I have developed a method to play Jackpot Games.

Reply #814

Sarge0202 — Mon, 08 Oct 2018 12:52:05 GMT

Well thanks for clearing that up

Reply #813

wander73 — Mon, 08 Oct 2018 03:57:06 GMT

Wow. Seriously. Think about what I said in there and then you will understand.

Gematria is geometry plus letters and numbers.

If Igor was helping everyone actually win legit the postings wouldn't go so far.

Reply #812

ressuccess — Sat, 06 Oct 2018 18:16:11 GMT

I agree with you on this one Sarge0202

Reply #811

Sarge0202 — Wed, 03 Oct 2018 21:15:49 GMT

Huh? Wut?!? I am looking to filter down my large result set. I am very confused on what you said here, please translate. Also an explanation on why these techniques would actually work would be useful. I am not questioning your intelligence or anything, I just need more definition.

One other thing that will work is prime numbers. What is the prime number to a certain, specific date? Seriously everyone learned them in school. Also, if there is 22 in a draw it could be 11 twice.

Yes, I learn... [ More ]

Reply #810

Big Joey — Tue, 02 Oct 2018 02:02:20 GMT

I like to try store bought quick picks with my form picks.

I have noticed at some stores, when you play form picks, the cashier validates the form twice, so you're playing with the cashier also. The cashier validates a ticket for themslves with the tip jar money, and you! I am always taken aback at that, someone playing my numbers too.

Reply #809

wander73 — Mon, 01 Oct 2018 17:52:17 GMT

I have only been reading tidbits to this thread. One other thing that will work is prime numbers. What is the prime number to a certain, specific date? Seriously everyone learned them in school. Also, if there is 22 in a draw it could be 11 twice. 14 is 41. so forth. gematria. I see Igor actually might take this into acct. Look on youtube everett pierce as well. @ancient40 if anyone does get 4 or 5 in the jackpot indicated it is what it's worth.

Your hands could act like a stop sign.... [ More ]

Reply #808

ancient40 — Mon, 01 Oct 2018 08:51:39 GMT

Has anybody nailed at least 4 of 5 jackpot yet with this method?? I'm going back to quick picks it seems i have wasted a few months chasing my tail employing this method and or any other. It's funny once in several months i have gotten 3 lines right out of 5 when my neighbor just picks numbers out of thin air and gets 3 of 5 about 5-8 times a month. I have wasted several hundred and most times to get only 1 or 2 out of 5 right. I'm throwing in the towel good luck to all the dreamers who give cha... [ More ]

Reply #807

Sarge0202 — Mon, 10 Sep 2018 01:24:42 GMT

As part of Igor's analysis method, I calculate the average number of times in a round (this game is 9 draws/games in a round) a number between 1 and 52 is picked zero times, one, two and 3 or more times. For the predictions I use the 8 previous games and add my calculated game and see how well it comes to the average amount.

The columns Zeros, singles, and triples are all 1 so they are at the best count. The doubles are at .8, and very close to max. If I were to replace the doubles column wi... [ More ]

Reply #806

alchemist7 — Mon, 10 Sep 2018 00:37:38 GMT

Hi Sarge,

Did you filter out the numbers that have previously hit? i know that there is a chance of the numbers could and probably hit more than once. I was thinking of using that as one of my many filters.

Alchemist

Reply #805

Sarge0202 — Sun, 09 Sep 2018 19:15:19 GMT

Here are the top 20ish results for Monday's Illinois Lotto game. The total score of 8.7 is higher then Saturday's top total of 8.1. I got 100,641 sets of numbers with the 8.7 score.

So anybody got a spare 100,640$ I can borrow? For this set I created an initial 6,413,549 records - outliers comes to 1,190,248 usable choices.

Reply #804

Sarge0202 — Sun, 09 Sep 2018 16:47:37 GMT

Man, if I only had $362,000, I could have won 12.5 Million last night in the Illinois Lottery (6/52, 1-in 20Million chance, RNG)......

