What are the bases of an algorithm for discovering patterns of a lottery

Reply #51

Lottomeister — Mon, 06 Aug 2018 16:49:59 GMT

Reply #50

GuesssWork — Sun, 05 Aug 2018 20:52:47 GMT

so in a nut shell the daily games are a lost cause to play and profit from i gather in the short and long run.

Reply #49

dr san — Sun, 05 Aug 2018 12:23:33 GMT

hello, perfect,aquarius, thank you

Reply #48

aquariuslottery — Sun, 05 Aug 2018 00:55:33 GMT

dr san,

Patterns always existed and will exist in lotteries. They are in perfect agreement with randomness which does not imply any specific outcome at any given time - anything (including groupings as you describe patterns) may happen and is equally possible.

Looking at past patterns is only useful for observing what kind of patterns exist and if they have a tendency to repeat and how long they last (some may last for a while). Trying to time patterns is a lost cause, they are random. Bu... [ More ]

Reply #47

dr san — Sat, 28 Jul 2018 20:18:01 GMT

hello, aquaris Standard, set, or architecture, drawn by a signal or set of signals that form a coherent model and point in a possible direction.

Standards are read simultaneously easier and harder than statistics.

More difficult as long as there is no environmental habituation and consequently intelligibility.

Easier because Pattern reading is largely intuitive. In a sense it can be said that the human brain is a supercomputer specialized in reading Patterns.

Like this:

A farmer s... [ More ]

Reply #46

aquariuslottery — Sat, 21 Jul 2018 04:48:25 GMT

Anal(ytic) or not the reason why millions of hours were spent for best-guessing is that there is no clear

definition of best-guess. Even if you only look at LP pretty much everybody has their own opinion what

the best-guess could be (including your humble). And the reason for that is that randomness does not

imply any specific output sequence - any output is possible with the same probability as any other. Wild

open field for best-guessing. And I dare to best-guess that there will be... [ More ]

Reply #45

dr san — Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:55:48 GMT

https://www.joomag.com/Frontend/WebService/downloadPDF.php?UID=0172796001473859227

Reply #44

dr san — Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:49:09 GMT

http://www.wsb.edu.pl/container/FORUM%20SCIENTIAE/forum%202016%20nr%201/kwartalnik-1-2016-5.pdf

Reply #43

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 18 Jul 2018 03:49:25 GMT

Many ways to extrapolate a set of numbers to play, mention prediction and the battle begins.

I prefer best-guess as it seems best suited for anything random. To predict something is to

have foreknowledge whereas the act of making a prediction does not. I would estimate millions

of hours have been wasted on the subject, anal-retentive if you ask me.

RL

Reply #42

dr san — Tue, 17 Jul 2018 12:27:24 GMT

standard Rorschach in lotteries

Reply #41

aquariuslottery — Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:30:37 GMT

If you look at the last 10 drawings, you will see a bunch of repeating digits. It has to be the case because 10 drawings involves choosing a digit 0-9 30 times, and since there are only 10 digits, there will be at least 20 repeating digits in there. It is totally random.

In lotteries randomness refers to probability - each number (in Pick 3 but not in jackpots) has the same probability of being drawn next. But it does not mean that numbers WILL BE DRAWN at the same (or at least similar) rate

Reply #40

Tucker Black — Tue, 17 Jul 2018 05:18:05 GMT

I came up with just over 60% chance of a repeating digit somewhere in the next 3 digits of the next drawing.

Anyway, what good is that? You can't bet on that outcome, and even if you could, you know the state is only going to pay you 50% of what the wager is worth.

Reply #39

dr san — Mon, 16 Jul 2018 10:42:04 GMT

ok, but you can observe this pattern = always from the last to the next pick 3 in 67% repeats a digit but not in the position,

ex =

489 = last, 862 repeated the digit 8 but not in the same position,

we have double pairs of pairs and pairs of pairs of odd pairs

I

127, the odd pair 17

or 429 = double s of pairs 42m we have three positions for doubles = 1,2 1,3 2,3

Also, the missing digits are missing from the pick.

three

ex = 159 = missing digits = 2,3,4,6,7,8,0

we ca... [ More ]

Reply #38

Tucker Black — Mon, 16 Jul 2018 05:16:43 GMT

Short terms trends are part of randomness.

