run a test off the draw 6119

Date :11/03/2015

State :MO

Permutations without repetition (n=6, r=4)

Using Items: 6,7,3,2,0,5

List has 360 entries.

{6,7,3,2} {6,7,3,0} {6,7,3,5} {6,7,2,3} {6,7,2,0} {6,7,2,5} {6,7,0,3} {6,7,0,2} {6,7,0,5*} {6,7,5,3} {6,7,5,2} {6,7,5,0} {6,3,7,2} {6,3,7,0} {6,3,7,5} {6,3,2,7} {6,3,2,0} {6,3,2,5} {6,3,0,7} {6,3,0,2} {6,3,0,5} {6,3,5,7} {6,3,5,2} {6,3,5,0} {6,2,7,3} {6,2,7,0} {6,2,7,5} {6,2,3,7} {6,2,3,0} {6,2,3,5} {6,2,0,7} {6,2,0,3} {6,2,0,5

Reply #47

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 09 Aug 2016 06:37:26 GMT

I just noticed that the Back-test results may not be correct. The lines you posted are 24-way lines, ie single digits lines.

The program calculates the Straights first and when one is found it's suppose to skip the box calculations. In the eve

results it shows 5 straight hits and 115 box hits. In a 24-way draw there are 24 possible combos that will match all

4 digits or 1 straight and 23 box. If I multiply 5 * 23 I come up with 115 which I think is a error in the code. To prevent

the... [ More ]

Reply #46

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 09 Aug 2016 06:04:42 GMT

adobea78

I am working on several options trying to see what does the the best overall. I ran a backtest on the lines you posted

for both box and straight hits. The midday results were best but the straights were a bit on the low side. I averaged

the payouts for box hits to get a rough idea what the payouts would have been. Anyway here is a pic of the results. The

totals are for the evening draw but the midday done far better. For the box calculations I added the 5 straight hits to th... [ More ]

Reply #45

adobea78 — Tue, 09 Aug 2016 01:51:55 GMT

There are 12 choices and all 12 must be correct to reduce to a single straight line

Why not observe the transition of the digits for each of 12 choices? You may adjust the assumption that, the' single straight line' is the average of the 12 choices.

Reply #44

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sun, 07 Aug 2016 16:27:11 GMT

adobea78

Here are the results for 08-06-16 my eve game. I will try and post the results for 10 draws

RL

Reply #43

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sun, 07 Aug 2016 16:01:36 GMT

boot

I am hoping I can average one hit per month so in a year that's 12 * $6K for $72,000 or around $50,400 after taxes.

Cost to play 365*$4.00=$1,460 which still leaves a nice chunk of change. I seem to do best on evening draws but

may include midday if things work out. As mentioned in the CF video I no longer have to hit all 12 steps and can split

the process among the different game engines setting only the values that look strongest for showing in the next

game. This could go... [ More ]

Reply #42

bootleg233 — Sun, 07 Aug 2016 08:20:15 GMT

Rl looking forward to your live results with your newer version of sc!!! Good luck!! Da boot......

Reply #41

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sun, 07 Aug 2016 03:06:06 GMT

Here is a pic of one of the p-4 live play test where I missed 1 of the 12 S-C step choices.

Reply #40

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sun, 07 Aug 2016 02:58:21 GMT

adobea78

MO pays $6000.00 for a P-4 straight and the choice to switch from my 5-39 to p-4 is based on the odds. The odds of winning my

5-39 are 1 in 575,757 and the average JP is around $142,000.00. The odds for P-4 are 1 in 10,000 so a P-4 player should be able

to win more over time than playing the 5-39. 575,757 / 10,000 = 57.6 * 6,000 = $345,600. The 5-39 pays for lower level prizes so

this figure is not exact but I think the p-4 is still a better bet. I have a little app that I c... [ More ]

Reply #39

adobea78 — Sat, 06 Aug 2016 23:12:24 GMT

With regard to the ratio 1/10 , P5 is manageable than P4 which is manageable than P3. The issue here is PRIZE RATIO, I will rather opt for $5000 prize with a cost $1000 than a cost of $100 for $500.