I wrote a program (still tweaking it) using Igor's methods. First I wrote a program to analyse what he discussed in the book such as distributions, rounds, singles, doubles, etc. Then I added my own of horizontal sums and odd numbers.

My second program generated all (5-7 Million) combinations of the 4 top distributions I got from my analysis. I then we... [ More ]

Reply #803

ressuccess — Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:24:12 GMT

I agree with you with this one AllenB

Reply #802

AllenB — Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:35:09 GMT

I will be watching to see if the last few Posts were lethal injections for this Topic.

I support more control that Favors staying on the Thread Topic and not adding personal problems.

Anyway, it has been a good Topic, I hope it survives.

Reply #801

Todd — Fri, 31 Aug 2018 14:09:54 GMT

That is your decision to leave. If the rules drives you away, then you wouldn't last here anyway, sorry to say. 18 years of experience doing this informs me that around 2% of the people who register think that the rules are stupid and/or should not apply to them, and eventually they get angry or resentful and lash out at me or other member(s). So I suppose it's good that you recognize that it is not a good fit for you up-front before anything regretful happens.

Reply #800

SterlingK9 — Fri, 31 Aug 2018 13:45:46 GMT

Hi Todd,

The only issue I have with what you've just said is that the rule is a bit too blunt. It clearly does not discriminate between a non-spammer and a spammer. Your rule succeeded in driving me away. It did hurt, especially when I thought this is a great place for serious lottery players to gather and exchange ideas and I was very enthusiastic about contributing here. I've had a long career in programming and indulging in stuff like spamming is not even remotely in my mind - we've all go... [ More ]

Reply #799

Todd — Fri, 31 Aug 2018 13:31:37 GMT

Yes, it's also important to keep in mind that there is always one warning issued before the system suspends any account. So in order to get suspended someone has to try to post/send a link or e-mail address twice. The first warning even states that if they try again they will be suspended.

As others have mentioned, this policy is responsible for the nearly spam-free environment that members are able to enjoy here. There will ALWAYS be people who disagree with the policy (what subject does not... [ More ]

Reply #798

SterlingK9 — Fri, 31 Aug 2018 12:35:39 GMT

Thank you for that stunning piece of enlightenment. What would I do without noble souls such as yourself

Reply #797

Nikkicute — Fri, 31 Aug 2018 11:31:34 GMT

Ohhh, so that's what happened to PoundHound.

Don't get upset by THE RULES.

Your not the first New Member it has happned to.

New Members are NOT ALLOWED to post links within private message or you get the boot.

Those are THE RULES Todd has put in place to prevent spammers (not saying your one) and the like

from coming here and trying to sell members something.

Reply #796

KARAT — Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:49:42 GMT

SterlingK9, it is a pity!

But you wrote: I was getting ready to share my work in Excel and was in the process of trying to help another poster here. All I did was exchange my email address (to avoid cluttering up the thread) and immediately got suspended for that.

Reply #795

SterlingK9 — Tue, 28 Aug 2018 11:45:17 GMT

Unfortunately, I do not post anywhere at all these days. Used to be very active in trading forums...saw a lot friends drop out and hence, lost my enthusiasm. Coming to LP was a big step of sorts, but got quickly disappointed. I intend closing this account within a couple of days.

Reply #794

KARAT — Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:46:41 GMT

SterlingK9, on what site and with what name you can be found

Reply #793

KARAT — Tue, 28 Aug 2018 06:06:02 GMT

The author of a method Igor does not wish to apply computer programs. However, there are people who have successfully created, apply them and are ready to publish them for all.

