The way the lotteries look at people working on systems

Reply #16

Mike973 — Mon, 12 Aug 2019 21:16:20 GMT

That was funny lol come on gunner

Reply #15

Nikkicute — Mon, 12 Aug 2019 14:35:04 GMT

100

Reply #14

Lucky Loser — Sun, 11 Aug 2019 18:37:56 GMT

I only watched a short portion of this video and decided that it's largely unreasonable in its intent but still has merit. No harm intended to the poster of it at all. How many times are we exposed to animals of the same species that are either trained to be, learn by numerous trial and error, or just by nature smarter than others? It happens every single day and is probably happening somewhere now. To assume that no human(s) have been able to master all lottery games actually isn't unreasonable... [ More ]

Reply #13

BobP — Tue, 06 Aug 2019 03:28:37 GMT

Goberment needs to be prepared for any eventuality from a winning lottery system to zombies. In the event it happens and they turn to that page in the contingency plan and the instructions are: Run in circles, scream and shout. maybe we'll get a refund. Seriously, they have to plan for the possibility no matter how unlikely, though I don't think they buy or test systems. Good chance JP winners are asked if they used a system, good chance the winner isn't all that forthcoming.

BobP

Wha... [ More ]

Reply #12

garyo1954 — Tue, 06 Aug 2019 01:40:41 GMT

Yeah, pretty much right. Most of it is looking for some little tell that would tip the odds maybe a single decimal point in our favor. It only has to work one time, we retire, write book on our system and sell it on Amazon for $60 a pop! And do Youtube videos on the side with commercials! LOL

The odds hasn't stopped anybody to my knowledge.

And when you think about it, you don't hear the programmers discussing the guy who won due to a fortune cookie or the UPC code on a can of baked... [ More ]

Reply #11

Stack47 — Tue, 06 Aug 2019 01:07:17 GMT

I watch youtube videos endlessly, trying to figure out how to create this formula or that formula.

Yep, but do you expect to actually beat the lottery or just win a few bucks

Reply #10

Stack47 — Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:57:24 GMT

I know lots of players that try to figure out better ways to play lottery games and considering there are over 206,000 on 8232 system topics, it sure looks like lots of LP members enjoy creating and discussing systems too. But I never read here or heard anyone say they have or are trying to create a system to beat the lottery .

and playing around with programs is enjoyable in and of itself, sometimes even more enjoyable than playing.

You and I understand the odds of self picks winning a

Reply #9

Cmoore50 — Mon, 05 Aug 2019 23:51:32 GMT

I think you're right. It's the journey that gets some people excited. And in the back of their mind, they think just maybe I'm on to something. I think my excel program has promise. I think about ways to improve it every day. I watch youtube videos endlessly, trying to figure out how to create this formula or that formula. It is fun. When I get frustrated, I move on to my other hobby. Horse racing.

Reply #8

cottoneyedjoe — Mon, 05 Aug 2019 22:34:25 GMT

For some, working out lottery systems and playing around with programs is enjoyable in and of itself, sometimes even more enjoyable than playing.

Reply #7

grwurston — Mon, 05 Aug 2019 22:14:37 GMT

If what you're doing ain't working, try something different.

https://youtu.be/2w27P0-tWms

Reply #6

KY Floyd — Mon, 05 Aug 2019 15:05:56 GMT

Numbers not to play should be the approach

Cool. Can you explain how that's different than deciding what numbers you should play

Reply #5

rcbbuckeye — Mon, 05 Aug 2019 14:11:00 GMT

Years ago MM was the big game in Tx, didn't have PB yet. I kept track of the numbers drawn by how many times each number was drawn in each position. Man, I spent serious time keeping track of that twice a week, but over time I realized it wasn't worth the work. The odds and combinations were just too big, and that was back when there were 56 numbers in the matrix.

Such a system might be useful in a small game such as Cash 5.

Maybe?

As Coin Toss likes to say, One person's self pick is an... [ More ]

Reply #4

garyo1954 — Mon, 05 Aug 2019 13:37:15 GMT

He's closer to getting that stick through that door than I am to solving the lottery!

G

Reply #3

noise-gate — Mon, 05 Aug 2019 13:35:49 GMT

It's no different from playing your favorite numbers and losing. While the guy next door at a fastfood Chinese restaurant, has a meal with a fortune cookie thrown in. Those numbers are played they walk away with millions of dollars. It's one of life's great mysterious.

Reply #2

diggindeeep — Mon, 05 Aug 2019 09:40:48 GMT

Numbers not to play should be the approach

Reply #1

hearsetrax — Mon, 05 Aug 2019 08:40:03 GMT

people plan and the lottery fairy laughs teases

The way the lotteries look at people working on systems

Coin Toss — Mon, 05 Aug 2019 04:44:33 GMT

For those thinking there is a system to beat the lottery;

https://www.msn.com/en-us/video/animals/adorable-puppy-struggles-to-get-favorite-stick-through-door/vi-AAFbjGt

The door is the lottery, the dog is a player that think they have a system, and the stick is the particulars of the system.