Most amount of coverage with the least amount of pairs https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/311047 Lottery Post Forum Topic: Most amount of coverage with the least amount of pairs en-us Lottery Post RSS Generator Reply #3 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/311047/5015401 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/311047/5015401 Sat, 11 Mar 2017 01:49:19 GMT Rocko2x I deflated all 720 singles and all 270 doubles, keeping only those pairs. Returned 89 box combinations (69 singles - 20 doubles) and 474 straight combinations.

]]> Rocko2x Reply #2 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/311047/5014311 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/311047/5014311 Fri, 10 Mar 2017 02:36:33 GMT Raven62 How did you arrive at this conclusion

]]> Raven62 Reply #1 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/311047/5003521 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/311047/5003521 Wed, 01 Mar 2017 20:26:05 GMT Todd

]]> Todd Most amount of coverage with the least amount of pairs https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/311047 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/311047 Wed, 01 Mar 2017 17:31:21 GMT Rocko2x Does anyone know what pairs will give you the most amount of coverage in pick 3? I've found that these 10 pairs will cover 47.4% of total combinations:

02 06 09 14 18 26 27 34 38 57

Changing the pair 18 to 15 will also give 47.4% coverage so I imagine there are other pair sets that do same but is it possible to reach 49.0% with just 10 pairs or maybe even 9 pairs or less? I know 50% is impossible as we can not include the pairs for triples.

]]> Rocko2x