Programs of the automated analysis of the data will help to develop a method further. Will appear more participants of a theme. Let's ask the moderator to allow place references to programs. Who will support it

Reply #792

SterlingK9 — Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:54:44 GMT

First post here! Well, not really....in another life, I was PoundHound. I was getting ready to share my work in Excel and was in the process of trying to help another poster here. All I did was exchange my email address (to avoid cluttering up the thread) and immediately got suspended for that. My requests to the administrator to re-instate the account while explaining the circumstances was met with stony silence. Well, I'm not a spammer or anything dodgy like that, yet I get suspended. I've kep... [ More ]

Reply #791

KARAT — Sun, 26 Aug 2018 17:25:39 GMT

Adamcustom, I did not ask the program giving to a combination for game. And your irony on concerning language is incorrect.

Here there are those who could create programs Excel for the analysis of circulations and creation of structures in colour. Mr-B 216, mitachoo, AllenB, notmyday, PoundHound or somebody, please, share the program.

Reply #790

adamcustom — Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:41:21 GMT

KARAT

Let me answer this one for Igor. For sure it has not been translated into any language. It's out only a couple of months so no way. If somebody comes up with an idea of translating it into any language I think they would also have to take care of the distribution of the book. In terms of potential I'd say the most interesting would be Cantonese/ Mandarin( given their well-known propensity for gambling of any kind) and Spanish.

As to the program I think there's none and even if it's i... [ More ]

Reply #789

KARAT — Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:27:26 GMT

1) Igor, whether is your book in Russian?

2) somebody Can load the program for work on Igor's method

Reply #788

LA Igrok — Sat, 04 Aug 2018 17:17:29 GMT

sorry... I can't read your message as it looks like a massive text of question marks...

Reply #787

LA Igrok — Fri, 03 Aug 2018 22:12:47 GMT

I cleared some space...

Reply #786

Maximillion — Fri, 03 Aug 2018 18:22:28 GMT

LAIgrok,

Can you please check you messages, because your inbox is full, and it is impossible to get in touch with you.

Thank you

Reply #785

Maximillion — Thu, 02 Aug 2018 06:17:30 GMT

I am for one have a lot of trouble with Kindle version for PC. Most of the tables are not formatted properly. And showing only partially.

Reply #784

LottoBux — Wed, 01 Aug 2018 16:36:26 GMT

Congrats On Your Wins,Igor

More Winners Than Normal = Lower Payout.

I Suppose Most Winners Played Birthday Numbers

--------------------------------------------------------

Also 2 Top Prize Winners.

Tuesday, July 31, 2018 | Winning Numbers | Draw #9033

3-8-10-11-25

Detailed Draw Results

Matching Numbers Winning Tickets Prize Amount

Matched 5 of 5 numbers 2 $82,492

Matched 4 of 5 Numbers 239 $255

Matched 3 of 5 Numbers 6,495 $11

Matched 2 of 5 Numbers

Reply #783

LA Igrok — Wed, 01 Aug 2018 09:42:20 GMT

I meant that because my actual basic combo of 3 numbers hasn't played this time (though I still won 4/5) I can attribute this result to my own efforts and strategy only partially... so, it's a statistical fluke that 2 out of 3 basics actually played but 2 additional variable numbers I figured out correctly for a reason...

Reply #782

adamcustom — Wed, 01 Aug 2018 09:28:11 GMT

People playing clever and smart using math to their advantage have to live with the fact that it still leaves them with some choices or educated guess to be made. At the end of the day this is a lottery so we cannot win every time we play.

Reply #781

LA Igrok — Wed, 01 Aug 2018 09:17:04 GMT

agree... so far the frequency of winning 4/5 looks way better than the mathematical probability...

also agree that hitting 4/5 or a JP are two quite different things... but this time I would have missed the JP in any case... I played active strategy with 3 core numbers and 2 more additional ( variable ) ones... and in this case only 2 out of 3 basics have played actually...

Reply #780

adamcustom — Wed, 01 Aug 2018 08:12:59 GMT

The frequency of 4 of 5 hits is really impressive. My respect to you.