Lets take the string 672804 off the MO's eve draw 3018( 8/2/2016), considering 6C4 (with digit order), we generate 360 combos:

Permutations without repetition (n=6, r=4)

Using Items: 6,7,2,8,0,4

List has 360 entries.

{6,7,2,8} {6,7,2,0} {6,7,2,4} {6,7,8,2} {6,7,8,0} {6,7,8,4} {6,7,0,2... [ More ]

Reply #38

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 06 Aug 2016 21:05:28 GMT

From the stats above it does not look like it makes much different playing combined vs mid to mid or eve to eve.

I was hoping something would show up but looks like nothing other than one should play a mix of both high and

low skip digits, 2-2, 1-3 3-1 etc. I think I will run another test for non positional skips.

RL

Reply #37

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 06 Aug 2016 20:56:04 GMT

Here in MO p-3 pays $600 for a straight, still not enough for me to get interested. Maybe some day but not now.

Playing for straight hits I hit more digits playing P-4 vs P-3. Don't know why p-4 seems easier but that's where I

am at.

RL

Reply #36

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 06 Aug 2016 20:51:48 GMT

p-4 mid to eve

Games with 0 skips = 9 - 14 avg 1 in 71.42857

Games with 1 skips = 9 - 134 avg 1 in 7.462687

Games with 2 skips = 9 - 384 avg 1 in 2.604167

Games with 3 skips = 9 - 320 avg 1 in 3.125

Games with 4 skips = 9 - 148 avg 1 in 6.756757

Games with 0 skips = 10 - 148 avg 1 in 6.756757

Games with 1 skips = 10 - 320 avg 1 in 3.125

Games with 2 skips = 10 - 384 avg 1 in 2.604167

Games with 3 skips = 10 - 134 avg 1 in 7.462687

Games with 4 skips = 10 - 14 avg... [ More ]

Reply #35

adobea78 — Sat, 06 Aug 2016 20:19:40 GMT

Is are about ratios, some will spend $30 for prize of $50. I'll like the ratio of spending $300 for $500. If you're risk-aversed, then forget P4, and focus on P3(which has a lot twist/turns with lower payout ).

Reply #34

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:45:03 GMT

The results posted below are positional,

Pick-4 evening to evening draws

Games with 0 skips = 9 - 27 avg 1 in 37.03704

Games with 1 skips = 9 - 160 avg 1 in 6.25

Games with 2 skips = 9 - 315 avg 1 in 3.174603

Games with 3 skips = 9 - 356 avg 1 in 2.808989

Games with 4 skips = 9 - 142 avg 1 in 7.042253

Games with 0 skips = 10 - 142 avg 1 in 7.042253

Games with 1 skips = 10 - 356 avg 1 in 2.808989

Games with 2 skips = 10 - 315 avg 1 in 3.174603

Games with 3 skips

Reply #33

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 06 Aug 2016 18:13:51 GMT

mid p-4 pairs

Box Pair shows

00= 58

01= 99 11= 52

02= 89 12=102 22= 52

03= 97 13= 94 23= 94 33= 50

04=107 14=105 24= 94 34=119 44= 47

05= 84 15=115 25=101 35=100 45= 99 55= 62

06= 77 16= 91 26= 98 36= 91 46= 88 56= 78 66= 58

07=111 17= 94 27= 99 37=110 47=107 57=102 67= 89 77= 59

08= 92 18= 94 28= 88 38= 95 48= 99 58= 82 68= 96 78=107 88= 47

09= 89 19= 94 29= 94 39= 87 49= 87 59=103 69= 85 79= 92 89= 93 99= 60

Pairs games out

00= 8

01= 15 11= 20

02... [ More ]

Reply #32

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 06 Aug 2016 18:07:28 GMT

mid to mid, three positional digits with 10 game skips.

eve to eve, three positional digits 10 game skip

Reply #31

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 06 Aug 2016 16:20:31 GMT

Hi all

I am still working of the P-4 stats, Trying to figure out the best way to format the data so that it's easy to

understand. I got pulled away yesterday and running a bit behind today

RL

Reply #30

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 06 Aug 2016 16:18:23 GMT

dr san

I don't really follow the summer Olympics, all my favorite events are in the winter games. I plan to try and catch

Phelps.

