can someone please refresh how Pick 4 Maths work ?

Reply #26

Raven62 — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 17:59:06 GMT

Yes! Add to each position and don't carry to the next position.

Reply #25

Todd — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 13:11:10 GMT

Reply #24

Soledad — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 03:22:40 GMT

You're right about unique events of course I have to consider it that way when betting. The timing is difficult, it's never the same but a good point, the info I get is usually by using both day and night. But considering specific day and night data of course would be effective in order to place the bet. Thanks for the discussion adobea, you got me thinking about ways to focus and ideas that make sense.

Reply #23

adobea78 — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 03:12:47 GMT

I'll rather keep to a type draw(day or night not both) with few picks for effective waging strategy.

Reply #22

Soledad — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 02:49:47 GMT

Using this example look at all that is observed.

X95 exact pair, and 95 pair again.

12X exact pair and 52 pair again.

948 as 984.

377 as 773.

447 straight. 009 straight.

The list goes on and on. That's what I mean, by 'difficult'. In no way I'm saying impossible, but for me for every 2 or 3 hits that I get, there's usually 3 or 4 that I should get.

Reply #21

Soledad — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 02:45:39 GMT

The second goes as follows; this was the example I was just referring to on the previous page. Gravitational constant (pairs need to be considered as well)

374 - 418

712 - 195

164 - 125

095 - 237

685 - 181

292 - 276

790 - 239

587 - 948

016 - 009

123 - 447

655 - 172

999 - 377

396 - 462

952 - 343

Reply #20

Soledad — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 02:42:07 GMT

Okay, I used three different maths with your example.

I am using the numbers from 374 until 952; that week only.

The first one addition as well as division.

The answers are 980, 488, and 368. 98X pair exact twice and 90 pair twice (the following week

Reply #19

adobea78 — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 02:22:57 GMT

If the answer is obvious and right in front, then why is so hard to predict. I will not phrase the premise as' not to know beforehand' but stick to 'unique events', different perception!. These many seem playing with words, but in a text, a comma may change one's understanding.

Reply #18

Soledad — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 02:17:33 GMT

Reply #17

Soledad — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 02:14:14 GMT

Yes. True.

Reply #16

Soledad — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 02:10:29 GMT

It's true, perhaps I am looking for dialogue that is not there with others. The premise of the game is not to know beforehand, I understand that, but it is difficult as well when you have the goshdarned answer right in front of you and you choose to not look at it or 'play' it. It's happened more times than I can count. And I guess I try to figure out 'for what' instead of thinking that I am wasting my time.

Reply #15

adobea78 — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 02:09:46 GMT

Drawing Date Pick 3 Pick 4

Midday Evening Midday Evening

Sat, Jan 27, 2018 8-2-1 3-3-5-4

Fri, Jan 26, 2018 6-6-0 9-9-7 5-1-2-6 0-5-9-3

Thu, Jan 25, 2018 2-5-4 7-6-7 6-9-7-7 5-5-6-3

Wed, Jan 24, 2018 9-0-8 6-2-3 0-9-7-3 7-7-5-8

Tue, Jan 23, 2018 3-5-2 0-1-5 7-3-5-3 9-3-4-2

Mon, Jan 22, 2018 8-6-6 4-4-7 3-4-9-7 3-9-0-1

Sun, Jan 21, 2018 6-0-9 4-0-6 3-3-0-2 5-7-9-0

Sat, Jan 20, 2018 0-0-9 5-9-5 3-4-3-5 8-0-2-9

Fri, Jan 19, 2018 5-1-2 1-5-6 8-1-2-8 4... [ More ]

Reply #14

adobea78 — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 01:55:36 GMT

Take any game matrix, set the parametric limits of the game for any randomizer , then observe what happens

Reply #13

adobea78 — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 01:48:59 GMT

You see, this is example while people find it hard to participate in any meaningful dialogue. No one is underestimating maths, my statement is rather the opposite if you care to pause a moment. Before you start talking about digits, prime numbers, should ask yourself the history of the words digit, prime and the assumptions behind. Every math theory,concept, equations etc started with hypothetical assumptions, so what am saying is, why not focus on the premise of the game?. Like I said , maths i... [ More ]

Reply #12

Soledad — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 01:18:50 GMT

Gravitational constant. I tweaked it for use with numbers and it worked. For instance looking quick at last year for you, June 11th 756. 219 would the numbers to follow. And I mean only from 756, not 657 or 567, 756. Anyways we can't expect 219 to always come afer 756 right. So divide 219 into pairs, 21,19,29. 927 on the 12th, 829 on the 14th, 492 on the 15th, 124 on the 16th, and finally 210 on the 20th. 21X exact.

Sometimes you get for instance 219 after but not frequently enough. It's the... [ More ]

Reply #11

grwurston — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 00:46:44 GMT

That's pretty cool to know. Can I ask where do you find that info

Reply #10

Soledad — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 00:31:43 GMT

I'll give you a prime example, 746 last draw in MD. 129 before it. Well, 487 follows 129, 48,47,87 pairs. 74 pair followed right after. 214, 21,14,24 pairs follow 746. Now I'm not saying next draw, but I'm saying you will see them sooner than you think. I know it's not win4 but my focus is pick3.

Reply #9

Soledad — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 00:22:52 GMT

I know I'm trolling a bit. I'm just sick of the negative thoughts regarding math , when obviously it's not true. I'm standing here everyday proving it. Yes there's a variable, an extra one granted, I mean it can't just be set in stone right, but it can't be underestimated either. Math works like a charm.

Reply #8

grwurston — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 00:19:11 GMT

I think Dr. Bowman was referring to lottery math in his 2nd post.

Reply #7

Soledad — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 00:17:41 GMT

Every single hit I have is based on math. Look at my statistics. And that's definitely not all of them. Just the ones I decided or had time to put. Trust me there is no other way. Guessing? No way. Never. Unless it's family. You'd be surprised what shows up on my papers.

Reply #6

Soledad — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 00:15:55 GMT

I don't do that either. Although, others do. And others use of that does work. I'm speaking of one in particular, obviously.

Reply #5

grwurston — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 00:10:28 GMT

When you are adding or subtracting numbers from each other, do NOT carry over the one.

Examples- 328 465

+495 -328

=713 =147

Reply #4

Soledad — Sun, 28 Jan 2018 00:03:30 GMT

Not antagonizing, I'm sorry to have to step in on this, BUT this is not true. Prime example - Prime Numbers, and the digit 1. Much is unknown. Just because, does not mean it is not true. Many roads lead to Rome granted. BUT do not underestimate math, underestimate human thinking.

Reply #3

DrDavidBowman — Sat, 27 Jan 2018 23:48:22 GMT

very sorry ...

all i meant was how do you do pick 4 maths

as in + and - those 0 to 9 digits ?

as in 9+9=8 ???

how does it go again ???

Kind Regards

Reply #2

adobea78 — Sat, 27 Jan 2018 23:27:17 GMT

Pick 4 has a pool of 10 digits, and every draw starts with 10,000 combinations, so which of the 10,000 combos are you analysing

Reply #1

adobea78 — Sat, 27 Jan 2018 23:18:38 GMT

There is no math in predicting random events, but one can get closer with theoretical assumptions. So what is your assumption when the premise of the game states 'all draws are exclusive

can someone please refresh how Pick 4 Maths work ?

DrDavidBowman — Sat, 27 Jan 2018 23:01:15 GMT

can someone please refresh how Pick 4 Maths work