Anyone who has hit a 4 of 5 on many occasions realizes that there is a huge gap between hitting a 4 of 5 and a 5 of 5. The thing is there are a lot of sets( much more than reasonable budget-minded people usually play) containing the 4 winning numbers and only one of them is the right one. Just pure math.

Reply #779

LA Igrok — Wed, 01 Aug 2018 03:05:26 GMT

6 numbers produce 15 different pairs... there are a lot of calculators on the internet that automatically calculate this kind of stuff...

Reply #778

LA Igrok — Wed, 01 Aug 2018 03:04:54 GMT

exactly... thank you, Adam...

Reply #777

LA Igrok — Wed, 01 Aug 2018 02:53:00 GMT

to Sarge0202

I made my best to satisfy Kindle requirements... all of a sudden they just removed the Kindle version from sale because like they told me it wasn't convenient for those readers using their cell phones for reading ... now it's OK with the sell phones but doesn't look so good with PC... it's their own internal glitch of transferring the text from one format into another... which unfortunately I cannot do anything about until they fix it somehow...

and, please, gentlemen, st... [ More ]

Reply #776

LA Igrok — Wed, 01 Aug 2018 02:38:42 GMT

today in CA Fantasy 5 I hit 4/5 once and 3/5 five times... !!!!... that's the 15-th time this year I was just a number away from hitting a JP... 3-8-10-11-25 is what actually played and I hit 8-10-11-25... what a nonsense...(((((( played 15 lines in total... the rest 9 lines have won the replays...

Reply #775

Sarge0202 — Mon, 30 Jul 2018 14:49:36 GMT

Thanks RL and Adam,

Plugging in the 15 gave me smoother results. Below are the top results with the number of consecutive pairs on the left and the count, on the right from doing the rounds in the history.

54 50

55 44

53 41

56 25

52 21

58 21

59 20

57 19

51 18

60 16

50 13

Now I need to go back and count/calc the number of unique, double and triple+ pairs per round. I will probably do that later, I need to get my numbers out for tonight's game. Thanks again... [ More ]

Reply #774

adamcustom — Mon, 30 Jul 2018 13:54:35 GMT

RL is absolutely correct. Let's say that these are the winning numbers : 1, 25, 26, 30, 31, 47 so we got following pairs:

1, 25

1, 26

1, 30

1, 31

1, 47

25, 26

25, 30

25, 31

25, 47

26, 30

26, 31

26, 47

30, 31

30, 47

31, 47

Reply #773

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Mon, 30 Jul 2018 09:16:57 GMT

15 pairs in a 6-number set. The 2/3 rule seems to hold true but that alone won't hand you the winning

combo. Expect to have to make some choices / guesses along the way, Playing smarter does not mean

you will be the next big winner but it should produce more wins overall.

RL

Reply #772

adamcustom — Mon, 30 Jul 2018 09:03:21 GMT

Are you 100% sure that 6 numbers produce 12 pairs

Reply #771

Sarge0202 — Sun, 29 Jul 2018 16:35:44 GMT

So for my 6/52 game that is 1326 possible unique combinations with 51 pairs of unique consecutive numbers. With 6 unique comes up with 12 different pairs. Therefore I need 1326/12 = 111 draws in a round for analysis. I should get 64 pairs with round (2/3 rule).

Dziekuje Ci

Last nights game I got 4 out of 10 tickets with a (minimum) win. Since overall odds are 11%, I can't complain.

Reply #770

adamcustom — Sun, 29 Jul 2018 08:04:18 GMT

Igor was referring to his game of 5/39. In this game you got 38 consecutive numbers or twins out of 39 numbers. 39 numbers will make 741 pairs( without repeats) and you got 10 pairs in each draw line as 5 numbers can make 10 pairs. So you divide 741 pairs by 10 and hence 74 draws.

