Cycles - Interesting Numbers

Reply #176

lakerben — Sat, 29 Dec 2018 21:13:10 GMT

Yes.

I hit 3 of 5 all the time in the NM roadrunnercash but 3 of 5 only pays $5. No kidding.

Four of 5 pays $200. I hit 4 of 5,3 of 5,2 of 5 on one ticket and the payout was $206.

Some states pay more than others.

Nm has alot of repeat pairs,triples in the pick 5. Timing is everyrhing.

Reply #175

Hydromaln7 — Thu, 29 Nov 2018 13:52:19 GMT

Thank you oat, appreciate the recommendation.

Seems everyone's down on excel. Personally I love Excel, sure it has a high memory overhead for big data but it also allows a very strategic way to lay out data and track and trace it relatively simply.

I have not used any other number crunching tool that has allowed such flexibility as a spreadsheet.

If what I am doing was pure math then perhaps a stronger number cruncher would work. However there are so many logic junctions in my data anal... [ More ]

Reply #174

oate — Wed, 28 Nov 2018 23:58:51 GMT

Yes, all in Excel, my default go to program for number crunching and general graphing.

Seeing as this is a long-term project for you, have you considered learning to use more robust software like Mathematica or Matlab? There is also a free and open source Mathematica-like program called Sage, which you can either download or just use online. Mathematica also has a 15-day free trial.

Reply #173

Hydromaln7 — Wed, 28 Nov 2018 14:58:50 GMT

Dr did you ever see that movie A Beautiful Mind?

He got to a place that all his brilliance seemed like gibberish to everyone around him.

Sadly that is where I find myself when I read your posts. Not a criticism of you but an observation of my understanding and lack of it when I read your replies.

I can understand elements of what you have said and can see some quite brilliant observations and insights overall, however I can not always tie together what you are meaning as a whole?

You... [ More ]

Reply #172

dr san — Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:03:21 GMT

hidro , Statistically speaking:

1) Every number will eventually appear often enough that the average appearance will be roughly 50%. This means a simple calculation of it will or won't appear. Heads or tails coin flip. The more often there is a bunch of numbers drawn there is a greater chance that the numbers will approach the 50% line, HOWEVER!!... this leads to point 2

2) Even among the variations of the 50% ESTIMATE, there is a variation that is replicated in a bias among the group whic... [ More ]

Reply #171

dr san — Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:59:36 GMT

hello HIDRO,maln7

You also need to ensure that the data sets have an overlap period where the union of two sets are more common than other numbers. This union set would form the alignment alogrithm to array your results more accurately. Think of 3 circles of different sizes that all intersect in a single point near the middle of them all. they form a petal which is that exact union of numbers from the arising frequency. Ther would be as many petals as circles.

Consider also that the cir... [ More ]

Reply #170

Hydromaln7 — Wed, 28 Nov 2018 03:41:24 GMT

Thanks Kola.

YET is an awesome way of saying I don't know for sure .

Whilst it may seem that I am getting some amazing results based on historical game testing I am also getting some incredible failures.

I generally get very excited when I seem to be having unexpected success in my predictions (and throw up a premature post of my success), generally this happens within a range of results that I am working with. Once I then apply it to a broader data set some of the associations that I h... [ More ]

Reply #169

Hydromaln7 — Wed, 28 Nov 2018 03:23:46 GMT

Done most of that but thanks anyway Dr.

Empty sectors / missing numbers filled with projected variables based on natural log data distribution and also intensity ordered polynomial.

Natural Log distribution is derived from variables that have occurred, a Natural Log (NL) curve fits the data distributions that I have derived but is not an exacting fit to highs and lows. It gives an intensity distribution across the spectrum of data.

Intensity ordered polynomials are polynomials of a nth

Reply #168

dr san — Tue, 27 Nov 2018 11:08:33 GMT

ok hydro, you have to think about the numbers, next, but you also have to think about the empty sectors inside the matrix, you have to think about the pattern crossing two to two, you have to think about the missing numbers, empty sectors in the matrix are the rows and columns, Cartesian type ,

you have to think about the last digits, and the repetitions, and the delays

Reply #167

Kola — Mon, 26 Nov 2018 19:17:06 GMT

Great ideas Hydromaln7!

They are so fundamental to these games. I agree with you on the concepts of Static and Dynamic, my current signature is a nod to that and more. I once mentioned in a long-ago forgotten thread about the inherent flaw of using static data sets to make predictions. Static data does have its Strengths, but it's very helpful to know a thing's Limit as well. Static data is just a snapshot, a frozen picture in time, and only infers the dynamism behind it.

