<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Adjusting Pearson&#x27;s test statistic for k/N-type lottos</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/324052</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/324052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Adjusting Pearson&#x27;s test statistic for k/N-type lottos</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Adjusting Pearson&#x27;s test statistic for k/N-type lottos</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/324052</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/324052</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 03:19:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>oate</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Here&#x27;s something for math people who like to do statistical analysis on lottery data<br /><br />Tests of uniformity for sets of lotto numbers (Harry Joe)<br /><br />https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167715293901415 (sorry, the full text of the article is behind a paywall but you might have institution access)<br /><br />Chi-square and the Lottery (Christian Genest, Richard A. Lockhart, and Michael A. Stephens)<br /><br />http://lstats0.tripod.com/_TheLottery.pdf<br /><br />Here&#x27;s the gist of it:<br /><br />Pearson&#x27;s test stat... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/324052">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>oate</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