Reply #769

Sarge0202 — Sun, 29 Jul 2018 01:16:17 GMT

Can somebody explain where Igor (love that name) gets the number of 74 on page 57. This is in regards to a 74 draws in a round to calculate consecutive numbers or what he calls twins.

Thanks.

Well I got most of the book implemented so far. I have to just go to add the twins, triplets, etc. I have done a slightly different approach and added my own filters such as vertical and horizontal sums, along with even/odd count. I'm doing it for the Illinois Lotto game, a 6/52 game pl... [ More ]

Reply #768

adamcustom — Sat, 21 Jul 2018 06:47:38 GMT

Sarge0202

People are math and logic resistant so no use trying to turn them around.

Reply #767

Sarge0202 — Sat, 21 Jul 2018 04:42:11 GMT

Yes, he is rude and I am not standing up for the guy. Looking at your sig file, I can tell you I would rather buy his book than get lottery advise from you.

Reply #766

Groppo — Fri, 20 Jul 2018 21:06:43 GMT

.

LA Igrok,

I'm going to save you the trouble of sending out one of your books. That would have been to me.

I just don't like how you told the other responder above about how rude he is. So, that was your

deal-breaker with me.

I for one am not interested in any book that claims a system .

Additionally, I'm not going to be put off from playing my favorite gambling games, because

there's a book out there . . . .

Who the heck are you, anyway, that I should take note... [ More ]

Reply #765

Sarge0202 — Fri, 20 Jul 2018 19:14:40 GMT

Looks like it is available in Kindle again

Reply #764

Sarge0202 — Fri, 20 Jul 2018 03:53:32 GMT

I saw this thread in the margin this morning. I started reading it and on page 3 I went to the amazon link and got disappointed. 48 pages later... more people are having the same problem. Should we send Igor a private message because he is losing sales

Reply #763

adamcustom — Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:06:39 GMT

A bit surprising as if the source file was good for so long what happened to it? I do not really know.

Reply #762

MillionsWanted — Thu, 19 Jul 2018 13:27:44 GMT

It's the digital version which is unavailable. it's the technical quality of the file itself which is the problem. The paperback is still available.

Item Under Review

This book is currently unavailable because there are significant quality issues with the source file supplied by the publisher.

The publisher has been notified and we will make the book available as soon as we receive a corrected file. As always, we value customer feedback.

Reply #761

adamcustom — Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:49:40 GMT

PDF version should be available without any problem.

If it actually is true then it's a good sign that some people are still able to use their brains, which is good and I didn't expect it to be honest. It's easier to believe in magic formulas, pyramids, birthdays etc., than to invest one's time in legit analysis.

Reply #760

MillionsWanted — Thu, 19 Jul 2018 09:45:28 GMT

On Amazon:

This title is not currently available for purchase .

Reply #759

Yang$118 — Sun, 15 Jul 2018 03:51:47 GMT

Pavizio$

Thank you

Reply #758

pavizlo$ — Sun, 15 Jul 2018 01:31:27 GMT

Read page 4 of this thread.

Reply #757

Yang$118 — Sat, 14 Jul 2018 15:58:19 GMT

Hello Nukkicute

Can you share where we can get/or buy a copy of the ebook

Thanks

Reply #756

Nikkicute — Sat, 14 Jul 2018 07:33:30 GMT

This seems like a really complicated Hot/Cold lotto system. (I have the e-book

Reply #755

Kristoff10 — Mon, 09 Jul 2018 05:28:17 GMT

Thank you for the feedback.

Reply #754

Prometheus1 — Sun, 08 Jul 2018 04:29:47 GMT

LA Igrok! At first, I read your intro and thought by chance James Simons was dropping by on one of his math missions. LOL

How great it is to have such distinguished and talented people join in on the forums from time to time. Thank you for your input. We use to have some real Math and statistics fans scattered around the forums. Unfortunately, It does seem that most have lost heart over time or become sort of roof rats.