You said, What is... [ More ]

Reply #166

Hydromaln7 — Mon, 26 Nov 2018 03:41:18 GMT

The FUTURE is DYNAMIC.

DYNAMIC is a label given to the future, it is dynamic because it has not yet come into being. It is variable and dynamic because of this, some aspects of the future are predictable such as the next keystroke I make. Other aspects of the future are ambiguous, clouded in a multitude of decisions and directions that those decisions take them on.

I also use the term dynamic to describe my data analysis. If I rely on static data I get static outcomes, outcomes that span

Reply #165

GuesssWork — Sun, 25 Nov 2018 12:38:17 GMT

There is a relationship to past draws!!!

Wait, the past is static and dynamic is what?? are you saying dynamic is just a label and it does or does not exist. Kinda like me saying to you, see you tomorrow , but tomorrow in my mind never actually arrives.. Why because its a future time construct of thought that can never be met because the current day is today present/current and can never be tomorrow, for when its tomorrow its actually today or can it lol..

My crazy thoughts say present or... [ More ]

Reply #164

Hydromaln7 — Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:29:03 GMT

Thanks Mr-B 216, appreciate the post and nice to know I'm not alone in my tragic lotto quest

Reply #163

Hydromaln7 — Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:27:12 GMT

Sorry Karat,

Can not remember that one?? Jog my memory for me please?

And NO, sorry no software exists that does what I am trying to achieve, never has, never will.

All existing software fails, simple as that, all snake oil salesmen. No real proof of any of their systems.

Reply #162

KARAT — Thu, 22 Nov 2018 06:20:58 GMT

Hydromaln7, you wrote: There is a 3rd similar approach .

Explain please that the such 3rd similar approach .Whether there is a software

Reply #161

Mr-B 216 — Thu, 22 Nov 2018 04:18:04 GMT

In all honesty what I did was based on a hunch, an intuitive guess that went against my normal logic process, and once again by following my intuition it came up with a result that I can not fully comprehend.

Been there a few times myself. We sometimes get so wrapped up in our work, that we spin out of control. I find keeping things simple and thinking a little outside the box can sometimes be the key to victory.

Understanding what we did to get positive results isn't always clear as bell... [ More ]

Reply #160

Hydromaln7 — Thu, 22 Nov 2018 01:41:52 GMT

So I have again spent the better part of all night checking and rechecking my calcs....

And for the life of me I can not find an error.

In all honesty what I did was based on a hunch, an intuitive guess that went against my normal logic process, and once again by following my intuition it came up with a result that I can not fully comprehend.

I keep telling myself this can't be right, surely not, I've made a mistake somewhere, something is amiss.

I still need to keep digging back th... [ More ]

Reply #159

Hydromaln7 — Wed, 21 Nov 2018 23:48:49 GMT

I will be doing a fair bit more testing first AllanB

Once again I was stunned by the relatively simple yet abstract solution.

I had been digging a deep hole chasing an elusive variable. Numbers everywhere as I dug up to 50 layers deep and none of them made sense.

In the end the answer was only 3 layers deep. It comes down to proportional ratio's of dynamic variables.

As you will have found in your quests with gates and filters that every number in every game chops and changes with... [ More ]

Reply #158

AllenB — Wed, 21 Nov 2018 14:55:26 GMT

Sounds Like it is Time to Play for Real. You are apparently onto something.

I would say be careful, if you hit, you could be fooled into thinking you have actually done it and stop working on the process.

On the Other hand your game has a Jackpot that you really only need to hit Once, after which you will be busy spending and sharing the wealth.

Good Luck, Hyromaln7.

Hoping you are able to Stay Balanced with your coming Wealth.

Allenb

Reply #157

Hydromaln7 — Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:33:02 GMT

OK I know I said that's all folks but by crikey I think I've cracked it....

There is a relationship to past draws!!!

It exists on more than one dynamic and more than one level.

It is based around:

The number of hits in a cycle.

The total cycle hits.

The overall number of hits.

The time since x multiple layers.

The times since as a ratio of the total time.

These values + some others make up part of an algorithm for a dimensionless variable, this is t... [ More ]

Reply #156

Hydromaln7 — Mon, 12 Nov 2018 02:54:56 GMT

So the latest.....

I am chasing 12 digits that make up 6 numbers in my latest approach.

So far I am able to hit between 8 to 10 of the correct digits that make up the winning 6 numbers.

