high low, sums, odd even: useful system?

Reply #9

MoneyMind — Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:38:18 GMT

I agree with you.

Reply #8

Raven62 — Tue, 19 Sep 2017 17:09:02 GMT

82 Boxed Combinations gets 47% of the Hits! (All Singles, 1-Low, 1-High, 1-Even, 1-Odd

Reply #7

Hans — Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:06:56 GMT

The best software can delete max. 6 numbers from 21 numbers without eliminating winning numbers.

Any filtering is risky.

Nan

Reply #6

aquariuslottery — Thu, 07 Sep 2017 07:47:45 GMT

What I do in my simulation is to operate on 10 Pick 3 numbers, not combinations. I stated this before and repeat again - being successful in lottery depends on ability to predict the numbers correctly. That's the basis. And in Pick 3 what is easier to predict - numbers out of Pick 3 pool of 10 or combinations out of 1000? Sorry for asking such stupid questions but that's how I perceive logic.

Instead of looking for the perfect combo each and every time I look at 0 to 9 numbers. Compile their... [ More ]

Reply #5

lottery-123 — Wed, 06 Sep 2017 18:43:35 GMT

aquariuslottery, your message -also other messages posted to this thread- is very interesting. It seems that in practice, random is not always true random. However I have a few doubts: what are `due to hit numbers ?

On the other hand, about overdue numbers you say they are total losers, in such a sense...Would they be useful for discarding all of them from a pool? Also, in this same subjet: which steps would you follow in order to discard the maximum numbers possibles from a pool, or in game

Reply #4

Hans — Mon, 04 Sep 2017 03:27:47 GMT

Any system that can generate extreme conditions would be an ideal.

Suppose you get one set of 24 numbers with 0 numbers for a 649 lottery, that implies that another 25 numbers have all 6 winning numbers. :-)

The method itself does not matter.

Nan

Reply #3

RJOh — Fri, 01 Sep 2017 11:47:23 GMT

Any system that improves your odds of winning is a good system.

Reply #2

BobP — Fri, 01 Sep 2017 07:23:28 GMT

In lottery software these are filters. In the better software enough filters can be found to chip away at the lines like a sculptor chisels to find the object of art within. Get all filters correct a win is guaranteed and after the draw the software does an autopsy on request showing the exact filter settings that would have resulted in a winning line among the minimum number of lines. The problem is, winning the filter lottery is on a par with winning Pick-4 Straight.

BobP

Reply #1

aquariuslottery — Fri, 01 Sep 2017 05:48:44 GMT

I've been running a simulation for Wisconsin Pick 3 since November last year.

The purpose is to see which one of several prediction methods is the most effective in a long time span.

I use several prediction methods: hot (from hottest down), cold (from coldest up), repetitive (drawn frequently in short period of time), growing trend (best trenders in a given time), due to hit based on their current average frequency and overdue (not drawn the longest).

Logically they should have the sa... [ More ]

high low, sums, odd even: useful system?

lottery-123 — Tue, 29 Aug 2017 17:03:59 GMT

I know that many players use calculations of high-low numbers, sums, odd even etc for choosing their numbers. Is this a good system? Thanks