Reply #753

LA Igrok — Sat, 07 Jul 2018 13:05:54 GMT

to Kristoff10... the frequency of the triplets can be easily calculated for each specific game... for example, in the 5 out of 39 lotto we have 37 different triplets...also there might be 9139 unique combinations of three numbers in total... 10 unique combinations of three numbers are played every draw of 5 numbers... so, one full round for the threes is 914 consecutive draws... 914:37=24.70 which means that a triplet has to be played once in 25 draws in average...

I did not abandon this topi... [ More ]

Reply #752

pavizlo$ — Sat, 07 Jul 2018 02:52:30 GMT

I use the following excel formula to convert a round of drawings into singles, twos,threes,... (see table 9 in the book).

=CONCATENATE(0,0,COUNTIF($K$5:$O$10,$K5))

Below is an illustrated example of how i convert the first 6 drawings of a round.

5/6/2018 5 8 10 30 32 001 002 004 002 001

5/5/2018 10 11 13 23 34 004 002 001 001 003

5/4/2018 6 14 27 28 34 001 001 002 001 003

5/3/2018 4 25 27 31 34 001 001 002 001 003

5/2/2018 9 10 11 19 35 001 004 002 001 002... [ More ]

Reply #751

mitachoo — Fri, 06 Jul 2018 23:42:18 GMT

Yup, discussion has pretty much dried up. Have I lost interest? No way . . . I've been hammering away at my Excel Spreadsheet for Pick 3, and have had some good results as of late. I plan on going after my state's Cash 5 (5 of 35) at some point but I'm not there yet; I want to get my Pick 3 strategy to a point where it's somewhat repeatable before I move on, so I can fund Cash 5 from my Pick 3 winnings

Reply #750

Kristoff10 — Fri, 06 Jul 2018 21:09:33 GMT

Although it looks like Igor isn't chiming in as much on this specific forum anymore I will update some results. I bought the kindle version back in late April and been testing on the Florida Fantasy 5. 5/36. I have had 4 out of 5 win results 5 times so far as well as many more 2 and 3 out of 5s. Unfortunately in Florida 4 out of 5 only pays $100-$555 depending on whether or not someone won the jackpot. I have employed more of a proactive strategy waiting on triplets which is falling every 20-25... [ More ]

Reply #749

mitachoo — Fri, 06 Jul 2018 18:50:33 GMT

Oh so close for today's Midday Pick 3! I correctly identified the pool of numbers (014689, 478, 467 for positions 1, 2, and 3), but I was foiled by my no more than 1 digit in common with the previous draw filter; today's draw ended up with 2 in common with yesterday's (746 yesterday, 446 today). Historically, the filter works 87% of the time, alas but 87% is not 100% . . .

Reply #748

mitachoo — Fri, 06 Jul 2018 14:03:19 GMT

Yuck! Not even close this time. Only got 1 digit out of 3.

Reply #747

Gambler667 — Fri, 06 Jul 2018 10:31:00 GMT

Congrats Mitachoo !

Gambler667

Reply #746

mitachoo — Fri, 06 Jul 2018 01:17:10 GMT

Didn't get a chance to buy my tix for the Evening Pick 3 Draw, so for the record, here's what I would have played:

369

412

417

419

437

439

462

467

469

812

817

819

837

839

862

867

869

I'll elaborate more on exactky how I'm picking numbers in a later post.

Reply #745

alta-babe — Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:37:38 GMT

Great news mitachoo ! I just purchase the book and I am studying it now. Glad that this thread is still going. I am learning a lot by reading through the thread as well. Thank you for sharing and thanks to all others who have offered constructive feedback, and of course a big thank you to Igor for the book.....awesome work

Reply #744

mitachoo — Thu, 05 Jul 2018 23:16:03 GMT

Hey hey! Hit my 3rd Pick 3 Jackpot using Igor's method! $9 in, $250 out (played $0.50 0n 18 combinations).

