Statiscians vs math formulae in pick 4 ny

Reply #6

osmannica2001 — Mon, 19 Jun 2017 05:12:08 GMT

Researcher, learner, programmer in Java and Python. Trying to master LSTM's - it seems very compromising towards predicting randomness. Predicting falls under statistics. LSTM and Neural Networks over all is Math

Reply #5

AllenB — Sat, 17 Jun 2017 03:03:12 GMT

Statististics or Formulas ?

I would say Bit or Both

Statistics seem to be unavoidable. Any Back Test of a Formula is itself a set of Statistics. For most Back Tests, the primary statistic is Win/Loss. Much more can be gleaned from that test. Back Tested Systems can be analyzed for frequencies and skips in the same way that combinations, pairs, etc are analyzed. I have spent a lot of time in that Rabbit hole with nothing to show for It.

I would like to think that I am a free thinker. T... [ More ]

Reply #4

Sunglasses — Fri, 16 Jun 2017 21:17:29 GMT

Great info? I don't think so.

Reply #3

Geodesic — Thu, 15 Jun 2017 02:03:29 GMT

How about a little bit of both

Reply #2

Todd — Thu, 01 Jun 2017 12:49:58 GMT

Reply #1

MoneyMike$ — Thu, 01 Jun 2017 04:05:44 GMT

There's only a small group of tools that statisticians use to explore the world, answer questions, and solve problems. It is the way that statisticians use probability or knowledge of the normal distribution to help them out in different situations that varies.

Taking known information about a distribution and expressing it as a probability [Hack #1] is an essential trick frequently used by stat-hackers, as is using a tiny bit of sample data to accurately describe all the scores in a larger p... [ More ]

Statiscians vs math formulae in pick 4 ny

MoneyMike$ — Thu, 01 Jun 2017 03:42:59 GMT

Which of the two do you consider yourself or neither? Have you seen any advantages over either or...

Check out this great info:

https://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/statistics-hacks/0596101643/ch04s07.html