Converting and re-converting, numbers to combination number

Reply #14

thamizhpayan — Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:27:26 GMT

Hi,

Here is a link with python code

http://www.math.umbc.edu/~campbell/Computers/Python/probstat.html

C++ library:

https://people.sc.fsu.edu/~jburkardt/cpp_src/combo/combo.html

all links in the reference section of the article are links to books and corresponding source code released under open source license(mostly GPL/LGPL). Make sure you follow usage restrictions when you reuse the code as such (each license is different). Or if you are a programmer, you can writ... [ More ]

Reply #13

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 21 Sep 2017 22:58:54 GMT

Here is a tool that wheels lexie digits, this shows the results for a 5-39 matrix wheeling the first 4 lexie values

for 100 lines. Have you tried feeding the NN the lexie digits one at a time? Seems to me to be the best method

so far but it's far from what I would like. I wrote a lexie predictor that hit a 5 of 6 right off the bat but in forward

test the best it ever got was several lines with 4 of 6 numbers correct. I've been working with index values for

over 15 years and have not... [ More ]

Reply #12

luckyguyxxx — Thu, 07 Sep 2017 15:54:35 GMT

nevermind about my previous post, i found the solution already.

Reply #11

alchemist7 — Thu, 07 Sep 2017 14:44:10 GMT

Thanks

Reply #10

luckyguyxxx — Thu, 07 Sep 2017 13:48:13 GMT

I would like to ask some help, in terms of inspiration.

So, we are talking here about probabilities, chances, precision, and difficulty.

We can't eventually ask a neural network to be able to correctly predict one number from 1 to 600.000.000, as the number of possibilities is astonishing (600 millions!), thus it is like finding a particular sand grain on a whole beach.

What if we lower down the chances, from 1 to 600.000.000 to.. 1 to 2???

That would make a huge diffe... [ More ]

Reply #9

Johnebench — Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:21:02 GMT

Reply #8

luckyguyxxx — Wed, 06 Sep 2017 20:27:15 GMT

Update:

So, the neuralnetwork has been trained up to an error of 0, correctly guessing all the 1200 drawings in the history.

The forecasted drawing however turned out to be simply not the winning one (and quite far from the winning one too!).

Clearly, an overfitting .

48 inputs * 48 hidden neurons + 48weights to the final output neuron, making a total of 2.352 variables within the network, i think this was the cause of the overfitting (1200 drawings got absorbed quite

Reply #7

JADELottery — Wed, 06 Sep 2017 12:29:01 GMT

To explain, we will need to create a new topic aside from this one.

We'll post when we complete our training on a different subject this week.

Reply #6

alchemist7 — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:57:20 GMT

Hi Jade,

Can you explain Fractal subsets of combinations , Please!

Thanks.

Reply #5

JADELottery — Sun, 03 Sep 2017 15:01:18 GMT

Good luck with your project.

We've been working with indexing of combinations; in addition to indexing fractal subsets of combinations.

It's an interesting field of study.

Reply #4

luckyguyxxx — Sun, 03 Sep 2017 14:38:45 GMT

Just a small update:

I've been able (thanks to the help i received here) to convert 1200 lottery drawing results to their relative index values (lexicographic index).

To sum up, we have now just one unique number for each lottery drawing (instead of 6), all these lottery history drawings (unique numbers) form a time-series chart.

The question is, do the past drawing are somehow linked each other, and can a future drawing can be forecasted by using past-ones?

A backprop... [ More ]

Reply #3

luckyguyxxx — Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:49:08 GMT

Thank you very much, to both posters, that was exactly what i was looking for!

I will keep the thread updated in case i have some advancements in my project..

Reply #2

JADELottery — Wed, 30 Aug 2017 19:42:04 GMT

We call it Combinatorial Indexing.

If you have Excel, you could try this:

http://www.jadexcode.com/files/excel/CombinatorialIndex.xls

or

ftp://www.jadexcode.com/excel/CombinatorialIndex.xls

Reply #1

Raven62 — Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:58:02 GMT

It's called Lexicographic Numbering:

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/230350

Lottery Post Forums Search is Your Friend:

https://www.lotterypost.com/search/forums?q=lexicographic t=all

Converting and re-converting, numbers to combination number

luckyguyxxx — Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:29:10 GMT

Hello, i had an idea.

Let's say we have a lottery like, 6 numbers from 1 to 90.

We would have a number of permutations, like:

1) 1-2-3-4-5-6

2) 1-2-3-4-5-7

3) 1-2-3-4-5-8

...

84) 1-2-3-4-5-90

85) 1-2-3-4-6-7

86) 1-2-3-4-6-8

etc......

untill the

622.614.630) 85-86-87-88-89-90

We would have around 622,614,630 possible permutations.

Now, what i want to do, is convert lottery drawings results, to permutations number.

This mean, if the lotte... [ More ]