Reply #743

Gambler667 — Thu, 28 Jun 2018 23:11:02 GMT

Carbob,

Maybe not a secret formula but by now some great members with a great VBA code may have developed it and may be testing the method??

I wonder if we could be put inside the club for a trial...

Gambler667

Reply #742

CARBOB — Thu, 28 Jun 2018 12:41:54 GMT

Yes, I think he has more he could add. As for a secret formula, no. He would never have written the book

Reply #741

adamcustom — Thu, 28 Jun 2018 11:07:59 GMT

Bob,

You think that Igor has a secret winning formula? I do not think any such thing exists. You can go deeper and deeper with filtering or expand the idea into groups etc, but still it leaves you with more than a couple of question marks that is possible lines to play. So again the budget you are going to stick to.

Reply #740

CARBOB — Thu, 28 Jun 2018 09:56:36 GMT

I believe Igor has things in his book he omitted

Reply #739

Gambler667 — Wed, 27 Jun 2018 23:01:33 GMT

This thread seem dead! I wonder why...

Gambler667

Reply #738

PoundHound — Wed, 27 Jun 2018 21:30:00 GMT

Another small win on Thunderball today - just a tenner. Enough to keep the motivation going! Again, had matching numbers on different lines...but for that would have won a triple digit prize! Oh well....gotta keep playing with the same approach.

Reply #737

PoundHound — Mon, 25 Jun 2018 07:52:27 GMT

Thanks Gambler667! TB has just 39 main balls plus the Thunderball itself (1-14) - definitely offers better odds compared to the UK Lotto which has 59 main balls. However, the Lotto game has a Hotpicks version which is the one I go after when I feel strongly about it.

Reply #736

Gambler667 — Sun, 24 Jun 2018 23:37:05 GMT

Congratulations on your winning poundhound. Thunderball is a hard one to play.

Reply #735

PoundHound — Sun, 24 Jun 2018 07:11:20 GMT

Matched four balls on the Thunderball game on Saturday....but on different lines. Only won a measly 3 for matching the Thunderball itself. Need to persist

Reply #734

CARBOB — Sat, 23 Jun 2018 20:00:20 GMT

What is the total number of rounds you need to track for analysis or is there one

Reply #733

PoundHound — Sat, 23 Jun 2018 08:04:29 GMT

I may add that I played lines based on three of the best performing structures - certainly paid off

Reply #732

PoundHound — Sat, 23 Jun 2018 07:24:54 GMT

Won on 2 lines in last night's Thunderball game. Again, small prizes ( 5 and 15) but sure came close! I'm pleased at the developing consistency...hopefully the bin one is is around the corner

Reply #731

LA Igrok — Sat, 23 Jun 2018 03:12:41 GMT

glad it works for you too... pity it takes time to learn and to get used to... I myself am still learning a lot everyday... yesterday came up with great idea as it seemed... spend a lot of time analyzing and was quite sure that I'm gonna hit something serious tonight... thus bought 49 lines which is way above normal... though the lotto decided otherwise... I played all singles but it came in as 3 singles, one two and one four... in return I got only 34 free quick picks for 2/5s and 5 more 3/5s f... [ More ]

Reply #730

mitachoo — Sat, 23 Jun 2018 02:27:49 GMT

Huh. Just had an epiphany. Something you said a few weeks back just clicked; I ran some backtests and said holy crap! That works REALLY good ! Re-did my numbers for tonight s draw and cand up with a whole 5 combinations to play!

I played my original 18 plus there additional 5. Fingers crossed.

Reply #729

mitachoo — Sat, 23 Jun 2018 00:38:04 GMT

Hi Igor! I'm in the background lurking . . . still focusing on Pick 3.No Jackpot wins since a week and a half ago, but dayum I am getting a LOT of 2 out of 3 close but no cigars ! Hit 2 out of 3 yesterday in both the Afternoon and Evening draws, played 20-ish numbers for each draw.