This equates to 4 or 5 right out of a 6 number play in a 6/45 game, consistent results over time and testing.

Whilst it has not give me the winning 6 it does show me something that many have said was all but impossible.

PREDICTABILITY

Yes that often maligned word that many despise when it comes

Reply #155

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 09 Nov 2018 01:53:44 GMT

So I have been doing testing using my refined and somewhat new approach, granted only a small sample and not blind (which means I can see the outcomes).

But in the last games tested I have had astounding outcomes.

My game is 6/45, the following is my testing results:

Game 1 - Selected a combination of 14 numbers. Winning numbers selected = 6.

Game 2 - S=12, W=5.

Game 3 - S=16, W=6.

Game 4 - S=15, W=5.

Game 5 - S=13, W=4.

Game 6 - S=14, W=6.

These where non sequential

Reply #154

Hydromaln7 — Wed, 07 Nov 2018 02:50:22 GMT

UPDATE...

To whom it may concern..

Mapping was killing my CPU memory, it was essentially a curiosity tool to get a visual on where different numbers where at for a given point in time. Pretty much anyone can map existing statistical data but then knowing what to compare that to is the trick.

Now I am doing a similar thing without the mapping and using a much smaller data set derived from statistical data that is dynamically compared. Dynamics normally shows changes to statistical data o... [ More ]

Reply #153

Hyperdimension — Fri, 02 Nov 2018 03:19:53 GMT

Well, I think I could get 1 to 3 straight hits on Pick 3 every 500 draws playing a single ticket per draw. I tested on different random sets generated on excel using RANDBETWEEN algorithm, that's my best effort on prediction. Maybe I could test my strategy on real lotto. Good luck with your numbers selection

Reply #152

Hyperdimension — Fri, 02 Nov 2018 03:12:51 GMT

It was very easy. I'm good at finding chaos patterns.

Reply #151

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 02 Nov 2018 02:45:08 GMT

Am I that predictable

Reply #150

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 02 Nov 2018 02:23:00 GMT

Easy HD, think differently and stop thinking at the same time ;-)

Seriously though I mean it, I don't know how I got where I am exactly. A lot of what I have done I do not understand when I go back over it and try to understand it.

It has been an evolution of chasing hints of something, and building on that by breaking down the next barrier each time I have gotten stuck.

Follow your instincts, your gut will direct your logic and evolve a solution, it's intuitive and not always structure... [ More ]

Reply #149

Hyperdimension — Thu, 01 Nov 2018 16:42:15 GMT

Hi Hydro,

Thanks for appreciate my research on your system. However, I want to learn how to do a similar approach of prediction.

Regards

Reply #148

Hydromaln7 — Thu, 01 Nov 2018 04:28:40 GMT

But wait there's more.....

V. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

We conclude that a suitably trained reservoir computing system is capable of approximating

the ergodic properties of the true system that it was trained on. Remarkably, as

shown in Sec. IV, it is possible to use the trained reservoir to calculate a large number of

positive and negative Lyapunov exponents of a high dimensional spatio-temporal chaotic

system with good accuracy. In the case of the Lorenz equations, our m... [ More ]

Reply #147

Hydromaln7 — Thu, 01 Nov 2018 04:10:10 GMT

Right... where to begin.

Hyperdimension posted a link to an article in another post here called

how could the computer find patterns in a lottery?

I'm not allowed to do links so go find it and have a look.

I reply posted to him there but include a copy here for anyone's interest.

Essentially what I read in the article that HD linked completely parallels to my methods and approach, I'm no mathematics pro so have a lot to learn about what they are developing and to draw from their... [ More ]

Reply #146

Hydromaln7 — Thu, 01 Nov 2018 03:28:41 GMT

So my latest findings.....

Parity - the state or condition of being equal.

I've been messing around with a dynamic element of my equation / method and made a very interesting discovery.

I have found a dynamic cyclic parity that occurs.

Dynamic in that it changes from number to number, game to game.

Cyclic in that this dynamic variable reduces to, or seems to be driven towards a set game frequency parity, in simple words it repeats to not a specific number but an overall pattern th... [ More ]

Reply #145

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 26 Oct 2018 04:13:08 GMT

Today I had a good day.

I have been having trouble with finalising my number selections to reduce the total number of numbers for my play pool.

Quick recap...

I am so far able to generate between 4 to 6 of the winning numbers in a 6/45 game with a play pool of between 12 to 24 numbers. Consistency has been fairly random as I test this across larger and larger numbers of games.

