LSA Pick 3 and Pick 4 Stats

Reply #16

ElinaSammy2081 — Fri, 27 Jan 2017 22:43:45 GMT

Fruity Pebbles and Mr Bubbles made me laugh so hard.

Reply #15

garyo1954 — Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:06:57 GMT

Life is such a terrible thing when you're 9 years old and mom gives you a choice between Fruity Pebbles in your cereal bowl or Mr. Bubbles in your bath water......

until the next year when the kid down the block can suddenly run faster and jump higher.....

Reply #14

Sunglasses — Fri, 27 Jan 2017 14:44:11 GMT

Eventually charts were done, and no advice was written on how to use them. Mostly it is that. Some other write down fat lies, a fixed choice connected to the software. That is what you want to see and read. The fat lies telling you that you will win a ton of money in short time or few years. The snakeoil.exe just was invented. Go get it! Only 999.99 USD without VAT and charges for updating ... . Comes with guaranteed jackpot wins and net wins pick 3, pick 4 and joker games! The sure win! Easy to... [ More ]

Reply #13

Jayhawk58 — Thu, 26 Jan 2017 14:39:01 GMT

Statistical analysis is important and does have results. Some to suggest what may happen based on what did happen. Some to prove that if it's missing, it will show up. some to show when goofy things happen.

The hocus pocus part is being able to take what's before you and make a decision that this happened so therefore this may happen. That's the individual part suggested by Bobby623.

Software doesn't do that. Back in the days of DOS and basic, it was simple...... If this happens then this.... [ More ]

Reply #12

str8ca$hhomie — Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:32:45 GMT

garyo1954,

HEAD OF THE CLASS

Reply #11

garyo1954 — Wed, 25 Jan 2017 23:35:14 GMT

To each his own.

Personally, statistical analysis is not a waste of time. It may not produce an immediate expected outcome, or the exact outcome expected, but what the statistics say will happen, does happen.

That can be proved with statistics.

I look at the state forums. I see people predicting the sets that do hit that morning, that night. Many of them who can do it can't explain how. To sound metaphysical, its as if they were attuned to the part of the universe that makes those decis... [ More ]

Reply #10

bobby623 — Wed, 25 Jan 2017 18:46:25 GMT

IMHO, if you are building a lottery prediction method that excludes a human element, you need to buy a quantity of antacid because you will suffer a lot of heart burn!

Mathematics can be useful but, whether you like it or not, no matter how you slice and dice it, you will have to include a line of data where the User of the method has to make a choice, or a guess, or whatever, as a final action when deciding which integers have the best chance of winning.

Otherwise, you will be just anothe... [ More ]

Reply #9

Sunglasses — Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:16:59 GMT

Pick three is a three sets game. That is like three one ball keno games. Anyway you can count by position. Where do you get? You get 1:10 for each position. It isn't a 6/48. Your want to win straight so you have to take up one set. Take the first one. E(1) = 0.1, same for the others. Position 1, numbers 0 to 9. Position solved. There you have your LSA logic. Further like everybody you summed up the hits by position. Position 1, ball x, y times. Now what do you do with that? Average 1 in 10. Payo... [ More ]

Reply #8

Developer — Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:27:36 GMT

As I thought, pick 3 and pick 4 analysis is a waste of time statistically; random numbers give the same statistical result. I would really like LSA to run pick games but it goes against the philosophy LSA s built upon and maintained over the past 18 years, produce lottery statistics from real world and verifiable maths.

Reply #7

garyo1954 — Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:45:06 GMT

I remember that! Always wonder how any state with the technology available and all the resources to test, check, and double check can make such mistakes.

Now me? Sure I can make that mistake. I do it a lot.

Last night played 138, 248, 329, 228 and 236.

Texas drew 238.

Makes you wonder if I'm the one playing with a few balls short

Reply #6

RJOh — Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:44:41 GMT

If Texas uses an incomplete set of balls it should show up in someone's database as it did some years back when Tennessee changed from balls to a pick3 RNG that didn't print doubles and triples.

Reply #5

Sunglasses — Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:30:17 GMT

Play 1000 = lose 500

Play 487 = win 13 or lose 487

=

Play red = double your money or lose

Reply #4

garyo1954 — Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:09:33 GMT

You won't find much online that delves into the statistical analysis of Pick 3. As much is as available on the game, most is regurgitation of something they heard or read. Or they are demonstrating something specific which means little in the overall game context. Most often when I've needed any type breakdown, I've had to work it out.

And while there are a lot of sites where you can glimpse bits and pieces, its best to be choosy in what you believe. Some cornballs write anything, like t... [ More ]

Reply #3

winsumloosesum — Mon, 23 Jan 2017 23:52:06 GMT

Just an idea for Pick 4 Pick 4 games:

If this is just creating a usable database

For Pick 3 games, add a 1 in front of the 1st postion, 2 in front of the 2nd position, and 3 in front of the 3rd position.

For example, 6-1-5 would be 16-21-35

Reply #2

Developer — Mon, 23 Jan 2017 23:17:48 GMT

Yes, I have looked over it; I was hoping someone knows of a system they could point me that uses real math.

The more I understand pick games the less I see viable analysis from it.

Perhaps this is why they were designed.

Reply #1

Sunglasses — Mon, 23 Jan 2017 23:09:40 GMT

Try the mathematics forum for mathematics.

LSA Pick 3 and Pick 4 Stats

Developer — Mon, 23 Jan 2017 22:38:39 GMT

I have been thinking about statistics in pick 3 and pick 4 type games that can give a user a mathematical advantage over using simple random numbers so I can integrate it into LSA but I cannot see anyway this is achievable because pick games can repeat an already drawn number meaning the normal distribution has no bias to analyse. If you use my software you will understand my approach to lottery analysis and therefore understand the problem I face.

The only way I can see (mathematically) of g... [ More ]