Discussing Lottery Math

Reply #15

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 05 Aug 2017 09:02:27 GMT

Personally, I think of random like any other complex thing- It is a system, with behaviors, characteristics and rules.

Me too, especially when making the connections after the drawing is over. Finding these patterns before the draw,

now that's another question. The major difference between random and non-random data is that one is predictable

while the other isn't. We do what we can and hope for the best.

RL

Reply #14

rca1952 — Tue, 01 Aug 2017 12:25:57 GMT

It has come to my understanding, from a very long time of playing with different ways of figuring out the numbers, that until the states bring back the number balls, and get totally away from the RNG's, there will not be any true random picks made from the lottery commission! The old ways of picking numbers by the states were to use the number balls that were different grams weight. Each time the drawing were to be called, they would use the first gram set to see if there were any repeated and o... [ More ]

Reply #13

eddessaknight — Wed, 28 Jun 2017 21:02:45 GMT

Aye, with respect to professional CT, my Vegas experiences teach me to double down on your action take.

Remember the legendary Nick the Greek gambler? A paraphrase from him said the second biggest high he got after winning, was losing!

On the other hand - another important player tell is that it seems, most serious male players really don't care about the odds, whether their methodology is right or wrong or even legal or illegal - only really care about how to win (even over sex)

M... [ More ]

Reply #12

Geodesic — Thu, 15 Jun 2017 02:11:37 GMT

You boiled down most systems that many players use. Does it mean that you will win? No, but it is fun to play with the numbers.

Reply #11

Soledad — Thu, 25 May 2017 03:47:03 GMT

Yes I mean that could work. Focus is what is needed. Elimination should not be ignored. And perhaps repetition as well just to see. I use formulas that work and repeatedly work, it's just determining the time that they do is the hard part. I'll always believe that there's a way right before the number is drawn to determine what the number will be, via math et al. Unfortunately the way the numbers are drawn become more and more complicated nowadays, with delays etc and certain numbers being favor... [ More ]

Reply #10

Datapile — Wed, 24 May 2017 02:48:54 GMT

Do we agree that, discounting exploits, we are looking for bell curves. Once found, we remove the tails (outliers), leaving the center of the bells.

We then are attempting to find a way to combine the bell centers into a useful method to generate a number combination

Reply #9

Soledad — Tue, 23 May 2017 00:28:53 GMT

Problem with math is first finding the numbers, second eliminating the ones that don't matter, and third figuring out what to do with the ones that do. The only way that I see is by using an example and trying to replicate the same thing. However in lottery games that doesn't happen as much as I would like to believe it should. There's many ways that numbers derived from math in lottery games can be used. It's more than just the number drawn. I still can't figure out why these numbers that are r... [ More ]

Reply #8

Novan60 — Mon, 22 May 2017 22:42:31 GMT

Actually the drawing results fall in line with the statistical probabilities. Combinations of odd and even numbers, high and low and even the general frequency in which a number will appear all fall within their statistical chances and that is actually what the casinos and lottery agencies are counting on. What they hate are statistical anomalies as those are what people try to exploit.

Reply #7

Datapile — Mon, 22 May 2017 01:03:58 GMT

If I drop a rock of set mass, from a set height, it will always fall to the ground in the same amount of time. No matter how many times I repeat the process, it will always be the same. Physics tells us that given the mass of the stone, the height, and negligible wind resistance, the time to the ground can be calculated.

Physics and math experiments have shown this is constant and predicable, so it is accepted as a scientific law.

Is it impossible that doing the same process repeatedly wil... [ More ]

Reply #6

bobby623 — Tue, 16 May 2017 03:14:09 GMT

Since there are no mathematics calculations going on in an active lottery drawing machine,

all mathematical computations relating to machine outputs are man-made.

The lottery machines have no memory, therefore, it's folly to think that future outputs will support or confirm anything 'man' has come up with.

Lottery mathematics is actually falsehoods being spread by fake prophets.

The only people who profit from 'made up' statistics are the lottery banks.

Reply #5

Datapile — Mon, 15 May 2017 22:58:54 GMT

Personally, I think of random like any other complex thing- It is a system, with behaviors, characteristics and rules.

Trees... Trees are each unique, but in understanding them, they become predictable. The roots will always seek the soil, the leaves the sun, and the trunk is always in the middle.

Much like the tree, if you look at random from enough different perspectives, the similarities become clear.

Reply #4

AlanHarvey — Fri, 12 May 2017 08:07:39 GMT

I enjoy using statistics to try an determine wither or not I maybe able to figure out a group of numbers that maybe randomly chosen in any of the lotto's, like Mega Millions, Powerball or my own state's lotto. However, one thing I have learned with using mathematics in analysis of lotto numbers is that some items can have the same trend and a positive correlation, and yet there maybe no cause and effect relationship between them. In a truly random situation; such as with lotteries, a person or c... [ More ]

Reply #3

Datapile — Tue, 02 May 2017 00:14:58 GMT

Of course statistical mathematics. (I save the discussions on imaginary number statistics for management...

Reply #2

Coin Toss — Mon, 01 May 2017 04:27:10 GMT

Math seems to take second place to people who want to play real bad.

For some people it's not even about wining or losing, they just want to be 'in action', i.e. have money riding on something.

Reply #1

Sunglasses — Sun, 30 Apr 2017 14:42:31 GMT

You mean statistical mathematics!? I don't lower myself to slang math.

Discussing Lottery Math

Datapile — Tue, 25 Apr 2017 03:15:14 GMT

Thank you for your consideration.