So today I did a little tweak and had a light bulb moment.

I figured out a way to structure my play pool

Reply #144

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 19 Oct 2018 23:41:11 GMT

Hi Butch and thanks for the information.

I have done a similar exercise but with differentials.

This is the difference in the numbers in a game, for example:

Winning numbers 1 - 5 - 20 - 33 - 40 - 42

Differentials

5 - 1 = 4

20 - 5 = 15

33 - 20 = 13

40 - 33 = 7

42 - 40 = 2

So you end up with 5 differentials.

4 - 15 - 13 - 7 - 2

You can then analyze and compare the differences between numbers which you will find more useful than just comparing the numbers themse... [ More ]

Reply #143

butch2030 — Fri, 19 Oct 2018 13:00:01 GMT

I don't know what you think, but I found patterns are everything. Here is my file of the IL Lotto (6/52). Going back to 01/17/98 thru 10/11/18 there have been 2,870 drawings. I look for patterns in 4 out of 6. I have come up with 616 Groups which make up 2,569 of the total 2,870 drawings or 89.51%.

Go To: https://app.box.com/s/4ib1zaht0w8g9oshajlo3i2dbyswu2dp

Good Luck Best Wishes.................

Reply #142

Hydromaln7 — Wed, 17 Oct 2018 23:43:44 GMT

If you follow any of my ramblings read on.....

Otherwise thanks for stopping by.

Over in another post Tired of loosing I gave a bit of a clearer definition of what I am doing.

Quick summary. Finding an element of dynamic conformity utilising dynamic data analysis and Bayesian reduction.

NOT a pattern.

An element of conformity that has allowed me an odds advantage.

It seems to be attached to the law of averages yet not conforming fully.

So I tripped across a different post

Reply #141

Hydromaln7 — Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:26:47 GMT

AAARRRRGGGGHHHHH!!!

Hindsight is a wonderful thing.

Last weekend lotto 6/45.

If I'd played my system I would have played 3 games of 12 numbers at a cost of around $2k.

I would have hit 2nd division 5 numbers + supplementary and won around $8.5k.

So sad, think I need to grow some.

Reply #140

Hydromaln7 — Tue, 16 Oct 2018 04:47:18 GMT

Hi AllenB,

Yeah nah nothing space age about me, apart from a recurring dream I've had since I was 4 of being on a flying saucer Weird how some things stick with you all your life.

Lately I'm off on tangents again trying to see if I do something a little different will it make a difference? So far no joy.

I have my core approach which is working, I know it is because of the repeatability and odds advantage it derives. But it only seems to work to a point that is out of my reach financial... [ More ]

Reply #139

AllenB — Tue, 16 Oct 2018 03:44:35 GMT

`So started from scratch, darnedest thing I found was that I could not for the life of me follow half of my own equations, algorithms or logic??

That Statement fits me to a T. What I usually discover is that there is something wrong with Either the Formula or Logic behind it. Sometimes it is a Typo that mimics good data. I also find that I simplify the process when I try to Recreate it or Come up with entirely new column(s) to Track.

I am Stacking Rocks in an Ancient City. Even though I Tr... [ More ]

Reply #138

Hydromaln7 — Tue, 16 Oct 2018 02:37:14 GMT

So I've been doing some more tests.

Results are mixed...

5 from 12

6 from 18

4 from 20

etc. etc..

I have found an underlying truth that holds for about 75% of selections or in my case exclusions.

But have been experiencing difficulty in nailing down that last 25%, until hopefully today. In a game of 6 winning numbers 25% can represent 2 numbers.

So started from scratch, darnedest thing I found was that I could not for the life of me follow half of my own equations, algori... [ More ]

Reply #137

Hydromaln7 — Sun, 14 Oct 2018 23:36:00 GMT

Thanks Kola, much of what you read here will be a progression and summary of my thoughts and approach.

Everything I do is listed here, everything.

What is not listed is each specific step and the sequence.

Reply #136

Hydromaln7 — Sun, 14 Oct 2018 23:31:56 GMT

You need twisted thinking to try left field concepts.

Nothing came about by everyone thinking the same way.

Keep at it.

There are more than 50 shades of magenta

Reply #135

Kola — Sun, 14 Oct 2018 19:17:56 GMT

Hello Hydromaln7,

with much of what you say here and with some of your earlier posts.

Good luck with learning how to calculate these dynamic patterns.