For example, if pick 3 produced:

578

390

412

The fourth drawing would have to have a 6 in it in order for there to be no repeating digits. Because there are only 10 digits, the fourth drawing containing a 6 (the last digit not drawn in the last 3) must have two more digits that were already chosen in the last three. 569, 672, and 336 all contain repeats because 4 drawings has 12 digits in it, and there are only 10 digits fr... [ More ]

Reply #37

Lucky Loser — Sun, 15 Jul 2018 15:11:44 GMT

Many lottery gamblers believe the dumb as dirt lottery balls are alive and can communicate with each other; that the balls can recall their history and know which combination of numbers will frustrate the most number of gamblers and enhance lottery profits.

No, bobby, lottery players don't believe that those numbered ping pong balls are alive, okay.It's the player's brain and interpretation of the numbers they see at play which registers what's going on to them. The balls are doing nothing bu... [ More ]

Reply #36

bobby623 — Sat, 14 Jul 2018 20:46:08 GMT

Lucky Loser!

First of all, I had decided to step back and just mind my own lottery business.

I'm a 'system player' using what I believe is a 'winning strategy' that has paid off many times.

No jackpots yet, but, you never know what might happen in future.

Secondly, when I read your comments suggesting that lottery officials can manage the output of the 'daily game' lottery machines, I couldn't resist.

Many lottery gamblers believe the dumb as dirt lottery balls are alive and can c... [ More ]

Reply #35

Lucky Loser — Sat, 14 Jul 2018 19:29:57 GMT

Hi bobby. Well, I'm glad you cut me some slack and decided to continue chatting with me after saying we should go our separate ways. So, let me elaborate on your post point by point and then I'll include a very, very good article which I honestly recommend and hope you'll read. It's very telling about lottery games and the winners thereof.

you really believe that lottery officials have a means to manage the output from the daily game machines!!

Depends on what type of machines you're... [ More ]

Reply #34

bobby623 — Sat, 14 Jul 2018 17:17:18 GMT

Lucky Loser

I can't believe that you really believe that lottery officials have a means to manage the output from the daily game machines!!

Please actually monitor/view the drawings and tell us how anyone can control which objects will flow up the tubes, be locked at the top and declared the winner.

I've watched hundreds of Texas lottery web casts and have never observed anything out of the ordinary.

You can go to the site and replay the drawings as many times as you like.

I reali... [ More ]

Reply #33

Lucky Loser — Sat, 14 Jul 2018 15:05:19 GMT

Yeah, I'm pretty sure that the testing would tell a very different story especially on those exact returns. Of course, we know that those combinations are still in the fold but, we're discussing the overall likelihood of such events re-occurring without their pre-testing. I tend to focus more on a consecutive cycle of draws meaning from night to day and then back to night with the tests as a reference. I'm convinced that what the lotteries are actually doing is 'preserving' those combinations by... [ More ]

Reply #32

grwurston — Sat, 14 Jul 2018 00:54:05 GMT

I would love to know what the pre-test draws were for these 3 days on Md. midday this week.

7/8 444

7/9 484

7/10 244

Also interesting is how consecutive dates 6/9, 6/10, 6/11, 6/12 and 6/15, 6/16, 6/17 all had 3 digit repeats later on.

6/9 Mid 096 7/12 Mid 069

6/10 Eve 509 6/18 Eve 059

6/11 Mid 416 6/16 Eve 416 Exact

6/12 Mid 321 6/13 Mid 231

6/15 Mid 945 7/4 Mid 495

6/16 Eve 682 7/4 Eve 628

6/17 Eve 207 7/7 Eve 720

6/22 Eve 389 6/28 Mid 389 Exact

6/29 Mid

Reply #31

dr san — Fri, 13 Jul 2018 19:54:19 GMT

Hello, how to identify empty blocks within the game matrix?

And also empty blocks of numbers missing from a draw

Reply #30

aquariuslottery — Fri, 13 Jul 2018 06:57:08 GMT

I believe that short term trends (patterns) are deviations from randomness. For example, for some reason some numbers for a short period of time appear more frequently than others. This usually does not last for long but deviations like these are detectable. There is no guarantee that the detection will always be correct but it's possible and, IMHO worth trying. Obviously, over the time all deviations will cancel each other out and there will be no (or very little) difference in frequency. But t... [ More ]

Reply #29

aquariuslottery — Fri, 13 Jul 2018 06:40:22 GMT

In any lottery I look for trends in the input, the numbers from which winners are drawn (0-9 in Pick 3, 1-49 in 6/49 etc). I do not bother to look for relationships in the output - the winning sets (1000 combos in Pick3, 12+ million lines in 6/49), as for me it's an exercise in futility. The smaller the pool of numbers to analyse the easier it is to spot trends.

