<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Unfair?</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/310477</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/310477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Unfair?</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/310477/4973120</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/310477/4973120</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2017 10:27:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Sunglasses</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>6 1 6.178.703,00 6/8 OF FAIR PAYOUT<br /><br />5+ 16 14.068,20 POOR<br /><br />5 387 551,60 SHOULD BE FAR OVER 1000<br /><br />4+ 960 111,10<br /><br />4 11.644 16,90 SHOULD BE OVER 40<br /><br />3+ 15.742 6,70<br /><br />3 156.974 5,00 EASIER THAN 2+ AND UNDERPAID<br /><br />2+ 113.560 3,00 HARDER TO GET AND PAYS LESS<br /><br />The payout rank 1 is like net 258.890.850*6/8 without taxes for MM.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Sunglasses</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/310477/4973119</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/310477/4973119</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2017 10:20:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Sunglasses</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Rank 1 paid 6/8 of the chances. Other payouts for 5/6 for example had like 1/4 of what they should get. Compared to the previous design 3/6 deserves much more than 5 euros payout as it is much harder to get. They added 3/6 to the 2+ to make publicity with 1% more payouts, but worse payouts. This game and payout design discourages playing more as I proved. You cannot enjoy this game if you knew the previous design and payout. Eventually it is getting better if more people play the game and we get... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/310477/4973119">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Sunglasses</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/310477/4972939</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/310477/4972939</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2017 03:09:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p></p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/310477/4972692</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/310477/4972692</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2017 00:16:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Lucky Loser</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey, every game is designed with a default to prevent &#x27;over payout&#x27; scenarios, okay. In other words, it&#x27;s much better to pay out too little than too much because you never when some interesting may happen like an abundance of players with the same numbers. This goes back to the original rule of gambling...&#x27;you must have more losers that winners&#x27; in order for the game to be successful. That said, I believe that our games can definitely be adjusted to garner more player participation as the amount... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/310477/4972692">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Lucky Loser</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Unfair?</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/310477</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/310477</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2017 20:25:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Sunglasses</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This was the drawing of 6 + R / 45. R = 7th ball drawn.<br /><br />Cost: 1 / combination<br /><br />2017-02-04 1 4 5 7 8 32 10<br /><br />The payouts were<br /><br />6 1 6.178.703,00<br /><br />5+ 16 14.068,20<br /><br />5 387 551,60<br /><br />4+ 960 111,10<br /><br />4 11.644 16,90<br /><br />3+ 15.742 6,70<br /><br />3 156.974 5,00<br /><br />2+ 113.560 3,00<br /><br />The payout in rank one is exceptionally high! Other ranks&#x27; payouts are very low.<br /><br />I consider this as being an unfair payout for the lower ranks.<br /><br />The entire payout construction has a bad sm... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/310477">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Sunglasses</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