Reply #134

GuesssWork — Sun, 14 Oct 2018 10:30:49 GMT

And just as quick as it appeared...... It's gone (quantum bunnies).--- Here today, current/present time gone tomorrow hah?. Did you know that tomorrow actually never arrives?.

Now that's twisted

A new way to look at data and quantify where it stands and what it is doing. I'm thinking of this as being in comparison to the color magenta, but its the most updated but lets use the label we have been taught in school, Dynamic Data.. Events perceived or logged are past events once the min... [ More ]

Reply #133

Hydromaln7 — Sat, 13 Oct 2018 19:45:06 GMT

Pattern recognition does not work.

There are loose repeats of various patterns but prediction of when and where these will occur against the actual numbers.......... I found it an exercise in futility.

Reply #132

Hyperdimension — Sat, 13 Oct 2018 19:29:55 GMT

Pattern recognition.

Reply #131

Hydromaln7 — Sat, 13 Oct 2018 16:27:20 GMT

And yes I have hinted at many elements of my method.

Everything that has been done in the past has all been static.

Recently with the advent of NN and AI systems an element of dynamic has been introduced. These facilitate a continuous refinement of the process in an effort to define the outcome.

I can tell you now that this will all fail because the answer is not in the actual numbers.

I have run just about ever conceivable statistical analysis on the numbers.

Which ever way you l... [ More ]

Reply #130

Hydromaln7 — Sat, 13 Oct 2018 15:59:44 GMT

How did you know who I really am

Reply #129

Hyperdimension — Sat, 13 Oct 2018 14:15:08 GMT

Hi GuessWork,

Hydromaln7 aka Numbers_Guru actually gave us a key hint, the numbers are dynamic [not static], that's how he obtained the amazing results above probability, I am experimenting in that area on Pick 3.

Reply #128

GuesssWork — Sat, 13 Oct 2018 10:16:31 GMT

Hard to explain and if I did then everyone would know what I am doing, so no advantage to me. -Did you give hints without meaning to

Reply #127

Hydromaln7 — Sat, 13 Oct 2018 00:41:44 GMT

Thanks Timmsy for the heads up.

I can do similar with VBA in excel but it's not a shell script so would take longer to run.

Besides I'm not counting popular numbers. Not entirely sure that a script of any code could do what I need?

Happy that you are winning against the machine.

Reply #126

lucky1day — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 22:51:27 GMT

Great thread!

I find threads like this fascinating because by reading various implied techniques, you quickly learn that your own process could benefit from such a method. In other words, if my current process started out with 5 correct numbers out of 15, I could make a living with lottery.

Good luck

Reply #125

timmsy — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 12:16:34 GMT

lol I had the same issue last year with Excel and that's why I don't use Excel to number crunching for keno and lotto ,, I use powershell so start learning powershell some code for Combinations https://github.com/dfinke/PowerShellCombinations good place to start

I couldn't find any lotto scripts to do what i need so i made my own,

Note : i am not sharing or selling the script as it took a very long time to write

but this Example is Keno but works for any lotto

download the past w... [ More ]

Reply #124

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 06:34:46 GMT

Going to check out the VRA in more detail.

Looks like it might enhance on of my steps.

Thanks for the heads up on this.

Reply #123

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 06:29:11 GMT

Sorry that should have been:

5 numbers hit from playing 7 off 10 number sets.

So essentially 5 from 10 having played 7 x 10 number sets.

Reply #122

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 06:22:35 GMT

It's not just the method or the equations, it's the approach as well.

I would like to say, hey it's easy just do this that and the other and hey presto you have the next set of winning numbers. But it is not that easy.

It takes thinking differently, I am not a mathematician so i am not constrained to think the way that they have been trained to think.

Hence I come up with complete odd ball approaches that sometimes don't make sense to me during the approach let alone after I have finish... [ More ]

Reply #121

Hyperdimension — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 06:14:40 GMT

Hydro,

It's impossible that anyone copy your system, I think no one understand it, however, I want to try something similar for pick 3.

Reply #120

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 06:10:14 GMT

The graphs posted and data attached to them are only snapshots of the dynamics that are happening in the background.

They are one element of one of the data sets.

I am running multiple data sets which are layered to create a progression that is non time dimension constrained (not entirely as time is contained within the derived numbers, very hard to explain). These are multi layered maps to build a progression at one step in the process that defines a specific trait that is being analysed.... [ More ]

Reply #119

Hyperdimension — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 06:07:50 GMT

The STATIC chance is only 1.11%, big improvement.