I go for simple but easy to compute statistics - hot, cold, repetitive, due, overdue and growing trend. These are easy to monitor fr... [ More ]

Reply #28

Stack47 — Fri, 13 Jul 2018 01:17:28 GMT

If you bother to look at the past patterns you will easily notice that some of them lasted for a period of time, sometimes for a quite long time.

Can you give an example of the type of patterns you look for and find.

it's quite easy to detect patterns in Pick 3 AS THEY OCCUR and definitely much harder for jackpot lotteries,

Are these patterns different than expected probability in pick-3 drawings

Reply #27

Stack47 — Fri, 13 Jul 2018 01:10:23 GMT

The odds of a digit repeating is 1 in 10, the odds of two digits repeating is 1 in 100 and the odds of all three digits repeating are exactly the same as any other three digit number being drawn, 1 in 1000. There are lots of examples where two digits repeat in the same digit position in every pick-3 and pick-4 games.

Jerry and Marge Selbee saw the flaw in Michigan's version of Cash Winfall in 2003 and played and won more money in Massachusetts when the Michigan game ended. They didn't find a... [ More ]

Reply #26

Stack47 — Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:39:24 GMT

I have a DOS based wheel making program that uses decades as standard filters. The 6/49 and 5/39 games always have at least 2 numbers in one decade because the 6 number lotto has five decades and the 5 number game has four; every possible combo has 2 numbers from one decade. PB and MM have more decades than the 5 numbers they draw, but the majority of combos have at least 2 numbers from one decade.

IMO all lottery bets are conditional including finding and playing the numbers that fall into

Reply #25

Lucky Loser — Thu, 12 Jul 2018 23:59:44 GMT

Okay, I'll go ahead and post it one more time just to establish that there has been and still is much more proof out there on a certain approach to win ANY lottery game... period.

https://www.thelottolife.com/blog/2015/2/23/strategies-how-these-mit-maths-whizzkids-managed-to-win-a-wh.html

*Those MIT mathematicians pushed odds, probability, statistics, and percentages to win that game many times over and, ultimately, caused it to be DISCONTINUED.

Now, let's go and have a quick look at... [ More ]

Reply #24

Artist77 — Thu, 12 Jul 2018 22:58:30 GMT

Mine as well

Reply #23

Original Bey — Thu, 12 Jul 2018 22:52:06 GMT

You nailed it completely. This is the premise on which my strategy is built.

Reply #22

bobby623 — Thu, 12 Jul 2018 22:26:40 GMT

Amen!

There are many patterns in the drawing history for any lottery game.

Problems is that they don't stand and hit you in nose.

You have to find them.

I've discovered that the best way to expose noteworthy patterns is to generate tracking charts that reveal events and features not

readily apparent when you evaluate the activity of 70 dead as dirt objects in a single vessel.

I use the power of substitution to the fullest extent possible.

The only problem is that my 'educ... [ More ]

Reply #21

grwurston — Thu, 12 Jul 2018 21:13:44 GMT

If you can't predict future drawings then how do people hit the P3 and P4 every day? It sure just isn't a lot of guess work, or picking numbers out of a hat. A lot of research and study of digits, patterns, and trends goes into their efforts to pick (predict) the winning number in the next draw.

Reply #20

dr san — Thu, 12 Jul 2018 19:17:17 GMT

Turcker = the repetitions, the absent, even and odd numbers,

The last digit, upper side, lower right and left side of the matrix

Are they standards for filters

Reply #19

Tucker Black — Thu, 12 Jul 2018 17:51:16 GMT

I'm not disagreeing with you that patterns exist today and in the future (any pattern, single digit, pair, difference between min and max, anything you can thing of... the possibilities are limitless).

The problem is that you don't know what the pattern will be in the future. THAT is random. Make sense

Reply #18

Todd — Thu, 12 Jul 2018 13:34:50 GMT

Maybe you just don't like the answer.