Reply #728

PoundHound — Thu, 21 Jun 2018 06:08:15 GMT

Thanks! And congrats on your own win! I'm sure the next JP win is just a few lines away

Reply #727

LA Igrok — Thu, 21 Jun 2018 02:03:09 GMT

congratulations!... glad it works for you...

tonight wasn't that bad for me either... though could be way better... had 16 lines and won on all of them... 10 times 2/5 and 6 times 3/5... will get back 10 free replay tickets and $84... correctly guessed all 5 numbers but in different lines unfortunately...

Reply #726

PoundHound — Wed, 20 Jun 2018 21:16:10 GMT

First win today on the UK Thunderball game! Small prize - 10 (two main balls and the the Thunderball itself).

Enough to fund another 10 tickets. I did match two more numbers, unfortunately on different lines. For me,

this is proof that the system works.

Reply #725

PoundHound — Wed, 20 Jun 2018 06:16:53 GMT

Well, the draw took place yesterday. The structure that played out was the second one. I matched just one ball, having played four lines. The ball that matched was a repeat from the previous draw.

Interestingly, we ended up with fewer singles at the completion of the round. That is obviously because the number of doubles increased. Going to have to improve my selection of numbers.

Reply #724

PoundHound — Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:00:19 GMT

Done a bit more work on structures for Euromillions. Both sets of results posted below. Interesting thing for me is that as I will be playing only Pck 3 or Pick 4, I can use practically ANY of the top three structures from the larger set and still have a fair chance of winning (famous last words!).

Reply #723

PoundHound — Mon, 18 Jun 2018 20:28:37 GMT

Thank you

Reply #722

PoundHound — Mon, 18 Jun 2018 20:17:10 GMT

I've got loads more history...intend doing a full run on two years' history at least....that is, once I get off my bad mood for failing to take profits on my Euro long in time

Reply #721

Mr-B 216 — Mon, 18 Jun 2018 20:17:09 GMT

Nice job on the spreadsheet PoundHound

Reply #720

LA Igrok — Mon, 18 Jun 2018 20:13:05 GMT

in this case it looks fine... my concern was about your total number of the draws show as 142 only... therefore the overall statistics for the entire history might be a bit off of the actual one...

Reply #719

PoundHound — Mon, 18 Jun 2018 20:07:17 GMT

Hi Igrok,

I'm fairly certain I've done the right thing....here's an image that illustrates how I keep moving the set of 10 draws for working out the structure.

Reply #718

LA Igrok — Mon, 18 Jun 2018 19:43:37 GMT

I guess your calculations are incorrect... in order to collect all the available rounds' statistics regarding the structures it would be wrong just to divide the existing number of the draws by ten ( in your case)... there are 10 times more actual rounds because after collecting the data from the first round, which includes draws from 1 to 10, the next round will include the draws from 2 to 11, the following one will be from 3 to 12 and so on... to calculate all of them one draw has to be detach... [ More ]

Reply #717

PoundHound — Mon, 18 Jun 2018 19:29:47 GMT

Apologies...some of the numbers in the EuroMillions snapshot posted earlier had some numbers in Round 1 without the appropriate colour for Doubles

Here's the corrected image...

Reply #716

PoundHound — Mon, 18 Jun 2018 18:16:45 GMT

Top-performing structures for EuroMillions

Reply #715

PoundHound — Mon, 18 Jun 2018 17:51:08 GMT

Here's my attempt at applying the concepts from the book. It's a work in progress! I play Euromillions (the HotPicks version), the UK National Lottery (again, just the HotPicks version) and the UK ThunderBall game. The odds seem to be the best for EuroMillions where if you Pick 5 and match them all, you win 1 Million! There are smaller prizes for the smaller picks (from Pick 1 to Pick 4, in addition to Pick 5).

The 2/3 rule is definitely spot on and I'm grateful to Igrok for making this known... [ More ]