Reply #118

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 06:04:35 GMT

First fail...

5 numbers hit from a 15 number set.

No 6th number achieved.

Still 5 from 15 potentially played is not a bad outcome.

Reply #117

Hyperdimension — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 06:03:34 GMT

Ok, the statistics only apply to Static groups? and your results apply to Dynamic groups

Reply #116

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 05:52:14 GMT

Sorry but no, too large a data set.

Reply #115

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 05:50:54 GMT

The non dimensional variables are part of the secret. Knowing what to do with them is the second step, knowing what to do with that data is the third step, refining that data is the fourth step and applying Bayesian analysis at each stage within a NN is the next step.

There is no way to define the dynamics of the number changes without this. You need to define a number of variable behaviour traits of each individual data set that is derived at each level of analysis.

To define the changes... [ More ]

Reply #114

Hyperdimension — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 05:40:38 GMT

I promise to exploit only Pick 3 and Pick 4, your lotto is yours.

Reply #113

Hyperdimension — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 05:37:46 GMT

Could you upload the data that generate that image? Its hard to understand.

Reply #112

Hyperdimension — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 05:32:43 GMT

VRA has more dimensions if more data, 50+, the part that you say that measure non dimensional variables is your secret.

Reply #111

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 05:31:41 GMT

If you hunt back through this post you will see some images of the maps I generate.

A lot of discussion took off on tangents about quantum bunnies and phantom wabbits, just a bit of fun trying to define the elusive dimensionless variables.

Reply #110

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 05:30:01 GMT

Similar concept but that is only 2 dimensional.

I'm running multi dimensional analysis on non dimensional variables.

Reply #109

Hyperdimension — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 05:23:39 GMT

The closest software I have to analyze numbers like topological data is VRA

I like your approach, I love numbers, I'll try Pick 3.

Reply #108

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 05:15:37 GMT

Sticking with what I know for now.

Trying to master 2 things at once is more than I could cope with.

As for insights...... I have plenty bombarding me every night. Not all lead to that elusive pot of gold.

Reply #107

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 05:13:45 GMT

And no to the numbers of the next draw.

All future draws are excluded from the data set, only past draws are utilised.

Reply #106

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 05:11:09 GMT

Hard to explain and if I did then everyone would know what I am doing, so no advantage to me.

Essentially it comes down to popularity and behaviour, but not of the actual numbers, a derive a dimensionless variable that I then apply various dynamic and statistical measures against. I map this out like a topographical map and then trace the dimensionless variables movement on these maps.

People need to move away from statistical analysis and apply dynamic measures. Any statistical measuremen... [ More ]

Reply #105

JAMORA — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 04:38:10 GMT

I would think that starting with the games of better odds, pick 3 pick 4, you could gain some insights....after all if you can't master 3 or 4 digits....why bother with more yet

Reply #104

Hyperdimension — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 04:32:33 GMT

That happened because different sets are equal in hits on same history. However, what are you testing? the numbers of next draw

Reply #103

Hyperdimension — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 04:17:11 GMT

The 3 methods apply same idea, use all the V numbers, then try to concentrate hits on first columns.

Reply #102

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 04:13:45 GMT

If mine plays out I'd call it a fingerprint.

More detailed than a signature.

Reply #101

Hyperdimension — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 04:12:40 GMT

Yes, I'm using GAT for this experiment, I think your approach and GAT are correlated on signatures. There is a 3rd similar approach I will investigate, and that is freeware.

Reply #100

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 04:04:03 GMT

Winner again...

A bit different on this one in that I would have had to play 6 sets of 14 numbers.

13 of the numbers between the 6 sets are identical, the last number is different.

5 of them had 5 number hits.

1 of them had a 6 number hit.

So a bit of a curve ball on that one for me.

Reply #99

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 03:56:12 GMT

You use Anastasios GAT engine?

I am a big fan of his research, don't use his software though.

But it was some of his insights as well as the rainbow system that every time I felt like giving up inspired me to keep trying. I then found an article on how Deep Mind did some lotto number analysis and found an underlying connection, although it could not use it to predict outcomes for future events it found something but no one knew exactly what? This seemed to gell well with what Anastasios ca... [ More ]

Reply #98

Hyperdimension — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 03:39:04 GMT

After reading your thread about cycles, I think it could be applied to Pick 3 or Pick 4, its the same as any other lotto.

I'm actually applying that approach with GAT since I don't know your strategy. I mean, it is easy to hit 1 in 1000 than 1 in million.