Rl

Reply #29

dr san — Sat, 06 Aug 2016 15:38:32 GMT

Hello, RL, what you opening game OlympicRIO Brazil in 2016

Reply #28

Sunglasses — Fri, 05 Aug 2016 20:07:01 GMT

The Lottery master guide is sold as a book. It is in fact more publicity. The tables in it aren't much.

The x and - are probably from the DOS era. We used to see a lot of ** and +-+-+.

The wheel books aren't much. A website like the lucky gene offers free wheels combined to data. People used to pay for wheels.

I heard complaints about the software, the data is not complete. I saw a screen shot and could compare it to the data on my website, which is complete.

You could rebuild all ta... [ More ]

Reply #27

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 05 Aug 2016 19:28:33 GMT

GH has sold millions of books all over the world over the last 30 or so years. I just googled GH and found that a site

that boast 107 documented first prize lotto jackpot winners. I don't know the exact numbers but I think many many

more than 107 people have won JP's playing QP's. Needless to say she's getting rich off the lottery without having

to buy a single ticket. You might have guessed I am not a fan of GH.

RL

P.S. sometimes I use

Reply #26

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 05 Aug 2016 19:09:00 GMT

I have had others make similar observations over the years, maybe she copied it from one of my old products.

I been using the the xx---x-x-x stuff since the late 80's. Maybe I should have of got a copyright. The computer

I wrote my first lottery program on did not even have mouse support, it used arrow keys to move to different

options and ran on a 360K 5 1/4 floppy disk.

RL

Reply #25

Sunglasses — Fri, 05 Aug 2016 18:10:19 GMT

Reply #24

Sunglasses — Fri, 05 Aug 2016 18:06:02 GMT

That reminds me the commercial G.H. A.+ product.

Reply #23

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:52:15 GMT

Here is the MO pick-4 midday data, top board is the data before the draw, middle board is after the draw and the bottom board shows

the hit/skips for digits/ all positions. The pics below show a breakdown for position 1,2,3 and 4. I shrunk the pics down so they would

fit the window so they are a bit blurry. I am getting ready to run the analysis to see the overall stats and will post the printout when

its finished.

mid to mid

eve to eve

mid to eve

eve to mid

P... [ More ]

Reply #22

lottoburg — Fri, 05 Aug 2016 13:43:40 GMT

RL,

Great Idea

Reply #21

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 05 Aug 2016 12:56:59 GMT

Guys

I started playing P-4 late last year and still don't have the game figured out, at least not to the extent that I

am ready to go live. 99% of my plays are on paper and so far the best method at least for me has been the

S/C Steps. When I first started playing I ran series of live plays that averaged around 4 lines per game and

my best was several 3 of 4 straights. I was beating the hell out of the odds but never won a dime. These

games don't offer second level prize payouts s... [ More ]

Reply #20

Lildarryl — Fri, 05 Aug 2016 10:42:54 GMT

maybe first position always play digits 0- 9 second position always play digits 0- 9. Now last 2 positions use this. Play digits that arent out more than 10+ draws. So maybe its a 10*10*5*5 wheel (2500#) to start with. Instead of 10,000

Reply #19

phileight — Fri, 05 Aug 2016 10:16:30 GMT

it does happen. it happened in the last game in ky mid. when you look at the history, it's still a good test for positioning within a combination.