Reply #17

Raven62 — Thu, 12 Jul 2018 13:34:39 GMT

With this in mind: How do you get a sufficiently large sample

Reply #16

dr san — Thu, 12 Jul 2018 11:43:27 GMT

hello, I agree with you, aquarius, we still have the tendency for numbers to come to equilibrium, in cycles, in the last digit (0 to 9), in frequencies, and in repetitions

Reply #15

aquariuslottery — Thu, 12 Jul 2018 07:18:29 GMT

Patterns existed not only in the past, they also exist NOW and, as the time progresses, they become past.

If you bother to look at the past patterns you will easily notice that some of them lasted for a period of time, sometimes for a quite long time. If it happened in the past it is happening now and it will happen in the future. I do not bother to analyse the past patterns - they belong to history. But there are patterns occurring RIGHT NOW and these are my target. It is still hit and miss

Reply #14

Tucker Black — Thu, 12 Jul 2018 06:30:59 GMT

You can't predict future drawings. Pick numbers at random, use favorite numbers, or buy a quick-pick. They all have exactly the same chance of winning.

You can reduce the chances of having to share the jackpot if you avoid picking numbers that other people commonly choose (7 and 11 are lucky , numbers 1-12 for months, and numbers 1-31 for days of the month since many people use dates to pick numbers). Also, pick numbers that other people avoid, of which the only one I can think of is unlucky... [ More ]

Reply #13

dr san — Thu, 12 Jul 2018 04:50:17 GMT

(1) Mathematics is the language of nature.

(2) Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers.

(3) If you graph the numbers of any system, patterns emerge. Therefore, there are patterns, everywhere in nature.

Reply #12

jsmith4x — Thu, 12 Jul 2018 03:56:29 GMT

Look at average of numbers drawn, do a standard deviation. do std dev of all numbers, lowest, second lowest, ....to highest.

you can get alot out of excel, but will need to write a program to do the real crunching.

Reply #11

wander73 — Thu, 12 Jul 2018 03:07:34 GMT

If I post a topic no one wants to answer. the problem is nobody can really answer a major question.

Reply #10

Raven62 — Thu, 12 Jul 2018 02:11:45 GMT

Number of Combinations= 2,629,575

It would take: 7204.31507 years to draw every combination once

Reply #9

grwurston — Thu, 12 Jul 2018 01:56:02 GMT

So then what do you use to predict future drawings if you're not using past patterns

Reply #8

aux8b — Wed, 11 Jul 2018 22:11:07 GMT

9548032

5048877

7568670

3045376

Reply #7

EdG1955 — Wed, 11 Jul 2018 22:02:40 GMT

Tucker is absolutely correct that patterns only exist in the past. That being said, there are certain heuristics that could be used as the basis for an algorithm. Assuming you are picking the numbers to play, you might narrow the odds a tiny bit by measuring and applying observations like these (I only play MM and PB so I have no ideas about other games:

Up to 90% of PB result sets contain 2 numbers in one or more decades, IOW 2 #s in the 40s in Saturday's drawing or 2 #s in single digits an... [ More ]

Reply #6

dr san — Mon, 09 Jul 2018 11:10:17 GMT

ok, adobea78 thank you

Reply #5

adobea78 — Mon, 09 Jul 2018 03:29:56 GMT

7/31 matrix

set up: low 1, high 31, runs 2629575

use the setup to generate random strings(keep the string to 8 digits max).

Reply #4

Tucker Black — Sun, 08 Jul 2018 18:23:01 GMT

Patterns only exist in the past and are therefore useless for betting.

Reply #3

shano1962 — Sun, 08 Jul 2018 14:29:28 GMT

Depends on what your hoping to win. 3, 4, 5, 6 hits

Reply #2

dr san — Sun, 08 Jul 2018 13:43:32 GMT

Okay, can you give an example,

for a 31/7 lottery? please

Reply #1

Raven62 — Sun, 08 Jul 2018 13:06:53 GMT

Large sequences of similar random events are consistent and their averages can be confidently predicted within a sufficiently large sample.

What are the bases of an algorithm for discovering patterns of a lottery

dr san — Sun, 08 Jul 2018 12:49:59 GMT

What are the bases of an algorithm for discovering patterns of a lottery