Reply #97

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 03:36:30 GMT

I don't know what pick 3 or 4 is? I have never investigated them, I have solely focused my last 10 years of research into the 6/45.

I have noted from visiting this and other lottery sites that many people bounce around from one game to the other and never maintain a focus on a particular game.

I call this the distraction equation ;-)

Mr Lustig (RIP) said his most crucial advice was consistency, consistent approach, consistent numbers, consistent frequency etc...

Hence I have chosen t... [ More ]

Reply #96

Hyperdimension — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 03:24:06 GMT

Hi Hydromaln7,

If your system works on a lotto 6/45 then it will work on Pick 3 or Pick 4, did you test those lotteries

Reply #95

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 03:20:34 GMT

Also forgot to mention that sometimes I don't get 6 winning numbers.

This is not a big issue as it usually comes in at the final selection step, this step seeks to eliminate numbers that do not fall within certain constraints for my final number selection.

If it can not do this then I am left with residuals, let's call them Y, Y can up to 6 residual numbers on top of my average 14 number pool.

This would then mean I have either:

1 x 20 number pool.

or

6 x 15 number pools.

My... [ More ]

Reply #94

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 12 Oct 2018 03:12:37 GMT

Just an update.....

Have done another couple of runs on random target games in my 6/45.

Results still holding up, getting 6 winning numbers from a pool of between 11 to 16.

Currently running a cycle with 4 winning numbers hit from pool of 9 numbers.

My method is actually quite simple and logical but counter intuitive at the same time, but in reality it is very complex to find the right methods and approaches.

Every approach is initially based on a philosophy of what is happening.... [ More ]

Reply #93

Hydromaln7 — Thu, 11 Oct 2018 22:53:56 GMT

Hi AllenB,

Yeah done the future contamination before so aware of potential for contamination.

Have checked through all my equations and algorithms and will be rechecking again as well as further blind testing. Will also be blind testing against real future draws to see what outcomes I get.

I've gotten excited in the past when something similar happened but that was based on a much simpler forecasting technique which had future outcomes contamination. Couldn't find it at first but knew... [ More ]

Reply #92

AllenB — Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:44:13 GMT

3 Games in a row. 100% Success. Be Careful, could be you slipped in a little future knowledge into you data somewhere.

Success with a System (However Fleeting) always makes me Ponder Your Question. I am Pretty Sure that Your Life would Change Radically. Your Thought certainly would. I See issues with Paranoia and for good reason. If anyone finds out who you are, You are talking about $$ that would inspire them to Try to Take if from you. Get Read to Start Looking Over You Shoulder.

Reply #91

Hydromaln7 — Thu, 11 Oct 2018 14:20:57 GMT

WOW

I spent the last week chasing down blind alley's.

No matter what I tried nothing was giving any improvement.

Then today everything changed.

Prior history:

Game type: 6/45.

Approach: Minimise played numbers, maximise winning numbers.

Results: Variable. Able to consistently get 4 to 5 winning numbers against a 18 to 24 number play set.

Occasional approx every 12 weeks 6 winning numbers from between 18 to 24 number play set.

Today that changed.

Only early results... [ More ]

Reply #90

Hydromaln7 — Thu, 04 Oct 2018 06:40:01 GMT

So this is really killing me at the moment.

In a 6/45 game I've worked out:

How to consistently get 5 numbers from a selection pool of between 18 to 24 numbers. The 5 number hit comes up on either the next game or the one that follows, consistently!! How to intermittently get 6 numbers from a selection pool of between 18 to 24 numbers. The 6 number hit comes up randomly, I can not get a fix on what triggers it.

What this is showing me is that I have found a way to reduce the number po... [ More ]

Reply #89

Hydromaln7 — Mon, 01 Oct 2018 02:37:02 GMT

Thanks thamizhpayan

Yeah, apart from all my midnight thumb typed spelling mistakes ;-)

Fools gold and snake oil, plenty of both for us poor unsuspecting fools.

Reply #88

Soledad — Mon, 01 Oct 2018 02:21:30 GMT

A good rant. What matters only is that you see something when you want to. Whether determining that is a problem or not is for you to decide.

Reply #87

thamizhpayan — Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:42:16 GMT

This is one of the topmost useful posts in LP.

Reply #86

Hydromaln7 — Fri, 28 Sep 2018 23:46:34 GMT

Indeed bankrolling a very important point TB.

Might surprise some but I don't actually play the lotto, apart from a pot luck jab at it on occasion.

