Tracking History When there Is More Than 1 Draw Per Day

Reply #11

bobby623 — Tue, 28 Feb 2017 22:33:45 GMT

When I started playing the lottery, I kept a record of all draws for all games I was interested in.

A big mistake but I didn't know any different at the time.

Lottery was new and it seemed plausible that a 'systems player' needed all of the available information.

I developed several workouts and created numerous tracking charts.

After many years and thousands of hours logging lottery integers I suddenly realized that

I only need the history for the games I play.

I selected the... [ More ]

Reply #10

DoctorWhy — Tue, 28 Feb 2017 02:05:57 GMT

I've always wondered about that, but I have had success with tracking every one by the draw instead of alltogether.

Reply #9

Soledad — Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:34:59 GMT

exactly right. I expand and keep track of what I find, but I understand. Yeah just a method of my own too, good luck and thanks

Reply #8

macb063 — Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:13:06 GMT

I did a back test from March 24, 2008 till February 8, 2017 and for me, there isn't much difference. I used a quick, simple method of choosing numbers as a test so that I could compare the results when merged and unmerged. Just a 1% increase in WINS when using the merged history.

Aside from this I developed my own methods though and I haven't figured out a way to test it using my more involved method and as far as testing it with my main whole process, it won't be possible because right now t... [ More ]

Reply #7

Soledad — Sun, 12 Feb 2017 17:58:33 GMT

441 for midday. So Night time digits had the 41 back pair exact which would pay 50 to 1. Night time numbers take this one at least.

Reply #6

Soledad — Sun, 12 Feb 2017 15:58:39 GMT

Ok I'll divide like you, let's see now this is for New York. and mind you it's just for the most recent numbers drawn. It's not tracking history on any level past a week ok.

Night. Day. Combined. All week combined

994. 015. 950. 909

757. 476. 610. 617

641. 581. 560. 516

I don't necessarily track probably the way you do, but I look at digits which obviously could be helpful in tracking as well. Let's just see if anything shows right off the bat. If not of course it could take longe... [ More ]

Reply #5

Soledad — Sun, 12 Feb 2017 15:21:03 GMT

Let us know. I'm betting that they would not. But I'd like to know what you come with..

Reply #4

macb063 — Sun, 12 Feb 2017 15:17:56 GMT

My guess is they each will give the same results, but I am going to try them both anyhow and let the actual results speak for themselves.

Reply #3

Raven62 — Sun, 12 Feb 2017 13:55:41 GMT

The way you are currently tracking (Day Eve Separate) is most effective

Reply #2

macb063 — Sun, 12 Feb 2017 13:34:06 GMT

Thanks for the reply. I'm about to try it out now.

Reply #1

Soledad — Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:52:19 GMT

day and night together. It's like putting a bunch of x's instead of real numbers if you separate. Sometimes can be good. Not every number is significant. Patterns no matter how you look at them are still patterns. Nothing will change that. But if you have 3 patterns all pointing in the same direction, well it's happy time.

Tracking History When there Is More Than 1 Draw Per Day

macb063 — Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:38:37 GMT

I currently track the history of each draw seperately, one state at a time, one draw at a time, according to time of day. However, I have seen people who track Morning, Day, Evening, and Night altogether. I wanted to know how other here play and whether or not you think it really matters. Would merging the history of all draws for the state in question improve the ability to predict