Reply #18

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 05 Aug 2016 05:40:18 GMT

Follower analysis

2nd digit followers

3rd digit followers

4th digit followers

Reply #17

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 05 Aug 2016 05:09:58 GMT

Tonight's eve to eve results. Looks like 3 of the digits were out longer then 10 games

RL

Reply #16

phileight — Thu, 04 Aug 2016 23:36:54 GMT

I find that in approximately 80% of the draws, at least two columns will have digits that have been called in the past 10 games. in other words at least 2 columns have to have digits that are less the 11 days out.

after i come up with a 4 digit combination this is one way that i select what position to play each digit.

Reply #15

notmyday — Thu, 04 Aug 2016 20:36:47 GMT

looks like the 6 was pretty cold if it dont hit tonite or mid tomorrow it is not ready to become hot yet.

Reply #14

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 04 Aug 2016 20:32:24 GMT

I am going to keep my eyes on digit 6 for tonight. I think it will show in the next couple games

but don't know which position. I could set is as a non-positional key digit.

RL

Reply #13

notmyday — Thu, 04 Aug 2016 20:31:44 GMT

i will do tonite my bet 1st pos 5 or 8 2nd 1 3rd 9 4th 5

Reply #12

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 04 Aug 2016 20:29:59 GMT

I should have time tomorrow so check back.

RL

Reply #11

notmyday — Thu, 04 Aug 2016 20:26:43 GMT

i look forward to seeing them results.

Reply #10

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 04 Aug 2016 20:25:52 GMT

Looks like evening to midday went the other direction and 3 of the numbers were greater than 10 games out.

It might make a bid difference which games are played eve to eve, eve to mid etc... I will know more after I

run some test. It makes sense if several of the digits are greater than 10 games out that it would have done

well to skip those. I always play mid to mid or eve to eve so not sure what the results would be if I combine

the two.

RL

Reply #9

notmyday — Thu, 04 Aug 2016 20:24:11 GMT

play 3 or 4 numbers 50cent boxed using the hot numbers and that can fund the combo play for the str8.

Reply #8

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 04 Aug 2016 20:22:24 GMT

Here is a pic showing the midday draw that would be the next draw after the 8-3-16 evening draw

Thursday, Aug. 4 Midday: 6-3-4-0

Reply #7

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 04 Aug 2016 20:17:28 GMT

I seen that, I might be a one needs to analyze them together. Also these results are eve to eve draw.

RL

Reply #6

notmyday — Thu, 04 Aug 2016 20:15:30 GMT

but in the all positions it was hot numbers only

Reply #5

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 04 Aug 2016 20:13:49 GMT

The first digit 8 was 13 games out but the other 3 fell in the lower games out range. I am working on doing a

backtest to see how it works over time.

Not sure how it would do with pick-3,

RL

Reply #4

notmyday — Thu, 04 Aug 2016 20:09:06 GMT

yea i like to track 20-40

Reply #3

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 04 Aug 2016 20:07:55 GMT

I am adding the ability to adjust the number of game history to use, I don't think it needs to be more than

30 to 60 would be enough

RL

Reply #2

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 04 Aug 2016 20:06:33 GMT

8-2-16

8-3-16

Wednesday, Aug. 3 Evening: 8-1-5-0

Reply #1

notmyday — Thu, 04 Aug 2016 20:06:17 GMT

is the 1000 games set in stone or can you change that. i think that would help to see the movers getting hot or turning cold

Pick 4 idea

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 04 Aug 2016 19:06:06 GMT

Below is a pic from one of my analysis tools. The data is for the last 1000 games for my evening game. The digits are

arranged from best to worst hitters. The first set is all positions and the following 4 are calculated by digit position in

the set, ie, 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th digit. I noticed that in each of the four positional stats that as few as 5 and as many

as 6 digits are 10 or more games out. It may be a safe bet to use a positional string wheel and wheel only the digits

that