I decided that I wanted to have the best possible chance of a return before investing any hard earnt cash.

This is why whatever I end up with as my final approach needs to be solid.

My parents where tragic gamblers, I choose not to be.

Did some more testing with my method yesterday and was able to get a consistent 5/18 played. But not... [ More ]

Reply #85

Tucker Black — Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:06:27 GMT

re infinite -- if the field of numbers were infinite (aside from the logistical problem that it would take an infinite amount of time just to do the drawing), the probability of winning would be zero. As in, completely and totally impossible.

One thing that players should consider is this: bankroll management. What that means is to have a budget for buying lottery tickets, and in advance, you decide at what point do you keep any gross winnings (could be anything, $1, or $1,000). Then you... [ More ]

Reply #84

Hydromaln7 — Wed, 26 Sep 2018 03:53:58 GMT

If the drawings were random without replacement, then obviously you would keep track of the numbers chosen and not choose them again on your next ticket (sort of like the Three Strikes game on Price is Right). But that's not what happens. - TB

To with or to without? That is the question? Nah not really I just thought that sounded funny.

You are still looking at the actual numbers, I am not. So what they are or are not is irrelevant to me, set or reset? Replaced or not replaced?

The... [ More ]

Reply #83

Hydromaln7 — Wed, 26 Sep 2018 02:31:53 GMT

EDSK yes we do and then we don't.

Not wanting to start a whole different discussion train on philosophy though.

As for the numbers they exist wherever and whenever they want.

And like time are a construct of our minds that are used to meter and measure.

But lotto numbers are the discussion point here.

We should reevaluate the way we perceive them and count them.

Ascribe measurement to them that is non linear yet retains a linear or time component in the actual number itself.... [ More ]

Reply #82

Hydromaln7 — Wed, 26 Sep 2018 02:24:05 GMT

Hi TB and thanks weighing in.

I have a confession to make. I checked some of your history and understand your thoughts more clearly because of that. Why? Because I need people who don't always think the same as I do to challenge my concepts and sometimes assumptions.

I'll give some thought to your comments and reply soon, very busy at present time.

Reply #81

eddessaknight — Tue, 25 Sep 2018 22:32:01 GMT

Hydromaln7, first of all. you are to be commended for your valiant non-linear thinking

Respectably, don't we all live in a world of time and space? Consequently there is a separation between our desires and the fulfillment that we all seek. Obstacle are now to fill that space. Chaos is able to penetrate that space.

Can the balls travel without moving?

IT is not worth the while to go round the world, to count the cats in Zanzibar.

Our life is frittered away by detail. Si... [ More ]

Reply #80

Tucker Black — Tue, 25 Sep 2018 20:12:25 GMT

When the drawing is done, the lottery puts the winning numbers back in the hopper. In other words, they are drawn at random with replacement. This re-sets the probability of any of the available numbers right back to what it was before the last drawing.

If the drawings were random without replacement, then obviously you would keep track of the numbers chosen and not choose them again on your next ticket (sort of like the Three Strikes game on Price is Right). But that's not what happens.... [ More ]

Reply #79

Hydromaln7 — Tue, 25 Sep 2018 05:45:45 GMT

Hi Spot9,

Firstly what I think of time. Time is a construct of man against which movement and frequency is given meaning within the constraints of our dimensional limitations.

So that sounds weird hey? Not meant to, essentially we measure everything by time, from the day of our inception to our departure. Not trying to ascribe any weirdness to this. It is what it is, we are constrained by it and consumed by it, hence we are so focused on it.

So is a lottery time series all non-stationar... [ More ]

Reply #78

Spot9 — Mon, 24 Sep 2018 20:20:56 GMT

Hi Hydromaln7,

I was just wondering if a lottery time series was all non-stationary data?

From Wikipedia - In contrast to the non-stationary process that has a variable variance and

a mean that does not remain near, or returns to a long-run mean over time, the stationaryprocess

reverts around a constant long-term mean and has a constant variance independent of time.

Spot9

Reply #77

Hydromaln7 — Sun, 23 Sep 2018 08:31:30 GMT

Well I'm feeling a bit like death warmed up. Had the worst flu of my life, episodes of delirium, runaway temps, medicated to the eyeballs.

So haven't really done much in the running of calcs for the new model I'm developing.

What I have done though is had time to conceptualise the layout of my model, key factors.

It will be dynamic. All the models and numbers I use in my approach are dynamic. They change from game to game. It will be dimensionless. The numbers I use have no dimensional... [ More ]